EPTAustralia bans small-breasted pornography? - Page 6
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
koreasilver
9109 Posts
| ||
|
PanN
United States2828 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote: I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore. Women, of adult age, should be allowed to participate in pornography if they wish, no matter their breast size, or whatever. | ||
|
Foucault
Sweden2826 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:49 dethrawr wrote: We also just banned female ejaculation videos from recieving classification, because our fucktard ministers apparently consider it to be urination. Bitches should go take a biology or anatomy course before banning everything they dont understand. lol that's ridiculous who's to say you can't urinate on someone during sex? It's not like the majority of the people thinks it's hot but who the hell is the government to decide this for people. | ||
|
Lexpar
1813 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote: I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore. Personal attacks. They're usually a convenient route to take when your argument is a house built from tissues and cake. | ||
|
PanN
United States2828 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:52 Lexpar wrote: Personal attacks. They're usually a convenient route to take when your argument is a house built from tissues and cake. I don't think anyone here is taking him seriously, hes being more crazy than the law its self. | ||
|
Khul Sadukar
Australia1735 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:45 Catch]22 wrote: No, it most certainly is NOT. This law is in no way discriminating to small breasted women, only to men who cant get off to anyting but women who look like children, which honestly are down right pathetic. idiots like u are runing our country into the ground!!! | ||
|
Conquest101
United States1395 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:49 Catch]22 wrote: I guess you're just gonna have to cry yourself to sleep knowing that you cant imagine that that girl might actually have been 16 instead of 18 anymore. Hahahahaha. What don't you understand man. It doesn't MATTER if they look like they are 14 or 40. If they have A-cup breasts, they ARE BANNED FROM PORN. It's literally not about how old they look but the SIZE OF THEIR BREASTS. Jesus christ. | ||
|
Foucault
Sweden2826 Posts
How about banning small dicks from porn? | ||
|
TwoToneTerran
United States8841 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:46 Catch]22 wrote: You dont fuck your girlfriend because she has small breasts, people look at "barely-legal porn" because of the acting and dialogue. Either that or the fact that they managed to find women who look 16, but are really 18. There's a huge difference in your intents. No I bet people will fuck their flat breasted girlfriend because, go fucking figure, women with small breasts can not only be attractive but downright sexy. It's already illegal to do child pornography, and that's because of the exploitation of children. You can't fucking illegalize thought despite how sick it may be. | ||
|
hifriend
China7935 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:49 dethrawr wrote: We also just banned female ejaculation videos from recieving classification, because our fucktard ministers apparently consider it to be urination. Bitches should go take a biology or anatomy course before banning everything they dont understand. srsly? wtf. On January 28 2010 09:26 Catch]22 wrote: You guys are all idiots. Society needs to do whatever it can against pedos. Lmao in what supposed way is this ban supposed to contribute to stopping pedos? Not all men drawn toward young women go out and rape kiddies you know. | ||
|
Foucault
Sweden2826 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:53 Khul Sadukar wrote: idiots like u are runing our country into the ground!!! if anything, he's running our country into the ground if given a chance. | ||
|
Catch]22
Sweden2683 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:52 Lexpar wrote: Personal attacks. They're usually a convenient route to take when your argument is a house built from tissues and cake. Right, you were the other guy who didn't know the difference between a comparison and an analogy, and then copypasted the same scentence half the pedos in this thread typed out already. Seems like it hit a nerve tho', I apologize and sincerely hope you find an alternative to almost-child-pornography. | ||
|
Slow Motion
United States6960 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/34/95_year_old_woman.JPG) | ||
|
koreasilver
9109 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:54 Foucault wrote: I think the issue here is that Catch]22 isn't that interested in the fact that millions of women will feel inferior about this. How about banning small dicks from porn? I think it would help immensely in curbing child pornography amirite. | ||
|
PanN
United States2828 Posts
Sorry, thats the dumbest thing I've heard this year, and I work with two guys who are ex-convicts and are obsessed with lil wayne (one of them has a lil wayne tattoo). I'm laughing way to hard right now. thanks hifriend, I missed that bit, hahahahahahaa | ||
|
Foucault
Sweden2826 Posts
No one would ever ban small dicks in porn. | ||
|
Foucault
Sweden2826 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:56 koreasilver wrote: I think it would help immensely in curbing child pornography amirite. You are right. | ||
|
koreasilver
9109 Posts
On January 28 2010 10:57 Foucault wrote: Btw I think this law is a pretty serious trespassing on the integrity of women and their bodies. No one would ever ban small dicks in porn. You fucking pedophile. | ||
|
Conquest101
United States1395 Posts
 Look at the size of her breasts. Get out you sick pedo. | ||
| ||
