EPTAustralia bans small-breasted pornography? - Page 2
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
REDBLUEGREEN
Germany1904 Posts
| ||
tirentu
Canada1257 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:07 Duckvillelol wrote: You may not be aware, the leftwing losers who put this in place are ALSO trying to make an internet filter so we can be as cool as China! Yeah, I read about that while going through these sources. It's completely ridiculous. | ||
|
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:05 tirentu wrote: I thought we liked Asian girls here? :/ Soooo many Asian girls have rather small breasts. I could even argue that they're being discriminated against. I still do like asian girls, I just like asian girls + big boobs more than asian girls w/o big boobs. Not by a massive amount, but if I had to choose... You're probably right about the discrimination thing though, but there's nothing we can do so I just accept it. | ||
|
Blyf
Denmark408 Posts
Like tirentu said, this is so massively detrimental to women's rights, I can't even begin to comprehend it. And so fucking what if the models only appear to be under 18. Then the sexually deviant can get off without hurting anyone. As long as no models actually are under 18 we'll be fine. | ||
|
..Slick...
United States202 Posts
| ||
|
hifriend
China7935 Posts
rorikon however is super gay | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
I get upset without my daily dose of flat chested beauty | ||
KwarK
United States43934 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:10 REDBLUEGREEN wrote: My gf has A-cups. If some Australian politician would tell her that she looks like a child because she has small breasts I'd rip his head off and shit down his neck. You don't understand. The problem isn't her, it's you. You only like her because she indulges your secret fantasy of raping an underage girl, who will obviously be underdeveloped, like your girlfriend. She's done nothing wrong but her very existence encourages your secret perversions to the point that it's inevitable you rape a child. What surprises me is they go after boobs but not after waxing. Small boobs is clearly a sign of an underage girl (lol?!?!) but no pubic hair isn't. | ||
|
Megalisk
United States6095 Posts
Who wouldn't, everybody loves kona..but loli is wierd man... | ||
|
Pika Chu
Romania2510 Posts
And what about girls with breasts too big? Won't it mean that maybe the women there are pregnant? That sounds like "food" for people with that kind of fetish! | ||
|
Mori600
Japan311 Posts
| ||
|
ghermination
United States2851 Posts
| ||
|
nevz
Sweden72 Posts
| ||
|
Hinanawi
United States2250 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:29 nevz wrote: Yes, let's remove all legal options paedophiles have to get off, that's help reduce cases of rape of children. I don't know what you're talking about sir. Catholic priests aren't allowed to look at porn, and they handle themselves just fine around children. | ||
|
Roxen000
1226 Posts
| ||
|
new_construct
Canada1041 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:17 KwarK wrote: You don't understand. The problem isn't her, it's you. You only like her because she indulges your secret fantasy of raping an underage girl, who will obviously be underdeveloped, like your girlfriend. She's done nothing wrong but her very existence encourages your secret perversions to the point that it's inevitable you rape a child. What surprises me is they go after boobs but not after waxing. Small boobs is clearly a sign of an underage girl (lol?!?!) but no pubic hair isn't. wha lol kwark really knows your fantasy's man | ||
|
deL
Australia5540 Posts
On January 28 2010 08:36 Roxen000 wrote: looooooool I should start selling illegal small boob pornography in alleyways to make some phat doe. Cut costs by taking existing porn and editting your chest onto the girls. | ||
|
TheSituation
United States32 Posts
If so I'm fucked bro. But whateva. Shit like this happens on the shore all the time. | ||
|
nebffa
Australia776 Posts
however, the australian senate, right now, is such that neither of the major two parties have control. the two major parties are the coalition, and labor. to have a majority, labor needs all of its party votes, plus every non-coalition senator. this means that the independent (i.e. not in a major party) senators have a lot of sway over the labor party. so obviously theyre going to use that sway. steve fielding is the only member of the (small) family first party in the entire house of representatives/senate, and a lot of people dont like family first because they have relatively extreme views (i think with their name you can kind of guess what policies they support). the internet filter was his idea and he used his influence to push it when most people dont really care a whole lot. so... i hope that explains to you guys why this filter is there  | ||
| ||
