?
D Ranks Teamleague Season 4 - Page 32
Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
icedraco
Philippines118 Posts
? | ||
SynC[gm]
United States3127 Posts
Update D-rank ELO rankings, of course, congrats with the iCCup ranking ;D | ||
ninini
Sweden1204 Posts
| ||
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On March 06 2013 16:39 ninini wrote: So, the format is really Bo5 with Ace match? nah, was just talking about it was some of my captains. Bo5 w/o ace seems better. | ||
Sinedd
Poland7052 Posts
![]() Why not Bo7 ?!?!?!?!? ;( PS - if its gonna be Bo5 for real.. can it at least be a Bo3 every game ? | ||
fabiano
Brazil4644 Posts
| ||
Sinedd
Poland7052 Posts
On March 06 2013 23:56 fabiano wrote: No man this is an answer to which of my questions ? | ||
fabiano
Brazil4644 Posts
| ||
Jealous
10156 Posts
| ||
EchOne
United States2906 Posts
| ||
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On March 06 2013 23:53 Sinedd wrote: So is there Sniper Ridge in the mappool or is it not ? ![]() Why not Bo7 ?!?!?!?!? ;( PS - if its gonna be Bo5 for real.. can it at least be a Bo3 every game ? Yea, with your team not surprised you would like Bo7, but some other teams have 8-9 players. Asking for Bo7 just isn't feasible and it will become D Ranks Walkover League. | ||
Sinedd
Poland7052 Posts
On March 07 2013 01:47 L_Master wrote: Yea, with your team not surprised you would like Bo7, but some other teams have 8-9 players. Asking for Bo7 just isn't feasible and it will become D Ranks Walkover League. oh.. well ok.. we can play a bo5.. but please make the individual sets a bo3, if we play them simultaniously it wont take much longer than a normal bo7 ![]() | ||
WandS
Canada86 Posts
| ||
pebble444
Italy2497 Posts
| ||
Jealous
10156 Posts
First of all, all Bo3 would be on the same map, otherwise there is no point of having a map line-up weekly; this makes for a lot of stale series. Second of all, Bo3 eliminates the potential for upsets - which in a way is a good thing, BUT - if a lower skill player knows they are playing a higher skill player, and knows their weaknesses, they can come up/practice a counter-build or cheese or all-in. These only work once, so a Bo3 would diminish the effectiveness of practicing a single build and would make lower skilled players lose morale because they will think there is no chance for them to ever win a Bo3 against a stronger player. Third, this is not consistent with the format that has been used for the past 3 seasons and is not consistent with ProLeague, which in my opinion is what this league intends to emulate. Fourth, Bo3 TvT can take forever and I don't think many people would want to play that, especially those that have time constraints (even with PP it is inconvenient to set a potential 2 hour block of time for a series for a lot of people). Even some games that were not TvT have lasted upwards of an hour and more in DRTL before. Fifth, we have had casting of a large number of DR games in the past, usually almost all of them. This would create a huge amount of games but not necessarily more EXCITING games. This therefore makes casting even the recommended games harder, because who will sift through all the reps and recommend games? What would prevent players from recommending their own games and not being objective about it? The recommendation system would also make lower skilled players less likely to get the opportunity to get their replays casted, which I think is one of the most rewarding aspects of DR leagues. Sixth, I doubt the majority of the league wants to play Bo3 format, since you've been the only one asking for it or defending it. The poll for DRGOT was dominantly in the favor of Bo1 vs. Bo3, even though that is probably the most appropriate setting for a BoX series. ![]() On March 07 2013 02:42 pebble444 wrote: I would really prefer BO7 with Ace match thats 6 games +1 game that a playe4r who already played, honestly dunno why BO5 last seasons where all bo7 with ACE and they worked I support Bo7 with ace match. With PPs included, I don't see the downside of having more games, and ace match is always exciting and brings out some of the best games in past DRTLs. We also have a really nice pool of players right now, some teams are more than capable of fielding 6/7 players, while others can resort to PP. | ||
Psyonic_Reaver
United States4336 Posts
| ||
Birdie
New Zealand4438 Posts
On March 07 2013 02:42 pebble444 wrote: I would really prefer BO7 with Ace match thats 6 games +1 game that a playe4r who already played, honestly dunno why BO5 last seasons where all bo7 with ACE and they worked Last season was Bo5, no ace match. | ||
KaiGreene
233 Posts
On March 07 2013 02:50 Jealous wrote: I am opposed to Bo3. First of all, all Bo3 would be on the same map, otherwise there is no point of having a map line-up weekly; this makes for a lot of stale series. Second of all, Bo3 eliminates the potential for upsets - which in a way is a good thing, BUT - if a lower skill player knows they are playing a higher skill player, and knows their weaknesses, they can come up/practice a counter-build or cheese or all-in. These only work once, so a Bo3 would diminish the effectiveness of practicing a single build and would make lower skilled players lose morale because they will think there is no chance for them to ever win a Bo3 against a stronger player. Third, this is not consistent with the format that has been used for the past 3 seasons and is not consistent with ProLeague, which in my opinion is what this league intends to emulate. Fourth, Bo3 TvT can take forever and I don't think many people would want to play that, especially those that have time constraints (even with PP it is inconvenient to set a potential 2 hour block of time for a series for a lot of people). Even some games that were not TvT have lasted upwards of an hour and more in DRTL before. Fifth, we have had casting of a large number of DR games in the past, usually almost all of them. This would create a huge amount of games but not necessarily more EXCITING games. This therefore makes casting even the recommended games harder, because who will sift through all the reps and recommend games? What would prevent players from recommending their own games and not being objective about it? The recommendation system would also make lower skilled players less likely to get the opportunity to get their replays casted, which I think is one of the most rewarding aspects of DR leagues. Sixth, I doubt the majority of the league wants to play Bo3 format, since you've been the only one asking for it or defending it. The poll for DRGOT was dominantly in the favor of Bo1 vs. Bo3, even though that is probably the most appropriate setting for a BoX series. ![]() I support Bo7 with ace match. With PPs included, I don't see the downside of having more games, and ace match is always exciting and brings out some of the best games in past DRTLs. We also have a really nice pool of players right now, some teams are more than capable of fielding 6/7 players, while others can resort to PP. Excellent points, I too prefer bo7 with ace match | ||
Biolunar
Germany224 Posts
| ||
Jealous
10156 Posts
On March 07 2013 03:15 Psyonic_Reaver wrote: Due to Despa's lack of PvZ. Is it possible to, with proper notice, for me to still be able to PvZ on maps my team feels they need a Protoss? I'd still like to be able to TvZ on maps my team needs a T but since we have plenty of T's I understand if I will be required to switch to full P "If players are race pickers they must announce their races within 12 hours of the lineups getting posted.": In the rules yo... | ||
| ||