D Ranks Team League Season 3 - Page 8
Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
Birdie
New Zealand4438 Posts
| ||
Jealous
10095 Posts
![]() IS BACK PiMyungHoon - Zerg Conversion - Zerg (inactive) Djagulingu - Zerg Cr4zyH0r5e - Terran (inactive) sGs.Minscnboo - Terran sGs.BaBo - Protoss sGs.Gorg - Protoss Laxercannon - We're here to stomp face ^^v + Show Spoiler + ![]() | ||
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On July 05 2012 16:14 Nikon wrote: Alright, my ISP is still wonky, but at least I have connection. Sorry for the delay yo. I'll proceed down the list of items of interest, updating this post as I go. OK, first of all, the format is going to change from WL style to PL style, Bo5 no Ace match. Map pool changes as following: Destination is out. Neo Outlier is out. Neo Aztec is exchanged for Outsider SE. Second, there will be no 2v2 happening this season. Sorry to the people who wanted it, but this league is 1v1 oriented. This is correct. Your team will be slotted into ladder once Season 2 starts. Ideally, we're going to have 14 teams this season, but I don't know how many people will turn out TT_TT Nikon, your a boss. Good decisions too, imo. Thanks for all the work you do making this league a reality! | ||
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
| ||
CoughingHydra
177 Posts
Race: Zerg ID: CoughingHydra Rank: D EDIT: Joined the team Airforce Ace of Spades! | ||
TheShimmy
United States1808 Posts
| ||
Nikon
Bulgaria5710 Posts
On July 05 2012 20:54 Birdie wrote: Hmm, can you not just penalize late lineup-submissions? I would think that would make people be more careful about submitting them on time. This doesn't work. Believe me, I've tried it. On July 06 2012 01:51 TheShimmy wrote: 14 Teams! Legit. If it looks there will be walkover problems teams could always merge. Also, kudos to Nikon for doing so awesome organizing. I was saying that I hope that there'd be 14 teams, not that there are 14 teams already. Just FYI ![]() On July 06 2012 01:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I'd love to play again this season, but I'm not sure if I'm too good for it or not. I haven't played since the previous season but I went 12-0 there. No clue what my iccup rank would be. If I'm allowed I'd love to play for TAKK again. Check your skype. | ||
EchOne
United States2906 Posts
-Time pressure for organizers. It just introduces a lot of work on-site for organizers in addition to the extant work of handling walkover/absence disputes, lag disputes, substitution/double-play disputes, etc. -Teams cannot self-mediate. With lineups preset, captains can negotiate on-site according to preset rules in order to keep the ball rolling/get the games played in case players or even organizers are late. -No preset matchups between players limits rescheduling. Players who live in inconvenient time zones will have to either wake up at 4am, negotiate a reschedule *after* Sunday (assuming a rule framework is built for that), or simply not play at all. I'm sure it can be made to work, but preset lineups just feel smoother. | ||
Sentenal
United States12398 Posts
Last time I think things were too leniant for lazy captains not submitting lineups. If they submit a late lineup, make them start at -2 points when the match starts, period. In my experience with leagues like this, submitting a lineup isn't hard at all. I can't imagine why any captain would have a legitimate reason to not submit a lineup by the deadline. | ||
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On July 06 2012 02:16 Nikon wrote: This doesn't work. Believe me, I've tried it. I was saying that I hope that there'd be 14 teams, not that there are 14 teams already. Just FYI ![]() Check your skype. I can attest to that firsthand. | ||
Sentenal
United States12398 Posts
| ||
Rlentless
Hong Kong322 Posts
| ||
![]()
Nagisama
Canada4481 Posts
On July 06 2012 03:23 Rlentless wrote: Damn, I wish the times are different. I really want to participate. =/ Well, with pre-made lineups ahead of time, you can always try to reschedule your games. Even if they're 1-2 days before default game day. | ||
George_the_man
796 Posts
![]() | ||
Kal_rA
United States2925 Posts
| ||
Skeggaba
Korea (South)1556 Posts
As for the IMBA-issue: Maybe there could be a gentlemans agreement on that the best players of each team always plays set 4 and 5? We have a pretty stacked team, but im probably not even going to play another games so no worries about me crushing. I also suck harder than ever these days ^^ | ||
ninini
Sweden1204 Posts
I think to prevent last seasons problems we need clearer deadlines. Nikon accomodated a lot for the teams with late lineups last season, which gave him a lot more work and delayed the lineups for the teams that sent their lineups in time, but he doesn't have to do that. Let's say that the deadline is 20:00 CET wednesday. Then Nikon could look at his mail at 20:05 and write down all lineups, and for any lineup that's missing, he just takes their lineup from the week before, and that lineup would be final. Whether that lineup would work doesn't matter, because if they can't find someone who is active enough to send in a lineup, they're in trouble either way. | ||
![]()
Nagisama
Canada4481 Posts
On July 06 2012 05:15 ninini wrote: For me it isn't a huge deal when the lineups are released (although the earlier the better), but mainly for rescheduling purposes it would probably be best if they got released a few days ahead. I think to prevent last seasons problems we need clearer deadlines. Nikon accomodated a lot for the teams with late lineups last season, which gave him a lot more work and delayed the lineups for the teams that sent their lineups in time, but he doesn't have to do that. Let's say that the deadline is 20:00 CET wednesday. Then Nikon could look at his mail at 20:05 and write down all lineups, and for any lineup that's missing, he just takes their lineup from the week before, and that lineup would be final. Whether that lineup would work doesn't matter, because if they can't find someone who is active enough to send in a lineup, they're in trouble either way. That sounds like a pretty good idea. And on the off chance one of the players from the previous week is unable to play entirely or something, at least the rest of the teams know, and can sort it out themselves if the captain is unavailable. | ||
Birdie
New Zealand4438 Posts
On July 06 2012 05:15 ninini wrote: For me it isn't a huge deal when the lineups are released (although the earlier the better), but mainly for rescheduling purposes it would probably be best if they got released a few days ahead. I think to prevent last seasons problems we need clearer deadlines. Nikon accomodated a lot for the teams with late lineups last season, which gave him a lot more work and delayed the lineups for the teams that sent their lineups in time, but he doesn't have to do that. Let's say that the deadline is 20:00 CET wednesday. Then Nikon could look at his mail at 20:05 and write down all lineups, and for any lineup that's missing, he just takes their lineup from the week before, and that lineup would be final. Whether that lineup would work doesn't matter, because if they can't find someone who is active enough to send in a lineup, they're in trouble either way. I also support this. As a team captain I'll always want to have my lineup sent on time and can't imagine why someone would be a captain without having the ability to preplan their schedule to fit in sending a lineup. | ||
Cpt.beefy
Ireland799 Posts
On July 06 2012 03:02 Sentenal wrote: Having no-preset match-ups pretty much prevents the possibility for rescheduling. Last time I think things were too leniant for lazy captains not submitting lineups. If they submit a late lineup, make them start at -2 points when the match starts, period. In my experience with leagues like this, submitting a lineup isn't hard at all. I can't imagine why any captain would have a legitimate reason to not submit a lineup by the deadline. this is fact, Late line-ups should be punished hard | ||
| ||