On February 21 2010 05:30 sl wrote: NO WAYYY JF would won that battle by a margin if the reavers hit more...
And Nony would have won it by a big margin if the rest of his goons had been shooting. Neither was perfect.
His goons were shooting? What are you talking about lol
JF's reavers were totally out of position T_T
I'm talking about the six or so that were hanging out behind his reavers not doing anything. He just didn't position all his goons well, which is why jf had the better position/concave.
Edit: Really all I was trying to say is that it's easy to say "If jf/nony had played perfectly he would have won" as long as you assume that the other person doesn't play perfectly. I'm just not sure how informative it ever is to say that.
On February 21 2010 05:30 sl wrote: NO WAYYY JF would won that battle by a margin if the reavers hit more...
And Nony would have won it by a big margin if the rest of his goons had been shooting. Neither was perfect.
His goons were shooting? What are you talking about lol
JF's reavers were totally out of position T_T
I'm talking about the six or so that were hanging out behind his reavers not doing anything. He just didn't position all his goons well, which is why jf had the better position/concave.
Yeah, but if JF's 4 reavers were in better position to rip shit apart... T_T
On February 21 2010 05:30 sl wrote: NO WAYYY JF would won that battle by a margin if the reavers hit more...
And Nony would have won it by a big margin if the rest of his goons had been shooting. Neither was perfect.
His goons were shooting? What are you talking about lol
JF's reavers were totally out of position T_T
I'm talking about the six or so that were hanging out behind his reavers not doing anything. He just didn't position all his goons well, which is why jf had the better position/concave.
Yeah, but if JF's 4 reavers were in better position to rip shit apart... T_T
On February 21 2010 05:30 sl wrote: NO WAYYY JF would won that battle by a margin if the reavers hit more...
And Nony would have won it by a big margin if the rest of his goons had been shooting. Neither was perfect.
His goons were shooting? What are you talking about lol
JF's reavers were totally out of position T_T
I'm talking about the six or so that were hanging out behind his reavers not doing anything. He just didn't position all his goons well, which is why jf had the better position/concave.
Yeah, but if JF's 4 reavers were in better position to rip shit apart... T_T
On February 21 2010 05:30 sl wrote: NO WAYYY JF would won that battle by a margin if the reavers hit more...
And Nony would have won it by a big margin if the rest of his goons had been shooting. Neither was perfect.
His goons were shooting? What are you talking about lol
JF's reavers were totally out of position T_T
about 5-6 of nonys goons were left out and weren't shooting
Nony's army moved in a ball, Jf had a realllllly nice arc on him, but Jf's reavers wasn't close enough to shoot, so Jf's goons got ~8 extra hits from reavers, that what cost him the game.
On February 21 2010 05:30 sl wrote: NO WAYYY JF would won that battle by a margin if the reavers hit more...
And Nony would have won it by a big margin if the rest of his goons had been shooting. Neither was perfect.
His goons were shooting? What are you talking about lol
JF's reavers were totally out of position T_T
about 5-6 of nonys goons were left out and weren't shooting
Nony's army moved in a ball, Jf had a realllllly nice arc on him, but Jf's reavers wasn't close enough to shoot, so Jf's goons got ~8 extra hits from reavers, that what cost him the game.
yes i know lol
nonys macro was better too, his supply was +20 after the battle, which ended up pretty damn even.