• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:30
CEST 20:30
KST 03:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
SC uni coach streams logging into betting site ASL20 Preliminary Maps Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024! Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 655 users

Valkyrie dmg formula? - Page 2

Forum Index > Brood War Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-07 14:20:36
January 05 2021 22:51 GMT
#21
I figured it out.

https://github.com/OpenBW/openbw/blob/master/bwgame.h


Sonko pointed me to the bwapi source code and I took a look. There is indeed a separate algorithm for "is_air_splash" and it makes two queues, one to deal full damage and one to deal splash.

Let's say L = outer splash radius, M = medium splash radius, S = inner splash radius.

Full queue
It builds a queue of units as such:
1) unit can't have same player as bullet's player (if it does, it must be the missile's target)
2) unit can't be the missile firer
3) unit has to be within L distance

Now, if the original bullet's target is in this queue and is within S distance, the queue is truncated to JUST the target, and full damage is dealt to it.
Otherwise, a RANDOM unit from this queue is chosen to take full damage.

Splash queue
1) unit can't have same player as bullet's player (if it does, it must be the missile's target)
2) unit can't be the missile firer
3) unit can't be missile target
4) unit can't be interceptor (!!!)
5) unit has to be within L distance

Then for each unit here, it does either 50%, 25%, or no damage depending on distance.


Let's apply it to our problematic cases.

Single target
The original target will always be in the Full queue because valkyrie missile has huge L.
It doesn't matter whether the target is within S distance because the queue only has size 1 and so the target takes full damage.

The Splash queue omits the original target, so nothing else needs to be done.

Conclusion: single target takes 100% no matter what

Multiple targets
As stated above, the original target will always be in the Full queue.
Case 1: Target is within S distance of the missile.

It becomes the ONLY element in the queue and takes full damage.
We now go to the splash queue. The non-targets within M take 50% and within S take 25%.

Conclusion: target takes 100%, rest take 50% or 25%

Case 2: Target is outside S distance of the missile.

A random unit in the Full queue is chosen to take 100% damage.
We now go to the splash queue. The non-targets within M take 50% and within S take 25%.

Conclusion: random unit takes 100%, non-targets take 50% or 25%.

Herein lies the issue -- the splash queue only excludes the target, NOT THE RANDOMLY PICKED UNIT FROM THE FULL QUEUE!
So it could be the case that the randomly picked unit was NOT the target, in which case that poor unit would take an additional 50% or 25% damage based on proximity! Let's call this "super damage", when unit takes more than 100% damage.

Note that this super damage can only occur if the target is NOT within S of the missile, because if it were, it would take the 100% from Full queue and be excluded from the Splash queue.
Since the missile pattern centers around the target, I imagine that most of the time, the target IS within S of the missile, so we don't see super damage.

Furthermore, it would be the case that the ORIGINAL target actually takes ZERO damage if the random unit picked during Full queue was not the target, since the splash queue specifically omits the target. So the existence of super damage implies the target received zero damage!

Note that the total damage is the same across the cases.

Finally, I think the "diminishing returns" observation is simply due to the fact the average missile misses its target. Let's pretend each missile is a student and each unit is a test question. Now, each student is dumb and scores 50% or 25% normally on any given question. However, the Full queue is a "get out of jail free card" that guarantees you a 100% on exactly one question. So if there is only one question, everyone scores a perfect score. If there are only a few questions, the class average is still high. Add a lot of questions, and it becomes clear that each student is failing.

Another interesting observation is that interceptors are immune to splash damage. In other words, it can never take damage via the Splash queue, so it must get damaged during the Full queue. Every valkyrie missile will hit at most one interceptor for full damage and deal no splash no matter how many interceptors there are. So in fact, valkyries are bad against interceptors. Similarly with corsairs.

Bonus observation:

If a corsair hits a group of say 11 stacked mutas, it will do a full 2.5 damage (not 5, since it's explosive damage) to the one target and 1.25 to the other 10. So no matter how stacked you are, it only does 2.5 to one muta. So if you have a group of corsairs, it helps to target fire one specific muta even if the mutas are clumped so that you do more concentrated damage on that one muta.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
MeSaber
Profile Joined December 2009
Sweden1235 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-06 01:04:32
January 06 2021 01:02 GMT
#22
Well thats what we were after all along! Thanks Sonko/Stryker! =)

Great write-up btw.

Holy smokas. Valkyries/Corsair being bad vs interceptors is actually mind blowing.
-.-
Jealous
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
10126 Posts
January 06 2021 06:31 GMT
#23
Additional details from the Discord discussion when I first approached Sonko about this

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

Many thanks to PurpleWave and all other participants in the SSCAIT Discord for this. These are things I think that not even progamers and their staff had explored, because they were more worried about outcomes than the internal logic by which these things operate. Valkonic made a splash for a reason. Cheers.
"The right to vote is only the oar of the slaveship, I wanna be free." -- бум бум сучка!
Sonko
Profile Joined February 2019
154 Posts
January 06 2021 09:05 GMT
#24
Thanks for the mention, all I did was post the source to the openBW source
Here you can take a look at it.
A site about brood war AI: www.makingcomputerdothings.com
kogeT
Profile Joined September 2013
Poland2037 Posts
January 06 2021 12:27 GMT
#25
On January 06 2021 18:05 Sonko wrote:
Thanks for the mention, all I did was post the source to the openBW source
Here you can take a look at it.


Is that basicially whole BW decomplied?
https://www.twitch.tv/kogetbw
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-06 14:11:16
January 06 2021 14:07 GMT
#26
I just wanted to note that "more units mean being more spread out" is not the primary factor in the diminishing returns observed. You'd still see it even if the units were tightly stacked on top of each other. The main factor is the "Full queue" effect which guarantees the missile doing 100% damage to exactly one unit while doing 50%/25% to the rest.

In contrast, ground-based splash does not suffer from diminishing returns when stacked. For example, if a Protoss player were glitching their units into a tight ball to do stacked recall, a siege tank in siege mode could fire a few times and wipe all the units at once, dealing a full 100% damage to every unit. Or if a player drills their workers into one location, a single Reaver scarab would wipe all of them out for 100% damage.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
Cryoc
Profile Joined July 2011
Germany909 Posts
January 06 2021 17:19 GMT
#27
Thanks for the investigation. I learned a lot. I always wondered, why Valkyries are bad vs Carriers, because based on the unit stats, half a control group of valkyries should destroy every interceptor of a Carrier fleet in seconds. Little did I know that they just excluded interceptors from taking any splash damage at all...

The developers must have liked Carriers a lot.
http://www.twitch.tv/cryoc
Jealous
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
10126 Posts
January 06 2021 20:41 GMT
#28
On January 06 2021 23:07 StRyKeR wrote:
I just wanted to note that "more units mean being more spread out" is not the primary factor in the diminishing returns observed. You'd still see it even if the units were tightly stacked on top of each other. The main factor is the "Full queue" effect which guarantees the missile doing 100% damage to exactly one unit while doing 50%/25% to the rest.

In contrast, ground-based splash does not suffer from diminishing returns when stacked. For example, if a Protoss player were glitching their units into a tight ball to do stacked recall, a siege tank in siege mode could fire a few times and wipe all the units at once, dealing a full 100% damage to every unit. Or if a player drills their workers into one location, a single Reaver scarab would wipe all of them out for 100% damage.

Ya, and what about Archon vs Muta? They ROAST stacked flocks, can literally kill like 36 stacked mutas in 3 hits no problem.
"The right to vote is only the oar of the slaveship, I wanna be free." -- бум бум сучка!
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
January 06 2021 22:01 GMT
#29
On January 07 2021 05:41 Jealous wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2021 23:07 StRyKeR wrote:
I just wanted to note that "more units mean being more spread out" is not the primary factor in the diminishing returns observed. You'd still see it even if the units were tightly stacked on top of each other. The main factor is the "Full queue" effect which guarantees the missile doing 100% damage to exactly one unit while doing 50%/25% to the rest.

In contrast, ground-based splash does not suffer from diminishing returns when stacked. For example, if a Protoss player were glitching their units into a tight ball to do stacked recall, a siege tank in siege mode could fire a few times and wipe all the units at once, dealing a full 100% damage to every unit. Or if a player drills their workers into one location, a single Reaver scarab would wipe all of them out for 100% damage.

Ya, and what about Archon vs Muta? They ROAST stacked flocks, can literally kill like 36 stacked mutas in 3 hits no problem.


I believe Archon splash isn't considered air splash, so that makes sense as well.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-06 23:52:58
January 06 2021 23:45 GMT
#30
Some quick math vs N mutas:

Each missile does 100% of 6/2 = 3 to one muta and a mix of 50%, 25% to all others, let's average to 33%, which is 1 damage. So each missile does 3*1 + 1*(N - 1) = N + 2 damage, or 8N + 16 damage for an entire volley.

To see the diminishing returns, note that we calculate the baseline denominator as 24N, since if we assume each missile does full damage, which is 3, that yields 24 damage per volley and there are N units. So the efficiency rate is (8N + 16)/24N, or 1/3 + 2/(3N). In other words, the efficiency goes down with N, establishing diminishing returns.

N = 1 => 100%
N = 2 => 66%
N = 3 => 55%
N = 4 => 50% and so on.

Furthermore, the average muta takes (8N + 16)/N = 8 + 16/N damage. At 7 mutas, this is roughly 10 damage. In other words, if you have 7 mutas clumped versus a valk, taking a volley is essentially like each muta taking a single hit from a wraith. Taking into account firing speed, the damage output of a valk versus 7 mutas is about 2.5 wraiths. Might be good to keep in mind when calculating whether you should fight or flee with your mutas.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1529 Posts
January 07 2021 07:23 GMT
#31
On January 06 2021 03:37 StRyKeR wrote:
I have an explanation for the single target case.
Given what we know about the spaghetti code, my bet is that Blizzard wanted you to be able to attack allies / your own units. But the issue is that valks (like reavers) cannot splash damage your own units. So if only the default splash algorithm is used for the valk, attacking yourself would cause 0 damage since they're splash only, even the intended target. They didn't want that, so they made every missile hit with 100% damage to the target unit regardless of miss. But if they do this with multiple units, valks would nonsensically do 100% to every unit even if miss. So once there's more than one target in the splash zone, they apply regular damage. Sloppy code imo, but consistent with their other sloppy coding.

Doesn't explain the > 100% damage though.
Good point, actually. I assume all of you went the route of doing tests on your own Wraiths, using normal melee play and your own Wraiths/Mutas? If so you have to consider that that may completely invalidate results, as far as enemy damage goes.
To make sure I'm not just talking out of some false memory, I actually made a test map where I can test it against stacks of enemy and neutral units.
MeSaber
Profile Joined December 2009
Sweden1235 Posts
January 07 2021 11:33 GMT
#32
On January 07 2021 08:45 StRyKeR wrote:
Some quick math vs N mutas:

Each missile does 100% of 6/2 = 3 to one muta and a mix of 50%, 25% to all others, let's average to 33%, which is 1 damage. So each missile does 3*1 + 1*(N - 1) = N + 2 damage, or 8N + 16 damage for an entire volley.

To see the diminishing returns, note that we calculate the baseline denominator as 24N, since if we assume each missile does full damage, which is 3, that yields 24 damage per volley and there are N units. So the efficiency rate is (8N + 16)/24N, or 1/3 + 2/(3N). In other words, the efficiency goes down with N, establishing diminishing returns.

N = 1 => 100%
N = 2 => 66%
N = 3 => 55%
N = 4 => 50% and so on.

Furthermore, the average muta takes (8N + 16)/N = 8 + 16/N damage. At 7 mutas, this is roughly 10 damage. In other words, if you have 7 mutas clumped versus a valk, taking a volley is essentially like each muta taking a single hit from a wraith. Taking into account firing speed, the damage output of a valk versus 7 mutas is about 2.5 wraiths. Might be good to keep in mind when calculating whether you should fight or flee with your mutas.


Thats actually very useful.
-.-
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
January 07 2021 12:21 GMT
#33
On January 07 2021 16:23 Freakling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2021 03:37 StRyKeR wrote:
I have an explanation for the single target case.
Given what we know about the spaghetti code, my bet is that Blizzard wanted you to be able to attack allies / your own units. But the issue is that valks (like reavers) cannot splash damage your own units. So if only the default splash algorithm is used for the valk, attacking yourself would cause 0 damage since they're splash only, even the intended target. They didn't want that, so they made every missile hit with 100% damage to the target unit regardless of miss. But if they do this with multiple units, valks would nonsensically do 100% to every unit even if miss. So once there's more than one target in the splash zone, they apply regular damage. Sloppy code imo, but consistent with their other sloppy coding.

Doesn't explain the > 100% damage though.
Good point, actually. I assume all of you went the route of doing tests on your own Wraiths, using normal melee play and your own Wraiths/Mutas? If so you have to consider that that may completely invalidate results, as far as enemy damage goes.
To make sure I'm not just talking out of some false memory, I actually made a test map where I can test it against stacks of enemy and neutral units.


Read the first post on second page, I figured it out.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1529 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-07 15:37:15
January 07 2021 15:25 GMT
#34
Shouldn't make mobile posts while still half asleep in bed in the morning… Also the problem with my own initial test setup was that I did not space out targets fa enough to get real single target damage. The combined spread+splash area of Valkyries is huge (about 5 tiles, it seems, could easily be calculated exactly from the scatter pattern positions and splash radii, of course).
However, my statement on the fact that the primary target in a tight stack is always the one to receive the least damage hold empirically true. I'll upload my test map shortly which easily proves this conclusively. Here it is
The algorithm, you laid out helps to better zero in on the exact mechanics behind that though: From 14 Missile hits only 5 hit more or less dead-centre, so we can assume that these fully hit the primary target (within 100% splash radius S). However it's probably only to be within 25% radius (L) of all the other missiles, which hit further out. So that gives an estimate of 4/7(5·6 + 9·1.5) ≈ 24, which is pretty accurate, though different, mostly lower values can be observed (it's statistical of course). Getting good estimates for the secondary targets is a lot harder, but it seems that between them "drifting off" into the 50% splash areas of more of the missile explosions and their randomly becoming the primary target of an attack they amass more damage over time than the actual, primary target.
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-07 16:30:55
January 07 2021 16:18 GMT
#35
The primary target never takes splash damage, so in your example, the other 9 missiles would do 0 splash damage to the primary target, and can only damage it via the random full queue process.

Primary target takes either 0% or 100%.
All others either take 25%, 50%, 125%, or 150%.

Say there are N targets total.

If as you said 5 of 14 missiles hit within S of the primary target, that primary target gets 100% and the rest get say, 33% on average.

Primary: 5*100%
Other: 5*33%

The other 9 of 14 missiles pick a random primary target, so every target has 1/N chance of 100%.
Non-primary takes, say 33% on average again.

Primary: 9/N*100%
Other: 9/N*100% + 9*33%

In summary, for 14 missiles, expected damage taken is:

Primary: (5*100% + 9/N*100%)/14 = 5/14 + 9/(N*14)
Other: (5*33% + 9/N*100% + 9*33%)/14 = 1/3 + 9/(N*14)

So ultimately, whether primary takes less damage depends on how many hits are straight on and also what the others on average take. Under the assumptions above, since 5/14 < 1/3, the primary target takes less damage.

Note that this estimation doesn't apply to the corsair since its missile always hits the primary target straight on (within S distance), and so the corsair always does more damage to the primary target (100%) as opposed to others (25% or 50%).
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1529 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-07 18:25:12
January 07 2021 18:22 GMT
#36
On January 08 2021 01:18 StRyKeR wrote:
The primary target never takes splash damage, so in your example, the other 9 missiles would do 0 splash damage to the primary target, and can only damage it via the random full queue process.

Primary target takes either 0% or 100%.
All others either take 25%, 50%, 125%, or 150%.

That makes the explanation even more clean-cut.

Say there are N targets total.

If as you said 5 of 14 missiles hit within S of the primary target, that primary target gets 100% and the rest get say, 33% on average.

Primary: 5*100%
Other: 5*33%

The other 9 of 14 missiles pick a random primary target, so every target has 1/N chance of 100%.
Non-primary takes, say 33% on average again.

Primary: 9/N*100%
Other: 9/N*100% + 9*33%

In summary, for 14 missiles, expected damage taken is:

Primary: (5*100% + 9/N*100%)/14 = 5/14 + 9/(N*14)
Other: (5*33% + 9/N*100% + 9*33%)/14 = 1/3 + 9/(N*14)

So ultimately, whether primary takes less damage depends on how many hits are straight on and also what the others on average take. Under the assumptions above, since 5/14 < 1/3, the primary target takes less damage.

Note that this estimation doesn't apply to the corsair since its missile always hits the primary target straight on (within S distance), and so the corsair always does more damage to the primary target (100%) as opposed to others (25% or 50%).

Imagine a Corsair with Valkyrie scattering on attacks O_o

Would be nice to actually have all the relevant code sequences quoted here for reference…
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
January 07 2021 18:39 GMT
#37
This was linked above: github.com

Just look there -- search for "is_air_splash". I think it's impossible to paste code readably on this forum.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
Jealous
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
10126 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-07 19:33:27
January 07 2021 19:32 GMT
#38
On January 08 2021 03:39 StRyKeR wrote:
This was linked above: github.com

Just look there -- search for "is_air_splash". I think it's impossible to paste code readably on this forum.

You can try like this.
Don't
Test
Me
"The right to vote is only the oar of the slaveship, I wanna be free." -- бум бум сучка!
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1529 Posts
January 07 2021 20:39 GMT
#39
^
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
January 08 2021 16:44 GMT
#40
Here it is.
I'm wondering now if bwapi actually lists which units have air splash. I searched in the repository but couldn't find where such settings are set.


void bullet_deal_splash_damage(bullet_t* b) {
auto bb = square_at(b->sprite->position, b->weapon_type->outer_splash_radius);
if (is_air_splash) {
a_vector<unit_t*> targets;
for (unit_t* target : find_units(bb)) {
if (target == b->bullet_owner_unit) continue;
if (target->owner == b->owner && target != b->bullet_target) continue;
if (!weapon_can_target_unit(b->weapon_type, target)) continue;
int distance = unit_distance_to(target, b->sprite->position);
if (distance > b->weapon_type->outer_splash_radius) continue;
if (target == b->bullet_target && distance <= b->weapon_type->inner_splash_radius) {
targets = {target};
break;
}
targets.push_back(target);
}
if (!targets.empty()) {
size_t random_index = 0;
if (targets.size() != 1) random_index = lcg_rand(58) % targets.size();
bullet_deal_damage(b, targets[random_index]);
}
}
bool damages_allies = !is_air_splash && b->weapon_type->hit_type != weapon_type_t::hit_type_enemy_splash;
for (unit_t* target : find_units(bb)) {
if (target == b->bullet_owner_unit && b->weapon_type->id != WeaponTypes::Psionic_Storm) continue;
if (!damages_allies && target->owner == b->owner && target != b->bullet_target) continue;
if (!weapon_can_target_unit(b->weapon_type, target)) continue;
int distance = unit_distance_to(target, b->sprite->position);
if (distance > b->weapon_type->outer_splash_radius) continue;
if (b->weapon_type->id == WeaponTypes::Psionic_Storm) {
if (target->storm_timer) continue;
target->storm_timer = 1;
}
if (is_air_splash) {
if (target == b->bullet_target) continue;
if (unit_is(target, UnitTypes::Protoss_Interceptor)) continue;
}
if (!is_air_splash && distance <= b->weapon_type->inner_splash_radius) {
bullet_deal_damage(b, target, 1);
} else if (!u_burrowed(target)) {
if (distance <= b->weapon_type->medium_splash_radius) {
bullet_deal_damage(b, target, 2);
} else {
bullet_deal_damage(b, target, 4);
}
}
}
}

Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RotterdaM Event
16:00
Rotti Stream Rumble 4k Edition
RotterdaM730
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 730
mouzHeroMarine 673
Hui .186
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 1143
firebathero 284
Stork 266
Dewaltoss 108
sas.Sziky 69
PianO 29
Aegong 18
Rock 18
Bonyth 12
Dota 2
qojqva3506
League of Legends
Grubby1136
Counter-Strike
fl0m1355
flusha316
zeus295
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King177
Other Games
Beastyqt818
ceh9571
B2W.Neo525
KnowMe223
oskar185
PGG 174
ToD160
ArmadaUGS136
Trikslyr69
ZombieGrub18
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick50769
StarCraft 2
angryscii 26
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 125
• poizon28 24
• Reevou 5
• OhrlRock 1
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 8
• Michael_bg 6
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis8975
• Jankos1872
• TFBlade1122
Other Games
• imaqtpie1511
• Shiphtur562
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 30m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
15h 30m
WardiTV European League
21h 30m
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
1d 5h
The PondCast
1d 15h
WardiTV European League
1d 17h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.