• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:05
CEST 21:05
KST 04:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO12 Preview: Maru, Trigger, Rogue, NightMare12Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, sOs, Reynor, Solar15[ASL19] Ro8 Preview: Unyielding3Official Ladder Map Pool Update (April 28, 2025)17[ASL19] Ro8 Preview: Rejuvenation8
Community News
Maru & Rogue GSL RO12 interviews: "I think the pressure really got to [trigger]"4Code S Season 1 - Maru & Rogue advance to RO80Code S Season 1 - Cure & Reynor advance to RO84$1,250 WardiTV May [May 6th-May 18th]5Clem wins PiG Sty Festival #67
StarCraft 2
General
Maru & Rogue GSL RO12 interviews: "I think the pressure really got to [trigger]" Code S Season 1 - Maru & Rogue advance to RO8 Clem wins PiG Sty Festival #6 How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Code S Season 1 - Cure & Reynor advance to RO8
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group B [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group A $1,250 WardiTV May [May 6th-May 18th] SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025
Strategy
[G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed Mutation # 470 Certain Demise
Brood War
General
Battlenet Game Lobby Simulator Twitch StarCraft Holiday Bash (UMS) Artosis vs Ogre Zerg [The Legend Continues] BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Why is nobody talking about game 1 of SK vs Rush?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Ro8 Day 4 [USBL Spring 2025] Groups cast [BSL20] RO32 Group F - Saturday 20:00 CET [BSL20] RO32 Group E - Sunday 20:00 CET
Strategy
[G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Creating a full chart of Zerg builds [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Nintendo Switch Thread Grand Theft Auto VI Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Elon Musk's lies, propaganda, etc.
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Books] Wool by Hugh Howey Surprisingly good films/Hidden Gems
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Why 5v5 Games Keep Us Hooked…
TrAiDoS
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
BW PvZ Balance hypothetic…
Vasoline73
Test Entry for subject
xumakis
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11190 users

Valkyrie dmg formula?

Forum Index > Brood War Strategy
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 Next All
MeSaber
Profile Joined December 2009
Sweden1235 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-12-27 10:58:47
December 26 2020 22:25 GMT
#1
Someone know the dmg formula of Valkyrie?

I guess its a balance thing why its doing diminishing returns but im curious what the formula actually is.

My own test:

Amount of stacked Wraiths and their leftover HP after one Valkyrie volley (8x6 dmg).

1 - 72/120 = 48 of 48 dmg (0% diminishing returns)

2 - 2x 84/120 = 72 of 96 dmg (25%)

3 - 96/120, 86/120, 84/120 = 94 of 144 dmg (35%)

3 - 102/120, 96/120, 66/120 = 96 of 144 dmg (33%)

4 - 4x 90/120 = 120 of 192 dmg (37%)

4 - 96/120, 2x 90/120, 84/120 = 120 of 192 dmg (37%)

5 - 2x 98/120, 2x 90/120, 84/120 = 140 of 240 dmg (42%)

6 - 102/120, 2x 96/120, 90/120, 2x 84/120 = 168 of 288 dmg (42%)

11 - 7x 96/120, 92/120, 3x 90/120 = 286 of 528 dmg (46%)
-.-
LML
Profile Blog Joined March 2007
Germany1756 Posts
December 26 2020 23:40 GMT
#2
(Wiki)Valkyrie
Isn't the "Advanced Mechanics" section explaining what you're looking for? All the rocket placements, etc.
LML
MeSaber
Profile Joined December 2009
Sweden1235 Posts
December 27 2020 10:54 GMT
#3
Well no, there seem to be a specific formula for it. It doesnt seem to matter how many times i try, i get the same results every time.

As you can see on my test this doesnt count for one Wraith where it always is 100% no matter where the missiles land.

I even tried stacked vs non-stacked where it yielded the same result. This one i tested above is stacked.

I will post my test of the non-stacked dmg also. If they wind out to be the same as stacked, there has to be a diminishing returns formula involved as it doesnt matter where the targets are.

Look at my second 3 Wraith test. One got 66/120 HP left, which should seem impossible ye? It seems calculate how many targets are in the area and what dmg should be dished out in total, no matter to whom it gets which is why it got down to 66/120 instead of 72/120 which would be the max dmg possible from a single volley vs one single target.

If the image of the missiles landing spots are true, i would be able to place a Wraith at every those locations and have no diminishing returns. Each wraith should end up with 72/120 or even more (splash), which im pretty sure wont be the case but ill try it anyway :D
-.-
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-12-28 16:33:39
December 28 2020 16:30 GMT
#4
Just tested it myself and you are right. This is kinda crazy. It confirms my intuitive understanding that mutas seem to survive a lot longer against valks than I expect them to. The diminishing returns seem even bigger versus mutas than wraiths actually (maybe cuz of the hitbox). With more than 3 clumped together, I see the originally targetted muta taking 10, 11 damage as opposed to 24 (48/2 since explosive damage is halved versus small units), which is a loss of almost 60%.

There definitely seems to be some algorithm that governs how to spread out the damage of a valk missile for every unit in its splash radius, an algorithm different from all other kinds of splash damage. Maybe someone who knows the source code (bwapi?) can explain it.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-12-28 17:03:30
December 28 2020 17:00 GMT
#5
Are you sure about the 66/120? I've never been able to recreate that and it does seem impossible.

My second theory is that when there's only one unit, there's a special algorithm to deal 100% of the damage.
When there's more than one, the default splash algorithm kicks in. Per liquipedia, 36% of the missiles hit the target, dealing 100%, and 64% miss, dealing between 25% and 50% (so let's say 37.5% average). So the expected damage is 100%*36% + 37.5%*64% = 60%, meaning that you would expect to lose 40% of the damage to the target. However, this only applies to the direct target; other targets slightly off center will be missed more. For example, if a unit is at the corner of the missile box then it will be missed completely by a few missiles. Therefore, you would expect to lose more than 40% of the damage, maybe 50% or more. This calculation then explains the findings you are seeing, without having to invent a new splash algorithm. This calculation also explains why mutas take even less damage (smaller hit boxes leading to less splash dealt).

EDIT: According to (Wiki)List of Unit and Building Sizes , mutas have larger sizes than wraiths, but this table might not refer to hit boxes.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
LG)Sabbath
Profile Blog Joined July 2005
Argentina3022 Posts
December 28 2020 18:51 GMT
#6
Would you say that cloning the valks to separate muta would increase the damage done by them?
https://www.twitch.tv/argsabbath/
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
December 28 2020 19:00 GMT
#7
No, because as long as there is more than one muta in the splash radius, I believe the standard splash algorithm applies.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1526 Posts
January 01 2021 09:49 GMT
#8
I don't think there is any explicit diminished return formula for Valks. Unfortunately you don't give any description of your testing method, which makes it hard to zero in on likely candidates for an explanation.
How did you stack the target Wraiths?
Were they holding position or moving while being hit?
Did you keep track of which one was the primary target and whether that received the full damage?
How many repeats did you run for each number?
Did you get the exact same distribution of remaining HP each time? And can you keep tests running without ever getting a differing result?
Which known factors did you already control for (if any) and how?
MeSaber
Profile Joined December 2009
Sweden1235 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-01 12:29:13
January 01 2021 12:16 GMT
#9
Well no its not an empirical test by any means. I did just as many tests of stacked as listed here. I will upload the replays:

https://ufile.io/d94yz9dm

https://ufile.io/ekln4qe4
-.-
MeSaber
Profile Joined December 2009
Sweden1235 Posts
January 01 2021 12:32 GMT
#10
On December 29 2020 02:00 StRyKeR wrote:
Are you sure about the 66/120? I've never been able to recreate that and it does seem impossible.

My second theory is that when there's only one unit, there's a special algorithm to deal 100% of the damage.
When there's more than one, the default splash algorithm kicks in. Per liquipedia, 36% of the missiles hit the target, dealing 100%, and 64% miss, dealing between 25% and 50% (so let's say 37.5% average). So the expected damage is 100%*36% + 37.5%*64% = 60%, meaning that you would expect to lose 40% of the damage to the target. However, this only applies to the direct target; other targets slightly off center will be missed more. For example, if a unit is at the corner of the missile box then it will be missed completely by a few missiles. Therefore, you would expect to lose more than 40% of the damage, maybe 50% or more. This calculation then explains the findings you are seeing, without having to invent a new splash algorithm. This calculation also explains why mutas take even less damage (smaller hit boxes leading to less splash dealt).

EDIT: According to (Wiki)List of Unit and Building Sizes , mutas have larger sizes than wraiths, but this table might not refer to hit boxes.


To be fair, if Valkyrie did 100% at all times they would be way way OP :D

Having a splash algo seems just fair, however it would be nice to know it just for fun

Maybe should test where it maxes out, how many targets it can hit until it stops diminishing dmg per target. This might be at 50%
-.-
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1526 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-01 21:48:48
January 01 2021 21:47 GMT
#11
You guys are massively overthinking this. Air unit repulsion is the simple answer to this problem: A perfect stack is just not possible, the more air units you stack, the more and faster they will drift apart, This (in conjunction with any other unit movement) means that the relative position of each stacked unit relative to the rocket explosions is slightly different and that the more target units there are, the more spread out they will be and the more the primary target will be relatively off-centre of the stack, meaning that statistically the they will be less likely to be hit by all the explosions.
If you want to estimate this effect in one single mathematical formula, you'll have to build a fairly sophisticated statistical model first, I am afraid.
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
January 03 2021 17:53 GMT
#12
I'm leaning towards Freakling's take as well. I think it isn't anything specific to the valkyrie (except the single target taking 100% damage, which is the only exception).
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
Freakling
Profile Joined October 2012
Germany1526 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-04 21:35:33
January 04 2021 21:31 GMT
#13
On January 04 2021 02:53 StRyKeR wrote:
I'm leaning towards Freakling's take as well. I think it isn't anything specific to the valkyrie (except the single target taking 100% damage, which is the only exception).

It is also worth noting this seemingly rather strange fact: Due to the exact spread pattern of the missiles, a Valkyrie's primary target is consistently the one target in a stack that receives the least damage.

In fact, I'd challenge the OP on the claim that a single targeted Wraith received 100% missile damage. This is not very reproduceable, at least not with a stationary Wraith. A moving Wraith with a lucky spread pattern might work, though, but that would be a statistical outlier.
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-05 20:34:58
January 04 2021 22:49 GMT
#14
On January 05 2021 06:31 Freakling wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2021 02:53 StRyKeR wrote:
I'm leaning towards Freakling's take as well. I think it isn't anything specific to the valkyrie (except the single target taking 100% damage, which is the only exception).

It is also worth noting this seemingly rather strange fact: Due to the exact spread pattern of the missiles, a Valkyrie's primary target is consistently the one target in a stack that receives the least damage.

In fact, I'd challenge the OP on the claim that a single targeted Wraith received 100% missile damage. This is not very reproduceable, at least not with a stationary Wraith. A moving Wraith with a lucky spread pattern might work, though, but that would be a statistical outlier.


OP is correct on this one. This is the first thing I recreated. For single targets, the damage is 100% every single time.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
January 04 2021 22:59 GMT
#15
I just checked out the replay. WOW the 3 wraith version (second one) actually DOES go down to 66 hp after one volley! That's crazy. It's not clear if the general splash algo does this or something specific to the valkyrie. Anyone from BWAPI wanna chime in here? Sonko?
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-05 19:05:51
January 05 2021 18:37 GMT
#16
I have an explanation for the single target case.
Given what we know about the spaghetti code, my bet is that Blizzard wanted you to be able to attack allies / your own units. But the issue is that valks (like reavers) cannot splash damage your own units. So if only the default splash algorithm is used for the valk, attacking yourself would cause 0 damage since they're splash only, even the intended target. They didn't want that, so they made every missile hit with 100% damage to the target unit regardless of miss. But if they do this with multiple units, valks would nonsensically do 100% to every unit even if miss. So once there's more than one target in the splash zone, they apply regular damage. Sloppy code imo, but consistent with their other sloppy coding.

Doesn't explain the > 100% damage though.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-05 19:30:41
January 05 2021 19:29 GMT
#17
Okay guys.

So I believe the behavior versus a single target is indeed SPECIFIC to air units in general. Here are the tests.

Unit - 100% damage rate to single target

Valkyrie - YES
Reaver - NO
Lurker - NO
Firebat - NO (tested vs vulture with speed)
Siege Tank - NO
Archon - NO (tested vs vulture with speed)
Corsair - YES (tested vs interceptors and always did full damage)
Infested Terran - NO (tested vs torrasque)
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
StRyKeR
Profile Blog Joined January 2006
United States1739 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-05 20:23:26
January 05 2021 20:04 GMT
#18
Got some more data.

In the longer replay MeSaber attached, I isolated the moment 02:17 when things go awry.

https://imgur.com/a/tpmDA2n

There are three wraiths stacked in this image.
This is after the first two missiles of the volley. It did 9 and then 9 damage to one of the wraiths, which should be impossible.

But interestingly enough, one of the other two wraiths took 0 damage and has 120/120 hp left.

So it would seem that the unlucky wraith took additional damage intended for the lucky one, and it has to do with the fact that they're exactly overlapped.

I can't imagine what kind of terrible code would result in this.
Ars longa, vita brevis, principia aeturna.
MeSaber
Profile Joined December 2009
Sweden1235 Posts
January 05 2021 21:03 GMT
#19
Stryker nice research man! Gotta hand it to ya! =)

I will give this "issue" another shot today by looking at where the missiles actually hit according to liquipedia.
-.-
MeSaber
Profile Joined December 2009
Sweden1235 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-01-05 21:54:12
January 05 2021 21:28 GMT
#20
I got a treat for you Stryker! https://ufile.io/hchdrvq4

[image loading]

If we go by this image as a reference, the top left should take one hit, bottom right 2 hits, center 5 hits at the most per each, this is however not the case as the replay shows.

The map has the test layouts copied so they should act quite the same per each 'site test' but it does not. Top left takes just as much damage as center and bottom right in most cases. Center rarely takes the most damage even though it should.

The damage imo seems to be equalized over how many targets are in the area.

https://ufile.io/n1r8b3mj

Replay of the next test of expanding the ring until only the center target takes damage.

A big conclusion from this test is that the AOE of valkyrie missiles are insanely large, and my guesses would be that wherever the missile lands it will split the damage to all units that are hit (liquipedia states 3x3 matrix). When its one unit (the target) it will always hit inside a 3x3 matrix of the unit, which means it can never miss a single volley versus its target.

This means also that it may be possible for missiles to land in the same spot many times, seems highly likely after looking at the damage from first replay. And thats why a unit who should be taking less damage (according to image above) gets more damage than the others.

Anything to add Stryker? :D
-.-
1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Circuito Brasileiro de…
19:00
A Decisão - Playoffs D2
davetesta2
Liquipedia
BSL Season 20
18:00
RO32 Group E
LiquipediaDiscussion
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
14:00
May
uThermal957
IndyStarCraft 400
SteadfastSC355
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
uThermal 957
IndyStarCraft 400
SteadfastSC 355
goblin 49
CosmosSc2 31
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 5175
Zeus 440
Dewaltoss 169
ZZZero.O 38
scan(afreeca) 21
Sexy 21
ajuk12(nOOB) 11
Sacsri 5
Stormgate
BeoMulf134
Dota 2
Gorgc15753
qojqva2489
Dendi1205
League of Legends
JimRising 444
Counter-Strike
flusha640
Stewie2K472
byalli374
NBK_264
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King153
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby2406
Liquid`Hasu673
Khaldor469
Other Games
tarik_tv22303
FrodaN2885
singsing2339
B2W.Neo931
mouzStarbuck589
ArmadaUGS132
Hui .130
Tefel8
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2611
StarCraft 2
ESL.tv125
angryscii 32
Other Games
BasetradeTV21
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 41
• LUISG 13
• HeavenSC 9
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 29
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3061
• Ler133
League of Legends
• Jankos1924
Other Games
• Scarra1110
• Shiphtur225
Upcoming Events
BSL Nation Wars 2
1h 55m
TerrOr vs Cross
TerrOr vs DragOn
UltrA vs Cross
Afreeca Starleague
14h 55m
BeSt vs Light
Wardi Open
15h 55m
Replay Cast
1d 4h
Replay Cast
1d 14h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 14h
Snow vs Soulkey
WardiTV Invitational
1d 15h
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
GSL Code S
2 days
ByuN vs Rogue
herO vs Cure
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
GSL Code S
3 days
Classic vs Reynor
GuMiho vs Maru
The PondCast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
SOOP
5 days
Online Event
6 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Nation Wars Season 2
PiG Sty Festival 6.0
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSLPRO Spring 2025
2025 GSL S1
Heroes 10 EU
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

NPSL S3
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
DreamHack Dallas 2025
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.