| Forum Index > BW General |
|
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6790 Posts
On November 29 2017 15:03 jimminy_kriket wrote: imp are you aware that starlog.gg has implemented your browser based replay viewer? And yes, the valk and dragoon bugs have been left as is. Where ? im looking that page and cant find it. | ||
|
AManHasNoName
United States165 Posts
On November 29 2017 18:17 [sc1f]eonzerg wrote: Where ? im looking that page and cant find it. https://starlog.gg/replay_viewer/ is all I could find, but it doesn't seem to be functional for actual use yet. | ||
|
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6790 Posts
On November 29 2017 22:12 AManHasNoName wrote: https://starlog.gg/replay_viewer/ is all I could find, but it doesn't seem to be functional for actual use yet. it Works,is the same from the openbw Project,so it only Works with 1.16 replays. | ||
|
imp42
398 Posts
On November 29 2017 15:03 jimminy_kriket wrote: imp are you aware that starlog.gg has implemented your browser based replay viewer? [...] No, I wasn't aware of that. Their developer did visit us on IRC briefly and talked about the new replay format. I assume he's trying to get SC:R replays to work. Citing OpenBW would be appreciated I guess, especially since the replay viewer doesn't come with a license (yet), although its source is published on our github. thanks for the info! | ||
|
retina
Korea (South)7 Posts
Last month, there was an Human vs AI competition in Korea. https://starlog.gg/replay_viewer/ This page is only used to predict the game style of AI player tscmoo. - Competition Result https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609242/humans-are-still-better-than-ai-at-starcraftfor-now/ http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20171101000801 This replay viewer page is now isolated because it does not work with SC:R. I tried to convert the new format rep file to the old format rep file. But it failed. | ||
|
jimminy_kriket
Canada5522 Posts
| ||
|
dark.matter
179 Posts
| ||
|
friendbg
Bulgaria576 Posts
| ||
|
iopq
United States1013 Posts
On January 21 2018 05:21 friendbg wrote: Imp, are you guys still developing the project? If openbw doesn't violate any Blizzard intelectual properties, wouldn't it be possible to reach out to afreeca and replace SCR altogether? It is really frustrating having to "beg" blizzard for permission about every tournament. You would need to rename the units and create new artwork for them, kind of like how dota 2 had to do. Marine is okay, battlecruiser is okay, zergling is most likely copyrighted. | ||
|
friendbg
Bulgaria576 Posts
On January 21 2018 05:31 iopq wrote: You would need to rename the units and create new artwork for them, kind of like how dota 2 had to do. Marine is okay, battlecruiser is okay, zergling is most likely copyrighted. I wouldn't mind the renaming honestly, as long as the scene stays healthy. I'm thinking all that money Afreeca is giving to Blizzard could easily fund this project to it's completion. | ||
|
iopq
United States1013 Posts
On January 21 2018 05:56 friendbg wrote: I wouldn't mind the renaming honestly, as long as the scene stays healthy. I'm thinking all that money Afreeca is giving to Blizzard could easily fund this project to it's completion. You also need to recode all of the bugs, you can't just use Blizzard files you use to run openbw because those are the property of Blizzard. It's literally a multi-million dollar project to actually code a new game. | ||
|
PorkSoda
170 Posts
On January 21 2018 06:50 iopq wrote: You also need to recode all of the bugs, you can't just use Blizzard files you use to run openbw because those are the property of Blizzard. It's literally a multi-million dollar project to actually code a new game. I mean, it can be. There's indie products, good ones, that cost very little money to develop. | ||
|
allhenryros
19 Posts
| ||
|
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
There are better battlefields we can fight on. Allocating our already scant resources towards openbw will just lead to painful disappointment. | ||
|
friendbg
Bulgaria576 Posts
On January 21 2018 15:44 Golgotha wrote: openbw is a pipe dream. stop thinking that openbw is a realistic solution. it'll be worse than vietnam in terms of being a quagmire. not just in terms of IP legal issues, but replicating the game itself is a gargantuan task. I can see it coming out, in five plus years. There are better battlefields we can fight on. Allocating our already scant resources towards openbw will just lead to painful disappointment. If this is even remotely possible i assume Afreeca would gladly jump on board. No longer leaving our resources as scant. If i recall correctly the game engine is already completely rewritten by these guys, but i am just speaking from memory. That is why we need imp's word on this. | ||
|
allhenryros
19 Posts
| ||
|
Essbee
Canada2371 Posts
| ||
|
iopq
United States1013 Posts
On January 21 2018 07:13 PorkSoda wrote: I mean, it can be. There's indie products, good ones, that cost very little money to develop. Progamers won't accept a game that is not 100% compatible with the current one. If the scourge are too smart, it's RIP corsairs, everyone will mass muta. An indie product is usually not well-polished, it's just an idea that is fun for a single player game. What indie games have been enduring multi-player successes? | ||
|
MamiyaOtaru
United States1687 Posts
| ||
|
TelecoM
United States10686 Posts
On January 21 2018 15:44 Golgotha wrote: openbw is a pipe dream. stop thinking that openbw is a realistic solution. it'll be worse than vietnam in terms of being a quagmire. not just in terms of IP legal issues, but replicating the game itself is a gargantuan task. I can see it coming out, in five plus years. There are better battlefields we can fight on. Allocating our already scant resources towards openbw will just lead to painful disappointment. Kinda feel the same way. T_T | ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
StarCraft2.fi
Monday Night Weeklies
Replay Cast
WardiTV 2025
StarCraft2.fi
PiGosaur Monday
StarCraft2.fi
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
