EPTThank you TL for organizing these great events and Brain for sponsoring. Good luck to all players. For someone that dont play BW anymore, but watches it all the time, i am very grateful towards all active players and for the amount of time and effort they invest in BW and for providing entertaining games for us fans.
TLS Championship - It Is Time - Page 4
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
tanngard
Norway1325 Posts
Thank you TL for organizing these great events and Brain for sponsoring. Good luck to all players. For someone that dont play BW anymore, but watches it all the time, i am very grateful towards all active players and for the amount of time and effort they invest in BW and for providing entertaining games for us fans. | ||
|
_Animus_
Bulgaria1064 Posts
I too hope to see Gargoyle and Marwin, as well as monster Sziky and Tehcnics back for this its gonna be awesome. | ||
|
dRaW
Canada5744 Posts
| ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES49496 Posts
On January 04 2016 16:52 dRaW wrote: If I register/sign up now but miss any week do I get a 0-2? Can't I just declare which weeks I can or cannot play? Seems weird to penalize if I can only participate in certain weeks if busy due to life issues. its only for the first week, and depending on that result all the players will have their next opponent assigned to them in advance so you you'll have a whole week to schedule around to play that game. | ||
|
HeyImFinn
United States250 Posts
| ||
2Pacalypse-
Croatia9474 Posts
On January 04 2016 16:52 dRaW wrote: If I register/sign up now but miss any week do I get a 0-2? Can't I just declare which weeks I can or cannot play? Seems weird to penalize if I can only participate in certain weeks if busy due to life issues. Well, besides first week, you have a whole week to play your match each week. It can't be longer than that because even one unplayed match halts the entire tournament, since we can't make the matchups without knowing the full results of previous round. On January 04 2016 20:11 HeyImFinn wrote: Is there room for more casters, or is it pretty much set for now? It is pretty much set now, but who knows, a chance to cast might always open due to some unforeseen circumstances of our casters. | ||
|
2Pacalypse-
Croatia9474 Posts
On January 03 2016 14:01 trutaCz wrote: Ps. Does seeding after the preeliminary round includes that top1 starts at top of the bracket and top2 at the bottom (etc)? Sorry for skipping on this question earlier, but had to give it some more thought. The seeding for the Ro32-elimination bracket will look like this: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/User:Itsjustatank/Sandbox_2 | ||
|
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
| ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12022 Posts
| ||
|
2Pacalypse-
Croatia9474 Posts
On January 05 2016 01:06 Cele wrote: can i bump the showmatch question again? my other question has been discussed already :D On January 03 2016 10:25 2Pacalypse- wrote: Showmatch - don't know for sure yet, but we hope there will be! Activity - not sure what to expect about activity. We are little worried, but let's hope it won't be too big of a problem. ^^ | ||
|
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
| ||
|
JieXian
Malaysia4677 Posts
| ||
|
deus_073
Romania187 Posts
| ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23335 Posts
On January 05 2016 03:53 deus_073 wrote: why doesn't Elegant cast? I'd love to know the reasons behind it... if you look at the video you'll see he did the sound track for the hype vid he's probably too busy being the next hans zimmer to cast bw hue | ||
|
Eywa-
Canada4876 Posts
On January 04 2016 22:00 2Pacalypse- wrote: Sorry for skipping on this question earlier, but had to give it some more thought. The seeding for the Ro32-elimination bracket will look like this: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/User:Itsjustatank/Sandbox_2 I just wanted to offer some input on the swiss system and how it will progress into a 32 player elimination bracket. I think it's a good idea, but you will need to reserve a weekend for seeding matches and/or tie-breakers. How a swiss system would progress with 64 players & 6 rounds (numbers are amount of players with even scores) -> 64 32-32 16-32-16 8-24-24-8 4-16-24-16-4 2-10-20-20-10-2 1-6-15-20-15-6-1 In this case there is an obvious 32, but there is no obvious seeding between them. With more or less players, it could become a problem. | ||
Ty2
United States1434 Posts
| ||
|
OminouS
Sweden1343 Posts
 | ||
|
GeckoXp
Germany2016 Posts
| ||
|
Cele
Germany4016 Posts
On January 05 2016 20:37 GeckoXp wrote: and now this thread has eywanomics. cant get any better. oh wait, write ups planned regularly? well you know how it is, having a private life (that can be a bitch sometimes) AND doing BW content. It doesn't always work out. Also bump this thread. | ||
|
Pulimuli
Sweden2766 Posts
| ||
| ||
