EPTMake of it what you will.
Starcraft 2 by 2008
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
seedcapital
United States72 Posts
Make of it what you will. | ||
|
QuietIdiot
7004 Posts
| ||
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
 | ||
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11579 Posts
| ||
|
Pressure
7326 Posts
beta testing? did they do that for the first sc? | ||
|
2Shakur
United States23 Posts
On January 15 2007 19:03 thedeadhaji wrote: ehhhh i'm afraid those comments dont really mean much It means starcraft will die sooner than expected? | ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
explain where anything is confirmed or even hinted at | ||
|
funkie
Venezuela9374 Posts
On January 15 2007 19:05 2Shakur wrote: It means starcraft will die sooner than expected? It means we have to game more now :D | ||
|
Physician
United States4146 Posts
| ||
|
Mora
Canada5235 Posts
On January 15 2007 19:04 CaucasianAsian wrote: If it's SC2 then it better be open to beta testers and I better be able to grab a spot at beta testing... but I think they'll leave that to the top koreans because they know the most about the game. Way more than us foreigners... Koreans know no more about SC2 than foreigners. It'd be like saying a top warcraft2 player would know more about Warcraft3 than any other top RTS player. (not true). If they were going to be selective (which i don't think they would) they would be grabbing the top players from multiple games from multiple countries. They would also probably like to get players who are successful at the early stages in mutliple strategy games (Pillars, Tillerman, Maynard) | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
BuGzlToOnl
United States5918 Posts
 Let's see what happens.  | ||
Excalibur_Z
United States12235 Posts
On January 15 2007 19:04 Pressure wrote: If it's 3D screw it beta testing? did they do that for the first sc? Yes there was a beta test for SC, and yes it's going to be 3D. Blizzard isn't going to do 2D games anymore. | ||
|
Wasabi
United States3085 Posts
| ||
|
LibertyTerran
Vietnam711 Posts
| ||
|
j0ehoe
United States2705 Posts
Unregistered User Yup! I heard from a credibal source this is true. 16-01-2007, 02:57" i dont know how much i trust information from this dude >< i really fear seeing bw in 3d. its gonna be slow like wc3 =/ | ||
|
2Shakur
United States23 Posts
| ||
|
pr0n
United States277 Posts
On January 15 2007 20:19 j0ehoe wrote: "Yup Unregistered User Yup! I heard from a credibal source this is true. 16-01-2007, 02:57" i dont know how much i trust information from this dude >< Maybe it's one of those weird British spellings...UK site... | ||
|
pr0n
United States277 Posts
On January 15 2007 20:26 2Shakur wrote: you will never know until you actually play it.Hope for the best... Ok that was a really stupid post for a third post. No; he can know from other people, he can watch videos of it being played, he could know based on the recommended system specs, etc. | ||
|
azndsh
United States4447 Posts
| ||
|
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
| ||
|
Gokey
United States2722 Posts
| ||
|
sweatpants
United States940 Posts
On January 15 2007 22:28 Gokey wrote: I have mixed feelings if the game is actually SC2... Not sure what it will do to the pro scene. I'd rather have another game that visits the universe, kind of like Ghost or something... Don't fix what's not broken, eh? My sentiments exactly! SCBW still has another 10 years! | ||
|
nemY
United States3119 Posts
Bunchahogwash Was that a credibal source or a credible source? Artard. This means nothing, you stack of ninnies. hahahaha gotta love the uk | ||
|
GoDannY
Germany442 Posts
On January 15 2007 22:28 Gokey wrote: I have mixed feelings if the game is actually SC2... Not sure what it will do to the pro scene. I'd rather have another game that visits the universe, kind of like Ghost or something... Don't fix what's not broken, eh? yeah btw any korean can tell me what about this? http://www.norinuri.fighterforum.com/news/news_read.asp?cat=SCO&idx=199 | ||
|
gravity
Australia1847 Posts
| ||
|
useLess
United States4781 Posts
edit: Also, Im not too worried about the pro-gaming scene. SC has been out for nearly a decade now; I want to get SC2 before I get too old to appreciate it. | ||
|
Leon-bw
France44 Posts
| ||
|
pyrogenetix
China5094 Posts
| ||
|
Pretorian-[DMK]
Netherlands49 Posts
| ||
|
Hollow
Canada2180 Posts
| ||
|
Sun
United States551 Posts
| ||
|
KwarK
United States42668 Posts
On January 15 2007 20:27 pr0n wrote: Maybe it's one of those weird British spellings...UK site... Nuhuh, He's just an asstard. | ||
|
Bond(i2)
Canada926 Posts
| ||
|
Cpt Obvious
Germany3073 Posts
since there is probably no chance that they will do any 2D game anymore, this means that SC2 will die faster than a steak in a pool of hungry piranhas. | ||
|
Doctorasul
Romania1145 Posts
On January 16 2007 04:45 Sun wrote: I demand someone change the title of this thread. You have no basis for spreading rumours. I agree, the title is misleading. | ||
|
Doctorasul
Romania1145 Posts
| ||
|
jtan
Sweden5891 Posts
On January 15 2007 19:08 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: So a blizzard rep slips up and says he's a fan himself and therefore hopes he can say its under development before its been a decade explain where anything is confirmed or even hinted at oh comon~~ He says he hopes to be celebrating the next starcraft game in 2008, suggesting that they already started it. It's quite an obvious hint to me. Of course; nothing is sure, but first that recent "leaked info" and now this... so I'm starting to believe | ||
|
maybenexttime
Poland5554 Posts
| ||
|
LuMiX
China5757 Posts
| ||
|
Equinox_kr
United States7395 Posts
On January 15 2007 19:24 Physician wrote: There will be a StarCraft sequel: 10th anniversary will be the target date. YEY 8D | ||
|
j0ehoe
United States2705 Posts
On January 16 2007 07:04 Metal[x] wrote: if it IS sc2 and in 3d..it will suck just like how wc3 is...hopefully its just something that has to do w/ the starcraft universe o.O god, there better not heros | ||
|
Night[Mare
Mexico4793 Posts
| ||
|
psychosis
Sweden107 Posts
 If they introduce the WarCraft 3 hero system into StarCraft 2, Imma gonna go Jihad on Blizzard.  | ||
|
wXs.Havok
Argentina529 Posts
| ||
|
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
The only thing i would be really happy about would be another add on which adds up to 2 or 3 units per race. Because u could test it and everything and if its just worse you could basically come back to SC/BW again and u wouldnt even mind.. or think.. will i be lone now.. ? D: | ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
| ||
|
BatTheMan
Canada759 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Introducing heroes as a critical part of teh game is going to seriously impact teh playing experience, so that's not good, but there is no harm in introducing a more complicated heroes system for UMS purposes, or even introducing a mild experience system to give micro and tactics more weight. With SC running for about 10 years now and the progamin scene for more than half a decade, there is a ton of valuable experience to be applied to the making of a new competitive RTS in the style of starcraft. There are good aspects of various genres taht can be incorporated into RTS, granted the RPG element isn't the best idea for this, something like the tactical complexity of a FPS is more suitable to a game like starcraft. The introduction of more tactical possibilities always means more room for innovative play and more room for the most skilled to display their work, and this is a worthy idea to pursue. And no, I don't think the comment itself is meaningless, unless it is somehow fake. It sounded like a pre-announcement announcement to me. | ||
|
Seraphim
United States4467 Posts
| ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
Personally I would just like to see a Remade Starcraft with everything the same, units, damage, costs , etc. With visual changes like new terrains new map editor and the overall general look of things. Basically just a new game engine all together. It wouldn't even have to be 3D just maybe 2D with the illusion of 3D. This way it would play exactly the same but just look a lot cooler graphics-wise with new unit animations, sound effects, and things like that. This way I can still play an old game without my friends saying shit like "Stop living in the past". Also public gaming would be somewhat renewed which would bring in much more support to the community which seems to have leveled off or began on the downward incline. | ||
|
Tiamat
United States498 Posts
 http://zanno.oddwebsite.com/cevofull.mp3 | ||
|
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
| ||
|
jtan
Sweden5891 Posts
I didn't really like the graphics in wc3, but that doesn't matter. Using 3d is simply better; it takes less memory and looks smoother (compared to in sc where groundunits can look and move in 8 directions only) | ||
|
_PulSe_
United States541 Posts
| ||
|
Myxomatosis
United States2392 Posts
| ||
|
ZaplinG
United States3818 Posts
| ||
|
zdd
1463 Posts
| ||
|
SuperJongMan
Jamaica11586 Posts
There was that new UMS with 3D graphics... warhammer rts? It looks good, I think SC could use similar but more modern and better graphics. I just hope there are no more unit AI glitches and the units aren't sluggish like WC3. If the interface and control is nice and sharp, there's really no way SC2 can tank.. besides some really bad random element like Items and Creep and Heroes but that's a fairies pixies and dragons thing and not a guns aliens and tanks thing. | ||
|
zdd
1463 Posts
On January 16 2007 16:35 SuperJongMan wrote: I would be down for good 3D, I don't mind. There was that new UMS with 3D graphics... warhammer rts? It looks good, I think SC could use similar but more modern and better graphics. I just hope there are no more unit AI glitches and the units aren't sluggish like WC3. If the interface and control is nice and sharp, there's really no way SC2 can tank.. besides some really bad random element like Items and Creep and Heroes but that's a fairies pixies and dragons thing and not a guns aliens and tanks thing. well all they'd really need to do is make two modes of play: classic (no heroes, creeps) and roleplaycraft (with heroes, experience, items, shops, creeps, and what have you) | ||
|
wishterran
United States1045 Posts
if blizzard is purposely starting to hint at SC2, we'll all be the first to know... | ||
|
mlaoxve
Sweden165 Posts
also, the brownish feeling of the original game and the other colours would have to stay, cause the feel of starcraft is cause of the amazing environments and the colours used | ||
|
stuthedog
Burundi262 Posts
| ||
|
Yogurt
United States4258 Posts
i'm fine with this game - maybe update the ai a little, and patch a few things - add a few units or two i guess i just want another brood war like more then one war of the broods | ||
|
SolaR-
United States2685 Posts
| ||
|
pr0n
United States277 Posts
On January 16 2007 18:43 stuthedog wrote: they should just add three more races to starcraft through an expansion pack. any 3d or crap like that simply wont be starcraft. 3 More races? I can tell why you only have 28 posts. Balancing 6 races (TWENTY ONE MATCH-UPS) would be utterly impossible (unless every race is a mirror of another one). Recently I've started wondering if 4 would even be a good idea. I think they should add max one race, or just add/change units/tech of the current 3. | ||
|
SirKibbleX
United States479 Posts
| ||
|
Drowsy
United States4876 Posts
| ||
|
j0ehoe
United States2705 Posts
| ||
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
| ||
|
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11579 Posts
On January 17 2007 18:27 Drowsy wrote: Beta spots to bgh/fastest players, not us low money NOOBIES obviously. I'm shooting for about 2k12 maybe 2010, BUT NOT 11! the world will end in 2012. I want to play it before i die!!! (or so the aztecs believe...) | ||
|
pariah
United States29 Posts
I worry about the design team though, as Blizzard has lost some employees throughout the years and gained some new ones. I haven't really kept track though - has anyone? | ||
|
pr0n
United States277 Posts
On January 17 2007 18:43 pariah wrote: SC2, if it comes out, will make ridiculous amounts of money. Of course Blizzard knows this, and this reason alone should give you hope. I worry about the design team though, as Blizzard has lost some employees throughout the years and gained some new ones. I haven't really kept track though - has anyone? Yes, they'll make what they make in a couple months off WoW. | ||
|
Drowsy
United States4876 Posts
So, to end the rant, I do believe that blizzard, now that they've put their foot in the waters of the mmorpg market, will doubtfully ever leave it. It's more profitable, and they're still a company who's goal has to be to earn profits. Yes, I know we all wish they were some eccentric charity obsessed with creating high quality competetive online games, but they've got bills to pay, and who's to blame them? Don't expect sc2 soon, don't even expect it ever, don't expect anything that isn't an mmorpg. If they do churn something out, be grateful, otherwise project revolution is pretty much the best you can hope for. | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
pariah
United States29 Posts
On January 17 2007 23:08 oneofthem wrote: Come on, just because WoW is making money doesn't mean blizzard isn't doing other projects. To totally shift gears into doing all morpg is a drastic decision that not only involves the question of "what makes more money" but also "what does blizzard stand for." They don't stand for anything. They exist for one reason: to make money. | ||
|
useLess
United States4781 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
They don't stand for anything. They exist for one reason: to make money. | ||
|
Heen
Korea (South)2178 Posts
They just need an extra race, a plausible storyline, and a better multiplayer system which will be easy. Of course, there's the balancing issue but.. I have faith ~_~; What I'm really thinking is.. this game has been out for too long and I've been in touch with this game from the very beginning but have wasted my time with a whole bunch other games. People have gotten too good! I want to kick some ass. I need a new game so we can all start from scratch | ||
|
The Storyteller
Singapore2486 Posts
On January 18 2007 00:59 Heen wrote: It won't be that hard to recreate BW as we know into 3D but with improvements like no scarab errors etc. A lot of you are just biased about WC3 which leads you to draw the conclusions about 3D engines. They just need an extra race, a plausible storyline, and a better multiplayer system which will be easy. Of course, there's the balancing issue but.. I have faith ~_~; What I'm really thinking is.. this game has been out for too long and I've been in touch with this game from the very beginning but have wasted my time with a whole bunch other games. People have gotten too good! I want to kick some ass. I need a new game so we can all start from scratch Actually, any change in the game engine would change the game fairly drastically. Things like muta stacking, micro timing, vulture sliding by laying mines and the other fancy tricks we've come to associate with Starcraft depend very much on its unique 2D engine. | ||
|
HAZE.tQ
United States251 Posts
| ||
|
DrainX
Sweden3187 Posts
| ||
|
pariah
United States29 Posts
http://sc.gosugamers.net/news.php?id=5522 | ||
|
sweatpants
United States940 Posts
And it better not be SLOW PACED AS ALL HELL like War3 is where every unit has 1000 health and deals 50 damage per hit, and they hit like once a second. I really don't know how they can implement a hero carries an item that gives bonuses thing with Starcraft without being hokey. The whole heroes, experience and inventory thing is too Tolkien-esque fantasy to be taken seriously in a game that's supposed to be modern or post-modern. In fact, to the poster who mentioned something like "you all want SC2 to be exactly like SCBW!", I would like LITTLE better than SCBW in beautiful graphics. Maybe a couple of new units for each race. That's it though. Then all they need to do is weave a great storyline around it (and I don't question their ability for a second) and voila, the next Starcraft. Oh and they definitely, for the first few years, need to be VERY receptive to balance criticisms, especially from the pro-gaming community. Blizzard needs to think of StarCraft like a huge Jenga tower. | ||
|
sweatpants
United States940 Posts
| ||
|
zdd
1463 Posts
On January 18 2007 13:26 pariah wrote: What do you guys think of this? I think it's probably bullshit, but I still have a bit of hope. http://sc.gosugamers.net/news.php?id=5522 If blizzard likes to do one thing ahead of schedule, it's announce their games. If the game was about to be released, you would have heard about it from blizzard years ago. Unless of course, they're talking about feb/march of 2011. | ||
|
WastedYouth
United States563 Posts
| ||
|
sweatpants
United States940 Posts
On January 18 2007 19:59 WastedYouth wrote: jeez. These blizzard fatcats are bigger teases than the girl in my political science class Yea-hah, bro! *motions high five* | ||
|
ocoini
648 Posts
and it's SC's many "flaws" that has been a major part of makeing it great, all the little things that probably werent planned. Like.. how you can block some units from passeing between them if you build in a certain way.. or the scarab that doesnt allways kill stuff.. observer not getting killed if you place it over the turret while its being built, even the flying drones... drama- and fun!!! Thoose are all good things in my book.. *votes for another expansion.. | ||
|
XCetron
5226 Posts
Cause then Id still have SC and thats fine by me. An expansion with new units is like the best thing I can imagine of right now. Or make SC play like Allegiance if anyone ever played that. Its like RTS mode but other people can go into FPS mode and control a single spaceship and stuff. | ||
|
RebelHeart
New Zealand722 Posts
| ||
|
PuertoRican
United States5709 Posts
On January 18 2007 19:37 sweatpants wrote: If War3 was first generation 3D RTS graphics, then I want Starcraft II to be made in fifth generation 3D graphics. Fluid movements, smooth surfaces (non-boxy! I hate that shit War3)on characters, faces, landscape, terrain. If this means waiting another five years for systems to generally be good enough to handle them, so be it. In fact, I would prefer no mention of a Starcraft II for another five years because I want to procrastinate on having to worry about it/ having anxiety over it. And it better not be SLOW PACED AS ALL HELL like War3 is where every unit has 1000 health and deals 50 damage per hit, and they hit like once a second. I really don't know how they can implement a hero carries an item that gives bonuses thing with Starcraft without being hokey. The whole heroes, experience and inventory thing is too Tolkien-esque fantasy to be taken seriously in a game that's supposed to be modern or post-modern. In fact, to the poster who mentioned something like "you all want SC2 to be exactly like SCBW!", I would like LITTLE better than SCBW in beautiful graphics. Maybe a couple of new units for each race. That's it though. Then all they need to do is weave a great storyline around it (and I don't question their ability for a second) and voila, the next Starcraft. Oh and they definitely, for the first few years, need to be VERY receptive to balance criticisms, especially from the pro-gaming community. Blizzard needs to think of StarCraft like a huge Jenga tower. Too tired to read your whole post, but I read the first 2 lines. A lot of people seem to forget this, because it was only mentioned when WC3 first came out: WC3 is a mix of rts and rpg. For those who remember when wc3 first came out, they were soo excited about making a game that was something never before seen on the market, it was a mix of 2 genres. You can google it somewhere. | ||
|
MyTHicaL
France1070 Posts
| ||
| ||
