Battle Born: A Battle Montage - Page 2
Forum Index > BW General |
![]()
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11568 Posts
| ||
WastedYouth
United States563 Posts
On November 23 2006 04:47 CaucasianAsian wrote: File can not be found... http://www.clanlare.com/entity/Battle Montage Final.rar | ||
WastedYouth
United States563 Posts
| ||
Rotodyne
United States2263 Posts
haha ![]() | ||
Physician
![]()
United States4146 Posts
| ||
mR.Sephiroth
Germany296 Posts
On November 22 2006 23:42 Drowsy wrote: The fuck you talkin about? This sucked. Even pum's movie where he blatantly ripped off both nada and oov from replays he probably knew almost everyone had seen, claiming that it was this mysteryland figure was better than this. This had tons of obnoxious zoom in, the quality of the play was bad, whether or not it takes equal skill is irrelevant, let's not bring this argument up again. Some clips were decent, such as the mass sheild batteries one and the maelstrom+storm clips, but some of them were beyond retarded. 150 lings attack moving into a protoss base? 20 vultures vs THREE WHOPPING ZEALOTS OMGFG? Bad movie in general. The fastest map community DOES get some undeserved bad rep due to the thousands and thousands of 14 year old bnet kiddies who play 3v3 fastest map ever and have no talent whatsoever, but some of these people who play fastest are genuinely talented and creative and could succeed in real starcraft with a small crash course, the mechanical skills of the guy doing the first person capture were acceptable, below the average of a given low money player. 1v1 fastest, and most of the clips featured in the movie were 1v1, is at least more respectable than talentless idiot carrier massing 3v3 pickup game only players. Sorry, but I just didn't like it. It was worth watching purely for some perspective on the fastest map ever "community". Hosting was sex, 943kbs per sec+ word! i thought to abort the download when i heard the word "fastest map gamer" anyway i got a headache watching it | ||
racebannon
Canada1225 Posts
Foreign SC movie makers are still stuck in this state of style over substance, probably because there's a lack of substance that they feel need to be filled in with random vegas video effects. Leave it to fastest mappers to fucking take it too goddamn far. What an awful movie | ||
[jOyO]
United States920 Posts
| ||
lawl mart v2.0
United States108 Posts
![]() | ||
Vin{MBL}
5185 Posts
On November 22 2006 22:48 Jumperer wrote: no one liner alert!!!~~~ see this thread dude before its too late http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=46242 we must save these poor souls before they devour themselves | ||
[jOyO]
United States920 Posts
i was expeceting some halfway decent micro or something but it was either vs a bd player or just bad itself. | ||
DeathBlow
Romania117 Posts
the very meaning of a video game. Entertianment. That's the word Even in Korea where Starcraft is played professionaly it's called - entertainment sport - . You say the movie was boring ? Let me tell something . This movie represent the fun part of Starcraft . If you want to make yourself a name in Starcraft you dont play Fastest maps ever When you play maps like this you play for fun , not to become a perfect uber gossu starcraft champion . You play for fun . So have some fun . | ||
Purind
Canada3562 Posts
It was an alright movie. I didn't find it as bad as some of the people here. I'd give it a 6/10. | ||
![]()
GrandInquisitor
![]()
New York City13113 Posts
On November 23 2006 03:47 pyrogenetix wrote: a bit like watching two cheaters in cs play each other. both cheat and suck at the same time, but theyre so stupid it makes for one helluva funny watch. BOOM HEADSHOT YEAH wow nice fragg video... only uh... youre cheating. nice sc vid of fights, only uhh... youre cheating. i seriously dont see how you can argue that fastest takes skill. its like argueing that aimbot takes skill. did you just equate playing fastest with cheating??! i suppose, then, that people who play luna (9 minpatch in main) are cheating 12.5% more than people who play LT (8 minpatch in main) | ||
![]()
GrandInquisitor
![]()
New York City13113 Posts
| ||
Kacas
Brazil3143 Posts
and the games...i liked some...and would prefer some more of that isanity 2382832938 vs 392802983 units video... not that 90apm guy like other said...because if i want to see some high skill or high apm play, i would watch progamers not fastest map players 8/10 video~ | ||
skyglow1
New Zealand3962 Posts
| ||
davidgurt
United States1355 Posts
On November 23 2006 03:47 pyrogenetix wrote: i seriously dont see how you can argue that fastest takes skill. its like argueing that aimbot takes skill. I'd actually have to disagree. Although I must say that playing regular maps (low) requires much more skill than playing fastest (money) will ever require, you have to keep in mind that it's a different type of playing style. In my point of view, it's sort of like comparing chess to checkers; although chess requires much more skill, checkers is also a board game and although it can thought of requiring no skill whatsoever, it still requires something. I actually played fastest for a year and a half before I switched to low (this was about a year ago), and I ended up becoming one of the top ten players on West. In fact, I just recently played a few games on fastest last week to see how much worse I've gotten. I could definitely see that I was definitely not playing as well as I did before, when I still played money maps, but I did find out that my APM skyrocketed from my practicing on regular maps (180 -> 250 APM on fastest, whereas my regular APM is only 160-200 APM). There was actually a mock-pgtour for fastest called vgtour last season; try searching for it online. As for the movie, a lot of the people playing are absolutely horrible (as most others players I've seen in fmp VODs). There are a lot of different techniques you learn while playing fastest, even if many of you might think otherwise. | ||
lIlIlIlIlIlI
Korea (South)3851 Posts
| ||
![]()
thedeadhaji
![]()
39489 Posts
On November 23 2006 00:09 DarK]N[exuS wrote: So why can't you simply say you don't like it, since Physician already covered that many in the FPM community are skilled. Basically all you added was your rant about how much the movie sucked, which was completely unnecessary. I'd much rather have someone explain why they thought something was bad/poor/shitty than have him/her simply state "this sucks." | ||
| ||