EPTHow about we have the first half of this thread here, and the second half on the SC2 forum?
Media Day: SK Planet Proleague Season 2 - Page 7
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Whynaut
Canada367 Posts
How about we have the first half of this thread here, and the second half on the SC2 forum? | ||
|
MegaFonzie
Australia1084 Posts
On May 10 2012 11:34 carloselcoco wrote: They were not made by ICCUP dude... Also, WTF!!!!!!! No Daybreak?!?!?!?! I think daybreak was made by GSL so it's understandable (but disappointing) that it is absent. If they actually use ladder versions of all these maps though then they're going to be shooting themselves in the foot. | ||
|
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
Yeah they were. ESV = ICCUP map-making team, and they used that name when most people in the BW forum last paid attention to SC2. On May 10 2012 11:36 MegaFonzie wrote: I think daybreak was made by GSL so it's understandable (but disappointing) that it is absent. If they actually use ladder versions of all these maps though then they're going to be shooting themselves in the foot. "Ladder version" only really matters for Antiga, unless they allow horizontal spawns on emtombed, which I'm not sure if even the ladder version allows. | ||
|
X10A
Canada9837 Posts
ace match in sc2 >< Why couldn't they just let the entire thing be sc2, so I wouldn't have to be torn like this | ||
|
Grampz
United States2147 Posts
| ||
|
Cam Connor
Canada786 Posts
There's no question in my mind that it should be bw | ||
|
amazingxkcd
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
Q: Are you using special versions of the SC2 maps? A: We are using ladder versions. The reason is because players have just started adjusting, and we also want to use maps that new Starcraft II viewers will be used to. That just reeks of advertising. They should be using the tournament versions if the BW players were to play outside of korea... | ||
|
Demonhunter04
1530 Posts
On May 10 2012 11:34 carloselcoco wrote: They were not made by ICCUP dude... Also, WTF!!!!!!! No Daybreak?!?!?!?! They were, actually. Once they lost their sponsors, the iCCup mapmaking team renamed themselves to ESV. | ||
|
Gorlin
United States2753 Posts
On May 10 2012 11:34 carloselcoco wrote: They were not made by ICCUP dude... Also, WTF!!!!!!! No Daybreak?!?!?!?! The ICCUP map making team became the ESV map making team, so, yes, they were made by them. edit: Beat to it. I'll just say that I agree, wish Daybreak was in. | ||
|
Caladbolg
2855 Posts
| ||
|
jpak
United States5045 Posts
| ||
|
ShadeR
Australia7535 Posts
On May 10 2012 11:35 Pelopidas wrote: Hahaha what a joke. I can't wait to see the ratings dropoff after the third set. Maybe the audience will leave. OGN and Kespa have commit suicide. The audience they gain from ESPORTS fanboys is going to be nothing compared to the BW fans who desert. The current SC2 fanbase will also probably be halved with the release of Diablo 3. Opening day should get good ratings because of people (like me =P) giving SC2 another chance to impress, but yeah if it still dissapoints then ratings are going to evaporate after the 3rd set for following matches. | ||
|
Demonhunter04
1530 Posts
On May 10 2012 11:36 Whynaut wrote: How about we have the first half of this thread here, and the second half on the SC2 forum? If there's an odd number of pages, the last page goes on the SC2 forum. | ||
|
TuElite
Canada2123 Posts
Meh. They should have just completely made the switch over or do one last BW, this is ridiculous. | ||
|
a9arnn
United States1537 Posts
Players who competed in Starcraft 1 will play Starcraft 2 in the next game on the same day (???), and players who competed in Starcraft 2 will play Starcraft 1 in the next game on the same day (???). If this is true that would be the dumbest shit I've ever heard. This will cause for horrible games if there aren't any specialists for the games and they are being forced to play both games. It makes no sense to make them switch mindsets between different games like that, let the teams decide who plays and not the rules... | ||
|
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
On May 10 2012 11:38 ShadeR wrote: Opening day should get good ratings because of people (like me =P) giving SC2 another chance to impress, but yeah if it still dissapoints then ratings are going to evaporate after the 3rd set for following matches. It's going to disappoint. Even SC2 fans aren't going to be interested in mediocre SC2 once the novelty wears off. | ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
On May 10 2012 11:37 Grampz wrote: Every single BW / SC2 thread is the greatest shit storm since BP oil spill Imagine what the LR-threads will be like. XD | ||
|
setzer
United States3284 Posts
On May 10 2012 11:38 ShadeR wrote: Opening day should get good ratings because of people (like me =P) giving SC2 another chance to impress, but yeah if it still dissapoints then ratings are going to evaporate after the 3rd set for following matches. If you want another look at SC2 to see how well it is now I'd recommend looking somewhere else. There's no question in my mind the players are going to suck in both games with this format. | ||
|
Elegance
Canada917 Posts
| ||
|
Whynaut
Canada367 Posts
On May 10 2012 11:38 Demonhunter04 wrote: If there's an odd number of pages, the last page goes on the SC2 forum. Every time you post in the BW forum, you have to make your next post in the SC2 forum. | ||
| ||
