EPTOn January 26 2012 19:53 Fallout wrote:
Flash is 0-1 vs Tossgirl =)
Flash is 0-1 vs Tossgirl =)
link plz
Unimpressed Flash Meme - Page 54
| Forum Index > BW General |
Please keep the memes in this thread and not have them leak out. Otherwise we'll have to close the thread!!! This thread is not for arguing, it is for posting meme's. | ||
|
theleo_ua
Ukraine150 Posts
link plz | ||
|
theleo_ua
Ukraine150 Posts
On January 27 2012 01:24 Demonhunter04 wrote: Yeah...I really like BW's graphics actually, something about it seems more true to Starcraft than the WC3-esque art style of SC2 that I found really odd when I first played it. I don't have anything against Warcraft's style, but it doesn't really feel suited to Starcraft. Oh, and the sounds were way better in BW as well. 100% agree (about SC2 graphics and sounds, for example photon cannon animation, model and sounds). Maybe it's impossible to draw BW-style graphics in any modern game engines? | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On January 29 2012 09:29 theleo_ua wrote: 100% agree (about SC2 graphics and sounds, for example photon cannon animation, model and sounds). Maybe it's impossible to draw BW-style graphics in any modern game engines? Guess not. Haven't seen any. | ||
|
urashimakt
United States1591 Posts
On January 29 2012 09:29 theleo_ua wrote: 100% agree (about SC2 graphics and sounds, for example photon cannon animation, model and sounds). Maybe it's impossible to draw BW-style graphics in any modern game engines? The reason SC2 graphics don't look true to BW style graphics is because it looks farther from WC3 than BW looks from WC2. If you wanted to be true to the original you'd have to go a little more into the cartoony than the realism of their 1-inch actors or whatever they called them. They'd also have to stop evaluating the sounds so much, such as "Why do hydralisks shooting spines sound like goop?" I personally enjoyed both the cartooniness of WC and BW, but also the "realism" (aliens are real, right?!) of SC2. Mostly up to preference I guess. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Don't know how ;x or can someone upload it? | ||
|
shaftofpleasure
Korea (North)1375 Posts
On January 29 2012 11:03 Bluelightz wrote: http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/35u0xl/ Don't know how ;x or can someone upload it? Let me help you with that .... ![[image loading]](http://i.qkme.me/35u0xl.jpg) | ||
|
writer22816
United States5775 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.qkme.me/35u17d.jpg) | ||
|
fabiano
Brazil4644 Posts
On January 29 2012 10:23 urashimakt wrote: The reason SC2 graphics don't look true to BW style graphics is because it looks farther from WC3 than BW looks from WC2. If you wanted to be true to the original you'd have to go a little more into the cartoony than the realism of their 1-inch actors or whatever they called them. They'd also have to stop evaluating the sounds so much, such as "Why do hydralisks shooting spines sound like goop?" I personally enjoyed both the cartooniness of WC and BW, but also the "realism" (aliens are real, right?!) of SC2. Mostly up to preference I guess. either my english understanding is even poorer than I thought, or are you really calling SC2 less cartoony than BW?? | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On January 29 2012 11:35 writer22816 wrote: LOL Solid gold. | ||
|
DenSkumle
Norway108 Posts
On January 29 2012 11:35 writer22816 wrote: thread still going strong. | ||
|
mauvebutterfly
Canada15 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=306416 This an interview Tossgirl did on Flash. They mention that Tossgirl beat Flash during the interview. This was from before Flash was a successful progamer. | ||
|
Lebesgue
4542 Posts
 http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/35u1wm/ My contribution. Have problems pasting the image... | ||
white_horse
1019 Posts
On January 29 2012 09:29 theleo_ua wrote: 100% agree (about SC2 graphics and sounds, for example photon cannon animation, model and sounds). Maybe it's impossible to draw BW-style graphics in any modern game engines? I agree too. Also, I'm sure they can use sprite animation if they really wanted to.. The reason why SC2 is so terrible to watch as a spectator sport is not only because of the mundane death balls, but its the way the units push and slide against each other when they are bunched up, like they are all walking on ice. It makes it look very very unprofessional in terms of graphics and is a total turnoff when you are trying to pay attention to the action. | ||
|
Demonhunter04
1530 Posts
On January 29 2012 09:29 theleo_ua wrote: 100% agree (about SC2 graphics and sounds, for example photon cannon animation, model and sounds). Maybe it's impossible to draw BW-style graphics in any modern game engines? That's what I thought too, but at least the unit portraits could be made to look like they did in BW - 'realistic' images. The atmosphere created by the sound effects makes a huge difference. I miss the Overmind  . The lighting would also make a world of difference...if everything wasn't so bright and shiny but instead more grim and dark, like BW and Diablo, it would feel very different.I suppose we shouldn't be extending this conversation in this thread, but I'm not sure if this topic is thread-worthy. EDIT: Thinking back, I realized that from the WoL campaign, the levels that felt the most interesting/intense were the ones on Char...which fit the bill of "grim and dark" pretty well. The altitude of the camera is yet another factor....SC2's camera is way higher, which is why marines look like ants and seem to shoot very short distances, and why BW tanks appear to shoot farther. | ||
|
ChriS-X
Malaysia1374 Posts
On January 29 2012 12:46 Lebesgue wrote: So many good ones. Keep them coming ppl http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/35u1wm/ My contribution. Have problems pasting the image... but if he loses in a losing contest does that make him the actual winner? | ||
|
TheRPGAddict
United States1403 Posts
On January 29 2012 11:35 writer22816 wrote: Omg, this killed me. Thank you sir for a great laugh on a rather droll evening! | ||
|
TheRPGAddict
United States1403 Posts
On January 29 2012 12:58 white_horse wrote: Totally agree with this, I think alot of it is because in order to do really much of anything, you need a mass amount of units. Take for example, the zergling, in BW it could actually be a potential early game threat in terms of harassment, but in SC2 you need about 24 or more for them to really do anything useful. The little meaningful engagements are much fewer in SC2 which also means less micro oriented battles and more of " I'll smash my army together with your army and see what happens". I don't think I articulated that well but I hope people understand my point. I agree too. Also, I'm sure they can use sprite animation if they really wanted to.. The reason why SC2 is so terrible to watch as a spectator sport is not only because of the mundane death balls, but its the way the units push and slide against each other when they are bunched up, like they are all walking on ice. It makes it look very very unprofessional in terms of graphics and is a total turnoff when you are trying to pay attention to the action. | ||
|
mnesthes
5433 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.qkme.me/35u3wy.jpg) ^Props to you if you get this  ![[image loading]](http://i.qkme.me/35u3y6.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.qkme.me/35u3yh.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.qkme.me/35u40d.jpg) | ||
_Quasar_
Russian Federation4405 Posts
| ||
|
Yggdrasil Leaf
221 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.qkme.me/35u4kr.jpg) | ||
| ||
