Being a dragon is not for rookie imo. Stats is pretty good but he hasn't enough the experience and the reputation for being a Dragon. Pure is pretty good but unstable in PvZ and even in PvT.
Guemchi is just no a dragon.
If Movie win the OSL and continue to be in fire maybe we can considerate him as a dragon but for the moment I think it's a little early.

T.O.P.

Hong Kong4685 Posts

January 09 2010 10:09 GMT

#142

Roffles did not want to exclude Bisu from being a dragon. It's just unfortunate that Bisu didn't not meet any of the criteria that Roffles listed. Considering that 10 protoss players met that criteria, it's pretty obvious that Bisu is not an elite protoss player. If Roffles named Bisu a dragon by making a exception, it would be arbitrary and stupid. You earn the title of being a dragon by your accomplishments as a protoss player, not by the # of fans that you have.

bitchaRd[raGe]

Russian Federation376 Posts

January 09 2010 10:17 GMT

#143

I completely disagree. Ro16 MSL/OSL can't even be compared with >65% winrate or great achievements.

Kiante

Australia7069 Posts

January 09 2010 10:20 GMT

#144

The criteria you listed are pretty silly. Maybe next time you'll use standard ranking systems instead of inventing your own to troll the community with an anti-bisu post. Kk.

prototype.

Canada4200 Posts

January 09 2010 10:20 GMT

#145

On January 09 2010 10:00 Roffles wrote:
Must currently be within 90 points of their ELO peak

there are many protoss players that are within 90 points of their ELO peak

the more i think about this thread, the more i start to believe you're trolling

De4ngus

United States6533 Posts

January 09 2010 10:21 GMT

#146

On January 09 2010 19:17 bitchaRd[raGe] wrote:
I completely disagree. Ro16 MSL/OSL can't even be compared with >65% winrate or great achievements.

Who cares? Either way, Bisu is out of the dragon club kekeke.

Black Gun

Germany4482 Posts

January 09 2010 10:22 GMT

#147

+ Show Spoiler +

after seeing stats getting absolutely massacred by jaedong in the msl ro8, i really wonder how any sane person could think he was a better player than bisu, even when considering bisus recent underperformance....

preacha

Norway210 Posts

January 09 2010 10:45 GMT

#148

lol. best thread ever!

FastEddieV

United States614 Posts

January 09 2010 10:45 GMT

#149

Black Gun nobody said stats > bisu, just that stats is dragon status and bisu is not. Maybe if bisu can pick himself up and start winning again in the proleagues then he will be a dragon again. For now he has to satisfy himself with being SKT's top protoss. BiSu #1 Komodo!

TheYango

United States47024 Posts

January 09 2010 10:48 GMT

#150

Of course, this still begs the question:

What prompted this trolling? Was it something someone said or did in an LR thread?

Part of the reason I believed at first--it was entirely un-premeditated.

ghostWriter

United States3302 Posts

January 09 2010 10:59 GMT

#151

Slain dragon LOL
good one roffles.

Magic84

Russian Federation1381 Posts

January 09 2010 11:12 GMT

#152

Is this really that clever? I guess it requires reading comments. At least backho has been mentioned, the actual 7th dragon robbed of recognition.

TwoToneTerran

United States8841 Posts

January 09 2010 11:40 GMT

#153

I find the most hilarious statistic "within 90 elo of their all time high," which Bisu only hasn't reached because his all time is the second best and was the best for nearly a year, until Flash trounced it.

He's not qualified for dragonship, despite being #3 in Elo overall, dwarfing every protoss not named Kal and Stork? pshhhhhhhhhhh