|
Well now, this may seem somewhat out of place knowing this site's relationship with WCIII over the years, but a week or so ago I (prompted by my friend who had just played for the first time with some friends over LAN) decided
"You know what? Maybe this Warcraft III business really is for more than just awesome UMS games!"
And thus began trying to play 1v1 for the first time (I may have played 15-30 games of "1v1" back when I played a lot of WCIII customs, but that was when I was 13 and had no idea how to actually play 1v1) and proceeded to grab up all the information a hungry starcraft player would normally go for.
However I ran into a problem. After watching all of the Grubby's Warcraft III Commentaries which I highly recommend to anybody at all cause Grubby is awesome, I pretty much ran out of resources to help me other than just watching replays of me or pro players, which doesn't really help somebody who has no idea what they are doing.
So after finding my way to Garena for the first time and finding out that people are really really good there, but the ping made going back to regular old B.net impossible, I would join game after game and the same strange thing would occur.
I kept running into this situation.
Game 1, say I'm Orc vs UD. I have some 50 food army, and he has some 50 food army. We meet, a battle happens, and I don't kill a single unit while all of mine die.
Game 2, We switch the races but keep the same armies, so I now have the units that roflstomped the orc army right? Well after the battle I still don't kill any units (or even do any damage it feels like) and all my stuff dies.
Something is going on here, and I know that's is pretty much purely skill. But seriously how the fuck do you play this crazy game?
Anybody wanna help a noob out?
Also, I head out to a double header directly after I post this edit. 2 tests, 1 gets done 15 minutes before the 2nd starts.
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO fuckmylife.
 
|
|
|
On February 29 2012 09:50 babylon wrote:
Micro better. :D
Yes yes, that's what I've been told by nearly every person that speaks english, but...
What does than even mean man......T.T
|
In my experience with Warcraft III the general idea is that every single unit is very important and needs to be properly controlled, and the emphasis on macro is greatly diminished.
Some of the factors that cause this are the hero units, and the fact that amassing a large army works against you due to the whole income reduction you get when you get high in supply.
It's like Starcraft's micro, but a much larger emphasis is put on individual skirmishes over just "simply having more stuff" than the opponent.
|
Yeah ... it's like "macro better" but it's more difficult to explain. 
Stay away from a-moving, and pay close attention to what each individual unit is doing during a battle. Don't just let them hit things willy-nilly if you can help it. Run away injured units, deny experience if you're just having a small skirmish, try to predict what the enemy will do or where he'll move and adjust your own positioning to block or to set up a better angle or attack/spell-cast accordingly, etc. And surrounds. It's kind of like a chess game. :O
I mean, overall, War3's basically a game of extreme timings and one, constant, game-long skirmish. If you're more comfortable with macro, btw, I'd suggest going HU over the other races.
I find that a lot of my difficulties with War3 come from not being able to clearly perceive what's happening during battles. I get in that mode where a battle happens and ... I don't actively try to micro, because I can't see anything but flashy colors. It's terrible, and I've played the game since it was released. (Still not very good.)
|
in starcraft 2 you can get to gm while mostly 1Aing. this is not the case in wc3. u need to use your spells as fast as u can, focus fire different targets with melee units or target one with ranged units. , use items, back up red hp units, look for opportunities to surround, and many more micro concepts that starcraft players dont even understand.
if u want to be good at warcraft u actually need to play alot and be good. cant memorize a 4gate build and go to masters in 2 days.
|
On February 29 2012 09:52 N3rV[Green] wrote:Yes yes, that's what I've been told by nearly every person that speaks english, but... What does than even mean man......T.T
not sure if you are serious but I guess it doesnt hurt to answer.
Micro basically is the word for extensive unit control in a small scale. So for example in SC2 much emphasis is put on managing your economy and production facilities that would be macro. Micro is when the emphasis is put on single unit management. Best example would be the heros you are using in WC3. To get them to their full potential you have to put a lot of your time into managing them.
So what the guys were telling you about your games is that you did not get the full potential out of the units because you are more used to SC2s battles that dont put as much emphasis on single unit management.
|
I've been playing BW on ICCUP since 07 so I'm very familiar with all the starcraft terms, but when somebody just says micro better in WCIII I don't know what they mean. The not a moving and such is pretty helpful, mostly I just want some advice on what to do with my units during battle.
|
you got enough micro concepts from everyone here, now its up to you to actually be good.
|
1. Try not to fall behind in hero levels. If you do, you will most likely lose a battle when both of you have even supply. This means that unless you are engaging the enemy force, you should always be creeping. Obviously, you shouldn't lose any units to creeps.
2. As a rule of thumb, you should always focus fire if you have ranged units. With melee units you should try to surround enemy units that you attack so you can kill them. Also if there is a weak hero (normally intelligence heroes) that is exposed and easily surrounded, make him your first priority. Heroes are normally far more important than units!
3. Make sure you learn the attack-vs-armor mechanic! For example, siege attack does bonus damage to unarmoured, so you should focus your units with siege attacks on unarmoured units. This way you can make sure that you maximize your damage output.
4. Try not losing units by pulling back hurt/focused ones and/or heal them on time.
5. Do not lose your heroes!
6. Make use of items! Have a heal potion on your vulnerable/most targeted heroes. Use the NE and HU staff to save important units/heroes. Buying scrolls (armor/heal) is also a neccessity sometimes.
Those are all fairly obvious hints, but I hope at least some of them could help you.
|
SC2 is a game that's like 90% macro and 10% micro. WC3 is the exact reverse. There's no real way to get an edge on macro unless you do some kind of crazy expand timing, so you're almost entirely reliant upon micro.
Now I was mostly an NE and sometimes Human player, so I really can't give specific strats on Orc and Undead. Orc units are really easy to keep alive though, through pulling back injured grunts and salving them, or by playing Raidercraft and just pissing all over an NE army with good ensnares (which with a Blademaster makes hero nuking also ridiculous) and a handful of Spirit Walkers to spirit link everything. Good orc players just seem to never lose a freaking unit, no matter what. x.x And also almost never make it to Fortress -- Orc stronghold play is just stupidly good.
UD play was similar as I recall, only it was Fiend micro (or gargs if you're a total asshole), with a DK first to do some awesome coiling action -- healing in the early game, and hero nuking in the late game -- followed by a Lich so you can really get your hero nuking going. Hall of the Dead was such a playground for UD, with the addition of the Lich + statues. Citadel play was a little weak, but critical to get destroyers if your opponent was massing casters.
NE was where the real skill was at though...such flimsy units you had to micro. I miss the RoC days when huntresses were nigh invincible, TFT NE units were just a microfest -- I highly suggest staying away from NE when you're first starting out unless you like being in pain, all the time. x.x
Human is just archmage + towercraft. Everything else they do sucks.  Mass breakers is pretty cool I guess. *shrug*
|
as NE you have to play mass ballista of course
|
These two basics helped me the most as noob - keep killing stuff at all times and always pull every unit to safety before it dies.
On February 29 2012 12:14 Corsica wrote:
From my personal experience: Dont play undead unless you want to get roflstomped, play imba race - orc! That's EXACTLY my personal experience too. However, I got motivated to figure out how to beat Orc (and everyone else) with Undead, and eventually succeeded. But it sure as hell took like 20x more effort. With Orc the same things were a breeze.
|
On February 29 2012 10:20 ArcticFox wrote:SC2 is a game that's like 90% macro and 10% micro. WC3 is the exact reverse. There's no real way to get an edge on macro unless you do some kind of crazy expand timing, so you're almost entirely reliant upon micro. Now I was mostly an NE and sometimes Human player, so I really can't give specific strats on Orc and Undead. Orc units are really easy to keep alive though, through pulling back injured grunts and salving them, or by playing Raidercraft and just pissing all over an NE army with good ensnares (which with a Blademaster makes hero nuking also ridiculous) and a handful of Spirit Walkers to spirit link everything. Good orc players just seem to never lose a freaking unit, no matter what. x.x And also almost never make it to Fortress -- Orc stronghold play is just stupidly good. UD play was similar as I recall, only it was Fiend micro (or gargs if you're a total asshole), with a DK first to do some awesome coiling action -- healing in the early game, and hero nuking in the late game -- followed by a Lich so you can really get your hero nuking going. Hall of the Dead was such a playground for UD, with the addition of the Lich + statues. Citadel play was a little weak, but critical to get destroyers if your opponent was massing casters. NE was where the real skill was at though...such flimsy units you had to micro. I miss the RoC days when huntresses were nigh invincible, TFT NE units were just a microfest -- I highly suggest staying away from NE when you're first starting out unless you like being in pain, all the time. x.x Human is just archmage + towercraft. Everything else they do sucks. Mass breakers is pretty cool I guess. *shrug*
Yeah, NE has "flimsy" units. That DH surely rolls over and dies all the time I guess you forgot the cute bears with shitload of health, which have the ability to heal 400 hp during combat and then get staffed to safety if needed... Oh yeah and mountain giants 
If you want a real micro challenge play human and try to keep those 300 hp T2 units alive ^^
|
On February 29 2012 10:13 N3rV[Green] wrote:
I've been playing BW on ICCUP since 07 so I'm very familiar with all the starcraft terms, but when somebody just says micro better in WCIII I don't know what they mean. The not a moving and such is pretty helpful, mostly I just want some advice on what to do with my units during battle.
The first thing to do is know what attacks are good against what armor. Should tell you what units your own units should focus on. Yeah, and food differentials tell you almost nothing in War3, sorry. If you're better than your opponent, you can hold off an 80 food UD army with a handful of dryads and a few bears + your heroes, so stay as far away as possible from a-moving.
To add to ArcticFox's description (which is really good, btw):
- Orc: BM + SH, Hex + WW + right-click on enemy hero. Don't ever lose your BM, lol. It deals like 75% DPS for your army. In Orc vs. UD, you'll basically want your BM tailing the enemy DK (usually) and preventing him from creeping. DK at higher level has insane nuking power.
- UD: ... creep like a bitch, pour points into Coil, grab a Lich, pour points into Nova. Mass fiend + statues + destros are, as stated, kind of the go-to, and fiends on aura are pretty easy to micro (and burrow micro is pretty fun!). Good Orcs will pretty much deny you creeping with insta-mapcontrol BM, but if you can get lvl 3 nuking power, you can scare the fuck out of the BM by just nuking him down to red hp and forcing him to gtfo. Once the BM is gone, you're in a pretty good shape.
- HU: Lololol, my best race. Tower laming, towercraft (into gryphs <3), tanks, etc. Bitch to play against a good towering HU. HU tri-hero is ridiculously strong, btw. For further reference on towering, see: Infi. Best players in War3 right now are HU (i.e. TH000 and Infi). Also the fast-expand race.
- My NE sucks, but as stated, it's the race that probably benefits the most from good micro. Bears + dryads are ridiculously good, and well-controlled mass dotts destroy Orc. DH is a bitch; not as big a one as the BM, but almost.
|
On February 29 2012 10:34 Skilledblob wrote:
as NE you have to play mass ballista of course
They're called GLAIVE THROWERS! Courtesy of unexplained changes in TFT. And available at T1.
|
I play some. Add me, if you want lol. I play some RoC customs and some ladder on both Roc and Tft.
|
|
|
WC3 is all about microing, heroes, and items. If you have more healing scrolls and Invulnerability potions on your blademaster, you probably won't lose. Also, you have to micro your almost dead units away so you don't feed experience. Focus fire is important too.
Overall just micro LOL
|
United States33597 Posts
WC3 is all about playing human and building way too many towers, from what I can tell
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
