EPTMy idea for bnet - Page 4
| Blogs > rkffhk |
|
Najda
United States3765 Posts
| ||
|
MK4512
Canada938 Posts
On December 06 2010 05:16 Zergneedsfood wrote: That looks really well made....did you photoshop? Aahahhahahah XD Oh, man, pure gold | ||
|
RommelTJ
Mexico50 Posts
On December 06 2010 10:01 Najda wrote: Do you really want chat channels though? I think you should remove them and then just put in a big facebook window in it's place so you can browse facebook while you play Starcraft. Naw man. Then StarCraft would get in the way of Facebook. This is my vision of Bnet2.0: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://webstandards.raquedan.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/facebook3.jpg) | ||
|
Najda
United States3765 Posts
On December 06 2010 11:12 RommelTJ wrote: Naw man. Then StarCraft would get in the way of Facebook. This is my vision of Bnet2.0: + Show Spoiler + Wow what a bold move, you sir are a true innovator! It's so genius. | ||
|
Durak
Canada3684 Posts
I would buy StarCraft 2 if this happened. | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
That's my problem with theorycrafting threads like this one. Some bro who thinks he's really smart comes up with an idea that has never been tested, and would obviously fail if put into practice. They post it on TL, and ask people to discuss. What's there to discuss? The idea is bad. I mean, do you all really want chat channels? | ||
|
RyanS
United States620 Posts
I think people are overlooking the best part about this, players from different regions in the same channel. | ||
|
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
most awesome "troll" ever wp sir | ||
|
Radipon
United States47 Posts
| ||
|
Zim23
United States1681 Posts
| ||
|
Caphe
Vietnam10817 Posts
On December 06 2010 14:59 Subversion wrote: lolololol most awesome "troll" ever wp sir This! Yeah, Blizzard should just give SC2 the BW version of Bnet and we all be happy. They spend years coding the new Bnet that can't compete to old one in almost every way lol. | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
2.0: more pleasing interface auto-matchmaking ability to create parties (the photoshopper forgot this) 1.0: chat channels cross-region play | ||
|
PaPoolee
United Arab Emirates660 Posts
| ||
|
writer22816
United States5775 Posts
| ||
|
Loanshark
China3094 Posts
On December 06 2010 18:16 jalstar wrote: just combine the best features of both 2.0: more pleasing interface auto-matchmaking ability to create parties (the photoshopper forgot this) Facebook integration 1.0: chat channels cross-region play You forgot something which needs to be in Bnet 2.0. How could you forget this? This is like waayyyyyyyyy more important than chat channels or cross-region play get with the 21st century. | ||
alffla
Hong Kong20321 Posts
On December 06 2010 18:56 PaPoolee wrote: i dont get it o.o its the design of the original battle.net | ||
|
rkffhk
474 Posts
O_O REALLY?! Oh my god | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
Wooooosh. I honestly can't tell if some of these comments are sarcastic or are honestly clueless about OP's sarcasm. Or maybe I'm just blind to sarcasm after pulling an all-nighter to watch GSL and study for exams. | ||
|
Malinor
Germany4727 Posts
This already looks pretty solid. Take all the good things of Bnet and combine them with the few new nice features Bnet2.0 offers (plus Facebook-Integration, if you have to), and you are set. I still cannot understand how they messed up this badly with Bnet 2.0. They had all the tools they needed handed to them, and created pure crap, while making a wonderful game at the same time. I just don't understand  | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/cmgDb) Thing is, most of this is in game as of patch 1.2.0, with the exception of world/region ladders, which are available on sc2ranks.com. | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/vfB0j.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/fRVge.png)
