• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:07
CEST 04:07
KST 11:07
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China1Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL63Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16
StarCraft 2
General
Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion Practice Partners (Official)
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 713 users

Is "Noobs: Forget Everything But Macro" a Dogma? - Page 2

Blogs > Autofire2
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
Slayer91
Profile Joined February 2006
Ireland23335 Posts
November 06 2010 17:10 GMT
#21
Sure theres some situations where macro won't win - no medivacs vs infestors with bio. A-moving into tanks. Common sense solves them. If you don't totally ignore your brain you can get into diamond with good macro, is that a good enough clarification?
EchOne
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United States2906 Posts
November 06 2010 17:29 GMT
#22
You cannot learn effective strategy if your macro isn't passable. For example, if your build isn't timed properly, you simply will be unable to execute some strategies against a solid player. You will have insufficient units to execute a timing attack, or defend a fast expansion, regardless of your control.

Find opponents who keep their money low as quickly as possible, because the more time you spend against bad opponents who do not punish you for having poor macro, the more you will build suboptimal habits (like thinking you can expand with x build at y timing that is totally invalid against someone with solid execution of a robust build).

If you have perfect macro and are playing in leagues where your opponents don't, you should be attacking all the fucking time unless going for economic builds, because chances are your opponent has money banked that could be troops, giving you a decisive advantage. Barring some obvious micro gaffs on your part, no amount of fancy play should save him if he doesn't have shit.
面白くない世の中, 面白くすればいいさ
Autofire2
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Pakistan290 Posts
November 06 2010 18:31 GMT
#23
OK just to clarify, I'm not a great RTS player but I'm not brain dead. I absolutely agree that a lot of things have to be learned through experience, but surely things like "superior positioning" and "scout better" are things you should keep in mind while looking at replays.

I just think that telling newbies to Macro well and A-move to win, while well-intentioned, will definitely have a demoralizing effect. People in those leagues arent THAT bad.

@ Slayer: Well the "don't A-move into tanks" thing sounds easy, certainly. But people should learn, so as not to piss away their Macro advantage, what to do instead. Its not always obvious, especially in the middle of a game. In my case, I should have just covered the map and taken out any of his vulnerable expansions. I know that now. But because my money was low I was like "screw it, I'll just force my way up his ramp, he doesn't really have much stuff and what am I going to gain by waiting?" just little things like that.

But I get the thrust of these replies: that Macro is the building block and everything else will become obvious with time, whereas if you ignore your macro, you'll always be mediocre and wont really know why. Close enough?

Thanks again for all the replies!
DeckOneBell
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States526 Posts
November 06 2010 19:11 GMT
#24
I think it's important to note, mister OP, that macro being important isn't meant to help you win all your games.

In fact, proper macro might cause you to lose a few more games, instead of say focusing more on micro in a decisive battle.

But it gives you GREAT habits for playing, and eventually will make you a better player than if you tried to focus on micro, and let your resources spike like crazy every battle.

So yes: Macro's kinda the building block.

Still, feel free to micro your units or play with positioning once in a while. I like to try hard to get better at SC2, but I do enjoy actually having fun in the game sometimes.
Autofire2
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Pakistan290 Posts
November 06 2010 19:46 GMT
#25
@ DOB: nail on the head. That, I feel, is far more honest than saying "just focus on Macro and win every game till diamond".
teamsolid
Profile Joined October 2007
Canada3668 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-06 19:53:08
November 06 2010 19:52 GMT
#26
How do you get into Diamond if you're a new player? Watch Day9 and actually FOLLOW his advice. Don't just watch them for entertainment and then forget everything he said. He emphasizes macro, but also talks about important stuff like timings and common mistakes newbies make.
OverTheUnder
Profile Blog Joined November 2004
United States2929 Posts
November 06 2010 20:46 GMT
#27
On November 07 2010 04:46 Autofire2 wrote:
@ DOB: nail on the head. That, I feel, is far more honest than saying "just focus on Macro and win every game till diamond".


It is emphasized because without good macro you can't make a good judgement call on anything else.


I just don't think you are giving people much credit... how many players mind's go BLANK every game and they *just* focus on macro?

and you can probably 4gate/banelingbust/mm push you're way to diamond

Honor would be taking it up the ass and curing all diseases, damn how stupid can people get. -baal http://puertoricanbw.ytmnd.com/
Slayer91
Profile Joined February 2006
Ireland23335 Posts
November 06 2010 22:45 GMT
#28
On November 07 2010 03:31 Autofire2 wrote:
OK just to clarify, I'm not a great RTS player but I'm not brain dead. I absolutely agree that a lot of things have to be learned through experience, but surely things like "superior positioning" and "scout better" are things you should keep in mind while looking at replays.

I just think that telling newbies to Macro well and A-move to win, while well-intentioned, will definitely have a demoralizing effect. People in those leagues arent THAT bad.

@ Slayer: Well the "don't A-move into tanks" thing sounds easy, certainly. But people should learn, so as not to piss away their Macro advantage, what to do instead. Its not always obvious, especially in the middle of a game. In my case, I should have just covered the map and taken out any of his vulnerable expansions. I know that now. But because my money was low I was like "screw it, I'll just force my way up his ramp, he doesn't really have much stuff and what am I going to gain by waiting?" just little things like that.

But I get the thrust of these replies: that Macro is the building block and everything else will become obvious with time, whereas if you ignore your macro, you'll always be mediocre and wont really know why. Close enough?

Thanks again for all the replies!


Its MUCH easier to review a replay to fix minor problems, than to fix the problem that 99% of non diamond players have in that send out small armies of units and watch them move//fight as their minerals just keep rolling up unspent.

The argument for macro only is that its not only the most important element of starcraft but also the least focused on for the typical newbie. Your argument is that there are situations where you can be macroing better and lose, which is a no brainer but doesn't really hold a candle to the fact that macro reigns supreme for the general case.
thesideshow
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
930 Posts
November 06 2010 23:21 GMT
#29
well the macro >>>>>>>> all mentality got me into diamond recently. So it DOES work. Of coz mass lings will lose to banelings dispite how many zergling you have etc....

But my advice is just to keep working on your macro, and just makes stuff that doesn't get rolfstomped by whatever opponent is making, and you'll make it to diamond.
OGS:levelchange
Oceanic
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States122 Posts
November 06 2010 23:49 GMT
#30
I think people are forgetting that macro is how you spend your money, not just spending money however you want so for people saying that if you macro a bunch of marauders and lose to void rays, you macro'd perfectly but lost because of another factor but that's not true. If you spent your money on the wrong thing then you have failed at macroing.
I need a sig
haduken
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Australia8267 Posts
November 07 2010 02:12 GMT
#31
Macro is having more shit than your opponent at any particular instance of time in the game. It's not saying that you should just build shit and get countered, that much is common sense, you need to make the right units and by macroing properly you will counter you opponent's force by just having more units.

I think this wasn't explained properly to new players because in Brood War, pretty much everyone makes the right shit and the game always comes down to timing.
Rillanon.au
Purind
Profile Blog Joined April 2004
Canada3562 Posts
November 08 2010 19:27 GMT
#32
On November 07 2010 01:44 Autofire2 wrote:
I have to confess, this isn't a game where I have natural talent (I have it in other games/sports but not RTS's at all and its the first i've played competitively). For people who are just that good at RTS's, and especially people who played BW, I dont think you realize just how hard this game is for the layman who doesn't have tons of time to practice (like myself). And, because you could beat Silver and Gold players with your eyes shut (I beat Silver usually, Gold about 50%) I don't think you realize thats its very easy even in those leagues to get out-timed, out positioned, out whatevered even when you have better Macro than your opponent.


I think most realize how hard and overwhelming SC and SC2 can be to someone new to RTS. Even at higher levels, the experienced player may get overwhelmed by everything going on at once and being able to manage it all. I think an experienced player can understand how crazy hard managing a game of SC can be for a newbie.

I think the thing a lot of us take for granted is how hard it is for a newbie who didn't grow up playing Starcraft to be able to identify fundamental mistakes in their play immediately. It's one of the things I think Day[9] does well. He's able to identify common pitfalls in lower skilled play, and put into words what I've had ingrained into my head from playing and watching SC all these years

A silver player that loses to a zerg that builds 16 zerglings and attack moves them may think "damn I lost to zerglings, I need a bunker" whereas I would look at the game and go "hmm you have 500 minerals 6 minutes into the game" or "hmm you cut SCVs for 2 whole minutes early in the game"
Trucy Wright is hot
Gustav_Wind
Profile Joined July 2008
United States646 Posts
November 08 2010 19:40 GMT
#33
I think you are missing the point of the "dogma".

Will you win games at low levels where you outmacro them somewhat but make enormous tactical/micro/scouting blunders? no.

Do you need really, really solid macro if you hope to ever be not terrible at the game? Yes. So why not get it out of the way? It also lets the game knowledge you get from experience to be based on games with good macro, rather than knowledge that might apply at lower levels but not work once people can make units properly.
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25979 Posts
November 08 2010 19:50 GMT
#34
On November 06 2010 20:51 Autofire2 wrote:
Better Macro wont save you if they hard counter your army, it wont save you if you don't defend against early cheese, it wont save you if your understanding of positioning is so bad you lose 2x the food supply of your opponent.

In fact, I feel like in all of these situations, better macro would save you. I think bad players don't know what good macro actually looks like. It's scary, and having a few high-tech units that hard counter your army will still lose to a fuckton of units being jammed down your throat.
Moderator
zatic
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Zurich15325 Posts
November 08 2010 19:58 GMT
#35
On November 06 2010 20:51 Autofire2 wrote:
I just wanted to point out that perhaps there is an overemphasis on how lower level players (defined as anything Plat or under, or at the very most Gold and under) should ignore everything else, get good Macro and A-move their way to victory till Diamond. I believe this is an exaggeration.

I'd say this is not an exaggeration and it's EXACTLY how it works. I am planning to write an article about this in the future.

Exactly one week ago a newb friend of mine started playing multiplayer. Went 0-5 in his placements in the most ridiculous fashion and stranded in Bronze. He asked me for help. I sat down with him, had him play 2 games against the AI and told him how to make 3 barracks and make marine marauder from these barracks and attack move them into their death, and focus entirely on building more stuff.

He went on a 8 win streak immediately. He proceeded to win 2 our of 3 through Silver and Gold doing nothing but building marines and marauders and a-move them into the opponents base.

5 days (!) later he is exclusively matched against Platinum and Diamond, and maintains 50%, still doing nothing but a-moving his marine marauder groups, with the occasional stim.
ModeratorI know Teamliquid is known as a massive building
EchOne
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United States2906 Posts
November 08 2010 20:11 GMT
#36
I'd also like to add that the "macro mindset" is a very valuable tool to start basing your learning of the game on. By focusing on macro, you should find yourself examining all facets of the game in terms of time and money, the two key metrics in macro. Therefore in analysis of your mistakes or of SC2 play in general, you will have a more concrete, specific way of approaching problems.

For example, in reviewing the mistake of suiciding bio into tanks, you will begin assessing that as the loss of exactly as much time and money as it took to produce that army, not just the dimension of, oh x unit "counters" y unit. In tactical situations such as looking at terrain and arcs, you can begin thinking... okay x minerals and y gas of my army is fumbling behind the main firing line due to poor positioning, wasting z seconds of potential firing time.

While you should also learn the dimensions of space and information, time and money I feel are lower level and also extremely relevant in thinking about builds, which will become more and more of a concern once your mechanics improve.
面白くない世の中, 面白くすればいいさ
Offhand
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1869 Posts
November 08 2010 20:24 GMT
#37
While I'm certain you could show anyone how to 4gate/3rax/etc their way into diamond. I'm equally conviced you could show the same person how to staggerstep a small ranged group (rines/stalkers/roach/what have you) into diamond as well.
Happy.fairytail
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States327 Posts
November 08 2010 20:26 GMT
#38
Agreed esp. w/ Chill & Zatic. Macro is by far and away the greatest differentiator for winning and losing, at ALL levels of play.

Yes, you can get away with winning games with certain all-in kinds of builds and even get up to low-diamond that way, BUT you will find yourself at a loss if your attack fails. And you will end up just re-massing the same kind of attack on the 1-base or 2-base that your build order depends on 'cuz you don't know how to macro, which is an automatical loss against anybody who knows how to grab that 2nd or 3rd base against your 1-base or 2-base all-in.

Simple key ideas of learning to macro, from easiest to hardest:
+ Show Spoiler +
(1) never be at a worker disadvantage for your race (usually means constant worker production)
(2) don't get supply blocked, ever
(3) learn to keep your avg resources unspent under 300 for 1-base
(4) learn to keep your min/gas unspent under 600 for 2-base
(5) learn when to grab your 2nd
(6) figure out how not to die to common army compositions, fast rush builds
(6b) this necessitates good scouting, poking, watchtower usage, learning enemy builds, and incorporating harass/multi-task... this isn't macro, but I'm putting it in here in terms of learning progression
(7) learn when to grab your 3rd
Servius_Fulvius
Profile Joined August 2009
United States947 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-08 21:16:58
November 08 2010 21:13 GMT
#39
When the entire community screams "Macro is important" time and time again you tend to get the picture through repetition.

Macro doesn't just mean "get a good economy", it's laying your entire strategic infrastructure in forms of buildings, units, and their underlying strategy.

If someone comes up to me who has never played starcraft and wants to learn, I'd teach macro skills in form of building workers first since that is the most logical starting point. When you look at most lower level replays the player that loses often skimped on workers or attempted a strategy that they couldn't afford. Macro isn't the 'be-all-end-all', but it's the best place you can start.

Obviously players aren't just going to sit in their base and do nothing. They'll make some forces and try to attack. They'll scout an opponent and make a construct counters. They'll play the game the way they think they should play and learn from losses the optimal paths to achieve their strategy.

I won't disagree with you that posting a replay on the forums, especially from a low level, will net a lot of "get a better economy" and "macro better" one-liners. It's often easy to see this when the supply differential is hugely against your favor and your army gets rolled by superior numbers alone (zvp in BW for isntance has the most obvious examples with zergs who have inferior economy management losing to a protoss that knew how to make probes). You don't really see too many helpful tips in remembering worker production and when to put down buildings down, so I'll make a point to advise people on this next time I review a replay.

Even with better macro tips, I agree that, even if macro is your biggest issue, you shouldn't be excluded from advice on unit composition, placement, and advantageous times to strike. I'm sure this is what you were looking for in your Jungle Basin game (unit positioning) and your tvz (scouting, minimizing affects of fungal growth, dealing with banelings, and good compositions would be excellent areas to improve, though it's hard to say without actually seeing a replay).

Thanks for pointing things like this out. I'll make an effort to be more helpful to forum posters!
BroOd
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Austin10831 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-08 21:25:19
November 08 2010 21:22 GMT
#40
Plenty's been said here so I'll try not to belabor the issues. I understand part of your frustration in dealing with what seems to be a glib dismissal of lower-level players. Being told to simply macro and forget everything else seems to fly in the face of the new player's common sense and intuition. They read people talking about strategy and see games where micro plays a crucial role and start to believe that these skills are equally important in becoming a good player, and they’re right. Sort of.

For the new player, macro should be the all-important focus. This is not because macro is the only important part of their game, but because a) it’s the fundamental building block of mechanical play and b) it doesn’t come naturally. Your strategy will eventually evolve organically from what you play, what you read and what you see. Your micro will become increasingly better with the more games you play as your muscle memory develops and you become more comfortable controlling units. Macro, on the other hand, is a skill that requires work because it’s the one area where deficiency isn’t always apparent, and improvement will be very slow until you’re able to identify these deficiencies. It’s easy to see when you mis-micro or mis-read an opponent’s strategy, but many newer players have no concept of how lacking their macro is at times. They find themselves out-massed and frequently aren’t sure why they lost. They come to TL and ask for advice, but they don’t really want to hear that they have to work on their macro because macro is hard. They want to believe, with their superior intelligence, that strategy and tactics should win out, but that’s not what Starcraft is.

I think part of this can be attributed to the designation “Real-time strategy” being something of a misnomer for Starcraft. While it’s clearly accurate, strategy is not what separates good players from bad; solid mechanics are the defining trait of high-level play. It’s the area that requires the most work but will yield the most gains.

You’re right in that ignoring all other aspects of development is the incorrect way to learn. You attacked into a much better concave than yours and your macro was for naught as you threw away your advantage. But that isn’t the fault of the advice. If you didn’t know not to do that before, you know it now, and you can incorporate it into your frame of reference for the future, but that doesn’t mean that you should be focusing on learning things like that at the expense of learning how to macro. It goes without saying that everything you learn along the way is important, but your actual focus should be developing your macro. Often times when new players are given other advice, they can tend to place too much importance on the wrong things and get frustrated when it doesn't really improve anything.

When you’re learning to golf, the most important part is your swing. There are a ton of other aspects to becoming a solid, well-rounded golfer, like putting or chipping, but being a great putter becomes irrelevant if you can’t get the ball to the green. The same concept applies to starcraft. You can have great strategy and unit control, but if you don’t have the macro mechanics to execute that strategy or make enough units, those two important aspects are ultimately irrelevant. The thing to take from this is that, although it may be worded somewhat crudely at times, being told to simply focus on your macro is probably the best advice for a lower-level player.
ModeratorSIRL and JLIG.
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 53m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 234
Livibee 187
RuFF_SC2 138
ProTech73
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 836
Noble 26
Icarus 6
LuMiX 3
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1018
Counter-Strike
tarik_tv7143
Fnx 1838
Stewie2K1109
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King89
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor194
Other Games
summit1g10775
fl0m581
ViBE252
Maynarde176
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick54205
BasetradeTV130
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH189
• davetesta41
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
8h 53m
Replay Cast
21h 53m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 7h
WardiTV European League
1d 13h
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
1d 21h
The PondCast
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
FEL
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
FEL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.