• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:59
CEST 12:59
KST 19:59
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy9[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple2BSL Season 238Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser
Tourneys
Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Announcement RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 544 Double Trouble The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended
Brood War
General
BSL Season 23 Bot on ladder screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool PLAYzone Challenge - open offline tour in Prague BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 2 PLAYzone Challenge - open offline tour in Prague [ASL22] Ro16 Group D [ASL22] Ro8 Day 1
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo IV Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine All you football fans (soccer)!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Gaming Intensity, Problemati…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9312 users

Cross realm suggestion.

Blogs > Wr3k
Post a Reply
Wr3k
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada2533 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-02 20:04:31
June 02 2010 19:59 GMT
#1
I haven't seen anyone bring this up in the whole cross-realm argument. (Though I'm sure someone has thought of it, maybe somewhere in the huge thread from kennigit).

Why can't the match making system take into account region/latency to preserve the game experience while allowing cross-realm?

I made a post about it on the suggestion forums, I'm kinda curious what you guys think about this. Is this a good suggestion? Do you think blizz could make it work? Do you think blizzards position is just a cash grab? Do you think blizzard has a reasonable argument?

http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=25170610016&sid=5000

spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
June 02 2010 20:06 GMT
#2
I don't think that Blizzard can reliably and quickly determine the latency between each two players they might match.If it was player-server-player that would be easier to do, but as far as I know, the actual game is based on peer-to-peer networking.

And yes it is a cash grab (or extreme lack of skill or extreme laziness). There is no good argument against being able to select which server to connect to. There is an argument for that ("the players are too stupid to deal with something like that"), but I wouldn't consider it a good one.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Wr3k
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada2533 Posts
June 02 2010 20:06 GMT
#3
From suggestion forums:

This can be quoted from Kapeselus, a blizzard employee on the EU beta forums:

Show nested quote +


You copied the first sentence, while the rest of the paragraph answers your question for the most part. StarCraft was made in the 28k-56k modem era and because the game is not that demanding, today (many years later) it is possible to play against American and (some) Korean players (still not Chinese for example, because of latency). Even in Warcraft III if you wanted to play against someone from the USA being in Europe it would mean ~250ms and possibly some spikes. In case of players from Asia or Australia for that matter it would be much higher and rarely stable. How many times have you played on the Lordaeron (US) or Kalimdor (Asia) gateway in e.g. WC3 or any newer games than BW for that matter? What was the percentage of players you could play against without lag issues? Would you like to jump from game to game constantly and leave, discouraged by huge latency? Also think about your opponents - wouldn't it affect them as well? I personally just cannot see players not getting frustrated by lags given how many discussions we have had that 125ms in-built latency is way too high. I don't even mention the matchmaking, because it would be unplayable and with proper filters it would match you against European players only anyway.

Please reconsider and don't rage without thinking it over. I am sure it will be possible in the future, but for now “the technology's just not there yet”.


I don't understand how "the technology's just not there yet" when throughout beta people have been playing on the EU server from US/Asia and vice versa. Look at the HDH tournament for example, the biggest SC2 tournament to date. Players such as Idra, WhiteRa, ret, and TLO played their tournament matches on the US beta server from overseas in Korea and Europe. Yes, there would have been higher latency than normal, but there were minimal lag issues and the tournament was a huge success.

That being said, I really respect the fact blizzard is attempting to minimize lag issues in order to improve the playing experience as much as possible. A 125ms buffer feels much better than a 250ms one, and nobody likes playing with laggers. The problem is, without cross-realm, you will have people account sharing and buying additional copies to bypass this restriction anyways. It will be reduced, but certainly not prevented.

Alot of casual players will deal with the fact that they cannot play cross-realm, and as a result the gameplay experience will improve with regards to latency (though lots of casuals also have friends overseas).

Blizzards current policy on cross-realm play hurts the competitive scene the most. You will see account sharing and people purchasing additional copies of the game just so they can bypass this restriction. Not only does it hurt the pockets of your most loyal fans, but it makes competition on a global level difficult. If blizzard truly wants to make SC2 an esport, some sort of cross-realm functionality, if not just for tournaments, really needs to be there.

Suggestion: Allow cross-realm, but make sure the auto-matchmaking system for both ladder and UMS match based on latency/region. I understand this would be a large undertaking and probably will not happen, but I see it as the best possible solution balancing gameplay quality and including cross-realm. It would allow people to play with friends and competitors overseas in private custom games, but maintain a low-latency experience elsewhere.

Edit: Better yet, just disable matchmaking for players who come from IP address ranges from other realms (or disable it if your latency is above Xms). (I.e. if you are from Korea and you log on to US it will say something along the lines of "Matchmaking in this region is disabled for your account, please use suggested realm"). This would allow them to play tournament games and play with friends (in private customs), preserve game quality, AND it would require less implementation than matchmaking based on region/latency.

Example w/ suggested functionality:

Korean player on EU server wants to queue for a match. He will only be matched with people of similar high latency or region. The gameplay experience is preserved.

The same player wants to take part in a tournament being hosted on the US server. He can do so in private custom games, and the tournament organizers can decide at their own discretion at which point high latency becomes unacceptable.

The same example without suggested functionality:

Korean player on EU server wants to queue for a match. He will either share accounts, purchase an additional copy, or be discouraged to compete with players overseas. The gameplay experience is not preserved. This also gives the public appearance that this policy may be a money grab.

The same player wants to take part in a tournament being hosted on the US server, he will account share or shell out 60 bucks, bypassing the realm restriction.
bITt.mAN
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Switzerland3693 Posts
June 02 2010 20:07 GMT
#4
About the Blizzard employee's post

TL;DR Blizzard employee says SC:BW is old and simplistic so it dosen't send much data and still you have lag in different parts of the world.
-"the technology's just not there yet”

Does not mention any sort of latency program like Chaos, but your idea does sound legit and might work (if we can ever get Blizzard to really hear it)
BW4LYF . . . . . . PM me, I LOVE PMs. . . . . . Long live "NaDa's Body" . . . . . . Fantasy | Bisu/Best | Jaedong . . . . .
Wr3k
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada2533 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-02 20:11:08
June 02 2010 20:10 GMT
#5
On June 03 2010 05:07 bITt.mAN wrote:
About the Blizzard employee's post

TL;DR Blizzard employee says SC:BW is old and simplistic so it dosen't send much data and still you have lag in different parts of the world.
-"the technology's just not there yet”

Does not mention any sort of latency program like Chaos, but your idea does sound legit and might work (if we can ever get Blizzard to really hear it)


Feel free to keep the thread alive in the suggestion forums lol. I really do hope blizzard listens to the shitstorm about chat channels and cross-realm. It would be a shame if Sc2 didn't get cross-realm.
NuKedUFirst
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada3139 Posts
June 02 2010 20:15 GMT
#6
There is no "Do you think they could make it work?" they did make it work, I was able to play on the Asian server in battle.net, played 65% of my games on ICCup vs. Asians, They can do it but is it worth it to them?
FrostedMiniWeet wrote: I like winning because it validates all the bloody time I waste playing SC2.
deL
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Australia5540 Posts
June 02 2010 22:48 GMT
#7
It's a cash grab, end of.
Gaming videos for fun ~ http://www.youtube.com/user/WijLopenLos
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PondCast
10:00
Episode 110
CranKy Ducklings26
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko301
Rex 46
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 3742
Bisu 1217
Soulkey 373
Stork 195
Last 144
ggaemo 116
Light 97
Dewaltoss 89
Barracks 74
sorry 49
[ Show more ]
HiyA 48
uThermal 39
soO 37
Sharp 30
ToSsGirL 30
Free 18
Aegong 15
Dota 2
Gorgc4764
XaKoH 641
League of Legends
JimRising 302
Counter-Strike
byalli357
kRYSTAL_141
edward61
Other Games
gofns41507
shoxiejesuss570
crisheroes280
Livibee109
KnowMe88
Mew2King64
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream12982
Other Games
gamesdonequick588
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 409
StarCraft 2
WardiTV81
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 8
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 60
• mYiSmile16
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP6
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2083
Other Games
• WagamamaTV88
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
1m
IntoTheiNu 88
Rex46
Replay Cast
13h 1m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 16h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 23h
GSL
2 days
Yamato Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Soma vs Jaedong
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.