• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:02
CET 23:02
KST 07:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down20ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier6Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League92
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.17 How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Evil Geniuses - shutting down REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development
Tourneys
RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Simple Questions/Answers [G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 548 Shining Bright Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder SCHNAIL now supports Remastered Rollback Netcode in Brood War BW General Discussion [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [Women's StarCraft] MonstarZ vs BA 2026-10-30 Star Con San Diego 2026 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread R I P Patrick Stewart European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7903 users

Cross realm suggestion.

Blogs > Wr3k
Post a Reply
Wr3k
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada2533 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-02 20:04:31
June 02 2010 19:59 GMT
#1
I haven't seen anyone bring this up in the whole cross-realm argument. (Though I'm sure someone has thought of it, maybe somewhere in the huge thread from kennigit).

Why can't the match making system take into account region/latency to preserve the game experience while allowing cross-realm?

I made a post about it on the suggestion forums, I'm kinda curious what you guys think about this. Is this a good suggestion? Do you think blizz could make it work? Do you think blizzards position is just a cash grab? Do you think blizzard has a reasonable argument?

http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=25170610016&sid=5000

spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
June 02 2010 20:06 GMT
#2
I don't think that Blizzard can reliably and quickly determine the latency between each two players they might match.If it was player-server-player that would be easier to do, but as far as I know, the actual game is based on peer-to-peer networking.

And yes it is a cash grab (or extreme lack of skill or extreme laziness). There is no good argument against being able to select which server to connect to. There is an argument for that ("the players are too stupid to deal with something like that"), but I wouldn't consider it a good one.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Wr3k
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada2533 Posts
June 02 2010 20:06 GMT
#3
From suggestion forums:

This can be quoted from Kapeselus, a blizzard employee on the EU beta forums:

Show nested quote +


You copied the first sentence, while the rest of the paragraph answers your question for the most part. StarCraft was made in the 28k-56k modem era and because the game is not that demanding, today (many years later) it is possible to play against American and (some) Korean players (still not Chinese for example, because of latency). Even in Warcraft III if you wanted to play against someone from the USA being in Europe it would mean ~250ms and possibly some spikes. In case of players from Asia or Australia for that matter it would be much higher and rarely stable. How many times have you played on the Lordaeron (US) or Kalimdor (Asia) gateway in e.g. WC3 or any newer games than BW for that matter? What was the percentage of players you could play against without lag issues? Would you like to jump from game to game constantly and leave, discouraged by huge latency? Also think about your opponents - wouldn't it affect them as well? I personally just cannot see players not getting frustrated by lags given how many discussions we have had that 125ms in-built latency is way too high. I don't even mention the matchmaking, because it would be unplayable and with proper filters it would match you against European players only anyway.

Please reconsider and don't rage without thinking it over. I am sure it will be possible in the future, but for now “the technology's just not there yet”.


I don't understand how "the technology's just not there yet" when throughout beta people have been playing on the EU server from US/Asia and vice versa. Look at the HDH tournament for example, the biggest SC2 tournament to date. Players such as Idra, WhiteRa, ret, and TLO played their tournament matches on the US beta server from overseas in Korea and Europe. Yes, there would have been higher latency than normal, but there were minimal lag issues and the tournament was a huge success.

That being said, I really respect the fact blizzard is attempting to minimize lag issues in order to improve the playing experience as much as possible. A 125ms buffer feels much better than a 250ms one, and nobody likes playing with laggers. The problem is, without cross-realm, you will have people account sharing and buying additional copies to bypass this restriction anyways. It will be reduced, but certainly not prevented.

Alot of casual players will deal with the fact that they cannot play cross-realm, and as a result the gameplay experience will improve with regards to latency (though lots of casuals also have friends overseas).

Blizzards current policy on cross-realm play hurts the competitive scene the most. You will see account sharing and people purchasing additional copies of the game just so they can bypass this restriction. Not only does it hurt the pockets of your most loyal fans, but it makes competition on a global level difficult. If blizzard truly wants to make SC2 an esport, some sort of cross-realm functionality, if not just for tournaments, really needs to be there.

Suggestion: Allow cross-realm, but make sure the auto-matchmaking system for both ladder and UMS match based on latency/region. I understand this would be a large undertaking and probably will not happen, but I see it as the best possible solution balancing gameplay quality and including cross-realm. It would allow people to play with friends and competitors overseas in private custom games, but maintain a low-latency experience elsewhere.

Edit: Better yet, just disable matchmaking for players who come from IP address ranges from other realms (or disable it if your latency is above Xms). (I.e. if you are from Korea and you log on to US it will say something along the lines of "Matchmaking in this region is disabled for your account, please use suggested realm"). This would allow them to play tournament games and play with friends (in private customs), preserve game quality, AND it would require less implementation than matchmaking based on region/latency.

Example w/ suggested functionality:

Korean player on EU server wants to queue for a match. He will only be matched with people of similar high latency or region. The gameplay experience is preserved.

The same player wants to take part in a tournament being hosted on the US server. He can do so in private custom games, and the tournament organizers can decide at their own discretion at which point high latency becomes unacceptable.

The same example without suggested functionality:

Korean player on EU server wants to queue for a match. He will either share accounts, purchase an additional copy, or be discouraged to compete with players overseas. The gameplay experience is not preserved. This also gives the public appearance that this policy may be a money grab.

The same player wants to take part in a tournament being hosted on the US server, he will account share or shell out 60 bucks, bypassing the realm restriction.
bITt.mAN
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Switzerland3701 Posts
June 02 2010 20:07 GMT
#4
About the Blizzard employee's post

TL;DR Blizzard employee says SC:BW is old and simplistic so it dosen't send much data and still you have lag in different parts of the world.
-"the technology's just not there yet”

Does not mention any sort of latency program like Chaos, but your idea does sound legit and might work (if we can ever get Blizzard to really hear it)
BW4LYF . . . . . . PM me, I LOVE PMs. . . . . . Long live "NaDa's Body" . . . . . . Fantasy | Bisu/Best | Jaedong . . . . .
Wr3k
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada2533 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-02 20:11:08
June 02 2010 20:10 GMT
#5
On June 03 2010 05:07 bITt.mAN wrote:
About the Blizzard employee's post

TL;DR Blizzard employee says SC:BW is old and simplistic so it dosen't send much data and still you have lag in different parts of the world.
-"the technology's just not there yet”

Does not mention any sort of latency program like Chaos, but your idea does sound legit and might work (if we can ever get Blizzard to really hear it)


Feel free to keep the thread alive in the suggestion forums lol. I really do hope blizzard listens to the shitstorm about chat channels and cross-realm. It would be a shame if Sc2 didn't get cross-realm.
NuKedUFirst
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada3139 Posts
June 02 2010 20:15 GMT
#6
There is no "Do you think they could make it work?" they did make it work, I was able to play on the Asian server in battle.net, played 65% of my games on ICCup vs. Asians, They can do it but is it worth it to them?
FrostedMiniWeet wrote: I like winning because it validates all the bloody time I waste playing SC2.
deL
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Australia5540 Posts
June 02 2010 22:48 GMT
#7
It's a cash grab, end of.
Gaming videos for fun ~ http://www.youtube.com/user/WijLopenLos
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
07:00
Masters Cup #151: Group D
davetesta10
Liquipedia
The PiG Daily
05:30
Best Games of SC
herO vs Rogue
GuMiho vs ShoWTimE
Clem vs herO
PiGStarcraft253
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft253
Nina 93
JuggernautJason63
Codebar 59
EmSc Tv 22
StarCraft: Brood War
ProTech156
White-Ra 156
910 105
LancerX 17
Dota 2
syndereN287
PGG 163
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 590
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1180
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby3867
Other Games
summit1g3718
Liquid`RaSZi1713
FrodaN1549
Beastyqt660
shahzam430
Liquid`Hasu321
XaKoH 315
mouzStarbuck270
KnowMe209
RotterdaM137
ToD101
Trikslyr35
PPMD23
Organizations
StarCraft 2
WardiTV603
Other Games
ComeBackTV 479
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 22
EmSc2Tv 22
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 45
• musti20045 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix10
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3251
• Jankos3145
• Scarra998
Other Games
• imaqtpie470
• Shiphtur401
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
58m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
11h 58m
WardiTV Invitational
13h 58m
Epic.LAN
14h 58m
IPSL
17h 58m
eOnzErG vs McRibbed
LancerX vs StRyKeR
AI Arena Tournament
18h 58m
OSC
1d 15h
Yamato Cup
1d 16h
IPSL
1d 18h
Artosis vs RiceHat
Kyrie vs Sony
Map Test Tournament
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
Ultimate Battle
2 days
Rush vs BeSt
Replay Cast
3 days
Rogue vs Classic
Patches Events
3 days
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
KCM Race Survival
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-28
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
1xBet Invitational
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.