| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On May 10 2017 03:41 zlefin wrote: danglars trolling again, annoying. Your post's thrust, from what I could understand of it, overshadowed action by intent. I think too much is being drawn to the intent side of things, but if you disagree please disagree, don't just accuse me of trolling and jetpack on out of there. | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
the opacity of your writing is starting to make any conversation with you completely enraging. your escheresque sentences and dangling clauses give your name new meaning. | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On May 10 2017 06:17 IgnE wrote: what the fuck dude? the "thrust [. . . ] overshadowed action by intent?" but "too much is being drawn to the intent side of things?" what's the antithesis of intent? plain meaning? the opacity of your writing is starting to make any conversation with you completely enraging. your escheresque sentences and dangling clauses give your name new meaning. It doesn't matter if the order concealed discrimination by faking domestic security concerns (the action), what matters is the mean things Trump said about muslims on the campaign trail (the intent). That's using one to overshadow the other. If we were in the main thread, I'd ask if you can see those two in opposition. I've always liked your turns of phrases. My writing is very escheresque and I use far too many dangling clauses. | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
but fyi i stopped asking you about benghazi because i couldn't tell what your position was despite reading your posts two or three times. i dont care about a youtube video. i was asking about the 8 or 9 separate investigations the republicans conducted to find out that politicians don't tell the full truth. everyone was also ganging up on you at the same time. | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On May 10 2017 03:52 LegalLord wrote: Well perhaps you should report the posts in question (or in your case, pseudo-report) and call it a day. I report there's a problem here. And I did call it a day. there's no shortage of posts with violations from him. it's only a failure to moderate that's kept him from getting banned long ago. | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19162 Posts
| ||
|
TheLordofAwesome
Korea (South)2655 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On May 10 2017 15:48 TheLordofAwesome wrote: Why was Plansix warned for calling out LL? You seriously think calling someone a Russian shill has any place in a debate? Are you crazy? | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On May 10 2017 22:51 Danglars wrote: You seriously think calling someone a Russian shill has any place in a debate? Are you crazy? It does in a debate with a Russian shill  C'mon, it was in response to a guy who is openly and blindly pro-Russian calling for "sidestepping the Russia issue". The should be two pages of people calling him out. | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On May 10 2017 22:55 opisska wrote: It does in a debate with a Russian shill C'mon, it was in response to a guy who is openly and blindly pro-Russian calling for "sidestepping the Russia issue". The should be two pages of people calling him out. As if "Russia shill" wouldn't poison the debate further! It's childish name calling, not any attempt to call attention to anything. Pithy, derogatory insults would just cascade to infinity if they're tolerated. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On May 10 2017 22:55 opisska wrote: It does in a debate with a Russian shill C'mon, it was in response to a guy who is openly and blindly pro-Russian calling for "sidestepping the Russia issue". The should be two pages of people calling him out. On May 10 2017 12:03 LegalLord wrote: Let me word it a little differently: whether it's about Russia or not this is quite clearly a political firing. I thought it was pretty obvious that the above was what I meant. And if that wasn't something you could figure out I'm wondering if there's any reason to take you seriously. | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On May 10 2017 10:53 tofucake wrote: Your bar for violation is a lot lower than everyone else's. yes, which is why the thread is far worse than it could be; because you refuse to clean up the violators  I prefer preventative measures to surgery. also i'd say even your bars should've been crossed by some of the stuff danglars did. but since you don't read the thread, you're highly unaware of the issues. one of the reasons I'd like if there were another mod in charge of the thread (if there are any available that are better, I don't know how deep the bench is for mod selection, but iirc very few are willing to handle the thread, so we take what's allowed) | ||
|
tofucake
Hyrule19162 Posts
| ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On May 11 2017 03:57 zlefin wrote: yes, which is why the thread is far worse than it could be; because you refuse to clean up the violators I prefer preventative measures to surgery. also i'd say even your bars should've been crossed by some of the stuff danglars did. but since you don't read the thread, you're highly unaware of the issues. one of the reasons I'd like if there were another mod in charge of the thread (if there are any available that are better, I don't know how deep the bench is for mod selection, but iirc very few are willing to handle the thread, so we take what's allowed) You don't even adhere to your own idealized moderation standards, so it'd be best for everyone if you simply quit commenting on the moderation. | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14049 Posts
On May 11 2017 04:21 opisska wrote: Remember when we had coloured posts for fans of SKT and JINAIR in PL finals? That's what the US thread needs right now - every poster would be able to assign himself to dems or reps and his posts coloured accordingly; then some special posters could have even special colours, but it's a shame that red will be already taken, because that would be very suitable for a special poster. It would only work if people were allowed to upvote and downvote others political affiliation insofar as their perspective. | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On May 11 2017 05:02 Sermokala wrote: It would only work if people were allowed to upvote and downvote others political affiliation insofar as their perspective. tbh it would also have to be either red or blue. A left-leaning forum (probably far-left from American standards) would just consider some moderate liberals as nonpartisan and the rest leftists. It would be fun to see all the pages that ended up fully colored blue, I have to say. The fun experiment would be who you voted for in the last presidential election or the average party voted for in the last five or six. | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18133 Posts
On May 11 2017 13:46 Danglars wrote: I don't know what I was thinking. An average of previous votes, put in your senators and congressmen if you feel like it. I'm more in for seeing the cool colors rather than actual improvement; you get an idea of where people are coming from pretty quickly without it. Donkey and elephant flairs! | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
LAN Event
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
WardiTV Korean Royale
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Korean Royale
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
