|
On March 06 2020 08:01 themtc516 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2020 07:23 Velr wrote: At this point GH is just a doom and gloom preacher, nothing more. I don't get what some people see in his postings, i stopped commenting on them mostly for that reason. Arguing about anything with him, well.. Try hitting a wall, at least it will hurt your fist. GH will just ignore you because he has no answer aside from "capitalism/usa BAD". Endless whataboutism once confronted are all you ever get out of him, clear statements or ideas? Who needs them, we are all doomed anyway.
I really dont understand takes like this. Like i said: He has clearly and consistently laid out his reasons for why he believes this at least 10-20 times in the last year. He seems pretty set on it and like i said its consistent logically, so either you can argue within the framework he has set up or you can move on. Or hell, take the time to set up your own framework and maybe if it's worthwhile he will engage. Maybe he won't. But no one is saying he needs to accept yours on its face, just like you dont accept his. It's just that instead of not engaging, you and JimmiC and DMCD etc cant seem to accept that; then you get all flustered, and instead of disengaging you choose to comment in bad faith, mis-characterize his arguments, bait him, or sometimes just ad hominem him. It's unacceptable in any reasonable debate or academic setting. You can claim GreenHorizons' position is "logically consistent" until you're blue in the face and it will remain merely your opinion. GH may have got *subtler* about baiting other people into shitty arguments but a lot of the time it is still his fault, or the fault of his cronies.
I dont think that you guys are bad people or even have any malicious intent. I think its mostly due to miscommunications based on the fact that GH is arguing for a hypothetical audience of doctoral students while you and JC seem to think this is a CNN/Fox News roundtable or a casual conversation among your workmates. There's different requirements that need to be met based on the audience and setting. Does a forum thread on the internet more closely resemble an "audience of doctoral students" or a "casual conversation with workmates"? Given the obvious answer to that question, whose fault is this?
(Assuming that GH's intended audience is actually "doctoral students" as opposed to "people who have already drunk his cool-aid, or are willing to".)
edit: and before anyone brings up what Mohdoo touched on in the thread where i first incorrectly posted this. Ive been around awhile, I understand how GH used to be. I also remember how hes served his time through bans etc. I also remember how he tried to start his own thread/blog to avoid some of these issues that was then highjacked by JC only to get shut down. Like i said im hopeful that he will just continue not to respond to you guys, demonstrating his growth. GreenHorizons has fairly well highjacked JimmiC's South American politics thread from time to time as well. Swings and merry-go-rounds.
|
Gh is anything but logically consistent. His entire shtick is that hes here to teach us why were wrong and why we need to agree with him before we get to discuss anything. He wants a socialist revolution that doesn't intend to be violent but with everyone going into it fully prepared to do violence and entirely convinced that violence is necessary and just in the face of the violence they're fully aware will be coming.
He fundamentally hates us politics and yet constantly posts in a thread named us politics. There is no nation he likes and thinks Bernie Sanders is a right wing mark.
|
For the record, I don't really see "hope for the best and prepare for the worst" as logically inconsistent myself but I am thoroughly disinterested in relitigating the details of GH's political position in this thread. My opposition to his bullying and harassment has very little to do with exactly what his political positions are or exactly how rational they are.
|
See this is part of the problem. I defend the guy for having a consistent argument and suddenly that means im one of his comrades. For the record, not that its relevant at all to what i was originally saying, I happen to disagree with him and have hope for change within capitalism/democracy.
But if ones starting point is that capitalism is unsalvageable and that the democratic (real or otherwise) process is compromised beyond hope then everything he says follows quite easily. That part isnt my opinion, my issue with his starting point is.
But i had no intention to start this shit up, just help the thread read more smoothly.
Thanks you two for reminding me why it took 6 years to chime in though. You regular posters have much more patience than I, so back to lurking it is. Feel free to ban me mods and ill see yall in another 6 years or so.
|
On March 06 2020 10:12 themtc516 wrote: See this is part of the problem. I defend the guy for having a consistent argument and suddenly that means im one of his comrades. Who said this? I don't think anybody said this. Unless you're referring to my "cool-aid" statement, in which case I don't know that you're necessarily part of his intended audience. Or that drinking his cool-aid inherently makes one his "comrade".
But i had no intention to start this shit up, just help the thread read more smoothly. It baffles me a little why you think making sweeping assertions and accusations, and blatantly backseat moderating in the main thread, was going to make things go more "smoothly".
Then again, GreenHorizons has done his best to normalise and popularise the act of shitting on anybody he designates as an "acceptable target". (It's a very useful skill to learn if your goal is to effect political change, after all.) So I guess it's not that baffling why you would think your original post was okay or going to help.
But if ones starting point is that capitalism is unsalvageable and that the democratic (real or otherwise) process is compromised beyond hope then everything he says follows quite easily. That part isnt my opinion, my issue with his starting point is. No, that part is also your opinion.
|
Yeah that post in the main thread was totally my bad as I had no idea this thread existed. The post should be removed from the main thread for sure.
/wave
|
I think there is no need to turn this into another "who's more wrong" debate. JimmiC and GH are way past the point where it mattered who's more guilty. What matters now is that JimmiC should stop his crusade against LMMLM communism because he keeps bringing that up while no one else is interested in discussing that with him.
|
On March 06 2020 10:27 Sent. wrote: I think there is no need to turn this into another "who's more wrong" debate. JimmiC and GH are way past the point where it mattered who's more guilty. What matters now is that JimmiC should stop his crusade against LMMLM communism because he keeps bringing that up while no one else is interested in discussing that with him. I think it does matter who is fundamentally responsible for the state the thread is in, and that discussing the failings of the US political system without reference to the failings or merits of alternative systems (particularly alternative systems being proposed as replacements, which acronym-garble communism may or may not be) is likely to result in unreasonable conclusions.
That being said, JimmiC may wish to modify his behaviour to keep the peace. I don't personally have any advice for him on that front. Personally I've wound back my involvement with the main thread since its value to me as a source of information has gone way down and I've become generally sick of dealing with the garbage.
|
On March 06 2020 10:16 Aquanim wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2020 10:12 themtc516 wrote: See this is part of the problem. I defend the guy for having a consistent argument and suddenly that means im one of his comrades. Who said this? I don't think anybody said this. Unless you're referring to my "cool-aid" statement, in which case I don't know that you're necessarily part of his intended audience. Or that drinking his cool-aid inherently makes one his "comrade". Show nested quote +But i had no intention to start this shit up, just help the thread read more smoothly. It baffles me a little why you think making sweeping assertions and accusations, and blatantly backseat moderating in the main thread, was going to make things go more "smoothly". Then again, GreenHorizons has done his best to normalise and popularise the act of shitting on anybody he designates as an "acceptable target". (It's a very useful skill to learn if your goal is to effect political change, after all.) So I guess it's not that baffling why you would think your original post was okay or going to help. Show nested quote +But if ones starting point is that capitalism is unsalvageable and that the democratic (real or otherwise) process is compromised beyond hope then everything he says follows quite easily. That part isnt my opinion, my issue with his starting point is. No, that part is also your opinion.
The distinction for normalizing and popularizing shitting on "acceptable targets" absolutely goes to the ABL. Don't you put that evil on me Ricky Bobby
|
United States41979 Posts
I don’t read the topic much anymore but, as a white moderate, I think it’s handy to keep a dangerous negro on hand. There are areas in which I’m not especially well read and it’s good to have GH’s intellectual input, even if I don’t always agree with him. He reads books so I don’t have to.
|
On March 06 2020 09:31 Aquanim wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2020 08:01 themtc516 wrote:On March 06 2020 07:23 Velr wrote: At this point GH is just a doom and gloom preacher, nothing more. I don't get what some people see in his postings, i stopped commenting on them mostly for that reason. Arguing about anything with him, well.. Try hitting a wall, at least it will hurt your fist. GH will just ignore you because he has no answer aside from "capitalism/usa BAD". Endless whataboutism once confronted are all you ever get out of him, clear statements or ideas? Who needs them, we are all doomed anyway.
I really dont understand takes like this. Like i said: He has clearly and consistently laid out his reasons for why he believes this at least 10-20 times in the last year. He seems pretty set on it and like i said its consistent logically, so either you can argue within the framework he has set up or you can move on. Or hell, take the time to set up your own framework and maybe if it's worthwhile he will engage. Maybe he won't. But no one is saying he needs to accept yours on its face, just like you dont accept his. It's just that instead of not engaging, you and JimmiC and DMCD etc cant seem to accept that; then you get all flustered, and instead of disengaging you choose to comment in bad faith, mis-characterize his arguments, bait him, or sometimes just ad hominem him. It's unacceptable in any reasonable debate or academic setting. You can claim GreenHorizons' position is "logically consistent" until you're blue in the face and it will remain merely your opinion. GH may have got *subtler* about baiting other people into shitty arguments but a lot of the time it is still his fault, or the fault of his cronies.
That, on the other hand, wasn't a very subtle bait for me, so, kindly don't bring me into all of your GH-hatred-fueled conversations?
I have almost entirely ignored Jimmi from last time, so has Drone as far as I've seen. The only time I answered one of his posts was about Star Wars and I wasn't negative towards him at all. He did quote me to post some infuriating garbage and attack me for imaginary positions that he knows I don't hold on at least one occasion (that I remember, I'm sure if I looked in the database of this forum that you seem to keep, there'd be a few more).
|
On March 06 2020 11:31 KwarK wrote: I don’t read the topic much anymore but, as a white moderate, I think it’s handy to keep a dangerous negro on hand. There are areas in which I’m not especially well read and it’s good to have GH’s intellectual input, even if I don’t always agree with him. He reads books so I don’t have to. The same kind of argument applied to xDaunt but at some stage it stopped outweighing the parts of his behaviour that were just flat out unacceptable.
On March 06 2020 11:35 Nebuchad wrote: That, on the other hand, wasn't a very subtle bait for me, so, kindly don't bring me into all of your GH-hatred-fueled conversations? If I'd been trying to bait you I'd have used your name at some point in that post. You can hardly expect me to never at least vaguely gesture at the fact that GH has allies (which does include people beyond you and Drone).
|
On March 06 2020 11:44 Aquanim wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2020 11:31 KwarK wrote: I don’t read the topic much anymore but, as a white moderate, I think it’s handy to keep a dangerous negro on hand. There are areas in which I’m not especially well read and it’s good to have GH’s intellectual input, even if I don’t always agree with him. He reads books so I don’t have to. The same kind of argument applied to xDaunt but at some stage it stopped outweighing the parts of his behaviour that were just flat out unacceptable. Show nested quote +On March 06 2020 11:35 Nebuchad wrote: That, on the other hand, wasn't a very subtle bait for me, so, kindly don't bring me into all of your GH-hatred-fueled conversations? If I'd been trying to bait you I'd have used your name at some point in that post. You can hardly expect me to never at least vaguely gesture at the fact that GH has allies (which does include people beyond you and Drone).
Didn't start that way. Was a time something like this would come up and no one would speak up for me (cordiality wasn't a strength of mine, so I don't blame them). I argued it was a reflection of what I received and that if I didn't return it I'd get it anyway.
Presented with the ultimatum of either not returning (imo) vitriol or not posting here I chose to not return the vitriol. It wasn't instantaneous but most of the conflicts resolved amiably as Mohdoo mentioned (remember he was big and a bit crude on the Russia tricked Black voters thing, to which I took great offense personally and politically) I too consider us thread pals or whatever lol.
I was mostly wrong that folks would continue their vitriolic posts about me specifically as a person like the one LL pointed out from Seeker (mod).
A handful of people haven't. You DMCD and JimmiC are the ones people have noticed. DMCD forced people to notice when he went on his rant accusing me of not supporting gay rights (and more recently in the Corona thread), JimmiC most recently the ML socialism stuff and I'd bet ~70%+ of your last ~100 posts are specifically in opposition to my posting (rather than my argument itself).
As others have said, you guys don't have to agree with me, but the arguments about animosity being my fault and that I don't articulate my views logically and clearly simply don't match what plenty of my former/current good-faith critics are able to see with their own eyes.
|
On March 06 2020 12:13 GreenHorizons wrote:... A handful of people haven't. You DMCD and JimmiC are the ones people have noticed. DMCD forced people to notice when he went on his rant accusing me of not supporting gay rights (and more recently in the Corona thread), JimmiC most recently the ML socialism stuff and I'd bet ~70%+ of your last ~100 posts are specifically in opposition to my posting (rather than my argument itself). I'm not opposing your posting as a proxy for arguing with your ideas. I think that, independent of your ideas, your posting is objectionable.
As others have said, you guys don't have to agree with me, but the arguments about animosity being my fault and that I don't articulate my views logically and clearly simply don't match what plenty of my former/current good-faith critics are able to see with their own eyes. I wouldn't dream of telling people to believe anything other than what they see with their own eyes. Since this part of the forum now appears to be a place where your particular brand of bullying, ostracism and rhetoric is accepted, I've mostly stepped back. If TL.net moderation is fine with this being what happens in their house, I can just choose another house. I regret that you are getting more and more practice and getting more and more skilled at isolating and denigrating people who don't agree with your political views, and getting other people to pile on with you, but there's only so much I can do about it.
|
On March 06 2020 12:20 Aquanim wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2020 12:13 GreenHorizons wrote:... A handful of people haven't. You DMCD and JimmiC are the ones people have noticed. DMCD forced people to notice when he went on his rant accusing me of not supporting gay rights (and more recently in the Corona thread), JimmiC most recently the ML socialism stuff and I'd bet ~70%+ of your last ~100 posts are specifically in opposition to my posting (rather than my argument itself). I'm not opposing your posting as a proxy for arguing with your ideas. I think that, independent of your ideas, your posting is objectionable.
My point was simply that your primary contribution as of late seems to be trying to stop my posting, not engaging in good-faith discussion.
+ Show Spoiler +As others have said, you guys don't have to agree with me, but the arguments about animosity being my fault and that I don't articulate my views logically and clearly simply don't match what plenty of my former/current good-faith critics are able to see with their own eyes .
I wouldn't dream of telling people to believe anything other than what they see with their own eyes. Since this part of the forum now appears to be a place where your particular brand of bullying, ostracism and rhetoric is accepted, I've mostly stepped back. If TL.net moderation is fine with this being what happens in their house, I can just choose another house. I regret that you are getting more and more practice and getting more and more skilled at isolating and denigrating people who don't agree with your political views, and getting other people to pile on with you, but there's only so much I can do about it.
I'll just reiterate my point about the ABL with an example of when its nature came up.
|
On March 06 2020 12:35 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2020 12:20 Aquanim wrote:On March 06 2020 12:13 GreenHorizons wrote:... A handful of people haven't. You DMCD and JimmiC are the ones people have noticed. DMCD forced people to notice when he went on his rant accusing me of not supporting gay rights (and more recently in the Corona thread), JimmiC most recently the ML socialism stuff and I'd bet ~70%+ of your last ~100 posts are specifically in opposition to my posting (rather than my argument itself). I'm not opposing your posting as a proxy for arguing with your ideas. I think that, independent of your ideas, your posting is objectionable. My point was simply that your primary contribution as of late seems to be trying to stop my posting, not engaging in good-faith discussion. That's more or less accurate, yes. I don't really have much interest in participating in the currently frequent topics of discussion in the politics threads, nor in talking with the current frequent posters. Presumably since you are saying this you think it invalidates my position in some way. I don't think it does. I'm still posting in good faith - just not about politics any more.
I don't think the attempted redirections onto the ABL merit comment. It's not really a useful comparison.
|
On March 06 2020 12:43 Aquanim wrote:Show nested quote +On March 06 2020 12:35 GreenHorizons wrote:On March 06 2020 12:20 Aquanim wrote:On March 06 2020 12:13 GreenHorizons wrote:... A handful of people haven't. You DMCD and JimmiC are the ones people have noticed. DMCD forced people to notice when he went on his rant accusing me of not supporting gay rights (and more recently in the Corona thread), JimmiC most recently the ML socialism stuff and I'd bet ~70%+ of your last ~100 posts are specifically in opposition to my posting (rather than my argument itself). I'm not opposing your posting as a proxy for arguing with your ideas. I think that, independent of your ideas, your posting is objectionable. My point was simply that your primary contribution as of late seems to be trying to stop my posting, not engaging in good-faith discussion. That's more or less accurate, yes. I don't really have much interest in participating in the currently frequent topics of discussion in the politics threads, nor in talking with the current frequent posters. Presumably since you are saying this you think it invalidates my position in some way. I don't think it does. I'm still posting in good faith - just not about politics any more.
It is almost the only posting you do on the site was my point.
It is kinda weird that the only thing that has prompted you to post on this site recently is an explicit effort to stop me from "bullying" people as if I'm the one with the power not moderators or the person who had the primary US politics mod explicitly say it is as simple as JimmiC being a good person and me not.
So when you say that you're focused on objecting to my posting because you find it be unacceptable bullying, I'm not convinced that is demonstrative of good faith engagement.
EDIT: To be clear, you're arguing my posting is unacceptable because I am bullying posters like this:
+ Show Spoiler +On March 06 2020 13:00 JimmiC wrote: @themtc516 I'm sorry that your "Lurking" is being interrupted by my posts. But what I really think is that you are a PBU or another user. Stop pretending you are a lurker and man or woman up. I'm not sure what type of person is so scared that they create another name to complain on the feedback site of a message board. It is extremely pathetic. Either your complaint is not real and you are just trying to stir up drama, which is its own level of sad. Or you are a regular poster who was scared to voice this concern yourself.
And it was also embarrassing for GH to pretend like you were anything but the above. And Legal lord I would have hoped you would have noticed the post count before taking this obvious PBU trying to start shit, or regular poster who is a complete coward seriously.
As to the whole GH issue, I took offense when he called everyone who said they would vote Biden if he won "boot licking" I thought it was especially low considering many of the people in that group were people who constantly defend him in situations like this including Drone.
@Sent Because of my frustrating above I decided that I would give him a but of a hard time by pointing out to him that everything he is complaining about is done, and worse in countries running his preferred political system. He constantly acts as if by supporting "X" politician you are supporting their worst act. But for some reason suggesting to him that by supporting ML Socialism he is supporting what China is currently doing is out of bounds? I don't understand it. If he thinks it is out of bounds he should stop doing it. If he does not he should take some time to explain.
I figured it was a long shot, but what I have been hoping for some time is him to make some long post about what LM socialism would look like in the real world if done in the way he thinks it should. So he could say like the USSR but.... or whatever. I think everyone else at some point or another has had a situation where they said, for example, that First person to the poll is bad and this system is better because X, Y, Z, they do it here, it works better in these ways and maybe not in these. I don't think it is unfair after actual YEARS of saying what is wrong and why he will not get to this level of detail. I do know he prefers LM Socialism. When I look it up the countries that are and have used it are USSR, China, Cuba, North Korea, Venezuela and so on. GH defends those countries whenever people say bad things about them. But then we are somehow supposed to know he supports a somehow different system that is LM Socialism, but it isn't those, and has democracy, but not like we know it. And so on.
And to be honest that is fine, but then stop using the whataboutism and so on yourself.
@Neb, I don't know exactly what your problem is. I know you get mad when I call your youtube videos of college age people in Europe who have never met an actual Venezuelan and seem to think any of the bad news coming out of Venezuela is "right wing propaganda". I have met these people, and I have read UN reports written by actual scoialists about the terrible things they are doing. I'm sorry to burst your bubble but people who claim to be socialists don't all actually believe it. Sometimes they do it to grab power and wealth for themselves. Maduro is one such person. So are the people leading China, it sucks but it is reality. I really, really hate it when people treat their assumptions like fact. A assumption might be correct, but it is not a fact.
Beyond that part I think we actually have the same political views. I think you want a social democracy and then try to push left from there while still giving people choice.
I think GH actually thinks that if people don't want that we should still force it on them because they have been brainwashed. I think he thinks he knows better and his version of democracy is much like in the old USSR, you get to vote, but only for us. I believe this because he defends dictators of "socialist countries" and he says his preferred system is the what they are classified under.
I'm a little older than you and I remember the USSR and my neighbors lived in Poland until after the wall came down. My wifes family either came over during WW2 by escaping from the Ukraine and what would end up being East Germany or were stuck there until the Wall came down. I have got to now meet many of them and they do not have positive things to say about that form of government, and there is nothing about them that was or is "capitalist class". Some of them I will never meet as Stalin choose to not send enough food so they would starve to death.
For these reasons when I hear socialism or communism I ask what kind. When someone like you says socialist democracy I say excellent. When someone says LM socialism and starts calling people "commrades" I go "hmmmm" and ask questions. When that person constantly dodges questions, and defends dictators I tend to believe that they support those governments.
I dont' support those governments. While I'd much rather have Norway's system than the US systems, by a few magnitudes I would rather have the US system than the USSR, or North Korea, or Venezuela.
@ Kwark I appreciate your humor and what you bring to the thread when you participate. I also really appreciate that you took some time to help me solve a problem with where I work that allowed us to get a lot more diversion done. My only constructive feedback would be, I was very disappointed when you told GH that you would ban him if he explained how the North Korean's have it better than the American's in some ways. I was looking forward to that explanation, I think it would have helped others see his actual thoughts that he works hard to only hint at. Or maybe it would have been very informative and now I'll never know.
Most of my posts are written with a smile on my face and are probably not taken that way because tone is not always brought across on online. GH has been mean to me, GH has been a racially insensitive to me. I have been mean to GH, I have been racially insensitive to him. I have apologized. Him, of course not. Do I care? No. But I am not going to walk on egg shells because he is black, I'm a minority and don't expect that treatment. Everyone here just treats me as white and that is OK in fact it is preferred because the bonus of the message board is unless you tell people no one knows. And sometimes that is a nice break. And sometimes it is funny to have someone like GH talk down to me about issues of my people because he is Black so he knows. He does not know, and I don't know what is like for him. The big difference is I don't claim that I do.
I guess my big point is can't we all just get along, and argue, and not get along and then get along again? Do we have to always take ourselves so damn serious? We are not actually solving any issues on the thread, just discussing them. That we have different opinion is OK, probably preferred.
GH if you want to be a LM Socialist supporter who hates Capitalism and the US, you go right ahead. Just be aware that while I'm sure you have reasons to feel this way. Other people are going to have reasons to hate LM Socialist countries, often really personal reasons and they are going to be offended and say as much when you defend those countries. There are also people who love the Capitalism and the US, they probably have very personal reasons for that, perhaps coming from different countries. Or like Shockey having different situation and having this situation be much for them. So expect when you are that aggressive aggression will come back.
And as long as GH keeps being this way, this is going to keep happening, and I'm OK with that. I don't report his posts, or ever post in here that he should be banned, or that I'm a victim. Perhaps I should start because apparently that makes someone more sympathetic to many people here than just taking it and fighting back for oneself. I learned a long time ago the only way to deal with a bully is to punch them right in the face, you don't always win, but most of the time they don't keep bullying you. It does not work great on forum's but it is a lot more satisfying than being a punching bag.
So if you have a problem with my post, feel free to PM me or post it in the thread. I will always respond, I may not agree and you may not agree but I'll answer the best as I can about why I posted the way I did. I also may apologize if I have offended you as that is rarely my intent or goal.
It would be nice if after one of these referendums GH said "guys I'm sorry, I'll try to do better". Or "I'll take a break and won't come back until JimmiC has offended someone". I know I would appreciate that.
Guy's I will try to do better. I won't bring up LM socialism because I guess he only wants to talk about whats shitty with this system not why and how his system is better.
But what I will do instead is point out every time he uses the "whataboutism" he so complains about. And also point out when he is condescending to people, instead of just being it back to him. I hope that will be preferred.
I also think there is a misconception that there is some group of people conspiring to get rid of GH. If there is I am not a part of it. People like Aquanim, or Biff, or DMCD (he comes after me as much as GH), or whoever else do no plotting. We don't PM (though I have sent a thank you to Aquanim when GH and Neb were following me around and insulting me then complaining in here that I was a problem and he posted some of what I think many people were not aware was happening on threads they don't follow, because I don't come on here and cry about it). We just over time have come to the same conclusion on our own that he is just not a very nice person. And that when he decides he does not like someone he holds a grudge and makes it his mission to "get them". Maybe we all came to the same or similar opinions on our own and we are all wrong. But there is no get GH banned club or anything like that. Just a lot of people are not big fans of him because he has been a dick to a lot of people for a very long time.. Some people seem to have been desensitized to it, others it still bothers. I deal with it by what I feel is responding in kind, others finally get sick of it and explode, some come on here. We all have our own ways. But while I feel confident that for example GH and Neb have PM'd about how bad or whatever I am, I actually don't have a problem with that, vent, do what you need to do. But please PLEASE, stop pretending like you are some sort of victim, GH you know you are a dick to a lot of people, if you want to dish it out, please for heavens sake learn how to take it.
I also hope in the future when a Drama creator or PBU (often the same thing) creates and name to make drama for their amusement, people will ignore it instead of giving them exactly what they want.
Sorry for all the typos that I'm sure exist. It has been a long day and this a bit of stream of consciousness. If you took the time to read this monster post, I appreciate you investing the time. If you did not, I don't blame you, I might never even read it!
Thank you for you time.
|
|
On March 06 2020 12:56 GreenHorizons wrote:... It is kinda weird that the only thing that has prompted you to post on this site recently is an explicit effort to stop me from "bullying" people as if I'm the one with the power not moderators or the person who had the primary US politics mod explicitly say it is as simple as JimmiC being a good person and me not. I would say that based on that post it's fairly clear that Seeker doesn't call the shots.
Plenty of bullying happens on the school playground even though the teachers on yard duty ostensibly have all the power.
So when you say that you're focused on objecting to my posting because you find it be unacceptable bullying, I'm not convinced that is demonstrative of good faith engagement. As should be fairly obvious based on my previous comments, I really couldn't care less what you claim to be convinced or not convinced of.
|
On March 06 2020 13:05 Aquanim wrote:I would say that based on that post it's fairly clear that Seeker doesn't call the shots. Show nested quote +So when you say that you're focused on objecting to my posting because you find it be unacceptable bullying, I'm not convinced that is demonstrative of good faith engagement. As should be fairly obvious based on my previous comments, I really couldn't care less what you claim to be convinced or not convinced of.
Just to be clear, you're arguing my posting is unacceptable because I am bullying posters like this:
+ Show Spoiler +On March 06 2020 13:00 JimmiC wrote: @themtc516 I'm sorry that your "Lurking" is being interrupted by my posts. But what I really think is that you are a PBU or another user. Stop pretending you are a lurker and man or woman up. I'm not sure what type of person is so scared that they create another name to complain on the feedback site of a message board. It is extremely pathetic. Either your complaint is not real and you are just trying to stir up drama, which is its own level of sad. Or you are a regular poster who was scared to voice this concern yourself.
And it was also embarrassing for GH to pretend like you were anything but the above. And Legal lord I would have hoped you would have noticed the post count before taking this obvious PBU trying to start shit, or regular poster who is a complete coward seriously.
As to the whole GH issue, I took offense when he called everyone who said they would vote Biden if he won "boot licking" I thought it was especially low considering many of the people in that group were people who constantly defend him in situations like this including Drone.
@Sent Because of my frustrating above I decided that I would give him a but of a hard time by pointing out to him that everything he is complaining about is done, and worse in countries running his preferred political system. He constantly acts as if by supporting "X" politician you are supporting their worst act. But for some reason suggesting to him that by supporting ML Socialism he is supporting what China is currently doing is out of bounds? I don't understand it. If he thinks it is out of bounds he should stop doing it. If he does not he should take some time to explain.
I figured it was a long shot, but what I have been hoping for some time is him to make some long post about what LM socialism would look like in the real world if done in the way he thinks it should. So he could say like the USSR but.... or whatever. I think everyone else at some point or another has had a situation where they said, for example, that First person to the poll is bad and this system is better because X, Y, Z, they do it here, it works better in these ways and maybe not in these. I don't think it is unfair after actual YEARS of saying what is wrong and why he will not get to this level of detail. I do know he prefers LM Socialism. When I look it up the countries that are and have used it are USSR, China, Cuba, North Korea, Venezuela and so on. GH defends those countries whenever people say bad things about them. But then we are somehow supposed to know he supports a somehow different system that is LM Socialism, but it isn't those, and has democracy, but not like we know it. And so on.
And to be honest that is fine, but then stop using the whataboutism and so on yourself.
@Neb, I don't know exactly what your problem is. I know you get mad when I call your youtube videos of college age people in Europe who have never met an actual Venezuelan and seem to think any of the bad news coming out of Venezuela is "right wing propaganda". I have met these people, and I have read UN reports written by actual scoialists about the terrible things they are doing. I'm sorry to burst your bubble but people who claim to be socialists don't all actually believe it. Sometimes they do it to grab power and wealth for themselves. Maduro is one such person. So are the people leading China, it sucks but it is reality. I really, really hate it when people treat their assumptions like fact. A assumption might be correct, but it is not a fact.
Beyond that part I think we actually have the same political views. I think you want a social democracy and then try to push left from there while still giving people choice.
I think GH actually thinks that if people don't want that we should still force it on them because they have been brainwashed. I think he thinks he knows better and his version of democracy is much like in the old USSR, you get to vote, but only for us. I believe this because he defends dictators of "socialist countries" and he says his preferred system is the what they are classified under.
I'm a little older than you and I remember the USSR and my neighbors lived in Poland until after the wall came down. My wifes family either came over during WW2 by escaping from the Ukraine and what would end up being East Germany or were stuck there until the Wall came down. I have got to now meet many of them and they do not have positive things to say about that form of government, and there is nothing about them that was or is "capitalist class". Some of them I will never meet as Stalin choose to not send enough food so they would starve to death.
For these reasons when I hear socialism or communism I ask what kind. When someone like you says socialist democracy I say excellent. When someone says LM socialism and starts calling people "commrades" I go "hmmmm" and ask questions. When that person constantly dodges questions, and defends dictators I tend to believe that they support those governments.
I dont' support those governments. While I'd much rather have Norway's system than the US systems, by a few magnitudes I would rather have the US system than the USSR, or North Korea, or Venezuela.
@ Kwark I appreciate your humor and what you bring to the thread when you participate. I also really appreciate that you took some time to help me solve a problem with where I work that allowed us to get a lot more diversion done. My only constructive feedback would be, I was very disappointed when you told GH that you would ban him if he explained how the North Korean's have it better than the American's in some ways. I was looking forward to that explanation, I think it would have helped others see his actual thoughts that he works hard to only hint at. Or maybe it would have been very informative and now I'll never know.
Most of my posts are written with a smile on my face and are probably not taken that way because tone is not always brought across on online. GH has been mean to me, GH has been a racially insensitive to me. I have been mean to GH, I have been racially insensitive to him. I have apologized. Him, of course not. Do I care? No. But I am not going to walk on egg shells because he is black, I'm a minority and don't expect that treatment. Everyone here just treats me as white and that is OK in fact it is preferred because the bonus of the message board is unless you tell people no one knows. And sometimes that is a nice break. And sometimes it is funny to have someone like GH talk down to me about issues of my people because he is Black so he knows. He does not know, and I don't know what is like for him. The big difference is I don't claim that I do.
I guess my big point is can't we all just get along, and argue, and not get along and then get along again? Do we have to always take ourselves so damn serious? We are not actually solving any issues on the thread, just discussing them. That we have different opinion is OK, probably preferred.
GH if you want to be a LM Socialist supporter who hates Capitalism and the US, you go right ahead. Just be aware that while I'm sure you have reasons to feel this way. Other people are going to have reasons to hate LM Socialist countries, often really personal reasons and they are going to be offended and say as much when you defend those countries. There are also people who love the Capitalism and the US, they probably have very personal reasons for that, perhaps coming from different countries. Or like Shockey having different situation and having this situation be much for them. So expect when you are that aggressive aggression will come back.
And as long as GH keeps being this way, this is going to keep happening, and I'm OK with that. I don't report his posts, or ever post in here that he should be banned, or that I'm a victim. Perhaps I should start because apparently that makes someone more sympathetic to many people here than just taking it and fighting back for oneself. I learned a long time ago the only way to deal with a bully is to punch them right in the face, you don't always win, but most of the time they don't keep bullying you. It does not work great on forum's but it is a lot more satisfying than being a punching bag.
So if you have a problem with my post, feel free to PM me or post it in the thread. I will always respond, I may not agree and you may not agree but I'll answer the best as I can about why I posted the way I did. I also may apologize if I have offended you as that is rarely my intent or goal.
It would be nice if after one of these referendums GH said "guys I'm sorry, I'll try to do better". Or "I'll take a break and won't come back until JimmiC has offended someone". I know I would appreciate that.
Guy's I will try to do better. I won't bring up LM socialism because I guess he only wants to talk about whats shitty with this system not why and how his system is better.
But what I will do instead is point out every time he uses the "whataboutism" he so complains about. And also point out when he is condescending to people, instead of just being it back to him. I hope that will be preferred.
I also think there is a misconception that there is some group of people conspiring to get rid of GH. If there is I am not a part of it. People like Aquanim, or Biff, or DMCD (he comes after me as much as GH), or whoever else do no plotting. We don't PM (though I have sent a thank you to Aquanim when GH and Neb were following me around and insulting me then complaining in here that I was a problem and he posted some of what I think many people were not aware was happening on threads they don't follow, because I don't come on here and cry about it). We just over time have come to the same conclusion on our own that he is just not a very nice person. And that when he decides he does not like someone he holds a grudge and makes it his mission to "get them". Maybe we all came to the same or similar opinions on our own and we are all wrong. But there is no get GH banned club or anything like that. Just a lot of people are not big fans of him because he has been a dick to a lot of people for a very long time.. Some people seem to have been desensitized to it, others it still bothers. I deal with it by what I feel is responding in kind, others finally get sick of it and explode, some come on here. We all have our own ways. But while I feel confident that for example GH and Neb have PM'd about how bad or whatever I am, I actually don't have a problem with that, vent, do what you need to do. But please PLEASE, stop pretending like you are some sort of victim, GH you know you are a dick to a lot of people, if you want to dish it out, please for heavens sake learn how to take it.
I also hope in the future when a Drama creator or PBU (often the same thing) creates and name to make drama for their amusement, people will ignore it instead of giving them exactly what they want.
Sorry for all the typos that I'm sure exist. It has been a long day and this a bit of stream of consciousness. If you took the time to read this monster post, I appreciate you investing the time. If you did not, I don't blame you, I might never even read it!
Thank you for you time.
Edit: And GH get over that post from Seeker already, we have all seen it, very few of us feel bad for you because he has had to deal with you for a long long time, and you have to know that is not fun. He has banned me before, and I apologized and tried to better. So when he says stuff like that instead of feeling sorry for yourself. Maybe ask yourself "why would a volunteer mod for a gaming website say I'm a bad person". The answer is likely that you have been a dick to him a bunch. Have done a lot of shit and never or rarely taken responsibility and he is sick of dealing with issue after issue after issue about you.
But nothing there makes you think perhaps I'm not the one with unacceptable posting?
|
|
|
|