EPTUS Politics Feedback Thread - Page 264
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On September 21 2019 22:38 Jealous wrote: It can easily be sustained, because TL is not a democracy and this is their house, so if the moderators all decide "Hmm, fuck Trump and his supporters tbh," then there will always be a double standard. Even if they DON'T all agree to this, it seems pretty clear what the currently active/relevant mods' inclinations are. In other words, arguing against any hypothetical double standard is pointless even if it is present. It's well-known that there are plenty of double standards here. Mods that "don't moderate the thread" except when they want to use it to settle grudges, mods that ban one user for something another gets to do without punishment, and, perhaps the most relevant, mods that want to claim that there's a consistent standard for how moderation is done while wanting to reserve the right to clarify nothing about said standard and moderate in a manner that is often seen as capricious. Approaching this with the "if you don't like it, then just leave" strategy is certainly within their right as a moderation staff. In my eyes it's kind of petty and childish to do that on a consistent basis, but it seems like it's more or less the precedent. I do know that at least a few of the folks on the moderation staff don't really think that's the direction that should be taken, and that a perception of fairness really should play a role in how moderation is done. I don't really know that said people fit into the "active/relevant mods" that you mention, though. But when you do take on a "if you don't like it, then just leave" approach to all problems, a lot of people end up doing just that. Including, over the years, the vast majority of the people in the thread(s) who actually have something meaningful to contribute. All I seem to see now whenever I come back to look at these threads is... person A coming to the meta-thread to bait person B in the hope that B will say something banworthy, and a large crowd cheering on A because that B fellow just can't stop with his "hot takes" in the main thread. If that's what you refer to as "sustainable" then maybe the real problem is that it isn't worth sustaining in the first place. | ||
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
On September 22 2019 00:14 JimmiC wrote: I think it also important to remember that xDaunt said he was not willing to change and they may as well perma ban him. Which was hilarious because he just assumed he was some kinda celebrity that TL would of course accommodate. It was really weird seeing him go through a phase of thinking he was some kinda icon LOL | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
brian
United States9641 Posts
| ||
|
Sermokala
United States14131 Posts
Hes probably happier today then he was a month ago and we should at least think positively for that. | ||
|
Jealous
10321 Posts
On September 26 2019 14:09 Sermokala wrote: right-wing posters were told to leave at the start of the new us politics thread. Link? | ||
|
Artisreal
Germany9235 Posts
| ||
|
Excludos
Norway8257 Posts
I'm going to jump on this one as well: What? Source please. I was there from the minute the current thread went up, and I do not remember anything of the sort. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States43991 Posts
| ||
|
Jealous
10321 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
|
Jealous
10321 Posts
On September 27 2019 03:13 Danglars wrote: Let’s not accuse the center/right moderate of having a far-right victim complex or softening supposed white supremacist bans. Unless you absolutely like to clown around. Sent linked the old thread and new thread, so go read what he wrote in website feedback after the date the thread changed over. I'm sorry but I don't understand. Can't I just get a link to the post that has this: "Specifically, he was almost happy with the fact that right-wing posters were told to leave at the start of the new us politics thread. " | ||
|
Excludos
Norway8257 Posts
On September 27 2019 03:16 Jealous wrote: I'm sorry but I don't understand. Can't I just get a link to the post that has this: "Specifically, he was almost happy with the fact that right-wing posters were told to leave at the start of the new us politics thread. " No no. With a lack of easily avilable evidence, you are supposed to dig through it to find it yourself, not the accuser. | ||
| ||
