EPTImage embedding suggestion
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
Olli
Austria24417 Posts
| ||
|
Laryleprakon
New Zealand9496 Posts
| ||
|
DOUDOU
Wales2940 Posts
can't post img if account younger than a week | ||
|
IceFire
United States183 Posts
| ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
Either way, I would love to see this implemented. | ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
| ||
|
TheDougler
Canada8304 Posts
| ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On September 15 2012 23:56 DOUDOU wrote: alternative: can't post img if account younger than a week Ahh, I disagree with this, a PBU might just have slumbering accounts registered from other IPs or something of that sort. :s | ||
|
0kz
Italy1118 Posts
| ||
|
endy
Switzerland8970 Posts
On September 15 2012 23:57 MasterOfPuppets wrote: Ahh, I disagree with this, a PBU might just have slumbering accounts registered from other IPs or something of that sort. :s In that case we would need to ban entire cities. Why not ? | ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
| ||
|
Shinobi1982
1605 Posts
| ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On September 15 2012 23:58 endy wrote: In that case we would need to ban entire cities. Why not ? Or... we could implement something like the idea suggested in the OP. It would discourage most of the pathetic people who do this sort of thing, or at least give us time to figure out who they really are. Only the no-lifest of no-life losers would be able to replicate what this russian dude did. :/ | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
| ||
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
| ||
|
Roggay
Switzerland6320 Posts
| ||
|
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
| ||
|
rasnj
United States1959 Posts
On September 16 2012 00:02 Roggay wrote: Now that I think about it, it would have to be limited to posting and not thread creating (because some announcements and stuff are made by people with low post count). Or we could have "confirmed" accounts allowed to post right away, or the first time an image is posted it must be approved by a moderator before the public sees it. There are plenty of solutions. Obviously a little thought must be put into the implementation, but it shouldn't be that bad. | ||
|
scypio
Poland2127 Posts
| ||
|
EquilasH
Denmark2142 Posts
| ||
|
Bippzy
United States1466 Posts
Of course, let the funny pics thread have anyone post. | ||
|
Shinobi1982
1605 Posts
 | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
Olli
Austria24417 Posts
| ||
|
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
| ||
|
Diamond
United States10796 Posts
| ||
|
Zambrah
United States7306 Posts
I offer my full support to this suggestion, I don't think anyone wants to be in public and randomly see... what was in the thread on their screen. >.> | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
| ||
|
Romitelli
Brunei Darussalam566 Posts
On September 15 2012 23:56 DOUDOU wrote: alternative: can't post img if account younger than a week I think implementing both requirements would be nice, so people can't just spam 50 posts in a day or something. | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On September 16 2012 00:32 Ghanburighan wrote: Yeah, wholeheartedly agree. Also, if it's post-count related, one could spend 5 minutes spamming posts and be able to commit the crime. It's probably better if it's a month of TL membership or a combination of both. Don't you reckon by that point he'd either be banned for spamming or figured out and ... well... banned? At the very least it would discourage all but the most pathetic no-lifes, like I said. | ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7031 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On September 16 2012 00:45 MasterOfPuppets wrote: Don't you reckon by that point he'd either be banned for spamming or figured out and ... well... banned? At the very least it would discourage all but the most pathetic no-lifes, like I said. Potentially, if he spams the same thread or smth. But if he just speed-posts into a blog, then I doubt a mod would get to him before he posts the images. | ||
|
Yoshi-
Germany10227 Posts
| ||
|
sour_eraser
Canada932 Posts
Now you guys made me curious what that picture looks like. | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On September 16 2012 07:14 jidolboy wrote: :o Now you guys made me curious what that picture looks like. I hope for your sake that your curiosity will not be satisfied. | ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
Let's not overreact to this one incident; but if it does become a problem then we will take action. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
thanks for the response plexa! | ||
|
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On October 10 2012 20:37 Dodgin wrote: I still think this is a good idea, it's happening again in the GSL LR thread. Seconded. Plexa brings out a good point, but that doesn't mean that a solution cannot be found. For example, all under 50-100 post image embeddings are automatically spoilered and there's a huge red warning like with PMs from new members so no-one opens the images without being careful. | ||
Chill
Calgary25980 Posts
| ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
| ||
|
Chill
Calgary25980 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On October 11 2012 01:45 Chill wrote: Why? Is it that big of a problem? It seems like a one-time annoyance. Well, it seems like it's an easy exploit to annoy a large number of people. This means that it can and has been used in a number of LR threads on a number of days. It's also not just an annoyance. It has some some relatively unpleasant consequences. The images are bad enough that you don't get them out of your head easily. To avoid seeing them, people either leave the thread or start scrolling very carefully. Either way, it kills the the experience of following the LR while the game is occurring. As for annoying the regular forum-goer, it only has the potential to annoy them in the beginning. If the limit is 100 posts, it's almost like a reward of acceptance for a new member. Most truly new members wouldn't even think of posting images in their first 100 posts. There is the question of the long-time lurker. Some of them have sub-100 accounts. Perhaps it's 100 posts or 3 months since registration? If you'd list the ways in which this solution is detrimental, it would be easier to look for a solution. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On October 11 2012 01:45 Chill wrote: Why? Is it that big of a problem? It seems like a one-time annoyance. I would say it's a fairly frequent annoyance, I only bumped the thread because it happened again and this is the third or fourth time now. | ||
|
LittLeD
Sweden7973 Posts
It's starting to become a real problem. | ||
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
| ||
|
Hammer442
Australia749 Posts
| ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17676 Posts
| ||
|
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
| ||
|
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
On October 11 2012 01:45 Chill wrote: Why? Is it that big of a problem? It seems like a one-time annoyance. The guy doing it is angry at one of the mods I don't see him stopping unless something happens to prevent him from doing it. | ||
|
XaCez
Sweden6991 Posts
| ||
|
ScaringKids
Portugal819 Posts
| ||
|
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On October 14 2012 20:15 Plexa wrote: I'd rather just keep this guy away, we could do it but it's probably not ethical. I mean if it can be done for just tournament section there isnt a big reason not to. There are a rare amount of times I can think of where embedding pictures in that section is a good idea (I can really only think of an OP and an image capture of the event) and very rarely are the poeple posting those fresh accounts. | ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17676 Posts
On October 14 2012 20:15 Plexa wrote: I'd rather just keep this guy away, we could do it but it's probably not ethical. ethical? hmm I don't understand keeping him away doesn't really work that well because lots of people still see the pictures, even though you guys have awesome response times | ||
|
Hammer442
Australia749 Posts
| ||
iHirO
United Kingdom1381 Posts
| ||
|
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
On October 14 2012 20:15 Plexa wrote: I'd rather just keep this guy away. IP banning him isn't working so that makes it difficult. I know there is a solution, but it probably isn't ethical. Now I'm really, really interested in what the unethical solution is XD | ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17676 Posts
On October 14 2012 20:24 iHirO wrote: I disagree, what about if a new user signs up to compete in a cheerful contest or something. Then you'd have to constantly make exceptions for each thread. they don't have to embed the image, they can just post the link, I don't see an issue, or maybe new users can have their embedded images put in spoiler tags automatically | ||
|
Blix
Netherlands873 Posts
| ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17676 Posts
On October 14 2012 20:26 Blix wrote: how about, if post count is <100 images are automatically spoilered? high-five lol | ||
|
scrubtastic
1166 Posts
Like others have said it's an easy exploit that can hit a large number of people at once. I don't follow LR threads as they're actually happening much anymore...but something like this is getting me to consider dropping the habit completely. | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On October 14 2012 20:15 Plexa wrote: I'd rather just keep this guy away. IP banning him isn't working so that makes it difficult. I know there is a solution, but it probably isn't ethical. Maybe it's just me, but I think TeamLiquid can afford to forsake ethics just this once to get rid of this despicable a person. I wonder if it's possible to contact his ISP about it or something like that. But then again what he's doing is not exactly illegal. And even if it were, if this guy lives in Russia or maybe a third world country, the ISP wouldn't give a shit. :/ Either way I still support this idea, as well as any other idea whose goal is to deal with this no-lifer. It's hilarious yet sad to see how hard he tries to do damage to this community, almost to the point where it seems like if he cannot browse TeamLiquid his life has no purpose whatsoever anymore. | ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17676 Posts
On October 14 2012 20:29 MasterOfPuppets wrote: Maybe it's just me, but I think TeamLiquid can afford to forsake ethics just this once to get rid of this despicable a person. I wonder if it's possible to contact his ISP about it or something like that. But then again what he's doing is not exactly illegal. And even if it were, if this guy lives in Russia or maybe a third world country, the ISP wouldn't give a shit. :/ Either way I still support this idea, as well as any other idea whose goal is to deal with this no-lifer. It's hilarious yet sad to see how hard he tries to do damage to this community, almost to the point where it seems like if he cannot browse TeamLiquid his life has no purpose whatsoever anymore. ISP and IP related things won't work because of proxies, although there are javascript tricks you can do to block proxies, the easiest and most robust way is by post count | ||
|
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On October 14 2012 20:16 Xacez wrote: I do not see any reason why newly registered posters would need to post images in the first place, I personally believe that they should be making contributions to different sections of the forum. Off the top of my head: - map makers will want to post pictures - new tournaments will want to post pictures - people making interview threads - people wanting to contribute to SFW pics thread So yeah, it would make some people annoyed. | ||
|
LittLeD
Sweden7973 Posts
On October 14 2012 21:07 Plexa wrote: Off the top of my head: - map makers will want to post pictures - new tournaments will want to post pictures - people making interview threads - people wanting to contribute to SFW pics thread So yeah, it would make some people annoyed. - Make it so that the 100-post limit for posting embedded pictures only exists for Tournament threads, with the OP excluded. All the issues solved. Now whether this is possible to implement or not, I have no idea about. I know nothing about web design. | ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17676 Posts
On October 14 2012 22:39 LittLeD wrote: - Make it so that the 100-post limit for posting embedded pictures only exists for Tournament threads, with the OP excluded. All the issues solved. Now whether this is possible to implement or not, I have no idea about. I know nothing about web design. I like this, no one ever embeds images in the tournament forum anyways except for OPs, maybe all image embeds in that forum should be spoilered besides OPs of course | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
| ||
|
skilaunglafff
Russian Federation6 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17676 Posts
| ||
|
LittLeD
Sweden7973 Posts
| ||
|
Romitelli
Brunei Darussalam566 Posts
On October 14 2012 22:39 LittLeD wrote: - Make it so that the 100-post limit for posting embedded pictures only exists for Tournament threads, with the OP excluded. All the issues solved. Now whether this is possible to implement or not, I have no idea about. I know nothing about web design. Agreed, TL could also impose different rules for each section of the forum. It's clear that these trolls are going for the most popular threads, so maybe the post-limit is only necessary for General Forum, SC2 General and SC2 Tourneys. | ||
|
Fjodorov
5007 Posts
| ||
|
rasnj
United States1959 Posts
- If user has <25 posts, and his post is reported >2 times within 5 minutes of posting, then hide the post pending approval by moderator or something like that. Obviously any solution should not affect teams and tournaments making OPs, but there seems to be plenty of suggestions that could help with the problem. | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On October 16 2012 22:00 rasnj wrote: I wonder why TL doesn't just impose a rule like: - If user has <25 posts, and his post is reported >2 times within 5 minutes of posting, then hide the post pending approval by moderator or something like that. Obviously any solution should not affect teams and tournaments making OPs, but there seems to be plenty of suggestions that could help with the problem. The problem isn't going away. Where do we need to sacrifice CPU's to the altar of RICH for some magic to rain hellfire upon this shithead? The report button does not function in the way mentioned in the quoted post, but it could. The problem is, a lot of people would still see stuff even if all it takes is a few reports. In a LR, people are F5ing constantly. | ||
|
Yoshi-
Germany10227 Posts
https://raw.github.com/YoshiTL/ImageHider/master/TL-HideImage.user.js You can change the postcount, by hitting Postcount Setting in the top bar. | ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
| ||
|
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
| ||
|
Hammer442
Australia749 Posts
| ||
|
Malinor
Germany4727 Posts
| ||
|
Belha
Italy2850 Posts
| ||
|
zezamer
Finland5701 Posts
On October 20 2012 17:37 Belha wrote: Yes, please, no more shit haha | ||
|
mango_destroyer
Canada3914 Posts
| ||
|
7
Canada1218 Posts
| ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
| ||
|
WerderBremen
Germany1070 Posts
On October 20 2012 17:25 Malinor wrote: You really should do something about this, this is getting extremely annoying. So much this, please! Won't hurt anyone. | ||
|
LovE-
United States1963 Posts
| ||
|
IMHope
Korea (South)1241 Posts
| ||
|
Iplaythings
Denmark9110 Posts
Just waking up to that  | ||
|
Fencar
United States2694 Posts
| ||
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Roar | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On October 20 2012 20:32 Kennigit wrote: We're aware of it and are dealing with it. Bear with us. + Show Spoiler + Roar You lied. | ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
glad you are aware of it, hope it comes soon! | ||
|
Salteador Neo
Andorra5591 Posts
 | ||
|
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
| ||
|
Olli
Austria24417 Posts
| ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On October 27 2012 20:46 Plexa wrote: Dealing with it doesn't necessarily mean we are introducing a posting requirement for images. Dealing with it means that R1CH is on it. O_O Who is that kid (or manchild I guess) if it's taking even R1CH such a long time to deal with him? | ||
|
ACrow
Germany6583 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On October 27 2012 20:46 Plexa wrote: Dealing with it doesn't necessarily mean we are introducing a posting requirement for images. Dealing with it means that R1CH is on it. If Rich were on it, the guy would have been hexed to an 4th dimension by now But really, please take this more seriously. It's ruining one of the best experiences on TL, the LR of all major tournaments. And I don't need to tell anyone how disgusting it is. | ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9021 Posts
| ||
|
jpak
United States5045 Posts
Another one here. This is getting ridiculous. | ||
|
zezamer
Finland5701 Posts
| ||
|
Corrosive
Canada3741 Posts
please. i've seen enough feces for a lifetime in the last month | ||
|
shizaep
Canada2920 Posts
On October 27 2012 20:54 Garnet wrote: I don't mind seeing those pics but usually there are kids in my room... Don't even want to know... | ||
|
Ettick
United States2434 Posts
| ||
|
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
| ||
|
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
On November 03 2012 20:18 Plexa wrote: Implementing a no image embed option is a little trickier than you might think on TL. Nevertheless, R1CH set up some stuff via his phone yesterday (he's at Dallas) that he was going to implement next week which should solve problem. Thanks Plexa for the update, and thanks R1CH for doing it :D | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On November 03 2012 20:18 Plexa wrote: Implementing a no image embed option is a little trickier than you might think on TL. Nevertheless, R1CH set up some stuff via his phone yesterday (he's at Dallas) that he was going to implement next week which should solve problem. Hi, just wondering what the solution actually was? If you can tell us without endangering the viability of the solution. | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On November 11 2012 22:04 Ghanburighan wrote: Hi, just wondering what the solution actually was? If you can tell us without endangering the viability of the solution. It's not exactly what you think it is, but it shouldn't bother any legitimate users. | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On November 12 2012 20:45 Plexa wrote: It's not exactly what you think it is, but it shouldn't bother any legitimate users. I'll take that as a no, you cannot tell me, then. Thanks for the work, let's hope it works ^^ | ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
Yeah, a posting cap on images would solve that problem, but bear in mind it will be giving the PBU what it wants - creating work for/gaining attention from staff at TL. EDIT: for some reason I thought that this was a new one page thread. I see that this has been dealt with via alternative means. Goodo! | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
| ||
| ||
