|
After getting my new computer (last one ran on low with 15 fps average) I decided to see how different the graphical settings are from one another. So I took some Screenshots of the same thing on each graphical setting. Enjoy. Terran Base + Show Spoiler + Zerg Base + Show Spoiler + ZvT Battle + Show Spoiler + PF Exploding + Show Spoiler + Protoss Base + Show Spoiler + PvT Battle + Show Spoiler +
From what I could tell, the biggest graphical difference is between Low and Medium. The Difference between medium and high is lighting and the difference between high and ultra is very small.
|
Thanks for posting. I myself have tried in game switching between medium and ultra, and I really can't discern much of a difference while actively playing.
|
These are very nice screencaps, especially considering that everything is in the exact same location in every screenshot, which is something I rarely see in these graphics comparisons.
The huge difference between Low and Medium is actually due to the Shader setting. Switching between Low and Medium shaders causes the majority of graphical differences between the overall graphics levels. The other setting really don't matter as much as the Shaders, which provide vital lighting improvements to the game.
I think playing on Medium with an awesome framerate is much more efficient than playing on Ultra or High with bad framerate. However, deciding between Medium and Low will be difficult since there is such a huge difference in lighting and shader quality.
|
Sweet I have been trying to decide if I should go for High or just settle for medium and this really proves for me that Medium is more than adequate. Ty
|
Are forcefields usually that hard to notice on low settings?
|
On February 17 2011 14:49 XXGeneration wrote: Are forcefields usually that hard to notice on low settings?
Yeah they are. I was not used to them when I had to play on low on my laptop.
|
How about cloaked units? Which settings is bets? And should you have high or low gamma settings to see them easier?
|
Like someone mentioned I can't actively tell too much of a difference between Medium and Ultra during play. It certainly looks a lot crisper on Ultra, but other than that the difference between low/medium is so huge compared to the rest.
I just run medium most of the time. Ultra texture settings though
Edit: Forgot to say, nice write-up OP, good comparison shots too! N1!
|
Pretty great OP.
All I really have to say, is damn the graphics in this game are crazy (from the perspective of a person who plays on low settings)
|
you seem to be me in the future. my current laptop runs on 15 fps at low settings and i'm building 1 within a week. i was ALSO going to change between each graphical setting for funsies :D after seeing this i might keep it on medium just so it runs really smooth and looks a hell of a lot better than low.
care to post your comp specs if you want?
|
One thing I distinctly don't like about low with terran is that you can't see the symbols on terran structures.
|
thanks for demonstration btw am i the only one who plays Multiplayer games on low ?
|
On February 17 2011 17:38 NIIINO wrote:thanks for demonstration btw am i the only one who plays Multiplayer games on low ?
Definitely not, I seem to watch more streams that are on low than any other.
|
On February 17 2011 17:03 Karliath wrote: One thing I distinctly don't like about low with terran is that you can't see the symbols on terran structures. Yeah, I feel that symbol distribution in the game is fairly imbalanced (Maybe that'll be the next topic on Imbalanced?) On low Terran have no symbols, Protoss only has symbols on the robo and the nexus, and the Zerg have their symbols at the base around the hatchery; on all graphical settings that remains the same for Zerg) Graphic settings Medium and up: Terran has symbols on EVERYTHING even their marines have a symbol on their shields, and Protoss have them on every building+the mothership.
|
I play on Low settings, but I have to say, the graphics on Ultra are absolutely fantastic, and I love seeing them. =3
|
|
|
|