|
I've literally never seen a mafia game where people don't want to lynch a claimed recruiter that is not a claimed mason.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed.
I don't want to be caught out but I can essentially remove myself from the game and another person if I'm correct about it. I don't see why LS achieving his win con wouldn't work the same way.
|
On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. My role says I win if LS recruits me, you can bet that I will stop playing if that happens.
|
I sort of here but the people who want me to lynch me because of my claim and not because of my play is pretty scummy. I dont I get removed from the game if I get my alternate win condition fulfilled but will ask Onegu on that.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 08 2019 04:32 LightningStrike wrote: I sort of here but the people who want me to lynch me because of my claim and not because of my play is pretty scummy. I dont I get removed from the game if I get my alternate win condition fulfilled but will ask Onegu on that.
It would say it in your PM if you did.
|
On April 08 2019 04:32 LightningStrike wrote: I sort of here but the people who want me to lynch me because of my claim and not because of my play is pretty scummy. I dont I get removed from the game if I get my alternate win condition fulfilled but will ask Onegu on that. But why would you continue playing if you won via your alternate condition?
|
On April 08 2019 04:31 Eywa- wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. My role says I win if LS recruits me, you can bet that I will stop playing if that happens. Ok cool let's kill you then. LS has said that you'll be put in a QT with him.
|
HF sounds like assassin but if he is then the other assassin already wins when he picks him.
|
On April 08 2019 04:31 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. I don't want to be caught out but I can essentially remove myself from the game and another person if I'm correct about it. I don't see why LS achieving his win con wouldn't work the same way. why do you assume the person you are supposed to remove is town
|
On April 08 2019 04:33 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:31 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. My role says I win if LS recruits me, you can bet that I will stop playing if that happens. Ok cool let's kill you then. LS has said that you'll be put in a QT with him. Cool, then he'll recruit one of the other players that have claimed my role and I'll be proven right and you'll look like a bum.
|
On April 08 2019 04:32 Eywa- wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:32 LightningStrike wrote: I sort of here but the people who want me to lynch me because of my claim and not because of my play is pretty scummy. I dont I get removed from the game if I get my alternate win condition fulfilled but will ask Onegu on that. But why would you continue playing if you won via your alternate condition? It didnt say in my role pm
|
On April 08 2019 04:34 Eywa- wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:33 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:31 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. My role says I win if LS recruits me, you can bet that I will stop playing if that happens. Ok cool let's kill you then. LS has said that you'll be put in a QT with him. Cool, then he'll recruit one of the other players that have claimed my role and I'll be proven right and you'll look like a bum. Have you read literally anything LS has written about his role?
|
On April 08 2019 04:33 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:31 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. My role says I win if LS recruits me, you can bet that I will stop playing if that happens. Ok cool let's kill you then. LS has said that you'll be put in a QT with him. Honestly, like... What? 1.5 hours left? You're on the highest wagon 7-2 and you're trying to start a brand new wagon. That's just terrible mafia play as any alignment.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 08 2019 04:33 Vivax wrote: HF sounds like assassin but if he is then the other assassin already wins when he picks him.
Don't particularly care, it's a shit role but I'm essentially like BH in that one game years ago where he's gotta find someone to win. I get removed from the game if I'm wrong and I remove the other person from the game if I'm right. I presume that other person is mafia or 3P since I win with town but it's fucking boring and I hate shit roles like that. Why would I want to win any other way than by lynching mafia?
Presume other people are out to get me too since that's what my PM said but it is what it is, I don't really care.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 08 2019 04:33 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:31 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. I don't want to be caught out but I can essentially remove myself from the game and another person if I'm correct about it. I don't see why LS achieving his win con wouldn't work the same way. why do you assume the person you are supposed to remove is town
I don't?
|
On April 08 2019 04:36 Eywa- wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:33 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:31 Eywa- wrote:On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. My role says I win if LS recruits me, you can bet that I will stop playing if that happens. Ok cool let's kill you then. LS has said that you'll be put in a QT with him. Honestly, like... What? 1.5 hours left? You're on the highest wagon 7-2 and you're trying to start a brand new wagon. That's just terrible mafia play as any alignment. On TL we like to change who gets lynched at the last minute.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 08 2019 04:36 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:33 Vivax wrote: HF sounds like assassin but if he is then the other assassin already wins when he picks him. Don't particularly care, it's a shit role but I'm essentially like BH in that one game years ago where he's gotta find someone to win. I get removed from the game if I'm wrong and I remove the other person from the game if I'm right. I presume that other person is mafia or 3P since I win with town but it's fucking boring and I hate shit roles like that. Why would I want to win any other way than by lynching mafia? Presume other people are out to get me too since that's what my PM said but it is what it is, I don't really care.
AND MYSELF as well as the other person
like, why the fuck would I want to remove myself from the town?
|
On April 08 2019 04:37 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:33 Tumblewood wrote:On April 08 2019 04:31 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. I don't want to be caught out but I can essentially remove myself from the game and another person if I'm correct about it. I don't see why LS achieving his win con wouldn't work the same way. why do you assume the person you are supposed to remove is town I don't? ok, sensible. could you explain what you did when you typed ##differentiate?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 08 2019 04:38 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2019 04:37 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:33 Tumblewood wrote:On April 08 2019 04:31 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:29 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:27 Holyflare wrote:On April 08 2019 04:25 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On April 08 2019 04:23 Eywa- wrote: Alright, so we're not lynching a claimed recruiter when people who get recruited automatically win.
Sweet... The current highest wagon is trying to lynch someone who's pushing the only pro-town lynch here... K, I guess I just make that wagon bigger? You are the only person saying this. You clearly know something the rest of us don't about how this mechanic works. You want to lynch someone for their role, that is not a pro-town lynch lmao. Your lack of full claim at this point is a scumclaim imo. My role works exactly the same way just on an individual level. I don't believe it makes him mafia, he just has an alternate win con that would remove all those people from the game but he can still win with town. It's literally what my PM says too and why it's so shit to put in a game because it's anti town to remove 1 person, let alone 4-5. That's why we should be lynching people we think are mafia. These people can play with the shitty mechanics and recruit people for their selfish victory if they wish but the fun of mafia is solving alignments for me so they can do what they want. So HF let me get this straight, your roll LITERALLY says that you can "remove" someone from the game? Because that's not at all what LS has claimed. I don't want to be caught out but I can essentially remove myself from the game and another person if I'm correct about it. I don't see why LS achieving his win con wouldn't work the same way. why do you assume the person you are supposed to remove is town I don't? ok, sensible. could you explain what you did when you typed ##differentiate?
Mathematics™
|
Alright, well I'll see you guys tomorrow!
Too bad we couldn't lynch a claimed recruiter when a bunch of people have that in their role.. Almost like it's a key part of the set up.
|
|
|
|