re: damdred - maybe, that was just my impression when i read it
Linux Mini Mafia - Page 40
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
re: damdred - maybe, that was just my impression when i read it | ||
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On February 01 2015 06:55 Trfel wrote: Why do you want to kill Damdred? Just for the changes in his stance on Palmar as brought up by rsoultin? for now yeah. why does he want to policy lynch palmar and then not ever lynch palmar when palmar literally did nothing different between the two statements? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
| ||
Trfel
6474 Posts
On February 01 2015 06:57 marvellosity wrote: i'm feeling less confident in rsoultin and don't really know where to go with anything, so I'll probably just let other people do things for a while No, now I can't do my strategy of sheep marvellosity and Holyflare to victory. I guess it's probably time I actually did something, though. | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15127 Posts
On February 01 2015 06:53 marvellosity wrote: this kind of post is more aggressive than i expect from mafia damdred Some of his questioning I like. Some of the LS/SL interaction he was questioning on, not so much, cause it seemed like he was pushing scum at one or both and seeing which one stuck. Like...unless you believe both are scum and their idea of awesome scum play is hardtowning each other...that just doesn't make sense. Also, come on. His whole first page was about the setup. Could town do that, yes, but why would Damdred? And I will shut up now cause I'm edging back into the same reasoning I was tunneling him for last game, where I just think he's smarter than this. The Palmar read has to be explained, though, and he's been back into the thread without doing so. | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15127 Posts
On February 01 2015 06:59 Trfel wrote: No, now I can't do my strategy of sheep marvellosity and Holyflare to victory. I guess it's probably time I actually did something, though. Yes, please. You have yet to fulfill your rsoul anti-confirmation bias role in any of our games. Unless you're scum and just a lot better at hiding it this game. Then shut up. | ||
Trfel
6474 Posts
On February 01 2015 07:10 rsoultin wrote: Yes, please. You have yet to fulfill your rsoul anti-confirmation bias role in any of our games. Unless you're scum and just a lot better at hiding it this game. Then shut up. What does this mean? Sorry, I don't understand. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom35817 Posts
On February 01 2015 07:10 rsoultin wrote: Yes, please. You have yet to fulfill your rsoul anti-confirmation bias role in any of our games. Unless you're scum and just a lot better at hiding it this game. Then shut up. he can't be anti your confirmation bias when you don't have a stance for him to argue against | ||
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
On February 01 2015 06:47 rsoultin wrote: That post from FF caught my eye, too, because it's practically describing a good scum play...sheeping strong towns, especially those on the wrong track. Personally, though, I'd find it very weird for FF to just say he was going to do that if he was scum, so it's not actually something I'd scumread him for and he's still a policy lynch to me, and one I frankly don't care to pursue. This post is weird. He quotes two things that seem scummy to him but calls me too scum to be scum and says I'm still a policy lynch, while already happy with other points against me. Sounds like some wishy-washy tmi stuff to me. | ||
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
| ||
Trfel
6474 Posts
Scumreads please? | ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
On February 01 2015 07:32 Trfel wrote: Hi Palmar. Scumreads please? Myself, someone made a really good meta point. | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15127 Posts
On February 01 2015 07:13 marvellosity wrote: he can't be anti your confirmation bias when you don't have a stance for him to argue against When I do tunnel. Granted, if you kill me today I may not, but as long as I live till day 2 or 3 it will almost undoubtedly happen -_- | ||
rsoultin
Netherlands15127 Posts
On February 01 2015 07:24 Fecalfeast wrote: This post is weird. He quotes two things that seem scummy to him but calls me too scum to be scum and says I'm still a policy lynch, while already happy with other points against me. Sounds like some wishy-washy tmi stuff to me. Yes, please join the anti-rsoul bandwagon; it's a convenient one. I said I liked where her head was at cause she noticed the same thing I did then explained why I don't think that scum says what you said which is why you are still a policy lynch to me Do I need to sing for the people in this town or something for them to understand what I'm saying? -_- | ||
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On February 01 2015 07:33 Palmar wrote: Myself, someone made a really good meta point. ROFL | ||
Eden1892
United States5866 Posts
On February 01 2015 07:39 rsoultin wrote: Yes, please join the anti-rsoul bandwagon; it's a convenient one. I said I liked where her head was at cause she noticed the same thing I did then explained why I don't think that scum says what you said which is why you are still a policy lynch to me Do I need to sing for the people in this town or something for them to understand what I'm saying? -_- freestyle it to the beat of someone melodramatically reading an ee cummings version of your read you gave me on damdred that was slowed down to 3.7% normal speed | ||
Trfel
6474 Posts
| ||
Palmar
Iceland22590 Posts
On February 01 2015 07:41 Trfel wrote: I guess I don't really see the case on Damdred yet. His change in opinion on Palmar is really weird, but almost everything else he has said seems null at worst. Though I do find it weird that he said he was feeling really good about this game and then vanished. He's literally the only one that got my joke. Doesn't really say much about him though. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
| ||