|
Artosis
United States2135 Posts
If you want MBS in SC2 do NOT post in this topic please.
If you do NOT want MBS in SC2 please add your name to the thread. Outline why you do not want it if your reasons are different or you have something to add to the above posts. In a few days I'll compile this list and email it in to Blizzard.
do it something like this:
MBS takes a great deal of the skill out of Macro in RTS games. Having Macro / Micro / Strategy style players adds diversity to the pro scene.
Dan "Artosis" Stemkoski
|
Sweden33719 Posts
Uhm, at this point in time I don't want MBS but can't we wait until the beta? :o There is a possibility it will work out fine in the end, as hard as that is to imagine.
|
Artosis
United States2135 Posts
FA it might look like its working out fine in the early stages because none of us will know how to play. this is the safest long-term bet.
|
I have never seen such a biased and disgusting topic before. Mbs is going to be in sc2 and if cavemen like you don't like it you can stick to sc1. quit trying to crapify sc2 for the 99% of non korean players who want mbs.
NONE of you guys have even played sc2 and you have NO IDEA what it plays like.
|
On October 02 2007 08:51 AA-RaVaGeR wrote: I have never seen such a biased and disgusting topic before. Mbs is going to be in sc2 and if cavemen like you don't like it you can stick to sc1. quit trying to crapify sc2 for the 99% of non korean players who want mbs.
NONE of you guys have even played sc2 and you have NO IDEA what it plays like. obviously its biased, its set up for the express purpose of telling blizz what our viewpoint is. and he specifically asked for people like you to not post in this thread.
if you think mbs would actually improve the game, go ahead and make your own petition for that.
|
MyLostTemple
United States2921 Posts
lets set it up on an online petition site, we can link to it there.
|
MBS = Multiple build sequence or something? I keep seeing this pop up, but I don't want the game to be gayed up like wc3, making 10 units with 2 key presses. Shit is horrible for competition
|
SC2 will be a joke with mbs. Selecting more than 12 units sucks just as bad too.
|
|
MyLostTemple
United States2921 Posts
|
On October 02 2007 08:54 IdrA wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2007 08:51 AA-RaVaGeR wrote: I have never seen such a biased and disgusting topic before. Mbs is going to be in sc2 and if cavemen like you don't like it you can stick to sc1. quit trying to crapify sc2 for the 99% of non korean players who want mbs.
NONE of you guys have even played sc2 and you have NO IDEA what it plays like. obviously its biased, its set up for the express purpose of telling blizz what our viewpoint is. and he specifically asked for people like you to not post in this thread. if you think mbs would actually improve the game, go ahead and make your own petition for that. If everyone start making petitions forum will turn into mess. And they know your viewpoint. They definitely saw how discussed MBS topic here and their own forum is flooded with "noobifcation suck" threads.
|
None of you have actually played sc2 and seen what it plays like with the new abilities and many new things that you can do instead of the boring click each of your 15 gateways individually gayness zzzzzz. Finally sc2 is being made by the former wc3 team so Gee Gee. And yes, I really enjoyed wc3 and it does have a pro gaming community etc. www.wcreplays.com for pro wc3 matches.
|
MyLostTemple
United States2921 Posts
On October 02 2007 09:03 AA-RaVaGeR wrote:None of you have actually played sc2 and seen what it plays like with the new abilities and many new things that you can do instead of the boring click each of your 15 gateways individually gayness zzzzzz. Finally sc2 is being made by the former wc3 team so Gee Gee. And yes, I really enjoyed wc3 and it does have a pro gaming community etc. www.wcreplays.com for pro wc3 matches.
i've played it at blizzcon
i hated it.
mbs makes the game shitty and boring
your also rewarded for focusing on micro for long bursts of time and then going back to macro with one two buttons.
|
oh AA-RaVaGeR is a wc3 player /squelch
|
On October 02 2007 09:02 InRaged wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2007 08:54 IdrA wrote:On October 02 2007 08:51 AA-RaVaGeR wrote: I have never seen such a biased and disgusting topic before. Mbs is going to be in sc2 and if cavemen like you don't like it you can stick to sc1. quit trying to crapify sc2 for the 99% of non korean players who want mbs.
NONE of you guys have even played sc2 and you have NO IDEA what it plays like. obviously its biased, its set up for the express purpose of telling blizz what our viewpoint is. and he specifically asked for people like you to not post in this thread. if you think mbs would actually improve the game, go ahead and make your own petition for that. If everyone start making petitions forum will turn into mess. And they know your viewpoint. They definitely saw how discussed MBS topic here and their own forum is flooded with "noobifcation suck" threads. how exactly do you intend to clutter a forum (that is full of mostly useless topics anyway) with 2 petitions?
and they know the viewpoint, but those threads are only the people willing to debate the topic and it is also half full of people talking about what a great and wonderful thing mbs is. a petition is a way to state our case in a clear, concise manner and to demonstrate just how much support it actually has.
|
What is wrong with "long intense micro battles"? They seem far more enjoyable than not even looking at the battle because you are too busy clicking your gateways. Snoopysnacks=Fagtard K thx.
|
Sweden33719 Posts
On October 02 2007 09:03 AA-RaVaGeR wrote:None of you have actually played sc2 and seen what it plays like with the new abilities and many new things that you can do instead of the boring click each of your 15 gateways individually gayness zzzzzz. Finally sc2 is being made by the former wc3 team so Gee Gee. And yes, I really enjoyed wc3 and it does have a pro gaming community etc. www.wcreplays.com for pro wc3 matches. Uh, 1) You are making the assumption that because you don't enjoy having to switch between micro and macro nobody else will (I have been inactive for almost a year due to playing poker, but I recently played a bunch of games and one of the most fun aspects was the macro, it just feels really good to me to have to go back and forth between my base and my units).
2) Several people on here have played SC2. I haven't tho.
3) I know quite a bit about warcraft 3, I don't really like the game personally but it's a good game. Something being in warcraft 3 is not an argument for it being in Starcraft 2.
|
On October 02 2007 08:51 AA-RaVaGeR wrote: I have never seen such a biased and disgusting topic before. Mbs is going to be in sc2 and if cavemen like you don't like it you can stick to sc1. quit trying to crapify sc2 for the 99% of non korean players who want mbs.
NONE of you guys have even played sc2 and you have NO IDEA what it plays like.
Actually some of us (me) have played it.
Edit- I see I was beaten to the punch. However, I am not for or against the MBS yet because there was not enough time to utilize its full potential or abuse its power with certain strategies.
When I played at Blizzcon I didn't even use it and I won every game.
|
We could also go the safe route and keep all the old units. We know what works already, so why fix what aint broken, mirite?
|
On October 02 2007 09:10 CharlieMurphy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2007 08:51 AA-RaVaGeR wrote: I have never seen such a biased and disgusting topic before. Mbs is going to be in sc2 and if cavemen like you don't like it you can stick to sc1. quit trying to crapify sc2 for the 99% of non korean players who want mbs.
NONE of you guys have even played sc2 and you have NO IDEA what it plays like. Actually some of us (me) have played it. And so has my brother and it said it was great. Without proof you have nothing :D
|
|
|
|