On October 10 2012 05:01 JingleHell wrote: I get the impression that, due to missing the core of the joke (me telling people about sensitivity is a laugh), you tried to take the blog seriously in a way it was never intended to be.
That can most certainly be disastrous.
I don't think it's possible for anyone to take that blog post seriously. Are you taking my above post seriously?
It should be taken seriously. It explains everything.
On October 10 2012 05:01 JingleHell wrote: I get the impression that, due to missing the core of the joke (me telling people about sensitivity is a laugh), you tried to take the blog seriously in a way it was never intended to be.
That can most certainly be disastrous.
I don't think it's possible for anyone to take that blog post seriously. Are you taking my above post seriously?
Given that you took a reference to the blog elsewhere, it's not unreasonable to assume a level of offense might have been taken.
Ah... wait a minute. I see what's going on here.
So, if you want to find out if someone is a dumbass, just misinterpret everything they say for a few days. If they start getting all bitchy with you, they're a dumbass. At that point, you should, very politely, say "I'm sorry you're so fucking stupid, but can you please shut the fuck up so my brain cells don't keep trying to run in terror?"
Well played sir, but I am agile like a cat. My friends call me whiskers.
Oh do you want me to put another screen shot where he says stupid?
I could let me do it right now for you^^
User was warned for this post
I made a song about this:
You know rather than having that text stock message. THIS should be the stock message. I think the serious intent (no +first) and the joke would be much more understandable. I'm way too boring/Ritz-Carlton to use the text stock message, but I could definitely send them a song. haha.
The odd thing about this thread to me is that Team Liquid forums are the first place I ever got active on a forum. I learned what the whole "first" thing was on TL, and recieived a warning about it when I was actually first once. The warning was just "please don't do the 'first' thing on TL." So then I see this, this is hilariously better IMO, but I would have missed the point for laughter. It really is like I saw someone gloating over snatching the first peice of bread at the start of a ritz banquet and was warned by my table's host when I did likewise, then seeing it happen across the room except this time the guy who is still shitting runs out and screams threats and insults at him followed by the rest of jd's scenario.
Then one of the guests bursts out a guitar and records an awesome little ditty about it.
And then a host comes and says that ditty would make a nice warning for future offenders...
Actually this thread is a pretty good example of how awesome TL can be.
I am in a really good mood too. Sort of bemused by this thread.
OT:
From what I can tell KwarK is great and can lose his patience like anyone else.
On October 12 2012 06:22 Jrocker152 wrote: The odd thing about this thread to me is that Team Liquid forums are the first place I ever got active on a forum. I learned what the whole "first" thing was on TL, and recieived a warning about it when I was actually first once. The warning was just "please don't do the 'first' thing on TL." So then I see this, this is hilariously better IMO, but I would have missed the point for laughter. It really is like I saw someone gloating over snatching the first peice of bread at the start of a ritz banquet and was warned by my table's host when I did likewise, then seeing it happen across the room except this time the guy who is still shitting runs out and screams threats and insults at him followed by the rest of jd's scenario.
Then one of the guests bursts out a guitar and records an awesome little ditty about it.
And then a host comes and says that ditty would make a nice warning for future offenders...
Actually this thread is a pretty good example of how awesome TL can be.
I am in a really good mood too. Sort of bemused by this thread.
OT:
From what I can tell KwarK is great and can lose his patience like anyone else.
be·muse (b-myz) tr.v. be·mused, be·mus·ing, be·mus·es 1. To cause to be bewildered; confuse. 2. To cause to be engrossed in thought.
Also, that bot message is harsh. Also, KwarK hasn't been his best in his thread. He has acted like a cop having a bad day.
On October 12 2012 06:22 Jrocker152 wrote: The odd thing about this thread to me is that Team Liquid forums are the first place I ever got active on a forum. I learned what the whole "first" thing was on TL, and recieived a warning about it when I was actually first once. The warning was just "please don't do the 'first' thing on TL." So then I see this, this is hilariously better IMO, but I would have missed the point for laughter. It really is like I saw someone gloating over snatching the first peice of bread at the start of a ritz banquet and was warned by my table's host when I did likewise, then seeing it happen across the room except this time the guy who is still shitting runs out and screams threats and insults at him followed by the rest of jd's scenario.
Then one of the guests bursts out a guitar and records an awesome little ditty about it.
And then a host comes and says that ditty would make a nice warning for future offenders...
Actually this thread is a pretty good example of how awesome TL can be.
I am in a really good mood too. Sort of bemused by this thread.
OT:
From what I can tell KwarK is great and can lose his patience like anyone else.
be·muse (b-myz) tr.v. be·mused, be·mus·ing, be·mus·es 1. To cause to be bewildered; confuse. 2. To cause to be engrossed in thought.
Also, that bot message is harsh. Also, KwarK hasn't been his best in his thread. He has acted like a cop having a bad day.
Exactly. (And see nested quote...)
Yes the bot message is harsh, so much so that it is clearly not serious and yet serious.
But the whole thing is, as you defined, confusing! How did I come across as using bemused? Like amused? Well, that may also be true but would be redundantly redundant, and full of redundancy. But you are in understandable redundancy as I was already being redundantly redundant- with some redundancy involved. So thank you for making clear my meaning with clarity, as I may have been confusing and bemusing to the amused and entertained reader.