|
Russian Federation4295 Posts
Blizzard should introduce it to kill Muta wars and solve Protoss air OPness (as many Zergs thinks about it). Well, it works like a Bunker, with some differences - Spore Cannons throw banes into air, and only banes, and only to air. I think it can not be OP just because Banelings still cost some money, cargo capacity for Spore can be decreased to 2-4 Banelings. Banelings do bonus damage versus Mutalisk (light), so it really can solve problem of Mutalisk wars in ZvZ. To make it not so strong, maybe add expensive upgrade for Spore Crawlers at Hive? Also it can be nerfed in other term - Spore Crawler shoots 50% slower, when loaded with Banelings, so enemy will have time for reaction and retreating.
Remember, everything can be balanced:
• lower cargo size for Spores, so it can storage 2 or 4 Banelings
• or half fire speed when loaded with Banelings, so it will shoot every 2 seconds for example
• or add indication that Spore Crawler now storages Banelings to shoot, so enemy can react and retreat
• or slighty increase cost for Spore Crawlers
• or decrease HP for Spore Crawlers
• or lower Spore Crawler fire range by 1, when loaded with Banelings
• affects only air, like Spore - Banelings that were exploded in the air wouldn't damage ground units under it.
But really, it's just for fun, but still... it's really nice idea 
Poll: Do you like the idea?Hell Yeah! (856) 72% No, bad idea. (170) 14% I hate my life. (86) 7% Maybe, need to see it in action. (70) 6% 1182 total votes Your vote: Do you like the idea? (Vote): Hell Yeah!
(Vote): Maybe, need to see it in action.
(Vote): No, bad idea.
(Vote): I hate my life.
|
Hahaha nice, i remember back in beta i wanted Infestors to be able to throw with banelings like a catapult. Zerg siege tanks ftw
|
Haha, Starship Trooper style !
|
Lol thats awesome... Broken.. But awesome nonetheless...
GG WP
|
|
|
I wonder if baneling speed increases the fire rate. I mean, banelings swirling in the air seem pretty damn cute :p
|
Russian Federation4295 Posts
Zerg siege tanks ftw
Ground-to-air siege tank maybe?
|
|
|
I'm still waiting for mech stim ability. Just imagine thors charging like marauders,
|
TLADT24920 Posts
looks quite interesting. Definitely starship trooper style lol. Maybe in LoTV? 
|
United States30730 Posts
brilliant!
they'll be decent for ZvP as well >:D
|
What a nice idea ! I love it. It's so funny and so cool.
|
That looks so cool.. but would be so imbalanced T_T
|
This can work with balancing the baneling dmg to air. Actually great idea i must say. In zvp muta vs phoenix wars you can't really rush in to the lines if the enemy has banelings but thats another investment for zerg to do. In zvt this won't have much of a use anyway. David Kim, i know you are reading this, seriously do it as a protoss user i really liked the idea and it will give zvz way more options.
|
Russian Federation4295 Posts
On June 07 2013 19:08 playerboy345 wrote:
That looks so cool.. but would be so imbalanced T_T
Everything can be balanced:
• or lower cargo size for Spores, so it can storage 2 or 4 Banelings
• or half fire speed when loaded with Banelings, so it will shoot every 2 seconds for example
• or add indication that Spore Crawler now storages Banelings to shoot, so enemy can react and retreat
• or slighty increase cost for Spore Crawlers
• or decrease HP for Spore Crawlers
• or lower Spore Crawler fire range by 1, when loaded with Banelings
|
On June 07 2013 19:13 Existor wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2013 19:08 playerboy345 wrote:
That looks so cool.. but would be so imbalanced T_T Everything can be balanced: • or lower cargo size for Spores, so it can storage 2 or 4 Banelings • or half fire speed when loaded with Banelings, so it will shoot every 2 seconds for example • or add indication that Spore Crawler now storages Banelings to shoot • or slighty increase cost for Spore Crawlers • or decrease HP for Spore Crawlers
I completely agree, it doesn't have to work the same way it does to the ground. The idea is great, it can be balanced with internal testing...
|
Poll: Do you like the idea?Hell Yeah! (856) 72% No, bad idea. (170) 14% I hate my life. (86) 7% Maybe, need to see it in action. (70) 6% 1182 total votes Your vote: Do you like the idea? (Vote): Hell Yeah!
(Vote): Maybe, need to see it in action.
(Vote): No, bad idea.
(Vote): I hate my life.
|
its a cool idea but ultimately an unneeded balance change...the whole point of the spore buff vs light is for dealing with muta wars and in zvp there are already numerous ways to deal with skytoss.
|
On June 07 2013 19:13 Existor wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2013 19:08 playerboy345 wrote:
That looks so cool.. but would be so imbalanced T_T Everything can be balanced: • or lower cargo size for Spores, so it can storage 2 or 4 Banelings • or half fire speed when loaded with Banelings, so it will shoot every 2 seconds for example • or add indication that Spore Crawler now storages Banelings to shoot, so enemy can react and retreat • or slighty increase cost for Spore Crawlers • or decrease HP for Spore Crawlers • or lower Spore Crawler fire range by 1, when loaded with Banelings
You make me wish blizzard would just add this to the game T_T
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
I should close this, but this does look really cool 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/tyBsP3h.png)
