• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:02
CEST 16:02
KST 23:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week5[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL70
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Server Blocker RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone Script to open stream directly using middle click ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 Last Minute Live-Report Thread Resource! [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 641 users

[D] Are banshees superior than vikings vs P?

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
jrdn
Profile Joined September 2010
United States132 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 04:46:40
December 16 2011 03:45 GMT
#1
The purpose of this thread is to discuss whether vikings are superior to banshees in a typical TvP game.

Game parameters: We assume fast bio expand from terran (to eliminate 'unfair' advantage if opened banshees for example) and the toss opened some sort of fast expo into colossus. I believe these parameters are worth discussing as: 1) this is typical of ~75% of TvP's (or they transition here after early pressure), 2) this isolates the viking / banshee variable.

Unit Stats:

Viking:
Cost: 150 min, 75 gas, 42 sec (214min, 107gas) per minute; 2 food; 125hp
DPS: vs Colossus: 14 (-1.0 per armor upgrade), vs ground: 12 (-1.0)

Banshee:
Cost: 150 min, 100 gas, 60 sec (150min, 100gas) per minute; 3 food; 140hp
DPS: vs all: 19.2 (-1.6 per armor upgrade)

We pick up the game when the terran has 3-4 rax and has just finished their factory. This is where a decision must be made:

Vikings:
1 Starport: 150 min, 100 gas
1 Reactor: 50 min, 50 gas
Total Cost: 200 min, 150 gas ~50 sec if factory builds reactor

Banshees:
2 Starport: 300 min, 200 gas
2 Tech labs: 100 min, 50 gas
Total Cost: 400 min, 250 gas ~ 60 sec if factory builds both tech labs

Note, if the terran wants to build medivacs first he can delay the tech lab costs from the banshee build until later.

At this point the terran scouts colossus and figures he has ~ 2 min until an engagement. After 2 min:

6 Vikings:
Cost per minute: (428 min; 214 gas) *takes a little over 2 min for 6 vikings
Total Cost: 900 min, 450 gas
DPS: vs Colossus: 84 (-6 per armor upgrade)

or

4 Banshees:
Cost per minute: (300 min; 200 gas)
Total Cost: 600 min, 400 gas
DPS: vs all: 76.8 (-6.4 per armor upgrade)

Notice, the lower cost of the banshees has more than offset the cost of the extra starport / tech lab.

Now that we have our stats, which position do you prefer?

Fact: Costs are equal, therefore bio army is equal for either option

Vikings:
Pro: +~7.2 DPS vs colossus, + 3 range, may be able to get free snipe on colossus (ex: center area on XNC), larger total health pool.
Con: During "dancing" phase vikings can't shoot ground, dps drops to 12 when landed.

Banshees:
Pro: Can shoot ground units, much more resistant to stalkers (light), additional infrastructure (starport), harass opportunities if engage doesn't happen, saves (128min, 14 gas) per min if continues past 2 min.
Con: ~8% lower dps vs Colossus, wont get free snipe on colossus in transit.


Therefore, which option do you prefer? Remember, you will have the same size bio army with either option. Also remember, a protoss switch to air after this point is irrelevant as you have the ability to produce 2 vikings in each setup.


Edit: Banshee
Pro: If the stalkers die, the banshees force the retreat.
“The sole purpose of an opening is to achieve a playable midgame”
Notaa
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada51 Posts
December 16 2011 03:50 GMT
#2
the reason why people get vikings vs colossus is not because it has good damage, its because it matches colossus range without splashing ur own units due to chargelots aka tanks
That's Halo, Dont worry
Bananasword01
Profile Joined April 2011
Australia220 Posts
December 16 2011 03:52 GMT
#3
I like any idea that incites terran changes so we can get a less QQ.

Shame about one thing though. Getting banshees wouldn't be a huge sad moment when you find there are no colossus.... however if their are no colossus or less of them then there would be ht's with feedback. Down go the banshees.

Can cloak be fitted anywhere in there so then you can a) drain energy b) harras without throwing away units?
Notaa
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada51 Posts
December 16 2011 03:55 GMT
#4
vikings out range stalkers, it allows terran to actually damage colossus rather than being force fielded away, banshee doesn't allow that.
That's Halo, Dont worry
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6259 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 04:00:47
December 16 2011 03:56 GMT
#5
You did alot of math about cost-effectiveness and DPS but you've missed the main points why viking > banshee. Yes, you did cursorily mention some at the bottom of the post, but in reality, they are quite game-breaking:

- Viking build time is 42 sec and banshee is 60 sec. This is a HUGE difference and will let someone get 6 vikings (126 sec) far faster than 4 banshees (240 sec). Techlab or reactor build-time is not that important since they are often built on the factory.
- Medivacs come from reactors as well.
- The viking range is super important, banshees will get shot-down fast if they approach the protoss army.

In conclusion:
Real in-game situations > stats.

The only time when banshee > viking is when going for a sky-terran style.
Pokebunny
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States10654 Posts
December 16 2011 03:56 GMT
#6
Reasons why vikings are better:
Range (huge reason)
- most of the time with vikings you want to be abusing cliffs and terrain to hit colossus before the battle starts. this is a big deal.
Lower initial cost
- 90% of the time, when you're building a port in your build order, you're not gonna have enough extra gas. this is the time when stim, +1, combat shields, etc are all being started.
Targetting/target priority
- related to the range / cliffs - when you're trying to pick off colossi, it is easier if you can just amove and they'll hit the right thing from full range.
Semipro Terran player | Pokebunny#1710 | twitter.com/Pokebunny | twitch.tv/Pokebunny | facebook.com/PokebunnySC
jrdn
Profile Joined September 2010
United States132 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 04:02:06
December 16 2011 04:00 GMT
#7
- Viking build time is 42 sec and banshee is 60 sec. This is HUGE difference and will let someone get 6 vikings far faster than 4 banshees.
- Medivacs come from reactors as well.


You get 4 banshees before 6 vikings in the example above. Contrary to popular belief medivacs come out of non-reactored starports as well .


“The sole purpose of an opening is to achieve a playable midgame”
saltymango
Profile Joined June 2011
United States120 Posts
December 16 2011 04:00 GMT
#8
Thor banshee seems to be incredibly powerful versus collosus based armies but i don't think i've ever seen it used as a non all in. That being said i've also never seen it lose except by ryung who is a slayers terran and their tvp cannot be trusted.

Banshees with a marine marauder army though doesn't seem as effective. I think high templar just counter everything in your army.
stupidhydro
Profile Joined July 2010
United States216 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 04:08:22
December 16 2011 04:02 GMT
#9
On December 16 2011 12:56 Pokebunny wrote:
Reasons why vikings are better:
Range (huge reason)
- most of the time with vikings you want to be abusing cliffs and terrain to hit colossus before the battle starts. this is a big deal.
Lower initial cost
- 90% of the time, when you're building a port in your build order, you're not gonna have enough extra gas. this is the time when stim, +1, combat shields, etc are all being started.
Targetting/target priority
- related to the range / cliffs - when you're trying to pick off colossi, it is easier if you can just amove and they'll hit the right thing from full range.


This sums up some good points. Also, you will start making Vikings in response to colossus tech otherwise you will be making medivacs so you likely already have the reactor star port unless you mean to make two star ports for medivacs in which case it'd be inefficient in the case they don't go colossus.

Edit: after reading the op again I guess you mean to say you scout colossus tech before your first star port but I'm not really sure how that actual timing works out so that needs looking into. In that case pokebunny is right in saying you are pretty starved on gas initially as you need to get out lots of upgrades for the bio force and you won't have your third gas before starport unless you want to sacrifice barracks production.
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6259 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-16 04:11:16
December 16 2011 04:02 GMT
#10
On December 16 2011 13:00 jrdn wrote:
Show nested quote +
- Viking build time is 42 sec and banshee is 60 sec. This is HUGE difference and will let someone get 6 vikings far faster than 4 banshees.
- Medivacs come from reactors as well.


You get 4 banshees before 6 vikings in the example above. Contrary to popular belief medivacs come out of non-reactored starports as well.



I don't understand you? 6 vikings take 126 seconds to build whilst 4 banshees take 240 seconds? You've forgotten that reactors allow building 2 units at once?

Ok, I read the OP more carefully and i can see that you're advocating 2 starports for the banshee. Anyways, I don't see where a terran is going to find all the resources for this.
LighT.
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada4501 Posts
December 16 2011 04:03 GMT
#11
Vikings.
Vikings are 50 less gas and you can produce x2 the amount.
Reactor vikings synchonrizes with reactor medivacs but with banshees, you cant produce x2.
Vikings have greater range than banshees and allows for kiting.
Viking does more damage to the colosseus than the banshee does
With mass banshees, that's heavy investment in gas which you could have put in upgrades/medivacs which is important vs a toss death ball
Cocoba
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada352 Posts
December 16 2011 04:03 GMT
#12
Vikings have superior range so their able to shoot the colossi from a far so they don't get sniped by stalkers. Also, the viking can be produced 2 at a time because of the reactor and since terran players want to get medivacs asap, and medivac production can be cut instantly if needed.
:D
jrdn
Profile Joined September 2010
United States132 Posts
December 16 2011 04:10 GMT
#13
On December 16 2011 12:56 Pokebunny wrote:
Reasons why vikings are better:
Range (huge reason)
- most of the time with vikings you want to be abusing cliffs and terrain to hit colossus before the battle starts. this is a big deal.
Lower initial cost
- 90% of the time, when you're building a port in your build order, you're not gonna have enough extra gas. this is the time when stim, +1, combat shields, etc are all being started.
Targetting/target priority
- related to the range / cliffs - when you're trying to pick off colossi, it is easier if you can just amove and they'll hit the right thing from full range.



Certainly you want to be trying to pick off colossus from range, however, it seems as though most of the time the terran might get a few shots off (or may not....losing vikings in the process) and the protoss can retreat to regen. I do agree that the micro involved with the vikings is far simpler.

What about the benefits of the banshees being able to shoot the ground units as well, though? Most of the time there is significant repositioning between the armies before the engage, during which time the banshees can be doing over 50 dps?
“The sole purpose of an opening is to achieve a playable midgame”
jrdn
Profile Joined September 2010
United States132 Posts
December 16 2011 04:11 GMT
#14
On December 16 2011 13:02 Azzur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 13:00 jrdn wrote:
- Viking build time is 42 sec and banshee is 60 sec. This is HUGE difference and will let someone get 6 vikings far faster than 4 banshees.
- Medivacs come from reactors as well.


You get 4 banshees before 6 vikings in the example above. Contrary to popular belief medivacs come out of non-reactored starports as well.



I don't understand you? 6 vikings take 126 seconds to build whilst 4 banshees take 240 seconds? You've forgotten that reactors allow building 2 units at once?



In the example above you have 2 starports with tech labs.
“The sole purpose of an opening is to achieve a playable midgame”
jrdn
Profile Joined September 2010
United States132 Posts
December 16 2011 04:13 GMT
#15
On December 16 2011 13:03 LighT. wrote:
Vikings.
Vikings are 50 less gas and you can produce x2 the amount.
Reactor vikings synchonrizes with reactor medivacs but with banshees, you cant produce x2.

Viking does more damage to the colosseus than the banshee does
With mass banshees, that's heavy investment in gas which you could have put in upgrades/medivacs which is important vs a toss death ball


Please read OP.
“The sole purpose of an opening is to achieve a playable midgame”
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19574 Posts
December 16 2011 04:14 GMT
#16
On December 16 2011 13:03 LighT. wrote:
Vikings.
Vikings are 50 less gas and you can produce x2 the amount.
Reactor vikings synchonrizes with reactor medivacs but with banshees, you cant produce x2.
Vikings have greater range than banshees and allows for kiting.
Viking does more damage to the colosseus than the banshee does
With mass banshees, that's heavy investment in gas which you could have put in upgrades/medivacs which is important vs a toss death ball



I agree with this post mostly, plus I will add that they ENTIRE point of the battle is to kill the Colossus of the Protoss. The battle basically turns on whether or not the Colossus die quickly (Terran Wins) or slowly (Protoss wins).
Freeeeeeedom
Ver
Profile Joined October 2008
United States2186 Posts
December 16 2011 04:14 GMT
#17
You need to address concerns about feedback to make this comparison valid. Yes you can get around feedback either by wasting energy with cloak, which is not the most flexible option, or emping your own banshees which means you must have a huge amount of gas to afford that many ghosts to waste mana. But if you don't do either and the protoss brings out templar, you just lost.

Also versus colossus armies gateway units are mostly just fodder; colossus are the real threat. Most major terran victories versus colossus armies rely on the vikings to take out colossus before the latter can get enough hits on bio. Vikings kill colossus very fast from afar, which is why they are a given. Banshees simply do damage too slow and don't give you the ability to snipe colossus before the battle. Your best case scenario with banshees is if all their stalkers/archons die and the protoss army has to retreat until they can warp in more. This can work as a surprise move especially versus players who tend to overmake zealots with no stalkers but as a regular strategy? Forget it. There's a reason viking is the go-to unit.
Liquipedia
jrdn
Profile Joined September 2010
United States132 Posts
December 16 2011 04:16 GMT
#18
On December 16 2011 13:14 cLutZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 16 2011 13:03 LighT. wrote:
Vikings.
Vikings are 50 less gas and you can produce x2 the amount.
Reactor vikings synchonrizes with reactor medivacs but with banshees, you cant produce x2.
Vikings have greater range than banshees and allows for kiting.
Viking does more damage to the colosseus than the banshee does
With mass banshees, that's heavy investment in gas which you could have put in upgrades/medivacs which is important vs a toss death ball



I agree with this post mostly, plus I will add that they ENTIRE point of the battle is to kill the Colossus of the Protoss. The battle basically turns on whether or not the Colossus die quickly (Terran Wins) or slowly (Protoss wins).


However, remember that if you have banshees, instead of vikings the terran will win if the colossus dies or if the stalkers die. When you have a strong air-to-ground contingent the rules of the engagement can change!
“The sole purpose of an opening is to achieve a playable midgame”
jrdn
Profile Joined September 2010
United States132 Posts
December 16 2011 04:21 GMT
#19
On December 16 2011 13:14 Ver wrote:
You need to address concerns about feedback to make this comparison valid. Yes you can get around feedback either by wasting energy with cloak, which is not the most flexible option, or emping your own banshees which means you must have a huge amount of gas to afford that many ghosts to waste mana. But if you don't do either and the protoss brings out templar, you just lost.

Also versus colossus armies gateway units are mostly just fodder; colossus are the real threat. Most major terran victories versus colossus armies rely on the vikings to take out colossus before the latter can get enough hits on bio. Vikings kill colossus very fast from afar, which is why they are a given. Banshees simply do damage too slow and don't give you the ability to snipe colossus before the battle. Your best case scenario with banshees is if all their stalkers/archons die and the protoss army has to retreat until they can warp in more. This can work as a surprise move especially versus players who tend to overmake zealots with no stalkers but as a regular strategy? Forget it. There's a reason viking is the go-to unit.



Versus HT: Certainly there are difficulties with an energy unit vs the HT (feedback and storm); however, there are options available...I prefer the cloak route to start and then teching to ghosts as available. Either way I think you're better off with banshees vs HT than you are with vikings.

Versus Colossus: If you have a banshee squad with your army you can continue to stutter step backward, your banshees included. In this way your infantry will target zealot and stalker and your banshees will target stalkers. If the stalkers are gone then the colossus will be forced to retreat and your marauders can mow down the retreating gateway army. Especially with other builds where you have more banshees, the focus of the battle shifts from the colossus to the stalker.
“The sole purpose of an opening is to achieve a playable midgame”
fuzzy_panda
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
New Zealand1681 Posts
December 16 2011 04:24 GMT
#20
jrdn can you please address the issue of viking range? the main reason that vikings are used is because of the ridiculous range they have. some people even call them the siege tanks of the sky
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
FEL
12:00
Cracov 2025: Qualifier #3
IndyStarCraft 555
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 544
Lowko469
Hui .174
MindelVK 39
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaedong 1122
BeSt 970
Mini 854
EffOrt 750
Light 545
Stork 499
ToSsGirL 431
Larva 367
firebathero 308
PianO 226
[ Show more ]
GuemChi 175
Last 157
Snow 157
soO 113
Movie 77
JulyZerg 72
Mind 62
sorry 55
sSak 51
sas.Sziky 45
Shinee 43
Barracks 41
zelot 30
Terrorterran 23
Noble 13
HiyA 11
yabsab 7
Rock 0
Dota 2
Gorgc7094
qojqva1917
XcaliburYe253
LuMiX2
Counter-Strike
oskar375
chrisJcsgo344
edward51
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor369
Other Games
tarik_tv26758
gofns7475
FrodaN5107
B2W.Neo1720
singsing1656
crisheroes428
shahzam418
DeMusliM406
Fuzer 377
KnowMe214
SortOf102
ArmadaUGS84
Trikslyr20
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick38107
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 2954
lovetv 10
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 40
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 11
• Azhi_Dahaki6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis4617
Upcoming Events
FEL
1h 58m
Gerald vs PAPI
Spirit vs ArT
CSO Cup
1h 58m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3h 58m
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
DaveTesta Events
3h 58m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
19h 58m
RSL Revival
19h 58m
Classic vs Clem
FEL
1d
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 3h
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Wardi Open
1d 20h
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV European League
3 days
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Epic.LAN
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.