• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:35
CEST 22:35
KST 05:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL58Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event19Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? PiG Sty Festival #5: Playoffs Preview + Groups Recap
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Korean Starcraft League Week 77 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Mineral Boosts Tutorial Video Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL Replays question
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 557 users

[M] (2) Varuna

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
Johanaz
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark363 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-26 03:12:19
November 02 2010 14:58 GMT
#1
[image loading]


Version 1.7 is now uploaded to EU & NA server.
-need upload partner for SEA server!

Hello good TL people.

I have now completed my map: Varuna
It´s my feeble atempt to create an epic 1v1 map, with a lot of strategic options and hopefully equal opportunities for all 3 races.

The playable map size is 130x152
Available on EU server.

Overview:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

-click to enlarge-

Analyzer:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]


Main:
+ Show Spoiler +
Pretty standard main, except the ramp is double width.
[image loading]
-click to enlarge-

Main choke:

The ramp is 8 units wide and can´t be walled of with a barracks + 2 depots.
[image loading]

You need barracks+depot+bunker or equivalent
[image loading]


Natural:
+ Show Spoiler +

The natural has back highground á la Lost Temple but a Nexus/Hatchery/Command Center is just out of siege tank range.
[image loading]

-click to enlarge-


3rd, 4th & Gold:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]
-click to enlarge-



I appreciate all feedback; not least with regards to possibles imbalances and other showstoppers.

Changelog:

+ Show Spoiler +
Version 1.7:
Added an extra ramp to gold expansions
Widened bridges outside natural

Version 1.6:
-Removed XN towers & LOS blockers on bridges and shortened the bridges
-Redesigned and simplified central area
-Redesigned gold expansion and removed XN-LOS highground
-Added LOS refuges at natural and between 3rd, 4th and gold


My Map Thread
TPW Map Maker - theplanetaryworkshop.com
WniO
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2706 Posts
November 02 2010 15:23 GMT
#2
The way the natural entrance is set up is so cool. the middle area seems a bit awkward in terms of getting to your opponents base but it might make for some interesting positioning battles. How many maps have you made so far?
Superouman
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
France2195 Posts
November 02 2010 16:08 GMT
#3
What justifies your double width entrance?
Search "[SO]" on B.net to find all my maps ||| Cloud Kingdom / Turbo Cruise '84 / Bone Temple / Eternal Empire / Zen / Purity and Industry / Golden Wall / Fortitude / Beckett Industries / Waterfall
kXn
Profile Joined August 2010
254 Posts
November 02 2010 17:56 GMT
#4
I would like this map if the 3rd and gold expo would be just a little bit more accessible.


Anyways, I really like the layout on this map, and the texture usage.
Antares777
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1971 Posts
November 02 2010 19:01 GMT
#5
The middle seems awkward for traveling through, as some paths are tighter than others and other paths are open. The quickest base to base paths should be more open than the tighter ones in my opinion for balance reasons. I can see the zig-zag structure of the mid, but having the XWTs and the high ground that they are on destroys the need for players to use the middle are for travel as much, and in late-game can give Terran a huge advantage and allow themselves to siege up on that high ground, giving them a LoS advantage with the XWT and a height advantage, and the fact that once the enemy units break the high ground ramp, there is little to no wiggle room for armies with limited range. Also, I think it would be very easy for a Terran player to shut down enemies due to the fact that two XWTs overlook the entrance to the natural and will see you when you leave, and that there is this little high ground area for tanks to chill (honestly I see no other use for it).

I like the double-width ramps to the mains and I think that those should stay, but it also depends on the changes made to the mid of the map. If rush distances are decreased, which they probably will be, you might want to consider changing the size of the ramps to the mains.

Cliff by the naturals...
Meh, it's ok because it doesn't hit the building.

I don't think that you need two rows of LoSBs protecting the entrance to the "thirds". One row would be sufficient in my honest opinion.

Nice texture work on this, much better than I could do. Very good map overall, but the XWTs overlooking those fast paths to your enemy and the high ground that they are on need to be redesigned.

Johanaz
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark363 Posts
November 02 2010 20:04 GMT
#6
On November 03 2010 00:23 WniO wrote:
The way the natural entrance is set up is so cool. the middle area seems a bit awkward in terms of getting to your opponents base but it might make for some interesting positioning battles. How many maps have you made so far?

I wanted to make a map without an obvious frontline and open up for several attack routes.
I have done about 5 melee maps so far, added links in OP.

On November 03 2010 01:08 Superouman wrote:
What justifies your double width entrance?


I have seen many replays where top players either don´t wall off or use 3 buildings which is possible here. I was getting a little tired of the standard narrow entrance routine, and thought I might stir it up a little. I added extra chokes just outside of the main and natural that should help defend.
If there are good reasons to change it back to a narrow ramp, I will do that.

On November 03 2010 02:56 kXn wrote:
I would like this map if the 3rd and gold expo would be just a little bit more accessible.


Anyways, I really like the layout on this map, and the texture usage.

Thanks. I have tried different layouts for 3rd, 4th and gold, and I´m not sure I have the best setup yet. But still; on a lot of maps the 3rd and gold really hard to defend, which is fun to watch IMO.
TPW Map Maker - theplanetaryworkshop.com
Johanaz
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark363 Posts
November 02 2010 20:20 GMT
#7
On November 03 2010 04:01 Antares777 wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
The middle seems awkward for traveling through, as some paths are tighter than others and other paths are open. The quickest base to base paths should be more open than the tighter ones in my opinion for balance reasons. I can see the zig-zag structure of the mid, but having the XWTs and the high ground that they are on destroys the need for players to use the middle are for travel as much, and in late-game can give Terran a huge advantage and allow themselves to siege up on that high ground, giving them a LoS advantage with the XWT and a height advantage, and the fact that once the enemy units break the high ground ramp, there is little to no wiggle room for armies with limited range. Also, I think it would be very easy for a Terran player to shut down enemies due to the fact that two XWTs overlook the entrance to the natural and will see you when you leave, and that there is this little high ground area for tanks to chill (honestly I see no other use for it).

I like the double-width ramps to the mains and I think that those should stay, but it also depends on the changes made to the mid of the map. If rush distances are decreased, which they probably will be, you might want to consider changing the size of the ramps to the mains.

Cliff by the naturals...
Meh, it's ok because it doesn't hit the building.

I don't think that you need two rows of LoSBs protecting the entrance to the "thirds". One row would be sufficient in my honest opinion.

Nice texture work on this, much better than I could do. Very good map overall, but the XWTs overlooking those fast paths to your enemy and the high ground that they are on need to be redesigned.



Thanks for taking the time to do this detailed analysis; there´s a lot for me to digest. Great input with the "tank chill zone". I think I have enough feedback already to give this map an overhaul and take it to the next level.
TPW Map Maker - theplanetaryworkshop.com
WniO
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2706 Posts
November 02 2010 21:36 GMT
#8
i think maybe if you just added some space to the middle, it would make a more direct path to the opponents natural, and i would like that more than the current layout. keep the 4 watchtowers though where they are because i think they help split the map in late-game scenarios. as for your other maps i really dig asgard.
burningDog
Profile Joined September 2010
Netherlands59 Posts
November 02 2010 23:51 GMT
#9
I might close up the gaps in the middle, but that's just a feeling from seeing the pictures. Tried to play the map, but B.net can't find the map (on EU)...
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
November 03 2010 10:43 GMT
#10
The map feels a little clogged as a result of higher density than necessary "interesting terrain". I know it would hurt to alter the precisely fitted structure, but it looks annoying to use a lot of these spaces. Were you trying to create a novel environment? If that's not paramount, you should simplify.

The mini platform with the small ramp outside the natural doesn't need to be there. What about LOS refuge instead? The gaps at the center which create the narrow direct route feel too constricting. I think the narrow route is okay, but I would knock down the octagon towers and pinch the hole up a bit so there is more space to swing around it. This would also create an useful ring-around-the-rosey spot. Lastly, the XWT near the gold seems excessive--high ground, LOS, and XWT. I would just have high ground, but it's your map.

As you say there's a lot of criticism to digest. It's a cool concept; I'm anxious to see your revised execution.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Johanaz
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark363 Posts
November 05 2010 00:02 GMT
#11
Thanks for all your feedback. I have done a lot of changes with your comments in mind. Please have a look, and let me know what you think.

Version 1.6:
-Removed XN towers & LOS blockers on bridges and shortened the bridges
-Redesigned and simplified central area
-Redesigned gold expansion and removed XN-LOS highground
-Added LOS refuges at natural and between 3rd, 4th and gold
TPW Map Maker - theplanetaryworkshop.com
sob3k
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States7572 Posts
November 05 2010 00:35 GMT
#12
Looks like a good map, here are my two small proposed changes.

[image loading]

The first (red), is a move of the ramps of the golds to provide a better army path between the natural/main and the third. What I'm seeing is that at the 3 base stage of the game, armies are going to be positioned around the entrance of the natural and the watchtower. With your current positioning, this makes moving to intercept an attack on the 3rd very difficult, as you have to go back through the 3rd itself or go through the gold, then back considerably to get there. The rocks will help slightly, but at the time you have a third taken they will delay an army for a very small period of time. The move to the red position would, I feel, make for a more natural army flow between defending the natural/main complex and defending the 3rd expansion.

The only other suggestion I have is a slight widening of the blue lanes, as they are currently a bit too cramped.
In Hungry Hungry Hippos there are no such constraints—one can constantly attempt to collect marbles with one’s hippo, limited only by one’s hippo-levering capabilities.
-{Cake}-
Profile Joined October 2010
United States217 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-05 02:54:58
November 05 2010 02:54 GMT
#13
I'm liking the textures, and overall feel, but i feel like it is almost easier to hold your opponent's fourth as opposed to your own gold and fourth, I'd say maybe remove the outward facing ramp from the golds, and also remove the rocks at the thirds, that way the gold is essentially a third, and there are two angles of attack if your enemy decides to take your fourth

EDIT: Or do what the guy above me said
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
November 05 2010 16:41 GMT
#14
The question as to where to go for 3rd / 4th makes the map interesting... why would you change that.

Really good job with the adjustments. Even though I miss the narrow direct path, this is better. At first I felt like the watchtowers are too easy, but I realized that lategame they're necessary so the game isn't just an army position dice roll. I can't think of any possible improvements; this looks solid. Any idea if it will make it to other servers? NA?
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Johanaz
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark363 Posts
November 06 2010 18:19 GMT
#15
On November 05 2010 09:35 sob3k wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Looks like a good map, here are my two small proposed changes.

[image loading]

The first (red), is a move of the ramps of the golds to provide a better army path between the natural/main and the third. What I'm seeing is that at the 3 base stage of the game, armies are going to be positioned around the entrance of the natural and the watchtower. With your current positioning, this makes moving to intercept an attack on the 3rd very difficult, as you have to go back through the 3rd itself or go through the gold, then back considerably to get there. The rocks will help slightly, but at the time you have a third taken they will delay an army for a very small period of time. The move to the red position would, I feel, make for a more natural army flow between defending the natural/main complex and defending the 3rd expansion.

The only other suggestion I have is a slight widening of the blue lanes, as they are currently a bit too cramped.


I did a version with your proposed changes (thanks for taking the time):
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

I will try a few test games with my friends to compare. The question is: isn´t it supposed to be difficult to defend a 3rd, and the gold even more so?

On November 06 2010 01:41 EatThePath wrote:
The question as to where to go for 3rd / 4th makes the map interesting... why would you change that.

Really good job with the adjustments. Even though I miss the narrow direct path, this is better. At first I felt like the watchtowers are too easy, but I realized that lategame they're necessary so the game isn't just an army position dice roll. I can't think of any possible improvements; this looks solid. Any idea if it will make it to other servers? NA?

Thanks. I need an upload partner on the other servers. A guy volunteered to upload my maps but it seems he wasn´t really motivated to keep up with my frequent revisions and such. Also, I have lots yet to learn, and my previous maps could be better. That being said, I have a true passion for creating melee maps and I am dedicated to creating the best maps I possibly can.
My ultimate goal is to have Blizzard include on of my maps in the official ladder map pool ;-)
(I know, naïve/borderline stupid, never gonna happen, LOL).
TPW Map Maker - theplanetaryworkshop.com
EatThePath
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States3943 Posts
November 07 2010 01:20 GMT
#16
Aim high! At the least, dedicated mappers should present creative ideas so everyone has a chance to examine the possibilities. Even if you never create a hit, you help further the state of the art.
Comprehensive strategic intention: DNE
Johanaz
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark363 Posts
November 08 2010 18:31 GMT
#17
I have done a few changes to the gold expo and bridges as suggested by sob3k, so thanks!

+ Show Spoiler +
Added 3rd ramp to the gold expo and widened the bridge outside the natural
[image loading]


Also, I have polished the map a lot and placed doodads and decals, and I think it´s coming together as a pretty good melee map. I played about 10 matches against my friends, but unfortunately we´re all semi-newbs so there might be minor balance issues remaining. I hope to see more accomplished people try it out soon.
TPW Map Maker - theplanetaryworkshop.com
WniO
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2706 Posts
November 08 2010 18:39 GMT
#18
i might try it out later. do you still need someone for the NA server? i still have 8 slots.
2-_-n
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden24 Posts
November 08 2010 18:57 GMT
#19
Can't find it up on EU when serching for "Varuna"
ruskig on bnet
Johanaz
Profile Joined September 2010
Denmark363 Posts
November 08 2010 19:31 GMT
#20
On November 09 2010 03:57 2-_-n wrote:
Can't find it up on EU when serching for "Varuna"

That´s weird. I have played it multiple times with friends without any issues.
I heard that the search function on EU server is bugged hope it will be fixed soon.
I hope it´s not something I did.
TPW Map Maker - theplanetaryworkshop.com
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13h 25m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JuggernautJason76
ProTech74
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 237
JulyZerg 166
Rock 41
LancerX 23
Dota 2
monkeys_forever296
LuMiX0
League of Legends
Grubby3233
Dendi1243
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu451
Khaldor276
Other Games
FrodaN2201
fl0m1150
RotterdaM700
Mlord651
KnowMe134
Nathanias73
Sick61
Trikslyr43
summit1g0
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV990
StarCraft 2
CranKy Ducklings163
Other Games
BasetradeTV28
StarCraft 2
angryscii 25
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 24 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH231
• iHatsuTV 45
• StrangeGG 26
• davetesta24
• tFFMrPink 20
• musti20045 11
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler115
League of Legends
• Doublelift3721
• Jankos2287
• masondota2723
Other Games
• imaqtpie1095
• WagamamaTV553
• Shiphtur304
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
13h 25m
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
15h 25m
WardiTV European League
15h 25m
BSL: ProLeague
21h 25m
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
FEL
6 days
FEL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 2v2 Season 3
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.