(2) Twisted Peaks

konadora

Singapore66365 Posts

December 29 2009 15:39 GMT

Based off the SC2 version here.

Still in its beta stages, so decoration and balance issue isn't complete yet. Mineral formations are all perfectly fine, so that's okay.

+ Show Spoiler [SC2 ver] +

Twisted Peaks 0.5

Resources:
Main: 10M1G (Minerals: 9x1500, 1x 500, Gas: 1x5000)
Nat: 7M1G
1/7 expo: 7M1G
4/10 expo: 7M1G
Center expo: 14M1G (Minerals: 7Mx1500 stacked twice, Gas: 1x 10000)

Only 1 Power Generator at nat to help Protosses FE safer.
The Xel'Naga temples are not stacked, so there's two blocking your main and 1 at the ramps.
Neutral CC in center of map.
Feedback and comments are always welcomed

Download links:
Beta ver 0.5

neobowman

Canada3324 Posts

December 29 2009 15:41 GMT

Too linear. Hold two chokes, you got your side of the map. You can also push straight through the center, holding the neutral building ramp with a few vultures with mines and a tank or two.

Nice basillica-water blends though.

konadora

Singapore66365 Posts

December 29 2009 15:43 GMT

well i was just following the original design, don't really intend to change the overall design of it :p

neobowman

Canada3324 Posts

December 29 2009 15:47 GMT

Well, can't really be helped then. I would just add big ramps to either side of the basillica if I were remaking it though.

edit: Oh, and I think it'll work better as a 96x96 instead of 128x128.

seRapH

United States9830 Posts

December 29 2009 16:02 GMT

On December 30 2009 00:47 neobowman wrote:
Well, can't really be helped then. I would just add big ramps to either side of the basillica if I were remaking it though.

edit: Oh, and I think it'll work better as a 96x96 instead of 128x128.

if it were smaller, then the center would be a lot less open, adding to the already terran-imba. we don't have cliff jumpers yet, see?

GTR

51703 Posts

December 29 2009 16:03 GMT

112x128 sounds better than 96x96

Please or register to reply.

(2) Twisted Peaks

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming