|
OK, some thoughts leading into Day 2
+ Show Spoiler [Yamato = Keep] +Leaning TownThe crux: the "anonymous" vigilante argument. Yam has been questioned numerous times whether he had a kill activation phrase. His response: On March 12 2013 14:20 yamato77 wrote:
And no, before you ask, I am not answering any more stupid fucking questions about my role. All you need to know is in my filter. On March 11 2013 16:49 yamato77 wrote:First of all, my role is all inclusive. I didn't choose to reveal his alignment and then shoot him, it happens as a consequence of the person being town. So as soon as I PM'd his name as the alignment check, his fate was sealed and there was nothing I could do about it. + Show Spoiler +Why did I do it, knowing this risk? Firstly, I feel like the people roleplaying heavily, aside from perhaps Prom, deserve a good hard look. None of them had been saying much up to that point and I felt like it was a huge distraction. Kurumi was the worst in this group by a long shot, so losing him even if he was town was not a huge loss. More importantly, it kept town from focusing on him the entire rest of the day with his attention whore mentality and martyring.
Basically, I used my alignment check much like a vigi shot. Shoot into the worst of the unreadables and hope you hit red. Unfortunately, I didn't, but it was still objectively a decent move because what it did was get attention away from Kurumi and mainly on to me, where scum have a more difficult time taking a stance due to the more unsure thread sentiment regarding myself at the moment. I can now proceed to completely remove all doubt from the situation and look at who attacked me and why to make inferences about their alignment.
The "Pro gf snipe" comment was a joke on my role. Super soft should remember being the target of MZ as a dayvig after Super had just shot a mafia player. MZ made a comment just like that one as he decided to shoot super, who was town. My role, thus, only shoots people that are town. If they were mafia, it works like a detective chevk., where I receive a PM detailing their alignment. I will make it clear, after the alignment check popped up into the thread, I had zero control over the death of Kurumi. The comment was a joke. The shot was predetermined. I sure hope kita and Grey got a good laugh out of it. I can roll with that as its a play on the dreamflower role PM: On March 11 2013 17:33 Mocsta wrote:
Yam, sounds like your role is a play on dream flower from personality 1.
So your logic was if u hit Mafia u get a DT check
And
If u hit town u took out someone shitting up the thread?
Is that correct?
I'm still not sure why u would take this gamble without raising it as a question. I thought more people were hating bugs at the time than kurumi, unless u referring to him specifically about being town only today comments. Dreamflower role = Check scum => vig shot... check town => no shotThe way he has repeatedly stuck to his guns with the role dynamics is in a similar vein to what I have come to expect from a town yamato (brush it all off nonchalantly because he "knows" he is town, nothing sticks: attitude).
So even though I don't agree with his approach for the check (and it seems this is the main sticking point for a scum yam). I do believe the role dynamics => he was "anonymous".
Now some are saying, yam had the balls and insight to claim as scum (similar situation to vivax fake-claiming vig in mafia LX).. I disagree. I think (yes) has the balls to make this play... BUT I dont think he had the *more important* insight. Why? Because, he has been questioned repeatedly from all directions. Yet, when giving justification; never considers "this anonymity insight" as a motive for the shot. Fact: Yam is impulsive. I am confident if he was aware of this "insight" he would have thrown it into the mix instantly to clear himself. This never happened. Yam is an anonymous vigilante, that decided to claim the scalp because he thought it was pro-town to remove someone shitting up the thread. The reason I give "leaning town" vs "probably town" is because his play has been pretty timid for a usual town yamato, so I want to exercise a bit more caution before giving full trust.
+ Show Spoiler [Crossfire99=Vig] +Probably scumMy read has shifted. I thought this guy was trying to communicate better by dropping the roleplaying act. I also thought he was genuinely trying to aid town with his final posts.. i.e. On March 12 2013 11:00 Crossfire99 wrote:
Sorry I played so terribly. I deserve to be lynched. Watch vivax because he pegged me as town even though i played like crap. Watch out for dandel. he might be scum but i'm not sure cause i've only been scum when i've played with him. On March 12 2013 11:19 Crossfire99 wrote:
Uh is there anything specific you guys want me to focus on to make sure I spend some time on before the lynch? I'm trying to catch up, but need to know what would be the most helpful. Those posts read as a sincere plea from a townie to me. The problem is what eventuated from that plea. (1) he calls out SS with his Dandel Ion scum read & (2) the meat and veg of his late-cycle contribution(s)+ Show Spoiler +On March 12 2013 11:48 Crossfire99 wrote:Yeah I am unsure on Yamato, so I don't want to lynch him. There's some good and bad. It's good that he calls out super. It's good that he wants to lynch bugs. It's good that he claimed his kill of kurumi. It was bad that he actually killed kurumi. It's weird that he want from instantly voting me at the very beginning of the game, to me only be a possibility of a lynch later on + Show Spoiler +On March 12 2013 02:02 yamato77 wrote:
The delay for my role was built in.
As for my Marv read... Hm. Gonna have to reread his filter closely.
Super, I will say, is being especially useless and obviously lurky.
Nothing has changed about Bugs.
Not sold on Cross/Stutters, but the possibility exists there. Not good lynches.
Sloosh needs more attention for being a useless pile of lurking shit, , to don't lynch me. He'll have to be looked into more. I definitely still want to lynch wbg cause he's done nothing but attack kurumi even when he knew he was modconfirmed town, plus he just trolled the thread when called out and doesn't even care about doing anything. I'm keeping my vote on wbg. Decides to stand in the middle with one of the key discussion topics: Yamato. If you finish with "He'll have to be looked into more" & don't add anything new to the discussion, why bother to comment in the first place? Reads as a guy looking to contribute, without making an effort. & (3)Ends up sticking with his sheep vote on WBG, after promising to "catch up on the thread and focus on key areas"... Basically, Crossfire99 sold me on the emotional plea; and now that I have had to chance to review what the outcome of his focus is.. I am left severely disappointed. The late-cycle contributions were on par with when he was roleplaying. I think Crossfire99 would make a superb vig target tonight.
|
In his puzzle we are all pawns
so this is for good ole thrawn
I'll miss you old friend
didn't think these times would end
my old buddy is now gone!
I'm sorry for this departure from the norm
but this news took me by storm
my poor heat is broken
why, tonight we had spoken
and now from my games he is torn!
Now with the thread I'll catch up
missing my poor young pup
he was a good townie
as this sorrow surrounds me
I say: to thrawn raise your cup!
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
Mafia don't need to create multiple wagons if none of them are under pressure. From what I see bugs was always top candidate and not many people were hard against his lynch. I don't really think there's much to gather from the lynch. If there were last minute swings and people sheeping on bandwagons sure, but meh from yesterday's lynch.
I still 100% support a yamato lynch. I am also on board a crossfire lynch. I was skeptical of him at first, but after seeing his reactions right before and after the lynch I will gladly kill him (I haven't thoroughly analyzed him like I have yamato or Vivax though).
|
Corazon
My new approach is:
Instead of commenting on my case on you; I will continue discourse via the posts you replied to others
(As you are so insistent that I am piggy backing...)
(1) From VE
On March 11 2013 06:20 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 06:04 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote:
Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro...
##Vote: Yamato
Gonna start scumhunting? Does this not describe your play too? Did you not just delurk to call out Yam/Acro for something you yourself were guilty of? What do you think of the "other targets being hunted"? I think Strongandbig's argument is very good. It's very convincing, but we are still a long time away from the deadline. Other than that, I've just seen a lot of nonsense and posts that I cannot understand. I was the first one to start scum hunting, don't accuse me of not doing that...Also, it's a bit frustrating to try and scumhunt and then have 5 people complain that no one has scumhunted...
Why are you so concerned about your image: that you need to declare you were the first to scum hunt?
Everyone has to scum hunt: town, scum & 3rd party.
You throw this out as if it should imply you are confirmed town?
(2) From Vivax
On March 11 2013 06:57 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 06:31 Vivax wrote:On March 11 2013 06:20 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 11 2013 06:04 VisceraEyes wrote:On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote:
Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro...
##Vote: Yamato
Gonna start scumhunting? Does this not describe your play too? Did you not just delurk to call out Yam/Acro for something you yourself were guilty of? What do you think of the "other targets being hunted"? I think Strongandbig's argument is very good. It's very convincing, but we are still a long time away from the deadline. Other than that, I've just seen a lot of nonsense and posts that I cannot understand. I was the first one to start scum hunting, don't accuse me of not doing that... Also, it's a bit frustrating to try and scumhunt and then have 5 people complain that no one has scumhunted... [vivax] You think his argument is very good? His case is pretty big what exactly do you think is good about it or what parts do you think are good? If you think his argument is good why aren't you pushing Oats and say we're far away from deadline? [/vivax] I think he makes good points. If you're going to make me repeat what he is saying and then try to hammer me for it, it's not going to happen.I'm not pushing Oats because I am pushing my own read (Yamato). Just because SnB's case is good doesn't give us an excuse to sit around for 24+ hours and do nothing. I've already said why Yamato is scummy and now I'm voting for him. It's pretty simple. Vivax raises a good point.
You said you like SnB case; but its big. Why do you think it is applicable to Oats?
Your response: "I care about my image.. & i dont want you to try and make me look bad"
Why are you so concerned about your image when talking to others? Town Corazon normally is happy to share his tunneled thoughts.. this Corazon is thinking about what conversations make him come off looking better.. What gives?
If you really did want to push your scum read. you could have said simply
"I like the SnB case on oats, but I think yam is scummier. Im sticking with him"
Instead: you provide reasoning on everything Vivax DIDN'T ask.
You then continue discussion, and bring up trust as your reason for not providing more.
I dont see what trust has got to do with with sharing reasoning and thought? Everyone is trying to get reads on eachother, and you are making this task intentionally more difficult by choosing to share when it only benefits you
(3) From Marvellosity
On March 11 2013 08:06 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 07:08 marvellosity wrote:On March 11 2013 06:47 Kurumi wrote:
oh I will repeat that
I AM A SCUM ROLE AND I AM TOWN ALIGNED AND I WANT TO DIE SO WE CAN AVOID THE POSSIBILITY OF ME BEING A MOLE
thanks so, if you're intent on being lynched, why don't you tell us what your role is? hi s&b. we're not lynching Oats today and to be honest I only barely skimmed your case. $10 says that what you said is probably valid, but it doesn't make Oats mafia. By far the most interesting result of the case is that Corazon agrees with it, despite having played with Oats before (more than once I think?). Corazon, why don't you tell me in your own words why you think Oats is mafia, why don't you tell me how Oats' play is different this game than in Hiro's game. thanks bish. Dude, this shitty logic is bad for your standards Marv. Why are you attacking me for having the same view as you? We literally just said the same thing (like the case but don't want to vote for it). You are saying that you are not going to vote because it does not make Oats mafia and I said I'd rather see Yamato lynched than Oats. What is the problem with that? The thing is, Oats' meta is not the main part of the case. BnS laid out many reasons as to why he thinks Oats is scum and I just made a comment that I liked his case and that it had a lot of valid points in it. Let me ask you this Marv: Would you rather I...
Say "I agree with SnB" and just vote for Oats?
or
Say "I think it's a good case but I'm going to continue to scumhunt and push my top scum read"If you prefer #1 it would be such a glaring scumtell.
If "not sheeping SnB" is what you mean by the "same view" then yes.. you and Marv are common.
But that is not at all what Marv was talking about. His question was written in simple terms too; so its odd how you can even proceed to outright misinterpret the request.
Regardless, you again proceed to image based defense... justifying your logic as making a decision on which outcome makes you look townier.
(4) Mocsta - More of a summary as I said I was commenting on "piggybacked" commentary.
Now my original arguments put forth to you, were separate to the above (yet you refuse to see it).
My main issues with you, was that you set yourself up to move to an Oats vote, if Yam lose traction.
You reciprocate by throwing ad-hominem commentary all over the shop: never looking into what I am actually saying.
And then there is your lone case on Yamato, which was debunked with the about the same amount of effort it takes to sit on the toilet with a tablet to boot.
Heres a reminder: + Show Spoiler +On March 11 2013 14:55 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 13:37 cDgCorazon wrote:1. His initial reaction to my case.Yamato's first reaction to my case is basically calling it stupid. Why did he call it stupid? On March 10 2013 16:44 yamato77 wrote:
I'm calling you out for having a bad excuse for a scum read; me.
A case being stupid just because it is against you is not a legitimate defense. He basically refused to answer my main points: 2. He is playing absolutely nothing like his town meta The usual town Yamato is active, fearless, and does not care about anyone else's opinions. This should be ridiculously obvious from his duel with Hapa from Duel Mafia. As you can see from the quote in my original argument, he did not care if he died, as long as his top scumread went down with him. He was spot on in his duel with Hapa and that should have fueled his confidence even higher from this game (Marv said in Obs QT how Yamato was being a bit cocky at the beginning from getting the scumteam in the game before Duel Mafia). A town Yamato would be riding this wave of confidence. Instead, what have we seen from Yamato so far? A whole different game. His game has been far from aggressive. He's been timid, crumbled under pressure, run away from challenges, and has gone hiding while the town deliberates who to lynch. 3. Lurking and lack of scum huntingYamato's filter has been a lot of 1-liners and shitting up the thread. He's been attacking players, but not following through on them. His initial attacks on VE were based on one very weak point, yet he continued to call VE scum without expanding on that point. His other scumhunting contributions have been wondering whether Kurumi is the next coming of Chezinu, and that bugs might be scum (without any explanation) His defense of me was basically backing down and trying to avoid confrontation with my argument. His whole defense was that my read was wrong because it was on him. I don't think so. Ever since then, he basically disappeared from the thread, only to reenter to: 4. His kill (?) of KurumiI honestly don't understand this move. If he knew Kurumi was town and if Yamato was town, Yamato would not have gone on to kill Kurumi. Anyone who would kill a townie cannot possibly be town. Is that bad logic? Another possibility is that he is lying, but what would he gain from that? Could he be trying to cover for someone else? Either way, there is no town motivation in either his check/kill of Kurumi or claim of what happened to Kurumi. These are the reasons I think Yamato is scum and that he needs to be lynched. I, Corazon, the King of Hearts, decree that Yamato must be lynched, or this town shall feel my wrath! I am a good host, so you will not receive a points deduction for prioritising your "scum read" case, over addressing my points against you. Having said that, the case put forth is sub-par: 1. His initial reaction to my case.Disagree with the tell. Did the exact same thing with both me and jaybrundage in nomination mafia (as town). Your tell is m00t. 2. He is playing absolutely nothing like his town meta Your giving a meta read from one game? Are you not the guy that got ripped a new one for telling Marv how to apply meta in Duel mafia? o.0Fact is: this is a themed game where some are choosing to imitate their personalities. As long as they dont hide behind the personality to fake-hunt.. all good in my books. Disagree with the tell. Whether he plays like town meta or not, is irrelevant in a game such as this. Your tell is m00t (and hypocritical to boot: was yam not "fearless" in calling VE scum?) 3. Lurking and lack of scum huntingSeveral in the thread were doubting Kurumi before the town announcement? Does this mean they lacked scum hunting in their filter as well? The game hadn't even migrated past 24hrs, and you calling out someone with multiple posts a lurker? This is truly grasping at straws. Disagree with the tell. 4. His kill (?) of KurumiAgree with the tell, as does pretty much everyone else in the thread. <sarcasm> Why you piggy backing off others...</sarcasm>
tl;drYou throw shit over my case on you, using ad-hominem arguments. You then proceed to ignore my case, by developing said case against yamato. The case against yamato is sub-par; much like your justification to vote him, and your reasons to immediately tunnel him. OK, so I give you some conviction points for sticking to your guns; but overall, the effort looks lazy with hastily conjured points to boot. I don't like -at all- Yamato Kill action of a mod-confirmed town; but you, cDgCorazon; are still my top scum read.
I won't delve any further into my commentary with you, because you already made it clear you won't comment on my argument, you only comment on me as a person. Again more image-centric tactics.
========================================
Your modus operandi is quite clear now from 4 separate discussions:
Its not about hunting scum.. its about looking the best you can
Verdict: Probably Scum
|
On March 12 2013 16:10 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 16:05 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 12 2013 15:37 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 15:35 Oatsmaster wrote:Still pretty sure Vivax is scum. Also that means that Foolishness is scum, which is hilarious  Why does Vivax = scum => Foolishness MUST = scum? Cause I would assume that he is good enough to not try and defend someone who is scum/not so townie. Like if he read the two filters and called them different when in actual fact they are the same. Its kinda like if a chicken farmer tells you his chickens are fine, but in actual fact they arent, you know that the chicken farmer knew too and was lying to you. hmm.. well you can only have one lynch a cycle. With the information currently, do you prefer foolishness or vivax? Vivax ALL THE WAY. Actually I dont know why Foolishness defended Vivax just by a short few lines of meta. Seems weird considering he wanted to lynch him earlier.
On March 12 2013 16:10 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 16:05 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 12 2013 15:37 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 15:35 Oatsmaster wrote:Still pretty sure Vivax is scum. Also that means that Foolishness is scum, which is hilarious Why does Vivax = scum => Foolishness MUST = scum? Cause I would assume that he is good enough to not try and defend someone who is scum/not so townie. Like if he read the two filters and called them different when in actual fact they are the same. Its kinda like if a chicken farmer tells you his chickens are fine, but in actual fact they arent, you know that the chicken farmer knew too and was lying to you. hmm.. well you can only have one lynch a cycle. With the information currently, do you prefer foolishness or vivax? Vivax ALL THE WAY. Actually I dont know why Foolishness defended Vivax just by a short few lines of meta. Seems weird considering he wanted to lynch him earlier.
so you are sure Viv is scum
why then attack the other bum?
Votes were almost tied
it was six to five
but your vote was on Bugs the dumb.
|
On March 12 2013 18:20 Foolishness wrote:
I still 100% support a yamato lynch. I am also on board a crossfire lynch. I was skeptical of him at first, but after seeing his reactions right before and after the lynch I will gladly kill him (I haven't thoroughly analyzed him like I have yamato or Vivax though).
I am against a yamato lynch as per
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=400204¤tpage=78#1541
Will boogie onto Xfire though.
Q: You said you have some familiarity with Vivax... is that meta-read based on "history" or, "because you gave him prior games a quick peruse?"
|
On March 12 2013 12:13 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:11 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:09 iamperfection wrote:On March 12 2013 12:07 Mocsta wrote:
Wow.. 3rd party.
nicely done SnB .................................. .................. .......... ..... ... maybe you should read a bit closer ?? [Bugs win-con] You win when the Brown outnumber all other players. SnB was the first to say he could be 3rd party (as jester) but whatever Maybe you should read a bit closer Moc. His win-con was to survive the game. there is no "brown"...
my dear cDg
my special newbie
please tell who you think is red
please, which of these should be bled?
I would really like to see.
On March 12 2013 12:17 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:16 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:12 Acrofales wrote:
(but I am realizing that I suck at roleplaying my personality). Is this meant to be a claim? Yes. I am claiming that I have a personality!
Acro, like ver today should be good
so tell me where, if you could,
you think we'll find red
which one do you want dead
and removed from our 'hood?
On March 12 2013 12:41 VisceraEyes wrote:
I will decide every lynch. Factor that in scum.
but you voted for vivax
you went the the me and marv pack
but he is alive
while mr bugs died
so perhaps your voting was lax?
On March 12 2013 12:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
OMG guys stop it. Jesus you're worse than marv and I.
let me just add to this post by VE
you both are starting to annoy me
at least one of you is green
so calm down, don't be mean
i want you both to tell me who other scum could be.
On March 12 2013 14:20 yamato77 wrote:
And no, before you ask, I am not answering any more stupid fucking questions about my role. All you need to know is in my filter.
It is for posts like this I like Yam
don't don't the man
his play has been below par
but he deserves that fair hearing of ours
leave him alone overnight, understand?
On March 12 2013 12:16 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:13 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 12 2013 12:11 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:09 iamperfection wrote:On March 12 2013 12:07 Mocsta wrote:
Wow.. 3rd party.
nicely done SnB .................................. .................. .......... ..... ... maybe you should read a bit closer ?? [Bugs win-con] You win when the Brown outnumber all other players. SnB was the first to say he could be 3rd party (as jester) but whatever Maybe you should read a bit closer Moc. His win-con was to survive the game. there is no "brown"... What I wrote was the same thing (brown outnumber all other players) Regardless.. he wasnt scum, which sucks (cos they still have 3KP).. but.. we still eliminated an anti-town role. So it was a much better than a mislynch.
not quite anti town
well said by: brown
he was neither red
nor green in the head
in his death no joy is found.
|
On March 12 2013 18:33 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 16:10 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 12 2013 16:05 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 12 2013 15:37 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 15:35 Oatsmaster wrote:Still pretty sure Vivax is scum. Also that means that Foolishness is scum, which is hilarious Why does Vivax = scum => Foolishness MUST = scum? Cause I would assume that he is good enough to not try and defend someone who is scum/not so townie. Like if he read the two filters and called them different when in actual fact they are the same. Its kinda like if a chicken farmer tells you his chickens are fine, but in actual fact they arent, you know that the chicken farmer knew too and was lying to you. hmm.. well you can only have one lynch a cycle. With the information currently, do you prefer foolishness or vivax? Vivax ALL THE WAY. Actually I dont know why Foolishness defended Vivax just by a short few lines of meta. Seems weird considering he wanted to lynch him earlier. Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 16:10 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 12 2013 16:05 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 12 2013 15:37 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 15:35 Oatsmaster wrote:Still pretty sure Vivax is scum. Also that means that Foolishness is scum, which is hilarious Why does Vivax = scum => Foolishness MUST = scum? Cause I would assume that he is good enough to not try and defend someone who is scum/not so townie. Like if he read the two filters and called them different when in actual fact they are the same. Its kinda like if a chicken farmer tells you his chickens are fine, but in actual fact they arent, you know that the chicken farmer knew too and was lying to you. hmm.. well you can only have one lynch a cycle. With the information currently, do you prefer foolishness or vivax? Vivax ALL THE WAY. Actually I dont know why Foolishness defended Vivax just by a short few lines of meta. Seems weird considering he wanted to lynch him earlier. so you are sure Viv is scum why then attack the other bum? Votes were almost tied it was six to five but your vote was on Bugs the dumb.
Sleeping Dumbo.
Also why not kill bugs since they are both scum anyway.
|
On March 12 2013 10:13 Oatsmaster wrote:
Why are we not lynching WBG.
He martyred himself.
Why not vig crossfire? I think he is more of a coinflip than WBG tbh.
Also VIvax likely scum.
Also I gotta go and will be out for the whole day.
|
On March 12 2013 18:34 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 14:20 yamato77 wrote:
And no, before you ask, I am not answering any more stupid fucking questions about my role. All you need to know is in my filter. It is for posts like this I like Yam don't don't the man his play has been below par but he deserves that fair hearing of ours leave him alone overnight, understand?
Agreed.. this is the post that made me reconsider my negative read on yam and treat the anonymous vig argument as real.
|
I'm going to write something during the night I think.
If you guys want to lynch me tomorrow please let me know so I can activate my power.
|
On March 12 2013 18:45 prplhz wrote:
I'm going to write something during the night I think.
If you guys want to lynch me tomorrow please let me know so I can activate my power.
please tell me why?
you power is: you don't die
so if we wanted you killed
we won't be thrilled
if you escape your final necktie
|
On March 12 2013 18:34 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:13 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 12 2013 12:11 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:09 iamperfection wrote:On March 12 2013 12:07 Mocsta wrote:
Wow.. 3rd party.
nicely done SnB .................................. .................. .......... ..... ... maybe you should read a bit closer ?? [Bugs win-con] You win when the Brown outnumber all other players. SnB was the first to say he could be 3rd party (as jester) but whatever Maybe you should read a bit closer Moc. His win-con was to survive the game. there is no "brown"... my dear cDg my special newbie please tell who you think is red please, which of these should be bled? I would really like to see. Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:17 Acrofales wrote:On March 12 2013 12:16 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:12 Acrofales wrote:
(but I am realizing that I suck at roleplaying my personality). Is this meant to be a claim? Yes. I am claiming that I have a personality! Acro, like ver today should be good so tell me where, if you could, you think we'll find red which one do you want dead and removed from our 'hood? Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:41 VisceraEyes wrote:
I will decide every lynch. Factor that in scum. but you voted for vivax you went the the me and marv pack but he is alive while mr bugs died so perhaps your voting was lax? Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
OMG guys stop it. Jesus you're worse than marv and I. let me just add to this post by VE you both are starting to annoy me at least one of you is green so calm down, don't be mean i want you both to tell me who other scum could be. Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 14:20 yamato77 wrote:
And no, before you ask, I am not answering any more stupid fucking questions about my role. All you need to know is in my filter. It is for posts like this I like Yam don't shoot the man his play has been below par but he deserves that fair hearing of ours leave him alone overnight, understand? Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:16 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:13 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 12 2013 12:11 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:09 iamperfection wrote:On March 12 2013 12:07 Mocsta wrote:
Wow.. 3rd party.
nicely done SnB .................................. .................. .......... ..... ... maybe you should read a bit closer ?? [Bugs win-con] You win when the Brown outnumber all other players. SnB was the first to say he could be 3rd party (as jester) but whatever Maybe you should read a bit closer Moc. His win-con was to survive the game. there is no "brown"... What I wrote was the same thing (brown outnumber all other players) Regardless.. he wasnt scum, which sucks (cos they still have 3KP).. but.. we still eliminated an anti-town role. So it was a much better than a mislynch. not quite anti town well said by: brown he was neither red nor green in the head in his death no joy is found.
ebwop
|
Well nice lynch as far as my little theory went: Bugs was some sort of madhatter cause of the Chezinu rule and would kill the first guy or more on his wagon, alternatively he would reveal their alignment but cause of the first case I preferred not to take any risk + prplhz Ver and yamato were better lynches.
It's important that medics protect Foolishness tonight (he's not the only good one I would protect though) cause if you let one of the only guys die who is smart enough to actually see I'm town against VE's and marv's worrisome cases (they aren't this bad as town and just pushed a wagon on someone who wasn't scum after all) then this town deserves to lose. Him and a few others are your only hope do try to lynch me if you want but if you are a medic protect him.
Most of you are probably guys who like to crawl up marv's butt that's natural, he plays to reach that objective but I remind you that this guy rolls scum too and that his reads are awful as scum. Suspecting me cause of responding to a question with a townread is part of that. If anything it can't be explained how marv and Hiro were so sure that the announcement made Kurumi confirmed town. They couldn't know where it came from, but they could know that Kurumi was indeed town.
|
Oh I forgot to say!
Medics don''t look my way.
There are better protects
so don't save my neck
medics listen, I pray.
|
On March 12 2013 19:32 Vivax wrote:
If anything it can't be explained how marv and Hiro were so sure that the announcement made Kurumi confirmed town. They couldn't know where it came from, but they could know that Kurumi was indeed town.
Because it came from the hosts? Hosts dont lie, unless they are Caller.
|
On March 12 2013 20:14 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 19:32 Vivax wrote:
If anything it can't be explained how marv and Hiro were so sure that the announcement made Kurumi confirmed town. They couldn't know where it came from, but they could know that Kurumi was indeed town. Because it came from the hosts? Hosts dont lie, unless they are Caller.
while in general I agree
I'd like you to see
this link to the role of reporter
the conclusions you draw aren't in order
a host message that might not be.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
i have no idea why people are listening to foolish at all this game.
he outried lied to put suspicion on me (said he was always suspicious of me when we played together), THEN lied again when i pulled him up (said we'd played town once), and THEN corrected his story once again to that he found me suspicious in the game I smurfed (LIX), which for the uneducated was the game I tunnelled 2 mafia Day 1, got elected and lynched a mafia, then lynched mafia every day
It's piles upon piles of lies as an excuse to call me suspicious, and it's all fucking bullshit.
He still hasn't explained WHY HE WOULD LIE ABOUT IT in order to call me suspicious.
|
On March 12 2013 20:19 marvellosity wrote:
i have no idea why people are listening to foolish at all this game.
he outried lied to put suspicion on me (said he was always suspicious of me when we played together), THEN lied again when i pulled him up (said we'd played town once), and THEN corrected his story once again to that he found me suspicious in the game I smurfed (LIX), which for the uneducated was the game I tunnelled 2 mafia Day 1, got elected and lynched a mafia, then lynched mafia every day
It's piles upon piles of lies as an excuse to call me suspicious, and it's all fucking bullshit.
He still hasn't explained WHY HE WOULD LIE ABOUT IT in order to call me suspicious.
I'd say mr K
that fool shouldn't be saved for the day
no medics should help him
guns firing should make a din
Fool should be punished for his play
So why is it viv says to save
could it be he too is a red slave?
I say shoot for the fool and the vivax
between scum and town: no pax!
I call the aforementioned gentlemen knaves!
|
I my most recent post I may not have been clear
'mr k' equals 'marv' here
these rhymes are constraining
against restraints I am straining
I was talking about he who says 'dear'
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
