|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On March 12 2013 12:08 Foolishness wrote:No, there's only crappy evidence on why Vivax is mafia. When he's mafia, he spams one liners (with the very rare long post). See TL Mafia LX here. He's mafia and he literally did nothing day 1 except post one liners and derp around. Now look when he's town in British II here. He barely posts any one liners, and his posts have substance; he actually says what he thinks. He doesn't derp. And this game he doesn't have one liners and is clearly trying.
There's extremely hard evidence that you've outright lied for no reason in this game, though.
|
well that was bad
though at less he was a cad
I wish he was red
but black still needs to be dead
I'm sorry we didn't kill Vlad
|
Austin, what is your take on Yamato? A vote for you being mayor may or not be given due to your answer. Do you think he is scum?
|
On March 12 2013 12:09 iamperfection wrote:.................................. .................. .......... ..... ... maybe you should read a bit closer
??
[Bugs win-con]
You win when the Brown outnumber all other players.
SnB was the first to say he could be 3rd party (as jester) but whatever
|
Lol. That role was hilarious. Anyway, I am going to start reading the thread from the beginning and hope it actually makes sense this time. You should expect me to be back to the normal Acro you all know and love, with the odd roleplaying post thrown in (but I am realizing that I suck at roleplaying my personality).
|
On March 12 2013 12:11 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:09 iamperfection wrote:On March 12 2013 12:07 Mocsta wrote:
Wow.. 3rd party.
nicely done SnB .................................. .................. .......... ..... ... maybe you should read a bit closer ?? [Bugs win-con] You win when the Brown outnumber all other players. SnB was the first to say he could be 3rd party (as jester) but whatever
Maybe you should read a bit closer Moc. His win-con was to survive the game. there is no "brown"...
|
On March 12 2013 12:13 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:11 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:09 iamperfection wrote:On March 12 2013 12:07 Mocsta wrote:
Wow.. 3rd party.
nicely done SnB .................................. .................. .......... ..... ... maybe you should read a bit closer ?? [Bugs win-con] You win when the Brown outnumber all other players. SnB was the first to say he could be 3rd party (as jester) but whatever Maybe you should read a bit closer Moc. His win-con was to survive the game. there is no "brown"...
What I wrote was the same thing (brown outnumber all other players)
Regardless.. he wasnt scum, which sucks (cos they still have 3KP).. but.. we still eliminated an anti-town role. So it was a much better than a mislynch.
|
On March 12 2013 12:12 Acrofales wrote:
(but I am realizing that I suck at roleplaying my personality).
Is this meant to be a claim?
|
On March 12 2013 12:16 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:12 Acrofales wrote:
(but I am realizing that I suck at roleplaying my personality). Is this meant to be a claim?
Yes. I am claiming that I have a personality!
|
On March 12 2013 12:13 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:11 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:09 iamperfection wrote:On March 12 2013 12:07 Mocsta wrote:
Wow.. 3rd party.
nicely done SnB .................................. .................. .......... ..... ... maybe you should read a bit closer ?? [Bugs win-con] You win when the Brown outnumber all other players. SnB was the first to say he could be 3rd party (as jester) but whatever Maybe you should read a bit closer Moc. His win-con was to survive the game. there is no "brown"...
Anyways.. are you going to continue to pussy foot around my case on you?
You still have not addressed a single item from there...
|
On March 12 2013 12:17 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:16 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:12 Acrofales wrote:
(but I am realizing that I suck at roleplaying my personality). Is this meant to be a claim? Yes. I am claiming that I have a personality!
I know that you have been out of town, so i can live with the useless activity for Day 1.
But now that you are back.. i am going to be watching you *very* carefully
|
So I'm off to bed. It sucks wbg wasn't scum and was just a survivor, but it helps. I'll have to take a more thorough look at some people tomorrow when I have time.
|
On March 12 2013 12:20 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:17 Acrofales wrote:On March 12 2013 12:16 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:12 Acrofales wrote:
(but I am realizing that I suck at roleplaying my personality). Is this meant to be a claim? Yes. I am claiming that I have a personality! I know that you have been out of town, so i can live with the useless activity for Day 1. But now that you are back.. i am going to be watching you *very* carefully
Does that mean there's someone you're not watching carefully?
|
On March 12 2013 12:22 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:20 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:17 Acrofales wrote:On March 12 2013 12:16 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:12 Acrofales wrote:
(but I am realizing that I suck at roleplaying my personality). Is this meant to be a claim? Yes. I am claiming that I have a personality! I know that you have been out of town, so i can live with the useless activity for Day 1. But now that you are back.. i am going to be watching you *very* carefully Does that mean there's someone you're not watching carefully?
No. Im watching everyone carefully
And people like YOU... *Very* carefully
|
I will decide every lynch. Factor that in scum.
|
On March 12 2013 12:18 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:13 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 12 2013 12:11 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:09 iamperfection wrote:On March 12 2013 12:07 Mocsta wrote:
Wow.. 3rd party.
nicely done SnB .................................. .................. .......... ..... ... maybe you should read a bit closer ?? [Bugs win-con] You win when the Brown outnumber all other players. SnB was the first to say he could be 3rd party (as jester) but whatever Maybe you should read a bit closer Moc. His win-con was to survive the game. there is no "brown"... Anyways.. are you going to continue to pussy foot around my case on you? You still have not addressed a single item from there...
Well besides the fact that I've figured out you are going to defend Yamato to the bitter end, there's not much to say about the case.
However, the fact that you called me your #1 scumread and then switched off of me once it was obvious I wasn't getting lynched is a pretty suspicious.
|
On March 12 2013 12:41 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 12:18 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:13 cDgCorazon wrote:On March 12 2013 12:11 Mocsta wrote:On March 12 2013 12:09 iamperfection wrote:On March 12 2013 12:07 Mocsta wrote:
Wow.. 3rd party.
nicely done SnB .................................. .................. .......... ..... ... maybe you should read a bit closer ?? [Bugs win-con] You win when the Brown outnumber all other players. SnB was the first to say he could be 3rd party (as jester) but whatever Maybe you should read a bit closer Moc. His win-con was to survive the game. there is no "brown"... Anyways.. are you going to continue to pussy foot around my case on you? You still have not addressed a single item from there... Well besides the fact that I've figured out you are going to defend Yamato to the bitter end, there's not much to say about the case. However, the fact that you called me your #1 scumread and then switched off of me once it was obvious I wasn't getting lynched is a pretty suspicious.
#1 - Im not defending yamato to the bitter end. I want answers from him (unfortunately as much as you seem to want to)
I was pointing out, your case felt contrived and that you seem to string together points hastily.
I was debunking your case, not yamato.
#2 - You were my #1 read till I noticed Bugs was pressuring kurumi after the mod confirm. That was scummier for me than the things you had done. With Bugs gone, you're back in the mix for me.. im not letting you brush off my pressure - as currently you still have not addressed I single issue I raised to you...
*And guess what.. you called out yamato as scum for doing the same thing, you are doing to me*
|
OMG guys stop it. Jesus you're worse than marv and I.
|
On March 11 2013 14:55 Mocsta wrote:
tl;dr
You throw shit over my case on you, using ad-hominem arguments.
You then proceed to ignore my case, by developing said case against yamato.
The case against yamato is sub-par; much like your justification to vote him, and your reasons to immediately tunnel him.
OK, so I give you some conviction points for sticking to your guns; but overall, the effort looks lazy with hastily conjured points to boot.
I don't like -at all- Yamato Kill action of a mod-confirmed town; but you, cDgCorazon; are still my top scum read.
I did not throw shit on your case against me. Everything you had attacked me about (my reaction to BnS and tunneling Yamato) was stuff that others had attacked me about as well and that I had answered already. Most of your case was stuff I had answered too already, so I basically went and told you to read my filter.
It's not "You don't like the case because it's sub-par"
It's "The case is sub-par because you do not like it".
You're basically defending Yamato by attacking me and completely ignoring my points, just using stuff I said in Duel Mafia to try to make it look like I am contradicting myself.
On the topic of Duel Mafia, I never said anywhere that I had a town read on Oats in duel mafia. I had attacked him early on in the game before it because apparent that there were people way obviously scummier than him. So don't say I thought Oats was town in that game.
You are free to not like my case, but you are not free to use your opinion on the case to call me scum.
|
On March 12 2013 13:30 cDgCorazon wrote:Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 14:55 Mocsta wrote:
tl;dr
You throw shit over my case on you, using ad-hominem arguments.
You then proceed to ignore my case, by developing said case against yamato.
The case against yamato is sub-par; much like your justification to vote him, and your reasons to immediately tunnel him.
OK, so I give you some conviction points for sticking to your guns; but overall, the effort looks lazy with hastily conjured points to boot.
I don't like -at all- Yamato Kill action of a mod-confirmed town; but you, cDgCorazon; are still my top scum read. I did not throw shit on your case against me. Everything you had attacked me about (my reaction to BnS and tunneling Yamato) was stuff that others had attacked me about as well and that I had answered already. Most of your case was stuff I had answered too already, so I basically went and told you to read my filter. It's not "You don't like the case because it's sub-par" It's "The case is sub-par because you do not like it". You're basically defending Yamato by attacking me and completely ignoring my points, just using stuff I said in Duel Mafia to try to make it look like I am contradicting myself. On the topic of Duel Mafia, I never said anywhere that I had a town read on Oats in duel mafia. I had attacked him early on in the game before it because apparent that there were people way obviously scummier than him. So don't say I thought Oats was town in that game. You are free to not like my case, but you are not free to use your opinion on the case to call me scum. Perhaps it never occurred to you: that I didn't think the answers in your filter are sufficient.
That you do, suggests we are at an impasse.
When I get back from HotS. I will re-read over your filter answers, and communicate my issues with your play (i.e. why I think you are scummy) with a different approach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
