EPTFinding guys that play games isn't that hard, finding guys who play and love games with the same fervor I do however has not happened thus far.
Gay StarCraft Players - Page 44
| Forum Index > TL Community |
Don't post in this thread to say "gay gamers are like everyone else, why do they have a special thread?" It is something that has been posted numerous times, and this isn't the place for that discussion. For regular posters, don't quote the trolls. | ||
|
Ultramus
United States319 Posts
Finding guys that play games isn't that hard, finding guys who play and love games with the same fervor I do however has not happened thus far. | ||
|
thehitman
1105 Posts
You will notice that gayness is on the increase and this is due to the hormone reducer products that reduce naturally created hormones in very specific quantities. Now is there a conspiracy theory about this or is it that we just randomly put too much chemicals in our food and not fully understood chemicals in the vaccines I don't know. But if you take your attention and read on your most commonly eaten products and write down all the chemicals it contains you will be amazed. There is barely anything organic or natural, its 70-80% all chemicals. Even food like chicken is full of chemicals they consume over the course of the chickens life and its not a natural meat like if you were to eat a chicken found in the wilderness. And when you take the time to read about pills and vaccines and possible side effects you will know that each has side effects and in some cases medical side effects not listed on the manual. Now who is to say these don't effect the hormones in certain percent of people and making the natural process of creating say 0.023ml of hormone B to create 0.011 of hormone B. Could it be possible for there to be gays naturally? of course as its possible to have people born with a lot of negative stuff, but not in the number we are seeing gays popping up. I mean imagine if everyone was gay, how on earth will our human race survive? | ||
|
BarryWhite
15 Posts
On February 27 2011 22:26 thehitman wrote: I strongly believe that people are being given hormone reducer pills to people through vaccines, water, food products, etc... that over time and I'm talking Grandfather>father>son and the son becomes gay or daughter becomes lesbian, whatever. You will notice that gayness is on the increase and this is due to the hormone reducer products that reduce naturally created hormones in very specific quantities. Now is there a conspiracy theory about this or is it that we just randomly put too much chemicals in our food and not fully understood chemicals in the vaccines I don't know. But if you take your attention and read on your most commonly eaten products and write down all the chemicals it contains you will be amazed. There is barely anything organic or natural, its 70-80% all chemicals. Even food like chicken is full of chemicals they consume over the course of the chickens life and its not a natural meat like if you were to eat a chicken found in the wilderness. And when you take the time to read about pills and vaccines and possible side effects you will know that each has side effects and in some cases medical side effects not listed on the manual. Now who is to say these don't effect the hormones in certain percent of people and making the natural process of creating say 0.023ml of hormone B to create 0.011 of hormone B. Could it be possible for there to be gays naturally? of course as its possible to have people born with a lot of negative stuff, but not in the number we are seeing gays popping up. I mean imagine if everyone was gay, how on earth will our human race survive? You have 600 posts here, so part of me thinks this is a joke, but I'm not really sure. So I'll respond to some of it as if it's genuine. First of all, despite what you say in your second to last section, being born gay is not an inherently negative thing, and it's insulting to say it is. As far as chemicals in our food goes, I suppose part of that is true. Generally most of what we eat is loaded with chemicals, but obviously there is nothing even remotely factual about the idea that it is leading to an increase in "gayness." Or that there even has been an increase in "gayness." If there does appear to be a rise in the gay population, I would attribute that to gay rights movement being more vocal as well as more gay people being comfortable and feeling safe enough to come out. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
I always understood that one's sexual orientation or preference was that of a choice of the unconscious or the conscious and not one made when you are born and the ideas and views of sexuality are not prominent whatsoever. Am I alone thinking this? | ||
|
DamnCats
United States1472 Posts
| ||
|
Overpowered
Czech Republic764 Posts
 | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On February 28 2011 00:33 DamnCats wrote: ^^ I sure as fuck didn't choose to get a boner the first time I saw some fine ass women in a Playboy mag, sir. I don't see how the opposite would be any different. Despite that being playfully silly, it's not making sense. When I mean choice, I mean the idea that society shapes or directs you into preferences, much like how religion and moral values set by your parents, often have a role in your sub-conscious decision making. When I think "Born as a gay", I think of it as equal to being born African-American or Hispanic. When I mean "Chose to be gay", I think of it as equal to choosing a religion and depicting your strength of it. Of course, I believe in the Kinsey Scale which nearly absolves the terms or labels of homosexuals, heterosexuals and bisexuals and relies more on degrees of preference which would make more sense of my views: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_scale ![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/52/Kinsey_Scale.gif/800px-Kinsey_Scale.gif) Thankfully, the Kinsey Scale accounts for asexuality, which emphasizes even more why I think sexual preference is a preference and not a born trait. | ||
|
BarryWhite
15 Posts
On February 28 2011 00:28 Torte de Lini wrote: Am I the only one who thinks being born gay is not possible? I always understood that one's sexual orientation or preference was that of a choice of the unconscious or the conscious and not one made when you are born and the ideas and views of sexuality are not prominent whatsoever. Am I alone thinking this? All scientific evidence points against this theory. No specific gene has yet been discovered, but all the evidence suggests it is how you are born. And I think most people realize that's definitely the case. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On February 28 2011 00:39 BarryWhite wrote: All scientific evidence points against this theory. No specific gene has yet been discovered, but all the evidence suggests it is how you are born. And I think most people realize that's definitely the case. Where can I see this scientific rationality? | ||
|
KissKiss
United Kingdom136 Posts
On February 27 2011 22:26 thehitman wrote: I strongly believe that people are being given hormone reducer pills to people through vaccines, water, food products, etc... that over time and I'm talking Grandfather>father>son and the son becomes gay or daughter becomes lesbian, whatever. You will notice that gayness is on the increase and this is due to the hormone reducer products that reduce naturally created hormones in very specific quantities. Now is there a conspiracy theory about this or is it that we just randomly put too much chemicals in our food and not fully understood chemicals in the vaccines I don't know. But if you take your attention and read on your most commonly eaten products and write down all the chemicals it contains you will be amazed. There is barely anything organic or natural, its 70-80% all chemicals. Even food like chicken is full of chemicals they consume over the course of the chickens life and its not a natural meat like if you were to eat a chicken found in the wilderness. And when you take the time to read about pills and vaccines and possible side effects you will know that each has side effects and in some cases medical side effects not listed on the manual. Now who is to say these don't effect the hormones in certain percent of people and making the natural process of creating say 0.023ml of hormone B to create 0.011 of hormone B. Could it be possible for there to be gays naturally? of course as its possible to have people born with a lot of negative stuff, but not in the number we are seeing gays popping up. I mean imagine if everyone was gay, how on earth will our human race survive? Ok, thats some grade A paranoia there. Homosexuality has been around since the dawn of time. Not just humans too, pretty sure antelope aren't going gay because of whats in the water. You might perceive homosexuality to be on the increase, but I think thats probably because a larger proportion are openly gay now and also because TV gives more airtime to your lisping camp type than is really proportional. Anyway, remember Ancient Greece? Yeah, those guys loved cock. Also one of the more advanced civilisations of its era. As for all this chemicals in the food stuff, yeah, you got precisely zero evidence so you may as well correlate a increase in homosexuality with, idk, computer usage. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On February 28 2011 00:41 KissKiss wrote: Ok, thats some grade A paranoia there. Homosexuality has been around since the dawn of time. Not just humans too, pretty sure antelope aren't going gay because of whats in the water. You might perceive homosexuality to be on the increase, but I think thats probably because a larger proportion are openly gay now and also because TV gives more airtime to your lisping camp type than is really proportional. Anyway, remember Ancient Greece? Yeah, those guys loved cock. Also one of the more advanced civilisations of its era. As for all this chemicals in the food stuff, yeah, you got precisely zero evidence so you may as well correlate a increase in homosexuality with, idk, computer usage. He didn't consider the idea that homosexuals are just becoming more and more open with their sexuality. If only their rights were following behind. Equal rights seems something so easy to achieve, yet it takes forever. | ||
|
Tufas
Austria2259 Posts
And hell, a gay friend of mine is 10x manlier that I am. He he actually says that those homosexuals who dress like faggots deserve to be called that .. thats how he rolls :/ And most of the homosexual individuals I know use the word faggot and gay in their normal vocabulary and they mean it the same way when I say "defenitely the gay moment of the day.". And they are not only okay with it but also tell me that is absolutely okay and noone cares. The only problem is when you say it to people you dont know - and you shouldnt be talking like that with people you dont know anyway. Who goes to a strange person and tells them they look like a faggot - if they are actually gay or not doesnt matter in this case. Be aware of your surroundings and who cares what you say when you are with friends. When you are not, stop using possible offensive language. World peace achieved. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On February 28 2011 00:44 Tufas wrote: I think it is considerably dumb if you think that being born gay is possible. Sounds to me like the scientists of old (black people have a smaller brain = dumb, being gay is a desease). And whenever I head that being gay Is against nature, I have to laugh hard. Go out there and watch a bunch of animals have sex. And as long as he cannot prove to me that in the last 4000 years (arbitrary number) the amount of LGBT actually went up, well, post somewhere else. I would refer to this fun website. And hell, a gay friend of mine is 10x manlier that I am. He he actually says that those homosexuals who dress like faggots deserve to be called that .. thats how he rolls :/ And most of the homosexual individuals I know use the word faggot and gay in their normal vocabulary and they mean it the same way when I say "defenitely the gay moment of the day.". And they are not only okay with it but also tell me that is absolutely okay and noone cares. The only problem is when you say it to people you dont know - and you shouldnt be talking like that with people you dont know anyway. Who goes to a strange person and tells them they look like a faggot - if they are actually gay or not doesnt matter in this case. Be aware of your surroundings and who cares what you say when you are with friends. When you are not, stop using possible offensive language. World peace achieved. Way to ruin my attempt to be civil about the differences of views. This is incredibly callous to say. | ||
|
BarryWhite
15 Posts
On February 28 2011 00:41 Torte de Lini wrote: Where can I see this scientific rationality? Unfortunately all I can give you at the moment is this small cartoon clip from the documentary "For the Bible Tells Me So" It's a bit corny and over the top, but it goes over the very basics of the science of it. Unfortunately I can't find a clip of the end of the movie, but they list all their sources at the end. I highly recommend you check it out. It's a fantastic movie. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
This is highly entertaining, I also didn't know that my views were coinciding with those of Catholics and Christians o_____o I feel so out of touch! Won't lie, my eyebrows lifted a bit at these stats O: | ||
|
Tufas
Austria2259 Posts
On February 28 2011 00:46 Torte de Lini wrote: Way to ruin my attempt to be civil about the differences of views. This is incredibly callous to say. Irony may have had a tumultuous run with me there .. but I am not quite sure what part of my writings you are refering to .. And if you actually can get born gay, I will write an letter of apology to everyone whom I offended. I really would ! | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On February 28 2011 00:50 Tufas wrote: Irony may have had a tumultuous run with me there .. but I am not quite sure what part of my writings you are refering to .. And if you actually can get born gay, I will write an letter of apology to everyone whom I offended. I really would ! I think it is considerably dumb if you think that being born gay is possible. derp. Being unaccepting of other people's views is callous. | ||
|
BarryWhite
15 Posts
On February 28 2011 00:50 Torte de Lini wrote: Is that James Earl Jones? This is highly entertaining, I also didn't know that my views were coinciding with those of Catholics and Christians o_____o I feel so out of touch! Won't lie, my eyebrows lifted a bit at these stats O: I'm glad you liked it. I'd definitely check out the movie if I were you. It's sad at times, but it's really good and incredibly informative. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On February 28 2011 00:54 BarryWhite wrote: I'm glad you liked it. I'd definitely check out the movie if I were you. It's sad at times, but it's really good and incredibly informative. Still surprised my views are so aligned by Catholics and Christians. I'm a Catholic and a Jewish person, but I take neither as a form of arguments nor anything else besides moral guidelines when I was growing up. I still cannot help but feel it is a choice. Perhaps one that is irreversible (if that makes any sense), but still... to be born with a sexual orientation just feels illogical. | ||
|
Tufas
Austria2259 Posts
On February 28 2011 00:53 Torte de Lini wrote: derp. Being unaccepting of other people's views is callous. I refuse to belive that one has to accept everyones views. That would trap us in an invinite loop where I dont accept that you dont accept that I dont accept other views while you are not accepting my views thus making your statement invalid. And as far as my translation websites go (did not know that word in english) : callous - indifferent, deadhearted, apathetically, bitter, insensible, hardened .. would that be correct ? | ||
| ||
