EPTTL Mafia XXXIX - Page 22
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
| ||
|
Rising_Phoenix
United States370 Posts
*SPAM* *SPAM* *SPAM* *SPAM* *SPAM* *SPAM* *SPAM* Also lots of finger pointing without any actual evidence. I almost say vote for the spammers so at least we can have some constructive comments. Also, the reason why my one post was unsubstantial is because I am still waiting for something to stick out. Right now all the spam looks suspicious, or at least is really annoying. | ||
|
KillerSOS
United States4207 Posts
On May 05 2011 06:00 Rising_Phoenix wrote: I'm sitting here hoping that something interesting happen but all I see is: *SPAM* *SPAM* *SPAM* *SPAM* *SPAM* *SPAM* *SPAM* Also lots of finger pointing without any actual evidence. I almost say vote for the spammers so at least we can have some constructive comments. Also, the reason why my one post was unsubstantial is because I am still waiting for something to stick out. Right now all the spam looks suspicious, or at least is really annoying. I like how you make a spam post about spam posts. You would like to vote for yourself then? | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
Kurumi used Excuse! Kurumi has some Excuses left! Excuse:This will be my first time doing a small analysis,so please don't beat me and lay down Your stones,pickaxes,guns or whatever You just picked up. Thanks. My thoughts on: Chaos13 Points out my weird style of posting,numbers and thinks it is huge scum tell. He is thinking on his own rails,probably not trying to doom us all. Sandroba Hero of our city! Scumhunts every post and every post he has new scum tell,amazing how he does it. Together with Chaos13 is picking on my posting. Irish_Punk13 Got on my rails or at least tries to understand what I try to tell. Points out AirbladeOrange suspicious behavior. Supposedly works for town. AirbladeOrange Wants me dead. Because dead townie is best townie,right? Since I have no contribution value I am worthless. Looks like that is not what he meant actually. Dead townie has no vote privilege! The less votes are available for town,the better for the scum! Suspicious,might be scum. Chaoser Very careful,does not like me hugging him. This is both-side reaction. Though because it is Day1 and his biggest contribution was the hint post I believe I can't decide who he is. KillerSOS Plays for fun,enjoys the game. Agreeds with the Irish_Punk13. ilovejonn Is as careful as Chaoser,has good idea who should be looked at. Kenpachi Has got this. I mean,the backup plan of course. Is onto something obviously. Overall,most of people are trying to hop on me,or AirbladeOrange for his bluff about dead townies. I know this is not SO helpful analysis that You'd hoped for,but look at top of the post. No. Don't pick up those. Please? It is about my excuse. Many of You already used them,some multiple amount of times,but I have no time to pick on it. I believe I will have time to post tomorrow after school (day ends 5:00 KST,right?) | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On May 04 2011 15:09 AirbladeOrange wrote: I think this long of a post is more suspicious than anything irish punk dude said. On May 05 2011 04:09 AirbladeOrange wrote: I don't like this post. I never like it when a townie tries to end discussion. The town should always encourage discussion. However, Chaoser does not seem to support Kurumi at all. It seems like Kurumi could be trying to defend his mafia buddy Chaoser but Chaoser is being very serious about not defending Kurumi at all. Maybe Kurumi just made a bad mistake that Chaoser is trying to distance himself from it in order to not be involved if Kurumi turns out to be mafia. Chaoser even did a little investigation on Kurumi's other TL posts which is very interesting. Chaoser is a good player which nobody should forget. I believe he has the potential to be a great townie or a great mafia player. Eternalmisfit did a good analysis of Kurumi as well. I think the worst part about him is his posting method. What's up with that? At least if we lynch him and he flips town, we won't have to attempt to read those type of posts anymore. I agree with your overall assessment of Kurumi and I see him at least as of right now being most likely to be mafia. This is my third mafia game. I played haunted mafia a while ago and I had no idea what was going on the entire game. Then I just played Brown Bear's mafia game in which I was a mafia goon. DropBear, Coagulation, and GMarshal were all on my team. I'm trying to understand your posts because you seem to do a little flip flopping. You seem nervous to challenge anything Chaoser has said because of his "vet" status. You are very suspicious of Chaoser on page 15 [see initial quote], but now all of a sudden Chaoser decided to push against Kurumi just enough for you to resist attacking him [see 2nd quote]. I think this might have been a TL mafia first to create a campaign against a player because of posting habits on other parts of the forum. I'd like to believe that people are capable of wearing many hats. One of those hats is used in mafia, while the others are used elsewhere, when appropriate. From a first look I would say Chaoser wants to come in as a town leader but I don't really agree with the methods he used, though they are a bit convincing. Back to you Airblade... My question is do you think creating a chaoser vs/with kurumi vision is going to get us somewhere? You say either they could be together or they could be against each other, but you don't really elaborate on how to figure this out. Also are we going to take the route of weeding out bad/inactive townies or rely on posting for the first lynch? We need to be really careful about lynching habits. I remember during the very first mafia games we would go for inactives and those were actually the players with blue roles. This is a problem though as it's not really the towns fault, but instead the people who have these blue roles that need to keep active. Lynching a blue is more painful to watch than anything else in mafia. Do we have an updated list of the inactive players? I saw one a few pages back and I'll bump it in my next post.... If you're new please contribute, ask questions, and start being critical! | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On May 05 2011 00:19 Eternalmisfit wrote: People who are MIA till this point: jaminz VarpuliS aidnai Mig Takuna Amber[Light] GGQ Beneather Thanks for the list! I don't think I saw any of the above posters post since then... | ||
|
Varpulis
United States2517 Posts
| ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
if you guys read kurumi's posts with a thick but generic eastern european accent, it makes more sense. Try it! On May 05 2011 03:54 Irish_Punk13 wrote: Okay guys, I just woke up, so I'm going to be reading over this a few more times so I can try to get a good post up. I should be posting up within an hour or so with something useful, but for now I have to go look to see how another game is going. promises a good post On May 05 2011 04:22 Irish_Punk13 wrote: Okay, for now my vote is going on AirbladeOrange for his last post. I don't like the fact that he's okay with the idea of lynching town. Kurumi is making some great posts so far, and I think he's most likely town based off of his actions so far. The fact that you think it's okay to lynch him tells me that you're probably scum, so I'm putting my vote on you. delivers this?! what great posts? unless you meant "april fools"? On May 05 2011 04:25 KillerSOS wrote: I'm going to have to agree with this post, while I am not decided on a vote at all, this is a good line to follow. And killeragrees? what is going on here? if there is some sort of crumb in the numbers, it went way over my head. And like chaoser said, making town waste time trying to figure it out is, well, a waste of town's time. | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
KKK referring to killersos kenpachi and kurumi posting sequentially. also, off of work already yay | ||
|
KillerSOS
United States4207 Posts
| ||
|
Irish_Punk13
United States18 Posts
I'm keeping my vote as is for now because I haven't found anything that sounds more suspicious than AirbladeOrange. I'm going to go focus on my other game for now, and I'll get back to this in a bit. | ||
|
Eternalmisfit
United States643 Posts
On May 05 2011 00:19 Eternalmisfit wrote: I am not too sold on lynching inactives in this large a setup but I do agree that we should keep tabs on who was actively posting and reading the thread. People who are MIA till this point: jaminz VarpuliS aidnai Mig Takuna Amber[Light] GGQ Beneather That was the original list. Since then Amber[Light], aidnai, and jaminz have made a post each. Updated list Mig Takuna GGQ Beneather Keep in mind that these people are the ones who have not posted at all. There might be other folks who might be lurking by making a token post. Also are we going to take the route of weeding out bad/inactive townies or rely on posting for the first lynch? We need to be really careful about lynching habits. I remember during the very first mafia games we would go for inactives and those were actually the players with blue roles. This is a problem though as it's not really the towns fault, but instead the people who have these blue roles that need to keep active. Lynching a blue is more painful to watch than anything else in mafia. As I posted earlier, I am not too keen on lynching a lurker/inactive on the first day in a 30 man setup as a blue kill would hurt us quite a bit. However, if we have someone in the game who has not posted/voted till somewhat close to the deadline and the town cannot reach a consensus on a mafia lynch, I would recommend lynching the inactive person since he was going to be mod-killed anyways. That is my 2 cents on the issue but it would nice to hear thoughts from more experienced players about it. | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
| ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On May 05 2011 06:34 Cthsazsa wrote: Are we allowed to PM the coaches? Absolutely, that is what they are there for. ^_^ | ||
|
orgolove
Vatican City State1650 Posts
And we're just letting the suspicion go just like that? | ||
|
Node
United States2159 Posts
On May 05 2011 06:34 Cthsazsa wrote: Are we allowed to PM the coaches? In fact, that's pretty much the only legal way of communicating with them. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On May 05 2011 06:30 Eternalmisfit wrote: As I posted earlier, I am not too keen on lynching a lurker/inactive on the first day in a 30 man setup as a blue kill would hurt us quite a bit. However, if we have someone in the game who has not posted/voted till somewhat close to the deadline and the town cannot reach a consensus on a mafia lynch, I would recommend lynching the inactive person since he was going to be mod-killed anyways. That is my 2 cents on the issue but it would nice to hear thoughts from more experienced players about it. Depends on the situation. Are we going to be sure that the person we're sparing isn't red anyway? Why were we even going to lynch him? I believe that the inactive player should be disregarded as their punishment will be coming, and we need to use the lynches to lynch mafia, not avoid getting duplicate mod kills with potential mis-lynches. Sacrificing 1 inactive player to hit [potentially] 0 mafia is bad. Ignoring 1 inactive player to hit [potentially] 1 mafia is a pretty good deal. | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
I've noticed a lot of finger-pointing going around. A good example would be of KillerSOS qucikly criticizing Rising_Pheonix's post as spam, even though all he did was give his viewpoint on the current situation? Sandroba is very quick to accuse people as being scum. As a few people have already said, Kurumi's posts are strange. It seemed like that at first he was trying to attack chaoser, and then started claiming him to be a good pro-townie? AirBlade's post instantly looked like anti-town. He was suggesting that we lynch Kurumi, and then he said that even if Kurumi is a townie, it's still okay. As I said earlier, right now all we're doing is pointing fingers and forcing people into corners to make them look suspicious. I still haven't seen a good, legitimate reason for voting off someone yet. | ||
| ||
