• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:38
CEST 08:38
KST 15:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview8[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21
Community News
ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo20Weekly Cups (June 8-14): Clem and Solar double, PTR tested0RSL: S6 Finals played at BlizzCon 202611Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28)12[BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June4
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th Is the larve respawn broken? Yamato Cup Series What kind of tool would you be interested in? Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted
Tourneys
Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28) GSL CK #4 20-21th June Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery Mutation # 530 One For All Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ STARCRAFT MOVIE - Last Night at the Command center BW General Discussion Battle cruiser feet vs Carrier fleet Fact based Zerg Upgrade Tier List
Tourneys
CSLAN 4 is Coming! [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Relatively freeroll strategies Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread [H]Internet/Gaming Cafe Tips and Tricks The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How To Predict Tilt in Espor…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8242 users

Tie break rulings

Forum Index > UEFA Euro 2012
Post a Reply
blackhole12
Profile Joined May 2012
42 Posts
June 15 2012 20:58 GMT
#1
Hi, I have a question to all of you. My father and I had a debate about the tiebreak rulings. Currently it's something like points, goal difference, goals, FIFA ranking. If it ended up as to come depend on FIFA ranking, my father thought it would be fairer to let the team lowest on that list advance. His reasoning: the team lower on the ranking played relatively better to even tie with a higher ranked team, therefore deserve to advance more.

Does he make sense? Please decide.
MajuGarzett
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Canada635 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-15 21:04:28
June 15 2012 21:03 GMT
#2
They played better than they were expected to but assuming the tournament is designed to make competition be as high class as possible it makes more sense to take the higher ranked team.
KobraKay
Profile Joined March 2010
Portugal4335 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-15 21:10:39
June 15 2012 21:05 GMT
#3
On June 16 2012 05:58 blackhole12 wrote:
Hi, I have a question to all of you. My father and I had a debate about the tiebreak rulings. Currently it's something like points, goal difference, goals, FIFA ranking. If it ended up as to come depend on FIFA ranking, my father thought it would be fairer to let the team lowest on that list advance. His reasoning: the team lower on the ranking played relatively better to even tie with a higher ranked team, therefore deserve to advance more.

Does he make sense? Please decide.


Is that true? I think the order is wrong in your post, plus you are missing the direct confrontation (which I believe is the first tie breaker after points) and I believe fair play is the last tie breaker. I dont remember seeing fifa ranking anywhere but I wasnt exactly looking, I just heard somewhere that the first would be direct match and the last one fair play :s

EDIT: I search for it and fifa ranking is not a tie breaker. You mean uefa coefficient probably? Anyway the last two tie break criteria are fair play and drawing lots none of which is needed since there are no tied teams in the uefa coefficient which is the second to last criteria so I guess your post makes a little bit more sense now.

Oh and no, I dont think your father is right...if it ever reaches that far, the better team should advance and not be penalized by a bad day/game since chances are it will produce better games down the road.
CJ Fighting! (--.--)
GeorgeH
Profile Joined January 2012
United Kingdom190 Posts
June 16 2012 16:08 GMT
#4
FIFA rankings don't really mean anything as the rank is determined by performance over four years, so it may not be a reflection of how good a team is right now. The current system for tie breaking is just about fair to be honest:

- Head-to-head record; then
- Goal difference in head-to-head; then
- Goals scored in head-to-head; then
- Draw straws (I think???)

With the exception of the last criterion, the criteria generally favours the better team out of the two and goes through based on results obtained in the tournament. What your father is suggesting is not only that teams will go through based on past performances outside of the tournament, but the historically worse team ends up going through? Sorry, but that does not make sense at all.
Klyberess
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden345 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-16 16:17:49
June 16 2012 16:16 GMT
#5
I'll agree with the poster above that a winner should be chosen randomly rather than due to FIFA or UEFA ranking (favouring the lower ranked team is just as bad as the other way around, IMO). Perhaps number of yellows/reds should be counted before the coin toss.
EmpireHappy <3 STHack <3 ByunPrime
nayumi
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Australia6499 Posts
June 16 2012 16:24 GMT
#6
On June 17 2012 01:16 Klyberess wrote:
I'll agree with the poster above that a winner should be chosen randomly rather than due to FIFA or UEFA ranking (favouring the lower ranked team is just as bad as the other way around, IMO). Perhaps number of yellows/reds should be counted before the coin toss.

Yea there is another indicator before the lucky draw called fair play, which I assume the number of cards and fouls committed by each team ...
Sugoi monogatari onii-chan!
Mafe
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany5966 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-16 17:29:36
June 16 2012 17:16 GMT
#7
wikipedia:
"Tie-breaking criteria

If two or more teams are equal on points on completion of the group matches, the following criteria are applied to determine the rankings (according to paragraphs 8.07 and 8.08 of the regulations, and amendment to 8.07 adopted by the UEFA Executive Committee):

1. Higher number of points obtained in the matches played between the teams in question;
2. Superior goal difference resulting from the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);
3. Higher number of goals scored in the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);
4. If, after having applied criteria 1 to 3 to more than two teams, two teams still have an equal ranking, criteria 1 to 3 are reapplied exclusively to the matches between the two teams in question to determine the final rankings of the two teams. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 5 to 10 apply in the order given;
5. Superior goal difference in all group matches;
6. Higher number of goals scored in all group matches;
7. If two teams which are tied in all criteria 1 to 6 play their last group match against each other (i.e., the result is a draw and the two teams have the same number of points, goal difference and goals scored), and provided no other teams within the group have the same number of points, the ranking of the two teams in question is determined by penalty shoot-out. Otherwise, criteria 8 to 10 apply in the order given;
8. Position in the UEFA national team coefficient ranking system;
9. Fair play conduct of the teams (final tournament);
10. Drawing of lots.

Note: As all teams have different UEFA national team coefficient, the last two tie-breakers (fair play conduct and drawing of lots) will never be applied in this tournament."

This because the op posted wrong tiebreak rules (and we WILL talk about them a lot the next days). Also your father's argument of taking the lower ranked team does not make sense. Yes, the lower ranked team might have played better than expected, but the UEFA-coefficient (FIFA-ranking being irrelevant here) is based on recent results (qualification and finals of WC/EC). Essentially taking the lower ranked team would mean you would punish the team that showed good results recently; and also it would give teams an incentive to throw games in the qualification to purposely lower their coefficient. I think it is fair to say a the better team should advance, and if one could not order teams by their results in the last 2 weeks, I believe it is fair to separate them by their results of recent years.
Sanctimonius
Profile Joined October 2010
United Kingdom861 Posts
June 16 2012 17:39 GMT
#8
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.
You live the life you choose.
GeorgeH
Profile Joined January 2012
United Kingdom190 Posts
June 16 2012 18:04 GMT
#9
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.
nojok
Profile Joined May 2011
France15846 Posts
June 16 2012 18:43 GMT
#10
On June 17 2012 03:04 GeorgeH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.

Indeed, we've seen England play and also Chelsea.

Jokes aside, I totally agree with you.
"Back then teams that won were credited, now it's called throw. I think it's sad." - Kuroky - Flap Flap Wings!
-Archangel-
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia7457 Posts
June 17 2012 10:39 GMT
#11
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.

Football is about winning, not scoring more goals.
gasmeter
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United Kingdom251 Posts
June 17 2012 12:46 GMT
#12
On June 17 2012 19:39 -Archangel- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.

Football is about winning, not scoring more goals.


True.

The tie-breaker is definitely head-to-head record first. We saw this last night with Greece advancing ahead of Russia because they had defeated them 1-0.
Polt | MMA | MarineKing | Flash | Mvp | NesTea | INnoVation
sinii
Profile Joined August 2010
England989 Posts
June 17 2012 12:58 GMT
#13
On June 17 2012 03:43 nojok wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 03:04 GeorgeH wrote:
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.

Indeed, we've seen England play and also Chelsea.

Jokes aside, I totally agree with you.


What's funny about your post is that England have scored more goals then France so far in the Euros. :D
Ancient-Hunter
Profile Joined June 2011
Korea (South)142 Posts
June 17 2012 16:12 GMT
#14
I think GD first (as it is in the World Cup) is better as its more indicative of a teams overall performance in group stage.


Anyways can someone tell me how the dutch can advance tonight? If they beat Portugal and the Germans beat the Danes then Portugal/Denmark/Netherlands will all be tied at 3 points each.

who goes through?
Let's fly!
don_kyuhote
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
3007 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-17 16:24:13
June 17 2012 16:18 GMT
#15
On June 18 2012 01:12 Ancient-Hunter wrote:
I think GD first (as it is in the World Cup) is better as its more indicative of a teams overall performance in group stage.


Anyways can someone tell me how the dutch can advance tonight? If they beat Portugal and the Germans beat the Danes then Portugal/Denmark/Netherlands will all be tied at 3 points each.

who goes through?

Since it would be a three - way tie, I guess it comes down to goal differential.
Netherlands has to beat Portugal by at least 2 goals
For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
Stimp
Profile Joined November 2010
South Africa780 Posts
June 17 2012 17:18 GMT
#16
On June 17 2012 21:58 sinii wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 03:43 nojok wrote:
On June 17 2012 03:04 GeorgeH wrote:
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.

Indeed, we've seen England play and also Chelsea.

Jokes aside, I totally agree with you.


What's funny about your post is that England have scored more goals then France so far in the Euros. :D


And chelsea scored more than barcelona.
Don't count your apples before they've... grown
empty.bottle
Profile Joined July 2009
685 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-17 21:18:58
June 17 2012 21:18 GMT
#17
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Dont worry World Cup is goal difference first.
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 22m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft426
RuFF_SC2 64
Nina 63
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2960
GuemChi 1987
Leta 148
Hm[arnc] 40
soO 17
Icarus 7
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm120
League of Legends
JimRising 716
Counter-Strike
summit1g11600
Other Games
Happy102
kaitlyn35
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream5429
Other Games
gamesdonequick1086
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH291
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1614
• Rush1297
• Stunt436
• HappyZerGling93
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Weekly
4h 22m
Monday Night Weeklies
9h 22m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 3h
The PondCast
2 days
Douyu Cup 2020
2 days
Oliveira vs Trap
Jieshi vs XY
soO vs FanTaSy
TY vs Coffee
Douyu Cup 2020
3 days
Neeb vs Impact
MacSed vs Cyan
Scarlett vs Kelazhur
INnoVation vs Dear
Douyu Cup 2020
4 days
Maestros of the Game
5 days
herO vs Classic
Maru vs Serral
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
5 days
Douyu Cup 2020
5 days
[ Show More ]
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
6 days
Online Event
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4
WardiTV Spring 2026
Heroes Pulsing #2

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Season 21: Qualifier 1
SCTL 2026 Spring
Maestros of the Game 2
Murky Cup 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026

Upcoming

CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
BCC 2026
Light HT
Heroes Pulsing #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.