• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:20
CEST 07:20
KST 14:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out5RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-2212Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-69SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-64
StarCraft 2
General
SC4ALL: II Talent Announcement! Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 5/8 Protoss AoE skill expression August World Ranking: Clem climbs to #2
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Tasteless Time Warp: SC Evo Showmatch (May 25)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 538 Media Blackout The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Michaelbg appreciation thread How FlaSh Nearly Forfeited MSL Finals being late ASL22 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2v2v2v2 Tournament KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3 Escore Tournament - Season 3
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Any training maps people recommend? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation General RTS Discussion Thread Diablo 2 thread
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Letting Off Steam Thread Iain M Banks Says He Has Cancer And Months To Live Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Are High-Level Gamers more A…
TrAiDoS
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 5300 users

Tie break rulings

Forum Index > UEFA Euro 2012
Post a Reply
blackhole12
Profile Joined May 2012
42 Posts
June 15 2012 20:58 GMT
#1
Hi, I have a question to all of you. My father and I had a debate about the tiebreak rulings. Currently it's something like points, goal difference, goals, FIFA ranking. If it ended up as to come depend on FIFA ranking, my father thought it would be fairer to let the team lowest on that list advance. His reasoning: the team lower on the ranking played relatively better to even tie with a higher ranked team, therefore deserve to advance more.

Does he make sense? Please decide.
MajuGarzett
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Canada635 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-15 21:04:28
June 15 2012 21:03 GMT
#2
They played better than they were expected to but assuming the tournament is designed to make competition be as high class as possible it makes more sense to take the higher ranked team.
KobraKay
Profile Joined March 2010
Portugal4372 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-15 21:10:39
June 15 2012 21:05 GMT
#3
On June 16 2012 05:58 blackhole12 wrote:
Hi, I have a question to all of you. My father and I had a debate about the tiebreak rulings. Currently it's something like points, goal difference, goals, FIFA ranking. If it ended up as to come depend on FIFA ranking, my father thought it would be fairer to let the team lowest on that list advance. His reasoning: the team lower on the ranking played relatively better to even tie with a higher ranked team, therefore deserve to advance more.

Does he make sense? Please decide.


Is that true? I think the order is wrong in your post, plus you are missing the direct confrontation (which I believe is the first tie breaker after points) and I believe fair play is the last tie breaker. I dont remember seeing fifa ranking anywhere but I wasnt exactly looking, I just heard somewhere that the first would be direct match and the last one fair play :s

EDIT: I search for it and fifa ranking is not a tie breaker. You mean uefa coefficient probably? Anyway the last two tie break criteria are fair play and drawing lots none of which is needed since there are no tied teams in the uefa coefficient which is the second to last criteria so I guess your post makes a little bit more sense now.

Oh and no, I dont think your father is right...if it ever reaches that far, the better team should advance and not be penalized by a bad day/game since chances are it will produce better games down the road.
CJ Fighting! (--.--)
GeorgeH
Profile Joined January 2012
United Kingdom190 Posts
June 16 2012 16:08 GMT
#4
FIFA rankings don't really mean anything as the rank is determined by performance over four years, so it may not be a reflection of how good a team is right now. The current system for tie breaking is just about fair to be honest:

- Head-to-head record; then
- Goal difference in head-to-head; then
- Goals scored in head-to-head; then
- Draw straws (I think???)

With the exception of the last criterion, the criteria generally favours the better team out of the two and goes through based on results obtained in the tournament. What your father is suggesting is not only that teams will go through based on past performances outside of the tournament, but the historically worse team ends up going through? Sorry, but that does not make sense at all.
Klyberess
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden345 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-16 16:17:49
June 16 2012 16:16 GMT
#5
I'll agree with the poster above that a winner should be chosen randomly rather than due to FIFA or UEFA ranking (favouring the lower ranked team is just as bad as the other way around, IMO). Perhaps number of yellows/reds should be counted before the coin toss.
EmpireHappy <3 STHack <3 ByunPrime
nayumi
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Australia6499 Posts
June 16 2012 16:24 GMT
#6
On June 17 2012 01:16 Klyberess wrote:
I'll agree with the poster above that a winner should be chosen randomly rather than due to FIFA or UEFA ranking (favouring the lower ranked team is just as bad as the other way around, IMO). Perhaps number of yellows/reds should be counted before the coin toss.

Yea there is another indicator before the lucky draw called fair play, which I assume the number of cards and fouls committed by each team ...
Sugoi monogatari onii-chan!
Mafe
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany5966 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-16 17:29:36
June 16 2012 17:16 GMT
#7
wikipedia:
"Tie-breaking criteria

If two or more teams are equal on points on completion of the group matches, the following criteria are applied to determine the rankings (according to paragraphs 8.07 and 8.08 of the regulations, and amendment to 8.07 adopted by the UEFA Executive Committee):

1. Higher number of points obtained in the matches played between the teams in question;
2. Superior goal difference resulting from the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);
3. Higher number of goals scored in the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);
4. If, after having applied criteria 1 to 3 to more than two teams, two teams still have an equal ranking, criteria 1 to 3 are reapplied exclusively to the matches between the two teams in question to determine the final rankings of the two teams. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 5 to 10 apply in the order given;
5. Superior goal difference in all group matches;
6. Higher number of goals scored in all group matches;
7. If two teams which are tied in all criteria 1 to 6 play their last group match against each other (i.e., the result is a draw and the two teams have the same number of points, goal difference and goals scored), and provided no other teams within the group have the same number of points, the ranking of the two teams in question is determined by penalty shoot-out. Otherwise, criteria 8 to 10 apply in the order given;
8. Position in the UEFA national team coefficient ranking system;
9. Fair play conduct of the teams (final tournament);
10. Drawing of lots.

Note: As all teams have different UEFA national team coefficient, the last two tie-breakers (fair play conduct and drawing of lots) will never be applied in this tournament."

This because the op posted wrong tiebreak rules (and we WILL talk about them a lot the next days). Also your father's argument of taking the lower ranked team does not make sense. Yes, the lower ranked team might have played better than expected, but the UEFA-coefficient (FIFA-ranking being irrelevant here) is based on recent results (qualification and finals of WC/EC). Essentially taking the lower ranked team would mean you would punish the team that showed good results recently; and also it would give teams an incentive to throw games in the qualification to purposely lower their coefficient. I think it is fair to say a the better team should advance, and if one could not order teams by their results in the last 2 weeks, I believe it is fair to separate them by their results of recent years.
Sanctimonius
Profile Joined October 2010
United Kingdom861 Posts
June 16 2012 17:39 GMT
#8
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.
You live the life you choose.
GeorgeH
Profile Joined January 2012
United Kingdom190 Posts
June 16 2012 18:04 GMT
#9
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.
nojok
Profile Joined May 2011
France15846 Posts
June 16 2012 18:43 GMT
#10
On June 17 2012 03:04 GeorgeH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.

Indeed, we've seen England play and also Chelsea.

Jokes aside, I totally agree with you.
"Back then teams that won were credited, now it's called throw. I think it's sad." - Kuroky - Flap Flap Wings!
-Archangel-
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia7457 Posts
June 17 2012 10:39 GMT
#11
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.

Football is about winning, not scoring more goals.
gasmeter
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United Kingdom251 Posts
June 17 2012 12:46 GMT
#12
On June 17 2012 19:39 -Archangel- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.

Football is about winning, not scoring more goals.


True.

The tie-breaker is definitely head-to-head record first. We saw this last night with Greece advancing ahead of Russia because they had defeated them 1-0.
Polt | MMA | MarineKing | Flash | Mvp | NesTea | INnoVation
sinii
Profile Joined August 2010
England989 Posts
June 17 2012 12:58 GMT
#13
On June 17 2012 03:43 nojok wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 03:04 GeorgeH wrote:
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.

Indeed, we've seen England play and also Chelsea.

Jokes aside, I totally agree with you.


What's funny about your post is that England have scored more goals then France so far in the Euros. :D
Ancient-Hunter
Profile Joined June 2011
Korea (South)142 Posts
June 17 2012 16:12 GMT
#14
I think GD first (as it is in the World Cup) is better as its more indicative of a teams overall performance in group stage.


Anyways can someone tell me how the dutch can advance tonight? If they beat Portugal and the Germans beat the Danes then Portugal/Denmark/Netherlands will all be tied at 3 points each.

who goes through?
Let's fly!
don_kyuhote
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
3007 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-17 16:24:13
June 17 2012 16:18 GMT
#15
On June 18 2012 01:12 Ancient-Hunter wrote:
I think GD first (as it is in the World Cup) is better as its more indicative of a teams overall performance in group stage.


Anyways can someone tell me how the dutch can advance tonight? If they beat Portugal and the Germans beat the Danes then Portugal/Denmark/Netherlands will all be tied at 3 points each.

who goes through?

Since it would be a three - way tie, I guess it comes down to goal differential.
Netherlands has to beat Portugal by at least 2 goals
For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
Stimp
Profile Joined November 2010
South Africa780 Posts
June 17 2012 17:18 GMT
#16
On June 17 2012 21:58 sinii wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 03:43 nojok wrote:
On June 17 2012 03:04 GeorgeH wrote:
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.

Indeed, we've seen England play and also Chelsea.

Jokes aside, I totally agree with you.


What's funny about your post is that England have scored more goals then France so far in the Euros. :D


And chelsea scored more than barcelona.
Don't count your apples before they've... grown
empty.bottle
Profile Joined July 2009
685 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-17 21:18:58
June 17 2012 21:18 GMT
#17
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Dont worry World Cup is goal difference first.
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Cup
00:00
#94
PiGStarcraft363
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft501
PiGStarcraft363
FoxeR 26
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 3564
GuemChi 2115
Icarus 9
Dota 2
febbydoto22
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 650
Counter-Strike
summit1g7199
Coldzera 1256
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1371
Mew2King129
Other Games
C9.Mang0414
m0e_tv288
ViBE128
Maynarde111
ROOTCatZ30
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick701
BasetradeTV50
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH323
• Hupsaiya 69
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 85
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2156
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
3h 40m
Kung Fu Cup
5h 40m
Replay Cast
18h 40m
The PondCast
1d 4h
OSC
1d 7h
Replay Cast
1d 18h
Escore
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
OSC
4 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Rush vs Hm
Bisu vs Shuttle
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
The Patches Monday
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Sharp vs Shinee
Action vs Shine
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-08-10
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
Acropolis #5
RSL Revival: Season 6
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W7
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Escore Tournament S3: W8
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
META DYMY #4
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Thunderpick World Champ.
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.