• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 19:16
CET 01:16
KST 09:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge1[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA12
StarCraft 2
General
SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t GM / Master map hacker and general hacking and cheating thread
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened
Brood War
General
Data analysis on 70 million replays soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions
Tourneys
[BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] GosuLeague T1 Ro16 - Tue & Thu 22:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 EVE Corporation [Game] Osu!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine About SC2SEA.COM
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Health Impact of Joining…
TrAiDoS
Dyadica Evangelium — Chapt…
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1891 users

Tie break rulings

Forum Index > UEFA Euro 2012
Post a Reply
blackhole12
Profile Joined May 2012
42 Posts
June 15 2012 20:58 GMT
#1
Hi, I have a question to all of you. My father and I had a debate about the tiebreak rulings. Currently it's something like points, goal difference, goals, FIFA ranking. If it ended up as to come depend on FIFA ranking, my father thought it would be fairer to let the team lowest on that list advance. His reasoning: the team lower on the ranking played relatively better to even tie with a higher ranked team, therefore deserve to advance more.

Does he make sense? Please decide.
MajuGarzett
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Canada635 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-15 21:04:28
June 15 2012 21:03 GMT
#2
They played better than they were expected to but assuming the tournament is designed to make competition be as high class as possible it makes more sense to take the higher ranked team.
KobraKay
Profile Joined March 2010
Portugal4231 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-15 21:10:39
June 15 2012 21:05 GMT
#3
On June 16 2012 05:58 blackhole12 wrote:
Hi, I have a question to all of you. My father and I had a debate about the tiebreak rulings. Currently it's something like points, goal difference, goals, FIFA ranking. If it ended up as to come depend on FIFA ranking, my father thought it would be fairer to let the team lowest on that list advance. His reasoning: the team lower on the ranking played relatively better to even tie with a higher ranked team, therefore deserve to advance more.

Does he make sense? Please decide.


Is that true? I think the order is wrong in your post, plus you are missing the direct confrontation (which I believe is the first tie breaker after points) and I believe fair play is the last tie breaker. I dont remember seeing fifa ranking anywhere but I wasnt exactly looking, I just heard somewhere that the first would be direct match and the last one fair play :s

EDIT: I search for it and fifa ranking is not a tie breaker. You mean uefa coefficient probably? Anyway the last two tie break criteria are fair play and drawing lots none of which is needed since there are no tied teams in the uefa coefficient which is the second to last criteria so I guess your post makes a little bit more sense now.

Oh and no, I dont think your father is right...if it ever reaches that far, the better team should advance and not be penalized by a bad day/game since chances are it will produce better games down the road.
CJ Fighting! (--.--)
GeorgeH
Profile Joined January 2012
United Kingdom190 Posts
June 16 2012 16:08 GMT
#4
FIFA rankings don't really mean anything as the rank is determined by performance over four years, so it may not be a reflection of how good a team is right now. The current system for tie breaking is just about fair to be honest:

- Head-to-head record; then
- Goal difference in head-to-head; then
- Goals scored in head-to-head; then
- Draw straws (I think???)

With the exception of the last criterion, the criteria generally favours the better team out of the two and goes through based on results obtained in the tournament. What your father is suggesting is not only that teams will go through based on past performances outside of the tournament, but the historically worse team ends up going through? Sorry, but that does not make sense at all.
Klyberess
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden345 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-16 16:17:49
June 16 2012 16:16 GMT
#5
I'll agree with the poster above that a winner should be chosen randomly rather than due to FIFA or UEFA ranking (favouring the lower ranked team is just as bad as the other way around, IMO). Perhaps number of yellows/reds should be counted before the coin toss.
EmpireHappy <3 STHack <3 ByunPrime
nayumi
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Australia6499 Posts
June 16 2012 16:24 GMT
#6
On June 17 2012 01:16 Klyberess wrote:
I'll agree with the poster above that a winner should be chosen randomly rather than due to FIFA or UEFA ranking (favouring the lower ranked team is just as bad as the other way around, IMO). Perhaps number of yellows/reds should be counted before the coin toss.

Yea there is another indicator before the lucky draw called fair play, which I assume the number of cards and fouls committed by each team ...
Sugoi monogatari onii-chan!
Mafe
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany5966 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-16 17:29:36
June 16 2012 17:16 GMT
#7
wikipedia:
"Tie-breaking criteria

If two or more teams are equal on points on completion of the group matches, the following criteria are applied to determine the rankings (according to paragraphs 8.07 and 8.08 of the regulations, and amendment to 8.07 adopted by the UEFA Executive Committee):

1. Higher number of points obtained in the matches played between the teams in question;
2. Superior goal difference resulting from the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);
3. Higher number of goals scored in the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);
4. If, after having applied criteria 1 to 3 to more than two teams, two teams still have an equal ranking, criteria 1 to 3 are reapplied exclusively to the matches between the two teams in question to determine the final rankings of the two teams. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 5 to 10 apply in the order given;
5. Superior goal difference in all group matches;
6. Higher number of goals scored in all group matches;
7. If two teams which are tied in all criteria 1 to 6 play their last group match against each other (i.e., the result is a draw and the two teams have the same number of points, goal difference and goals scored), and provided no other teams within the group have the same number of points, the ranking of the two teams in question is determined by penalty shoot-out. Otherwise, criteria 8 to 10 apply in the order given;
8. Position in the UEFA national team coefficient ranking system;
9. Fair play conduct of the teams (final tournament);
10. Drawing of lots.

Note: As all teams have different UEFA national team coefficient, the last two tie-breakers (fair play conduct and drawing of lots) will never be applied in this tournament."

This because the op posted wrong tiebreak rules (and we WILL talk about them a lot the next days). Also your father's argument of taking the lower ranked team does not make sense. Yes, the lower ranked team might have played better than expected, but the UEFA-coefficient (FIFA-ranking being irrelevant here) is based on recent results (qualification and finals of WC/EC). Essentially taking the lower ranked team would mean you would punish the team that showed good results recently; and also it would give teams an incentive to throw games in the qualification to purposely lower their coefficient. I think it is fair to say a the better team should advance, and if one could not order teams by their results in the last 2 weeks, I believe it is fair to separate them by their results of recent years.
Sanctimonius
Profile Joined October 2010
United Kingdom861 Posts
June 16 2012 17:39 GMT
#8
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.
You live the life you choose.
GeorgeH
Profile Joined January 2012
United Kingdom190 Posts
June 16 2012 18:04 GMT
#9
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.
nojok
Profile Joined May 2011
France15845 Posts
June 16 2012 18:43 GMT
#10
On June 17 2012 03:04 GeorgeH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.

Indeed, we've seen England play and also Chelsea.

Jokes aside, I totally agree with you.
"Back then teams that won were credited, now it's called throw. I think it's sad." - Kuroky - Flap Flap Wings!
-Archangel-
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia7457 Posts
June 17 2012 10:39 GMT
#11
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.

Football is about winning, not scoring more goals.
gasmeter
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United Kingdom249 Posts
June 17 2012 12:46 GMT
#12
On June 17 2012 19:39 -Archangel- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.

Football is about winning, not scoring more goals.


True.

The tie-breaker is definitely head-to-head record first. We saw this last night with Greece advancing ahead of Russia because they had defeated them 1-0.
Polt | MMA | MarineKing | Flash | Mvp | NesTea | INnoVation
sinii
Profile Joined August 2010
England989 Posts
June 17 2012 12:58 GMT
#13
On June 17 2012 03:43 nojok wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 03:04 GeorgeH wrote:
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.

Indeed, we've seen England play and also Chelsea.

Jokes aside, I totally agree with you.


What's funny about your post is that England have scored more goals then France so far in the Euros. :D
Ancient-Hunter
Profile Joined June 2011
Korea (South)142 Posts
June 17 2012 16:12 GMT
#14
I think GD first (as it is in the World Cup) is better as its more indicative of a teams overall performance in group stage.


Anyways can someone tell me how the dutch can advance tonight? If they beat Portugal and the Germans beat the Danes then Portugal/Denmark/Netherlands will all be tied at 3 points each.

who goes through?
Let's fly!
don_kyuhote
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
3006 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-17 16:24:13
June 17 2012 16:18 GMT
#15
On June 18 2012 01:12 Ancient-Hunter wrote:
I think GD first (as it is in the World Cup) is better as its more indicative of a teams overall performance in group stage.


Anyways can someone tell me how the dutch can advance tonight? If they beat Portugal and the Germans beat the Danes then Portugal/Denmark/Netherlands will all be tied at 3 points each.

who goes through?

Since it would be a three - way tie, I guess it comes down to goal differential.
Netherlands has to beat Portugal by at least 2 goals
For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
Stimp
Profile Joined November 2010
South Africa780 Posts
June 17 2012 17:18 GMT
#16
On June 17 2012 21:58 sinii wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 03:43 nojok wrote:
On June 17 2012 03:04 GeorgeH wrote:
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.

Indeed, we've seen England play and also Chelsea.

Jokes aside, I totally agree with you.


What's funny about your post is that England have scored more goals then France so far in the Euros. :D


And chelsea scored more than barcelona.
Don't count your apples before they've... grown
empty.bottle
Profile Joined July 2009
685 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-17 21:18:58
June 17 2012 21:18 GMT
#17
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Dont worry World Cup is goal difference first.
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL 21
20:00
RO16 TieBreaker - Group A
TerrOr vs Aeternum
HBO vs Kyrie
ZZZero.O257
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
White-Ra 232
SpeCial 143
NeuroSwarm 84
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2575
ZZZero.O 257
NaDa 52
Noble 16
Dota 2
PGG 201
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox478
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor187
Other Games
Grubby5787
FrodaN2849
Trikslyr48
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1037
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 83
• musti20045 44
• davetesta29
• HeavenSC 15
• Airneanach4
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21900
• Ler112
Other Games
• imaqtpie1317
• Scarra1220
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
7h 14m
Classic vs SHIN
Maru vs TBD
herO vs TBD
Wardi Open
13h 44m
IPSL
19h 44m
StRyKeR vs OldBoy
Sziky vs Tarson
BSL 21
19h 44m
StRyKeR vs Artosis
OyAji vs KameZerg
OSC
22h 44m
OSC
1d 8h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 16h
OSC
1d 22h
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
3 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
LAN Event
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-21
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.