• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:28
CEST 14:28
KST 21:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror4[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 20264Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)77Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double2
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? [Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)
Tourneys
ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Grand Finals Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 546 Catch the Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble
Brood War
General
Fantasy returning? BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Sagi.gg Launcher Released SC4ALL II Brood War Complete Invited Player Lineup
Tourneys
[ASL22] Semifinal A [ASL22] Semifinal B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Escaping Into Video Games: G…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8565 users

Tie break rulings

Forum Index > UEFA Euro 2012
Post a Reply
blackhole12
Profile Joined May 2012
42 Posts
June 15 2012 20:58 GMT
#1
Hi, I have a question to all of you. My father and I had a debate about the tiebreak rulings. Currently it's something like points, goal difference, goals, FIFA ranking. If it ended up as to come depend on FIFA ranking, my father thought it would be fairer to let the team lowest on that list advance. His reasoning: the team lower on the ranking played relatively better to even tie with a higher ranked team, therefore deserve to advance more.

Does he make sense? Please decide.
MajuGarzett
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Canada635 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-15 21:04:28
June 15 2012 21:03 GMT
#2
They played better than they were expected to but assuming the tournament is designed to make competition be as high class as possible it makes more sense to take the higher ranked team.
KobraKay
Profile Joined March 2010
Portugal4391 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-15 21:10:39
June 15 2012 21:05 GMT
#3
On June 16 2012 05:58 blackhole12 wrote:
Hi, I have a question to all of you. My father and I had a debate about the tiebreak rulings. Currently it's something like points, goal difference, goals, FIFA ranking. If it ended up as to come depend on FIFA ranking, my father thought it would be fairer to let the team lowest on that list advance. His reasoning: the team lower on the ranking played relatively better to even tie with a higher ranked team, therefore deserve to advance more.

Does he make sense? Please decide.


Is that true? I think the order is wrong in your post, plus you are missing the direct confrontation (which I believe is the first tie breaker after points) and I believe fair play is the last tie breaker. I dont remember seeing fifa ranking anywhere but I wasnt exactly looking, I just heard somewhere that the first would be direct match and the last one fair play :s

EDIT: I search for it and fifa ranking is not a tie breaker. You mean uefa coefficient probably? Anyway the last two tie break criteria are fair play and drawing lots none of which is needed since there are no tied teams in the uefa coefficient which is the second to last criteria so I guess your post makes a little bit more sense now.

Oh and no, I dont think your father is right...if it ever reaches that far, the better team should advance and not be penalized by a bad day/game since chances are it will produce better games down the road.
CJ Fighting! (--.--)
GeorgeH
Profile Joined January 2012
United Kingdom190 Posts
June 16 2012 16:08 GMT
#4
FIFA rankings don't really mean anything as the rank is determined by performance over four years, so it may not be a reflection of how good a team is right now. The current system for tie breaking is just about fair to be honest:

- Head-to-head record; then
- Goal difference in head-to-head; then
- Goals scored in head-to-head; then
- Draw straws (I think???)

With the exception of the last criterion, the criteria generally favours the better team out of the two and goes through based on results obtained in the tournament. What your father is suggesting is not only that teams will go through based on past performances outside of the tournament, but the historically worse team ends up going through? Sorry, but that does not make sense at all.
Klyberess
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden345 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-16 16:17:49
June 16 2012 16:16 GMT
#5
I'll agree with the poster above that a winner should be chosen randomly rather than due to FIFA or UEFA ranking (favouring the lower ranked team is just as bad as the other way around, IMO). Perhaps number of yellows/reds should be counted before the coin toss.
EmpireHappy <3 STHack <3 ByunPrime
nayumi
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Australia6499 Posts
June 16 2012 16:24 GMT
#6
On June 17 2012 01:16 Klyberess wrote:
I'll agree with the poster above that a winner should be chosen randomly rather than due to FIFA or UEFA ranking (favouring the lower ranked team is just as bad as the other way around, IMO). Perhaps number of yellows/reds should be counted before the coin toss.

Yea there is another indicator before the lucky draw called fair play, which I assume the number of cards and fouls committed by each team ...
Sugoi monogatari onii-chan!
Mafe
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany5966 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-16 17:29:36
June 16 2012 17:16 GMT
#7
wikipedia:
"Tie-breaking criteria

If two or more teams are equal on points on completion of the group matches, the following criteria are applied to determine the rankings (according to paragraphs 8.07 and 8.08 of the regulations, and amendment to 8.07 adopted by the UEFA Executive Committee):

1. Higher number of points obtained in the matches played between the teams in question;
2. Superior goal difference resulting from the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);
3. Higher number of goals scored in the matches played between the teams in question (if more than two teams finish equal on points);
4. If, after having applied criteria 1 to 3 to more than two teams, two teams still have an equal ranking, criteria 1 to 3 are reapplied exclusively to the matches between the two teams in question to determine the final rankings of the two teams. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 5 to 10 apply in the order given;
5. Superior goal difference in all group matches;
6. Higher number of goals scored in all group matches;
7. If two teams which are tied in all criteria 1 to 6 play their last group match against each other (i.e., the result is a draw and the two teams have the same number of points, goal difference and goals scored), and provided no other teams within the group have the same number of points, the ranking of the two teams in question is determined by penalty shoot-out. Otherwise, criteria 8 to 10 apply in the order given;
8. Position in the UEFA national team coefficient ranking system;
9. Fair play conduct of the teams (final tournament);
10. Drawing of lots.

Note: As all teams have different UEFA national team coefficient, the last two tie-breakers (fair play conduct and drawing of lots) will never be applied in this tournament."

This because the op posted wrong tiebreak rules (and we WILL talk about them a lot the next days). Also your father's argument of taking the lower ranked team does not make sense. Yes, the lower ranked team might have played better than expected, but the UEFA-coefficient (FIFA-ranking being irrelevant here) is based on recent results (qualification and finals of WC/EC). Essentially taking the lower ranked team would mean you would punish the team that showed good results recently; and also it would give teams an incentive to throw games in the qualification to purposely lower their coefficient. I think it is fair to say a the better team should advance, and if one could not order teams by their results in the last 2 weeks, I believe it is fair to separate them by their results of recent years.
Sanctimonius
Profile Joined October 2010
United Kingdom861 Posts
June 16 2012 17:39 GMT
#8
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.
You live the life you choose.
GeorgeH
Profile Joined January 2012
United Kingdom190 Posts
June 16 2012 18:04 GMT
#9
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.
nojok
Profile Joined May 2011
France15846 Posts
June 16 2012 18:43 GMT
#10
On June 17 2012 03:04 GeorgeH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.

Indeed, we've seen England play and also Chelsea.

Jokes aside, I totally agree with you.
"Back then teams that won were credited, now it's called throw. I think it's sad." - Kuroky - Flap Flap Wings!
-Archangel-
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia7457 Posts
June 17 2012 10:39 GMT
#11
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.

Football is about winning, not scoring more goals.
gasmeter
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United Kingdom251 Posts
June 17 2012 12:46 GMT
#12
On June 17 2012 19:39 -Archangel- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.

Football is about winning, not scoring more goals.


True.

The tie-breaker is definitely head-to-head record first. We saw this last night with Greece advancing ahead of Russia because they had defeated them 1-0.
Polt | MMA | MarineKing | Flash | Mvp | NesTea | INnoVation
sinii
Profile Joined August 2010
England989 Posts
June 17 2012 12:58 GMT
#13
On June 17 2012 03:43 nojok wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 03:04 GeorgeH wrote:
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.

Indeed, we've seen England play and also Chelsea.

Jokes aside, I totally agree with you.


What's funny about your post is that England have scored more goals then France so far in the Euros. :D
Ancient-Hunter
Profile Joined June 2011
Korea (South)142 Posts
June 17 2012 16:12 GMT
#14
I think GD first (as it is in the World Cup) is better as its more indicative of a teams overall performance in group stage.


Anyways can someone tell me how the dutch can advance tonight? If they beat Portugal and the Germans beat the Danes then Portugal/Denmark/Netherlands will all be tied at 3 points each.

who goes through?
Let's fly!
don_kyuhote
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
3007 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-17 16:24:13
June 17 2012 16:18 GMT
#15
On June 18 2012 01:12 Ancient-Hunter wrote:
I think GD first (as it is in the World Cup) is better as its more indicative of a teams overall performance in group stage.


Anyways can someone tell me how the dutch can advance tonight? If they beat Portugal and the Germans beat the Danes then Portugal/Denmark/Netherlands will all be tied at 3 points each.

who goes through?

Since it would be a three - way tie, I guess it comes down to goal differential.
Netherlands has to beat Portugal by at least 2 goals
For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
Stimp
Profile Joined November 2010
South Africa780 Posts
June 17 2012 17:18 GMT
#16
On June 17 2012 21:58 sinii wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2012 03:43 nojok wrote:
On June 17 2012 03:04 GeorgeH wrote:
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Results always have priority over goals in football.

Indeed, we've seen England play and also Chelsea.

Jokes aside, I totally agree with you.


What's funny about your post is that England have scored more goals then France so far in the Euros. :D


And chelsea scored more than barcelona.
Don't count your apples before they've... grown
empty.bottle
Profile Joined July 2009
685 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-17 21:18:58
June 17 2012 21:18 GMT
#17
On June 17 2012 02:39 Sanctimonius wrote:
Gah not a fan of head-to-head record before goal difference. you can out-score an opponent and end up with ten more goals but if they beat you 1-0 then they progress instead of you.

It changes from tournament to tournament, iirc.


Dont worry World Cup is goal difference first.
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
INu's Battles
20:00
INu's Battles#21
Zoun vs herOLIVE!
SHIN vs TBD
IntoTheiNu 1240
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 280
Rex 83
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 55009
Calm 3926
Shuttle 3078
Bisu 1381
FanTaSy 1243
firebathero 386
Stork 277
Hyuk 262
Zeus 244
Mini 239
[ Show more ]
Soma 237
actioN 219
EffOrt 213
Rush 212
Soulkey 167
Last 144
Light 132
ZerO 119
Snow 103
Mong 75
PianO 68
Dewaltoss 66
Pusan 58
Killer 45
Barracks 44
JYJ 43
hero 38
Free 37
Shinee 36
ToSsGirL 32
NotJumperer 32
Bale 31
Aegong 23
Shine 22
Sharp 22
yabsab 20
Sacsri 19
HiyA 18
Noble 18
sorry 17
Dota 2
Gorgc6679
Dendi543
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1441
kRYSTAL_137
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King96
Heroes of the Storm
Lowko380
Other Games
gofns32869
singsing2000
B2W.Neo705
crisheroes260
DeMusliM231
hiko182
Livibee107
byalli47
ZerO(Twitch)5
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV216
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream23
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 6
[ Show 9 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 28
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
OSC
32m
OSC
9h 47m
Replay Cast
10h 32m
OSC
1d 10h
Big Brain Bouts
1d 21h
Rex vs INexorable
GgMaChine vs HeRoMaRinE
Reynor vs herO
AI Arena Tournament
2 days
BSL: Ladder Tournament
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Patches Events
3 days
BSL Open Qualifier
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Open Qualifier
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSB
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
HCC Season 3
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.