EPTTSL4 Wallpapers? - Page 2
| Forum Index > TSL4 Forum |
|
ShiniSama
United States103 Posts
| ||
Lip the Pencilboy
Italy420 Posts
On August 17 2012 10:49 ant-1 wrote: Why is it always the zerg the coolest? I love that grinning face  mhm because im zerg :DDDD | ||
|
SirElton
Korea (South)90 Posts
why does the marine have a bat in his hands? | ||
|
Hauptl
Germany4 Posts
On August 17 2012 18:57 SirElton wrote: @Pencilboy why does the marine have a bat in his hands? Hipster Marine killing zerg and Protoss with Bats and sh**, because Guns are too Mainstream :D | ||
|
PassionPRO
Singapore35 Posts
| ||
|
Whatson
United States5357 Posts
On August 19 2012 23:23 PassionPRO wrote: A higher resolution wallpaper pack would be appreciated It looks fine on my 1920 monitor, idk what you're looking at | ||
|
Azera
3800 Posts
| ||
|
ReboundEU
508 Posts
Seriously it's a shame because the drawings are beautiful, they must be in high def. Practicaly the ones u made (captured) only high-rez. I think everyone wins this way, don't see ANY reason not to make them :| This also means removing some of the video-motion-blur from some of the elements to give the wallpapers a more stable/static HD look and the eye can focus without getting tired. Static blurs are good but motion blurs used as a static wallpaper can make eyes bleed in time. Also the dotted line around some of the elements, in a video they look awesome but in a still image combined with low res amplifies the sense of a low quality image as it feels it doesn't have smooth edges (AA'ish) for ex the zerg/protoss background. I think u get what i am aiming at. | ||
|
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
On August 20 2012 15:25 Whatson wrote: It looks fine on my 1920 monitor, idk what you're looking at Well my monitor is from 2012, IDK what you're looking at. | ||
|
PassionPRO
Singapore35 Posts
On August 20 2012 21:08 ZAiNs wrote: Well my monitor is from 2012, IDK what you're looking at. I am just saying that the quality of the image can be much higher, and I'm using a 1920 x 1080 monitor and the wallpaper looks stretched out low and kinda low quality. | ||
|
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
On August 20 2012 21:19 PassionPRO wrote: I am just saying that the quality of the image can be much higher, and I'm using a 1920 x 1080 monitor and the wallpaper looks stretched out low and kinda low quality. Oh yea you're right for sure. I was just having a dig at the other guy who thought they looked crystal clear. I played with them in Photoshop a bit to get them clearer, but a higher resolution would of course be appreciated. | ||
|
Whatson
United States5357 Posts
On August 21 2012 07:27 ZAiNs wrote: Oh yea you're right for sure. I was just having a dig at the other guy who thought they looked crystal clear. I played with them in Photoshop a bit to get them clearer, but a higher resolution would of course be appreciated. lol point out where i said it looks crystal clear? "It looks fine" does not mean crystal clear in case you didn't know. Since you already have a clearer version on photoshop i don't see why you bother | ||
|
aviator116
United States820 Posts
On August 21 2012 07:27 ZAiNs wrote: Oh yea you're right for sure. I was just having a dig at the other guy who thought they looked crystal clear. I played with them in Photoshop a bit to get them clearer, but a higher resolution would of course be appreciated. Why would you want another one when you already have Photoshop? Lol? | ||
|
uwannapieceomeboy
Germany5 Posts
| ||
|
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
On August 21 2012 09:27 aviator116 wrote: Why would you want another one when you already have Photoshop? Lol? Touching it up with Photoshop makes it look better, but it's still not as clear as it could be. | ||
|
gOOp2147
Sweden1 Post
| ||
|
Wpcwe
Russian Federation126 Posts
| ||
| ||
