cheating in a big money tournament
GG.net bans all TSL2 abusers for six months - Page 2
Forum Index > TSL2 Forum |
aeroH
United States1034 Posts
cheating in a big money tournament | ||
t_co
United States702 Posts
| ||
FragKrag
United States11539 Posts
![]() nice to see the sites supporting each other though. edit: THE POWER OF ESPORTS | ||
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
On December 18 2009 07:34 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: I think opposers of this are going to be in for a very very rough surprise once we come with our announcement. Did I say very. Wow, goooooood. Here I was thinking that there would not be any punishments for the people who got caught. Good to hear that there will be consequences. | ||
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On December 18 2009 07:34 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: I think opposers of this are going to be in for a very very rough surprise once we come with our announcement. Did I say very. Why didn't you announce it before the ladder?!? Maybe these highly skilled players wouldn't have abused if they knew the full extent of the punishment. | ||
![]()
mikeymoo
Canada7170 Posts
On December 18 2009 08:53 jalstar wrote: Why didn't you announce it before the ladder?!? Maybe these highly skilled players wouldn't have abused if they knew the full extent of the punishment. To see their truuuue colours shining through. | ||
![]()
DivinO
United States4796 Posts
| ||
538
Hungary3932 Posts
On December 18 2009 08:53 jalstar wrote: Why didn't you announce it before the ladder?!? Maybe these highly skilled players wouldn't have abused if they knew the full extent of the punishment. ... ...lol? | ||
{88}nataL
Canada2 Posts
This is my plea to get all the cheaters punished, I really don't want to see tommorow that they've decided to not ban the already caught abusers. And I've seen at least 1-2 people who CLEARLY abused but weren't even the top 100. As for Jalstar, you're an idiot. They didn't abuse with the intention of getting caught moron. So any punishments that would have been listed previous to the start of the iccup stage wouldn't have effected their decision. Especially so since some of these guys don't even play BW anymore, and only came back FOR this tournament. | ||
Lemonwalrus
United States5465 Posts
Edit: It takes a lot of work/discussion for the admins to decide someone was cheating, and wasting all that work on someone who isn't competitive anyways is useless. Edit2: Just my 2 cents. Also cheers to ggnet for their decision. | ||
{88}nataL
Canada2 Posts
| ||
Lemonwalrus
United States5465 Posts
| ||
HazMat
United States17077 Posts
| ||
Kennigit
![]()
Canada19447 Posts
| ||
Necosarius
Sweden4042 Posts
| ||
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On December 18 2009 09:01 {88}nataL wrote: I think the bans are absolutely pointless. Why ban them when all the abusers who didn't even get a look over because they didn't make it into the top 48 get a pass? Either hate cheaters enough to find them all and punish them all, or don't punish any of them. This is my plea to get all the cheaters punished, I really don't want to see tommorow that they've decided to not ban the already caught abusers. And I've seen at least 1-2 people who CLEARLY abused but weren't even the top 100. As for Jalstar, you're an idiot. They didn't abuse with the intention of getting caught moron. So any punishments that would have been listed previous to the start of the iccup stage wouldn't have effected their decision. Especially so since some of these guys don't even play BW anymore, and only came back FOR this tournament. Most of them abused a small amount of games, if they knew the punishment would be more than missing the TSL they wouldn't have done it and we'd have a higher quality top 48 | ||
iNcontroL
![]()
USA29055 Posts
Well woopdie dooo dude.. lol we got some and that is better than none. | ||
zergpower123
United States197 Posts
| ||
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
| ||
aqui
Germany1023 Posts
On December 18 2009 09:32 jalstar wrote: Most of them abused a small amount of games, if they knew the punishment would be more than missing the TSL they wouldn't have done it and we'd have a higher quality top 48 Its not just about the points, they also smurfed against many of their possible opponents, which could gain them an advantage in an later encounter., | ||
| ||