EPTEDIT as i say that on my 123rd post
The Automated Ban List - Page 606
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
BobTheLob
Canada362 Posts
EDIT as i say that on my 123rd post | ||
|
Peanut Butter
Canada155 Posts
On October 25 2011 13:11 BobTheLob wrote: hmm we need to make some throwaway accounts to speed up the process until pg999 Thats a negative for two reasons: 1) The mods will see your IP and ban your Original Account 2) Half the fun is getting there Plus I think everyone forgot that getting banned is bad and it shouldn't be endorced. Even for the 1000th page. Wouldn't it be more productive to be the 20000th ban on the ban list? Not endorsing it, just saying. | ||
|
BobTheLob
Canada362 Posts
On October 25 2011 13:37 Peanut Butter wrote: Thats a negative for two reasons: 1) The mods will see your IP and ban your Original Account 2) Half the fun is getting there Plus I think everyone forgot that getting banned is bad and it shouldn't be endorced. Even for the 1000th page. Wouldn't it be more productive to be the 20000th ban on the ban list? Not endorsing it, just saying. things like this are the reason I need a sarcasm font | ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On October 25 2011 12:53 PraetorialGamer wrote: So, will you give out temps by request when the page is available? I think we'll just perm people. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
TAKE THE PAIN! | ||
|
Pillage
United States804 Posts
I guess we'll see who wants it the most in that case. I'd laugh if someone with 5000+ posts sacrificed themselves for a place on that list. You can count me out of the running for this dubious prize :/ | ||
|
OpticalShot
Canada6330 Posts
WILL IT BE WORTH THE RISK | ||
|
BobTheLob
Canada362 Posts
On October 25 2011 14:06 OpticalShot wrote: Well, I got some dumb pictures ready to spam on a single martyr blog aimed solely at convincing Harem to swiftly lift me to the 2-day purgatory (for a place in the glorious 1000th page!), but it seems like I could end up just riding the Plexa express down to permahell. WILL IT BE WORTH THE RISK YES IT WILL do it so i can check what happens to you ^^ | ||
|
OpticalShot
Canada6330 Posts
| ||
|
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
| ||
|
Megaliskuu
United States5123 Posts
I ain't even scared. | ||
|
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
On October 25 2011 12:45 Plexa wrote: No one on staff cares about page 1000, afaik. First thread in the mod forum: HOLY FUCK PAGE 1000 OF BAN THREAD INCOMING OMFG!!!!!1111 On October 25 2011 07:04 Koshi wrote: Guys, what is your opinion on all the HotS theorycrafting going on the forum atm? Thousands of post in the last 3 days, all about theories that aren't based on any real information. I read so many posts, people just type pure imaginable theories. TL had such a strict policy about theorycrafting in SCII. Even changing small things to existing units was not allowed. But now... All these posts/threads about the new units, about new imbalances, about new tactics. Starcraft II will not be the same game after HotS. Nobody knows how we will play Starcraft II: HotS 2 months after release. Nobody knew how the Mountain Giants would effect WCIII gameplay, or faerie dragons, or the obsidian statue, or the dragonhawk rider... It is getting out of control... Edit: I am just surprised nobody is getting banned. Some of the imbalance theories are just ridiculous. Do these people really believe that it will be the same game but with .... I don't even know what they think. First it's not really theory-craft if they are talking about actual units and mechanics that are going to be introduced, granted not all of the unit properties are currently known but the basics are there. I think it's important (and inevitable) for everyone to express their opinions and for the community to come to a consensus about what things are good and what things are not. It's also good for Blizzard and the Esports community to understand where fan opinions and feelings are at with the new content. And seriously compared to some of the theory crafting I've seen on TL this is mild. I remember one thread in particular about 8 months ago where the entire OP was about how cool it would be if SCVs had rocket backpacks that could cliff jump like Reapers. Shouldn't be any bans for discussing HOTS unless the OP is really terrible or someone gets too angry and posts a misspelled image macro, though I don't know anyone who would do that.... | ||
|
Iplaythings
Denmark9110 Posts
On October 25 2011 12:45 Plexa wrote: No one on staff cares about page 1000, afaik. hot_bid is hot_bid Plexa putttin on his | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
| ||
|
SEA KarMa
Australia452 Posts
| ||
|
marttorn
Norway5211 Posts
Gives an idea about the inflation of users after all the SC2 hype started O_O | ||
|
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
I'm out,gl to you guys  | ||
|
Pillage
United States804 Posts
On October 25 2011 17:48 TheKefka wrote: This "get banned on page 1k" is becoming too mainstream for my taste. I'm out,gl to you guys I see what you did there , too cool for us I guess. On October 25 2011 16:39 marttorn wrote: I think it's funny that the ban list has been up since sometime 2005. Discarding the fact that it was a normal thread for a while and normal users and mods used to post in it (thereby inflating it by a few pages), page 200 is from around 2009. In other words, there have been 800 pages of bans since 2009. Gives an idea about the inflation of users after all the SC2 hype started O_O That's just ridiculous :O I'm honestly curious if the TL admins think that the website is understaffed as of right now. I know I can speak for others when I say that I found this awesome site after I bought SC 2 | ||
|
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
...just to get perm-ed on page 1001 | ||
fusefuse
Estonia4644 Posts
Hi & bye TI17 :F | ||
| ||
