That account was created on 2011-08-29 13:13:35 and had 86 posts.
Reason: Faking your own death is grounds for never having an account here again, changing this to a perm.
I'm really, really curious about this. How did he fake his own death?
likewise. what's up with this?
He said his brother committed suicide and in the note wrote it was because of cyber bullying from iccup staff.
What in the fuck... Questions lol
1. Cyber bullying from ICCUP staff? What?
2. He faked his brother's suicide for what reason? None whatsoever?
I'm so confused O_O...
I think Chill meant that he pretended to be his brother and said that he committed suicide. Or, at least, that's how I understood it.
Regardless, he was pretending to be commit suicide as either himself or his brother. iCCup has a habit of doing broad-stroke IP bans (say, across ABC.*.*.* or something) to deal with cheaters, and he got caught up in the ban. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=267582
In a completely unacceptable turn of events he flipped out and pretended to commit suicide, probably to upset and "troll" the iCCup admins.
On September 22 2011 05:07 Aegisky wrote: Can I be permed? Thanks and happy birthday
User was banned for this post.
If this is the right place to ask then perm this mofo too ^^
I'm not going a way (sucks for you), just been thinking for a while that a unique nick is better than something like this. Do I need a different e-mail for the new account? I guess I do.
Must wait a year for the report button :c
e. ofc if making another account simply to circumvent the name change rule is prohibited, you don't have to ban me.
Wouldn't he be rejected? In the thread they say that you can't request or be given a name change if you have 500+ posts because you've built too much of a reputation.
Unless you're going to give him special credence, Nyovne.
On September 23 2011 01:34 Kinetik_Inferno wrote: Wouldn't he be rejected? In the thread they say that you can't request or be given a name change if you have 500+ posts because you've built too much of a reputation.
Unless you're going to give him special credence, Nyovne.
Fun fact, that is my nick on another forum
Also that is exactly why I didn't make a request for name change in the first place. Even though HwangjaeTerran is kinda just like all those mTwDimaga's on bnet EU. Just another imposter.
Holophonist was just temp banned for 1 week by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2010-12-25 00:03:53 and had 76 posts.
Reason:
On September 20 2011 09:59 Holophonist wrote:
On September 20 2011 09:49 Supamang wrote:
On September 20 2011 09:43 Holophonist wrote:
On September 20 2011 09:31 Supamang wrote: [quote] I dont think that Morality and God have any place in this discussion. I cant believe youre arguing your case against progressive tax brackets using Morality as your support base. You say its immoral to take money from someone and give it to someone else. Isnt it also immoral to leave the needy to suffer and die even when it is within your power to help them? Correct me if im wrong, but doesnt Jesus advocate giving to those who need when they ask?
If there be among you a poor man of one of thy brethren within any of thy gates in thy land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not harden thine heart, nor shut thine hand from thy poor brother
If you argue that it should be left to the individual to give his wealth away, why isnt it up to the individuals running the government to use their power to uphold the Morality of God? By taxing the rich more than taxing the poor, the ones running this country are actually being more Moral than those withholding their wealth from the poor. Right?
Basically, forget everything I said earlier and everything you have said about Morality. If you think that letting the rich improves our economy because it allows them to invest and expand businesses more rapidly or whatever other rational reason you have, go ahead and argue that. However, trying to bring in Morals to this discussion is pointless because Morality is subjective.
On September 20 2011 08:25 Holophonist wrote: I'm not going to read through 40 pages of idiocy. Especially considering the fact that I've NEVER heard a good argument for it and I doubt I'm going to find it on a sc2 forum.
Oh and dont be that guy...Youre here having a meaningful discussion and youre gonna suggest that people on an SC2 forum cant possibly have the intelligence and/or knowledge to argue with you properly just because youre mad that people disagree with you? Ugh
I'l answer your last point first: STOP WASTING MY TIME WITH HYPERBOLE. I didn't say we can't possibly have the intelligence to figure this stuff out. What I actually said was I doubt I'd find it on a SC2 forum. I'd say 80% of what I've written here over the past couple hours is stuff like this. I have to explain myself when I really shouldn't.
The terrible inconsistency in your suggestion that the people in power are using their "power" to do what's right is that they're using other people's faculties/resources, not their own.
total. waste. of. time.
You completely ignored the core of my post LOL. I was saying that its a double standard for you to argue using morals as a base when the people you are defending are being immoral by not giving out their wealth. Basically, Im saying its useless to argue using morals as your support because there are so many standards for morality (even within God) that youre bound to look like a hypocrite
its not a "total.waste.of.time", but youre obviously only saying that because youre angry at not having a good argument against me. So you target my afterthought and argue against that for the majority of your post instead of the actual meat of my original argument. You also say that this thread is "40 pages of idiocy" and say that you wont find a good argument on an SC2 forum. How is that NOT suggesting that those on TL.net lack the intelligence to argue against you?
Lol, Im not the one slinging around inconsistency, you are.
I left it out because you answered it yourself. The quote you used said nothing about the government making your charitable contributions for you. Your quote... your whole post... is what doesn't have a place in this thread.
And the rich... particularly the rich in the US are among the most charitable people in the history of the planet.
And I said I "doubt" I'll find the answer on a sc2 forum. Because obviously the main reason people are here at all is because of sc2, not because they like to argue economics. It's possible, of course, but I have no reason to think so. again, you're an idiot and you're wasting my time.
I have enough smart people to respond to, I'm not gonna waste any more effort on you, or people like you. fuck off.
Next time you get the urge to post stuff like this, don't, or it will mean a perm ban.
Thanks for this. This guy was way too agressive in that thread. He clearly had a point he wanted to prove but couldn't help himself. Kind of sad really.
As an aside, what is it with the same names appearing in the banned list. Just browsing the last few pages and I am sure these guys have been banned before.
Galaxy_Zerg
Caruso
Lomak
Risen
Gamegene
101Toss (I thought he was a decent poster, maybe I am confused)
Jayrod
L3g3nd (Mainly cause I have seen him around, not really cause of his bans so he probably shouldn't be on this list
nukeazerg
Medrea (Same as L3g3nd, probably shouldn't be on this list)
EricCartman
lorkac
Rorshach (Shame really, what an awesome name)
MozzerellaL
Krehlmar
mohdoo
Dark Archon
Discretionary Duck
kwan84 (I swear this guy isn't going to last long)
Biff (well, we all love Biff.)
I guess most of these bans are 30 day ones so they have been banned before. People obviously like getting banned. It would interesting to know how many people who receive 30 day / permanent bans, come back as decent posters.
Why am I being mentioned here again? I've been banned twice for 2 days. One was because I was joking and the mod didn't catch my reference to MMA killing his Command Center, which was reversed post ban.
Another was me accidently quoting something and then not adding anything to it, and the mod caught me RIGHT as I was editing it, so that one got reversed as well.
Holophonist was just temp banned for 1 week by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2010-12-25 00:03:53 and had 76 posts.
Reason:
On September 20 2011 09:59 Holophonist wrote:
On September 20 2011 09:49 Supamang wrote:
On September 20 2011 09:43 Holophonist wrote: [quote] If there be among you a poor man of one of thy brethren within any of thy gates in thy land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not harden thine heart, nor shut thine hand from thy poor brother
If you argue that it should be left to the individual to give his wealth away, why isnt it up to the individuals running the government to use their power to uphold the Morality of God? By taxing the rich more than taxing the poor, the ones running this country are actually being more Moral than those withholding their wealth from the poor. Right?
Basically, forget everything I said earlier and everything you have said about Morality. If you think that letting the rich improves our economy because it allows them to invest and expand businesses more rapidly or whatever other rational reason you have, go ahead and argue that. However, trying to bring in Morals to this discussion is pointless because Morality is subjective.
On September 20 2011 08:25 Holophonist wrote: I'm not going to read through 40 pages of idiocy. Especially considering the fact that I've NEVER heard a good argument for it and I doubt I'm going to find it on a sc2 forum.
Oh and dont be that guy...Youre here having a meaningful discussion and youre gonna suggest that people on an SC2 forum cant possibly have the intelligence and/or knowledge to argue with you properly just because youre mad that people disagree with you? Ugh
I'l answer your last point first: STOP WASTING MY TIME WITH HYPERBOLE. I didn't say we can't possibly have the intelligence to figure this stuff out. What I actually said was I doubt I'd find it on a SC2 forum. I'd say 80% of what I've written here over the past couple hours is stuff like this. I have to explain myself when I really shouldn't.
The terrible inconsistency in your suggestion that the people in power are using their "power" to do what's right is that they're using other people's faculties/resources, not their own.
total. waste. of. time.
You completely ignored the core of my post LOL. I was saying that its a double standard for you to argue using morals as a base when the people you are defending are being immoral by not giving out their wealth. Basically, Im saying its useless to argue using morals as your support because there are so many standards for morality (even within God) that youre bound to look like a hypocrite
its not a "total.waste.of.time", but youre obviously only saying that because youre angry at not having a good argument against me. So you target my afterthought and argue against that for the majority of your post instead of the actual meat of my original argument. You also say that this thread is "40 pages of idiocy" and say that you wont find a good argument on an SC2 forum. How is that NOT suggesting that those on TL.net lack the intelligence to argue against you?
Lol, Im not the one slinging around inconsistency, you are.
I left it out because you answered it yourself. The quote you used said nothing about the government making your charitable contributions for you. Your quote... your whole post... is what doesn't have a place in this thread.
And the rich... particularly the rich in the US are among the most charitable people in the history of the planet.
And I said I "doubt" I'll find the answer on a sc2 forum. Because obviously the main reason people are here at all is because of sc2, not because they like to argue economics. It's possible, of course, but I have no reason to think so. again, you're an idiot and you're wasting my time.
I have enough smart people to respond to, I'm not gonna waste any more effort on you, or people like you. fuck off.
Next time you get the urge to post stuff like this, don't, or it will mean a perm ban.
Thanks for this. This guy was way too agressive in that thread. He clearly had a point he wanted to prove but couldn't help himself. Kind of sad really.
As an aside, what is it with the same names appearing in the banned list. Just browsing the last few pages and I am sure these guys have been banned before.
Galaxy_Zerg
Caruso
Lomak
Risen
Gamegene
101Toss (I thought he was a decent poster, maybe I am confused)
Jayrod
L3g3nd (Mainly cause I have seen him around, not really cause of his bans so he probably shouldn't be on this list
nukeazerg
Medrea (Same as L3g3nd, probably shouldn't be on this list)
EricCartman
lorkac
Rorshach (Shame really, what an awesome name)
MozzerellaL
Krehlmar
mohdoo
Dark Archon
Discretionary Duck
kwan84 (I swear this guy isn't going to last long)
Biff (well, we all love Biff.)
I guess most of these bans are 30 day ones so they have been banned before. People obviously like getting banned. It would interesting to know how many people who receive 30 day / permanent bans, come back as decent posters.
Why am I being mentioned here again? I've been banned twice for 2 days. One was because I was joking and the mod didn't catch my reference to MMA killing his Command Center, which was reversed post ban.
Another was me accidently quoting something and then not adding anything to it, and the mod caught me RIGHT as I was editing it, so that one got reversed as well.
I'm a good poster dammit!
I'm not on that list, but I feel the need to say that I'm a good poster too goddamnit! My ban/warning were both because I went brain dead and posted a meme/image macro while trying to be funny.
I still feel like going back in time and punching myself in the face before I post either of those.
Holophonist was just temp banned for 1 week by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2010-12-25 00:03:53 and had 76 posts.
Reason:
On September 20 2011 09:59 Holophonist wrote:
On September 20 2011 09:49 Supamang wrote: [quote] If you argue that it should be left to the individual to give his wealth away, why isnt it up to the individuals running the government to use their power to uphold the Morality of God? By taxing the rich more than taxing the poor, the ones running this country are actually being more Moral than those withholding their wealth from the poor. Right?
Basically, forget everything I said earlier and everything you have said about Morality. If you think that letting the rich improves our economy because it allows them to invest and expand businesses more rapidly or whatever other rational reason you have, go ahead and argue that. However, trying to bring in Morals to this discussion is pointless because Morality is subjective.
On September 20 2011 08:25 Holophonist wrote: I'm not going to read through 40 pages of idiocy. Especially considering the fact that I've NEVER heard a good argument for it and I doubt I'm going to find it on a sc2 forum.
Oh and dont be that guy...Youre here having a meaningful discussion and youre gonna suggest that people on an SC2 forum cant possibly have the intelligence and/or knowledge to argue with you properly just because youre mad that people disagree with you? Ugh
I'l answer your last point first: STOP WASTING MY TIME WITH HYPERBOLE. I didn't say we can't possibly have the intelligence to figure this stuff out. What I actually said was I doubt I'd find it on a SC2 forum. I'd say 80% of what I've written here over the past couple hours is stuff like this. I have to explain myself when I really shouldn't.
The terrible inconsistency in your suggestion that the people in power are using their "power" to do what's right is that they're using other people's faculties/resources, not their own.
total. waste. of. time.
You completely ignored the core of my post LOL. I was saying that its a double standard for you to argue using morals as a base when the people you are defending are being immoral by not giving out their wealth. Basically, Im saying its useless to argue using morals as your support because there are so many standards for morality (even within God) that youre bound to look like a hypocrite
its not a "total.waste.of.time", but youre obviously only saying that because youre angry at not having a good argument against me. So you target my afterthought and argue against that for the majority of your post instead of the actual meat of my original argument. You also say that this thread is "40 pages of idiocy" and say that you wont find a good argument on an SC2 forum. How is that NOT suggesting that those on TL.net lack the intelligence to argue against you?
Lol, Im not the one slinging around inconsistency, you are.
I left it out because you answered it yourself. The quote you used said nothing about the government making your charitable contributions for you. Your quote... your whole post... is what doesn't have a place in this thread.
And the rich... particularly the rich in the US are among the most charitable people in the history of the planet.
And I said I "doubt" I'll find the answer on a sc2 forum. Because obviously the main reason people are here at all is because of sc2, not because they like to argue economics. It's possible, of course, but I have no reason to think so. again, you're an idiot and you're wasting my time.
I have enough smart people to respond to, I'm not gonna waste any more effort on you, or people like you. fuck off.
Next time you get the urge to post stuff like this, don't, or it will mean a perm ban.
Thanks for this. This guy was way too agressive in that thread. He clearly had a point he wanted to prove but couldn't help himself. Kind of sad really.
As an aside, what is it with the same names appearing in the banned list. Just browsing the last few pages and I am sure these guys have been banned before.
Galaxy_Zerg
Caruso
Lomak
Risen
Gamegene
101Toss (I thought he was a decent poster, maybe I am confused)
Jayrod
L3g3nd (Mainly cause I have seen him around, not really cause of his bans so he probably shouldn't be on this list
nukeazerg
Medrea (Same as L3g3nd, probably shouldn't be on this list)
EricCartman
lorkac
Rorshach (Shame really, what an awesome name)
MozzerellaL
Krehlmar
mohdoo
Dark Archon
Discretionary Duck
kwan84 (I swear this guy isn't going to last long)
Biff (well, we all love Biff.)
I guess most of these bans are 30 day ones so they have been banned before. People obviously like getting banned. It would interesting to know how many people who receive 30 day / permanent bans, come back as decent posters.
Why am I being mentioned here again? I've been banned twice for 2 days. One was because I was joking and the mod didn't catch my reference to MMA killing his Command Center, which was reversed post ban.
Another was me accidently quoting something and then not adding anything to it, and the mod caught me RIGHT as I was editing it, so that one got reversed as well.
I'm a good poster dammit!
I'm not on that list, but I feel the need to say that I'm a good poster too goddamnit! My ban/warning were both because I went brain dead and posted a meme/image macro while trying to be funny.
I still feel like going back in time and punching myself in the face before I post either of those.
I have those moments too, where I just got warned for like a smiley-only post or something in that vein. I haven't got a ban yet though, despite feeling entirely deserving of one at times! mwhahahahahahaa I'm a bastard.
EPT
