The Automated Ban List - Page 527
Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
![]()
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
| ||
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
![]() | ||
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
Hey Micronesia, I thought advertising was frowned upon? And what exactly do I get for my $100? | ||
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
Mystery solved. | ||
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On September 08 2011 07:32 Kipsate wrote: You guys, there is nothing wrong with Gilmore girls. Honestly, I enjoyed gilmore girls quite a bit. I watched the first 3 seasons pretty avidly...every tuesday i think it was on... ![]() | ||
oldgregg
New Zealand1176 Posts
| ||
marttorn
Norway5211 Posts
![]() If someone could ban me (30 days of course) just by this post that would be appreciated too Thanks in advance! User was temp banned for this post. | ||
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
! Banned by Jinro, what a lucky guy | ||
grs
Germany2339 Posts
dennistoo was just temp banned for 30 days by Nyovne. That account was created on 2010-10-13 17:25:41 and had 147 posts. Reason: Holy moley, your last banreason reads like: Reason: Just because you claim it's not balance whine doesn't mean it's not. Also you've been banned for balance whining before. And then you do exactly the same thing again, for the fourth time in a row. Darwin award if I ever saw one. Last chance, your moderation history is way too extensive and your post quality not existant. Isn't that more a ban for a "Balance whine in a balance whine topic"? I am not doubting what you are saying about his post history and previous bans, but isn't the front page article baiting these kind of reactions; especially when it contains way more drastic whining than the post from dennistoo? | ||
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
Also having a history is a huge factor. If I went way over the line in a balance whine for the first time it may result in a warning but probably a 2 day temp. But since dennistoo has had prior warnings and bans for the same reason, his duration is much much longer. Idk, I'll just let Nyovne answer this. | ||
grs
Germany2339 Posts
On September 08 2011 22:26 Probe1 wrote: What front page article are you referring to? I am referring to this article. | ||
pred470r
Bulgaria3265 Posts
| ||
AmericanUmlaut
Germany2575 Posts
If you haven't noticed that protoss sucks against terran, and has profound cost-efficiency difficulties against zerg, it’s because you're blind. would be worth a quick trip to Disneyland if it appeared in any LR thread, and dennistoo wasn't doing much more than agreeing with the sentiment of the OP, even if he does have a history of balance whining. | ||
zeru
8156 Posts
| ||
AmericanUmlaut
Germany2575 Posts
| ||
grs
Germany2339 Posts
| ||
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
A) treehugger is a veteran and doesn't have a prior history of balance whining in tournament threads. He wrote an article that was proofread, edited, finalized and triple checked by more than one other person. It wasn't a 30 second thought comment. B) I'm sad, very sad to be a Protoss player. In fact, i've stopped laddering due to the fact that Protoss simply can't win anymore late game against Z/T. This not not a balance discussion rather that thoughs on how the current metagame is producing. Please deepest apologizes to mod if my contents do shows like a whinning balance respond. Compare that to the part of the article I'm sure everyone is referring to: If you haven't noticed that protoss sucks against terran, and has profound cost-efficiency difficulties against zerg, it’s because you're blind. It has taken imbalance on such an appalling scale as the 1/1/1 family of builds to cast MC down... See the difference? If you can't then I would recommend you not talk about game balance on teamliquid.net Treehugger gave a emotional but reasoned statement about the difficulties and undeniable fact that Protoss just isn't doing well and it can't be solely attributed to the players. The pbu's comment was not a footnote as part of a much larger statement. It was just I can't win so nobody can win ever. That's battlenet mentality- treehugger represents what TL should. The truth. If this isn't convincing enough, just reread rule 7 then rule 1. | ||
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
On September 08 2011 17:16 oldgregg wrote: if you put it on mute maybe... I read an article once about how television and movie directors make their actors say their lines as fast as possible to make them appear more intelligent. Gilmore Girls was one of the shows that was used as an example. On September 08 2011 23:15 grs wrote: As I said, I am not doubting the ban because of his post history. What seems odd is that the article was basically baiting people into agreeing with it -> agreeing with a balance whine results in another balance whine --> ban. The reason he was banned is because he keeps prefacing his balance whines with "this is not a balance whine". That's almost like martyring. If you preface all your posts with "please don't ban me" or "this might get me banned", the mods are going to ban you. | ||
Archas
United States6531 Posts
On September 09 2011 01:08 TL.net Bot wrote: Woodzykiler2 was just banned by Harem. That account was created on 2011-09-08 20:12:55 and had 1 posts. Reason: Previously banned user. You can't be fucking serious. He tried AGAIN?! Jesus... | ||
tripper688
United States569 Posts
On September 09 2011 01:25 Aeres wrote: You can't be fucking serious. He tried AGAIN?! Jesus... Ehhh....remember that one guy that tried to get back with like 4 different accounts within an hour some time ago? lol | ||
| ||