|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37022 Posts
On November 19 2016 04:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2016 04:28 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 04:14 TL.net Bot wrote:
ACrow was just temp banned for 1 week by tofucake.
That account was created on 2011-10-17 20:53:34 and had 6577 posts.
Reason: You don't seem to get it. Posts need to have content in the, In the what...? IN THE WHAT TOFU?! YOU NEED TO FINISH THAT SENTENCE OR WE'LL BE STUCK WONDERING FOREVER WHAT THE END TO THIS BAN WAS SUPPOSED TO BE! I thought it was a joke since he banned somebody for not having content so his ban reason doesn't have any content.
Wow. Next level moderation thinking right here.
Seriously? That was it? Anti-climactic as fuck...
|
On November 19 2016 05:16 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2016 04:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On November 19 2016 04:28 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 04:14 TL.net Bot wrote:
ACrow was just temp banned for 1 week by tofucake.
That account was created on 2011-10-17 20:53:34 and had 6577 posts.
Reason: You don't seem to get it. Posts need to have content in the, In the what...? IN THE WHAT TOFU?! YOU NEED TO FINISH THAT SENTENCE OR WE'LL BE STUCK WONDERING FOREVER WHAT THE END TO THIS BAN WAS SUPPOSED TO BE! I thought it was a joke since he banned somebody for not having content so his ban reason doesn't have any content. Wow. Next level moderation thinking right here. Seriously? That was it? Anti-climactic as fuck...
Isn't being climactic the whole point of fuck?
|
On November 19 2016 09:13 opisska wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2016 05:16 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 04:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On November 19 2016 04:28 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 04:14 TL.net Bot wrote:
ACrow was just temp banned for 1 week by tofucake.
That account was created on 2011-10-17 20:53:34 and had 6577 posts.
Reason: You don't seem to get it. Posts need to have content in the, In the what...? IN THE WHAT TOFU?! YOU NEED TO FINISH THAT SENTENCE OR WE'LL BE STUCK WONDERING FOREVER WHAT THE END TO THIS BAN WAS SUPPOSED TO BE! I thought it was a joke since he banned somebody for not having content so his ban reason doesn't have any content. Wow. Next level moderation thinking right here. Seriously? That was it? Anti-climactic as fuck... Isn't being climactic the whole point of fuck?
Seems like Seeker has had bad experiences.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37022 Posts
On November 19 2016 09:13 opisska wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2016 05:16 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 04:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On November 19 2016 04:28 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 04:14 TL.net Bot wrote:
ACrow was just temp banned for 1 week by tofucake.
That account was created on 2011-10-17 20:53:34 and had 6577 posts.
Reason: You don't seem to get it. Posts need to have content in the, In the what...? IN THE WHAT TOFU?! YOU NEED TO FINISH THAT SENTENCE OR WE'LL BE STUCK WONDERING FOREVER WHAT THE END TO THIS BAN WAS SUPPOSED TO BE! I thought it was a joke since he banned somebody for not having content so his ban reason doesn't have any content. Wow. Next level moderation thinking right here. Seriously? That was it? Anti-climactic as fuck... Isn't being climactic the whole point of fuck?
Do you speaka the Englishy?
|
On November 19 2016 09:19 Elentos wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2016 09:13 opisska wrote:On November 19 2016 05:16 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 04:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On November 19 2016 04:28 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 04:14 TL.net Bot wrote:
ACrow was just temp banned for 1 week by tofucake.
That account was created on 2011-10-17 20:53:34 and had 6577 posts.
Reason: You don't seem to get it. Posts need to have content in the, In the what...? IN THE WHAT TOFU?! YOU NEED TO FINISH THAT SENTENCE OR WE'LL BE STUCK WONDERING FOREVER WHAT THE END TO THIS BAN WAS SUPPOSED TO BE! I thought it was a joke since he banned somebody for not having content so his ban reason doesn't have any content. Wow. Next level moderation thinking right here. Seriously? That was it? Anti-climactic as fuck... Isn't being climactic the whole point of fuck? Seems like Seeker has had bad experiences.
Assuming that has had any experiences at all, being presumably a male nerd
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On November 19 2016 09:44 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2016 09:13 opisska wrote:On November 19 2016 05:16 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 04:32 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On November 19 2016 04:28 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 04:14 TL.net Bot wrote:
ACrow was just temp banned for 1 week by tofucake.
That account was created on 2011-10-17 20:53:34 and had 6577 posts.
Reason: You don't seem to get it. Posts need to have content in the, In the what...? IN THE WHAT TOFU?! YOU NEED TO FINISH THAT SENTENCE OR WE'LL BE STUCK WONDERING FOREVER WHAT THE END TO THIS BAN WAS SUPPOSED TO BE! I thought it was a joke since he banned somebody for not having content so his ban reason doesn't have any content. Wow. Next level moderation thinking right here. Seriously? That was it? Anti-climactic as fuck... Isn't being climactic the whole point of fuck? Do you speaka the Englishy?
Our man piss here fancies himself humorous.
No one else agrees, of course.
|
|
|
On November 19 2016 10:03 Seeker wrote:Keep going guys. We'll see who gets the last laugh 
"laugh" - cricketer
do I win yet?
|
On November 19 2016 10:03 Seeker wrote:Keep going guys. We'll see who gets the last laugh
Isn't it better when everyone laughs simultaneously, same as with ... oh, sorry, I forgot we established you know nothing about such things.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37022 Posts
On November 19 2016 10:22 opisska wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2016 10:03 Seeker wrote:Keep going guys. We'll see who gets the last laugh Isn't it better when everyone laughs simultaneously, same as with ... oh, sorry, I forgot we established you know nothing about such things.
Strike 1 ^^
|
TLADT24920 Posts
On November 19 2016 10:28 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2016 10:22 opisska wrote:On November 19 2016 10:03 Seeker wrote:Keep going guys. We'll see who gets the last laugh Isn't it better when everyone laughs simultaneously, same as with ... oh, sorry, I forgot we established you know nothing about such things. Strike 1 ^^
HE'S COUNTING!
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37022 Posts
On November 19 2016 14:28 BigFan wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2016 10:28 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 10:22 opisska wrote:On November 19 2016 10:03 Seeker wrote:Keep going guys. We'll see who gets the last laugh Isn't it better when everyone laughs simultaneously, same as with ... oh, sorry, I forgot we established you know nothing about such things. Strike 1 ^^ HE'S COUNTING!
I'm sad because he stopped after I said stirke 1 
|
Damn, I missed the entire election cycle on here. Also, farva is still alive, right?
|
Farva survived without a scratch. Not even sure he copped a warning when they were being dished out to every second post in the thread.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
The thread sure seems to have self-selected towards a group more favorable towards our new president though, through a combination of ban bets and self-imposed exile.
|
On November 19 2016 14:30 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2016 14:28 BigFan wrote:On November 19 2016 10:28 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 10:22 opisska wrote:On November 19 2016 10:03 Seeker wrote:Keep going guys. We'll see who gets the last laugh Isn't it better when everyone laughs simultaneously, same as with ... oh, sorry, I forgot we established you know nothing about such things. Strike 1 ^^ HE'S COUNTING! I'm sad because he stopped after I said stirke 1
six letters, a number and two whatever is just not enough material maybe if you wrote "stroke" instead, i could talk about how you should not count them out loud 
|
On November 19 2016 17:14 Acrofales wrote:
Farva survived without a scratch. Not even sure he copped a warning when they were being dished out to every second post in the thread.
I got a single warning but fared better than a lot of folks, though the temptation to post ban bait was certainly there
Luv you, mdvajayjay
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37022 Posts
On November 19 2016 20:05 opisska wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2016 14:30 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 14:28 BigFan wrote:On November 19 2016 10:28 Seeker wrote:On November 19 2016 10:22 opisska wrote:On November 19 2016 10:03 Seeker wrote:Keep going guys. We'll see who gets the last laugh Isn't it better when everyone laughs simultaneously, same as with ... oh, sorry, I forgot we established you know nothing about such things. Strike 1 ^^ HE'S COUNTING! I'm sad because he stopped after I said stirke 1 six letters, a number and two whatever is just not enough material maybe if you wrote "stroke" instead, i could talk about how you should not count them out loud
I don't think I can count this as a strike because it's more humorous than insulting.
|
Germany25657 Posts
Seeker is so bad at being intimidating.
|
On November 20 2016 03:01 KadaverBB wrote:
Seeker is so bad at being intimidating.
How are you much better you are a yoshi?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
