|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37118 Posts
On February 04 2016 17:18 Diabolique wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 16:38 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 16:32 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot Good idea. If I got the original warning from a mod, I would have answered to him that it is a mistake and we could clarify the situation. On February 04 2016 16:22 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot I think he's referring to the fact that straight after explaining he now knows the rules he double posted. Well, I have seen people doing what I did = marking the second post with "double post" and they were not banned ... so I thought, this might be OK if I do it as well? :-) On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:My tone was half joking half serious. I'm not a stick up my ass, old, stingy, and cranky mod yet  But Phredxor is right. He double posted on the previous page. I'm pretty sure on purpose too On February 04 2016 16:15 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. I just don't understand, WHY? I would even not know, it is a rule, if I was not banned for it ... And when I do not understand the reason, I do not see a way how to follow it. Am I allowed to do a double / triple / quadruple post, if the posts will be let's say a few days from each other? As an example - I am trying to do some posts in the sOs Fan club thread. Almost noone else is active there. So I come back there after a few days with something new, and I see, the last post (a few days old) is mine. Does that mean, I am not allowed to post a new post? Or do I need to edit the last post adn add the new ideas into the old post? What a bullshit! Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. OK, this makes more sense now if it is allowed in fan clubs ... and the multiple posting in heavy discussions I do every day without a problem, as there is always someone posting between my posts. The problem are the "slow threads" ... so is there another exception than fan clubs? This is so stupid to answer to three posts in one post :-) How you did it just now is correct. Quote multiple times and put it all into one post. Thank you for doing that. If it's a really slowly moving thread and you don't want to get warned or banned for multiple posting, then post in here, PM a mod, or go to the Ask TL Staff Anything thread and ask us if it's okay to multi-post. We'll take a look at it, and if we think multiple posting should be allowed in that situation, we'll give you the thumbs up. Btw, if you post, then someone posts in between your next post, that is not multiple posting. That's just posting Look, Seeker, I really like you and respect you. But I do not think, I will be using this "answering in one post" much. Because this is a nonsense and I do not like it. But I promise, I will be very careful with any further double postings. Mostly, I will just not do the second post. So: 1. In fast flowing discussions, I do not care, I will just post quickly, in 90% of cases, somebody else writes in between my posts. 2. In sOs fanclub, I will not care if my posts are several days away from each other or describe another topic completely. 3. If I will want to make a double post in a slow moving thread, I will for sure not contact you or the mods and ask for permission, this is just some stupid discussion and I believe, your (and my) time is too valuable to contact you with something so stupid. So in these cases, I will consider whether it is reasonable in that particular situation to make a double post instead of putting it into the old post, and if yes, I will do the double post. In the worst case, I will be banned again for 2 days and that is nothing, I can't live with, just the mods of TL would fall in my eyes one level deeper.
Honestly, you should be fine. Most mods aren't THAT anal about double/multiple posting unless it's a constant and repeated offense. Just have fun with posting on TL and if you do get mod actioned, you can always ask about it in Website Feedback. Mods are there to help you and answer all your questions. We're not here to make your lives miserable (contrary to popular belief).
|
On February 04 2016 17:24 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:18 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:38 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 16:32 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot Good idea. If I got the original warning from a mod, I would have answered to him that it is a mistake and we could clarify the situation. On February 04 2016 16:22 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot I think he's referring to the fact that straight after explaining he now knows the rules he double posted. Well, I have seen people doing what I did = marking the second post with "double post" and they were not banned ... so I thought, this might be OK if I do it as well? :-) On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:My tone was half joking half serious. I'm not a stick up my ass, old, stingy, and cranky mod yet But Phredxor is right. He double posted on the previous page. I'm pretty sure on purpose too On February 04 2016 16:15 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. I just don't understand, WHY? I would even not know, it is a rule, if I was not banned for it ... And when I do not understand the reason, I do not see a way how to follow it. Am I allowed to do a double / triple / quadruple post, if the posts will be let's say a few days from each other? As an example - I am trying to do some posts in the sOs Fan club thread. Almost noone else is active there. So I come back there after a few days with something new, and I see, the last post (a few days old) is mine. Does that mean, I am not allowed to post a new post? Or do I need to edit the last post adn add the new ideas into the old post? What a bullshit! Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. OK, this makes more sense now if it is allowed in fan clubs ... and the multiple posting in heavy discussions I do every day without a problem, as there is always someone posting between my posts. The problem are the "slow threads" ... so is there another exception than fan clubs? This is so stupid to answer to three posts in one post :-) How you did it just now is correct. Quote multiple times and put it all into one post. Thank you for doing that. If it's a really slowly moving thread and you don't want to get warned or banned for multiple posting, then post in here, PM a mod, or go to the Ask TL Staff Anything thread and ask us if it's okay to multi-post. We'll take a look at it, and if we think multiple posting should be allowed in that situation, we'll give you the thumbs up. Btw, if you post, then someone posts in between your next post, that is not multiple posting. That's just posting Look, Seeker, I really like you and respect you. But I do not think, I will be using this "answering in one post" much. Because this is a nonsense and I do not like it. But I promise, I will be very careful with any further double postings. Mostly, I will just not do the second post. So: 1. In fast flowing discussions, I do not care, I will just post quickly, in 90% of cases, somebody else writes in between my posts. 2. In sOs fanclub, I will not care if my posts are several days away from each other or describe another topic completely. 3. If I will want to make a double post in a slow moving thread, I will for sure not contact you or the mods and ask for permission, this is just some stupid discussion and I believe, your (and my) time is too valuable to contact you with something so stupid. So in these cases, I will consider whether it is reasonable in that particular situation to make a double post instead of putting it into the old post, and if yes, I will do the double post. In the worst case, I will be banned again for 2 days and that is nothing, I can't live with, just the mods of TL would fall in my eyes one level deeper. Dude. You take your posting way too seriously.
Trust me, I don't, but I was banned for it and became a 'topic' in this thread, saying I am double / triple / quadruple posting because ... I do not know why ... So as FPL made me to come back to TL, I just wanted to clarify the situation.
BTW:
Cascade, thanks for the post, that is how I feel it as well. The only thing that time - I did not understand the warning from the TL.bot. I thought, it was just some error from the bot, who did not see, I was reacting to completely different posts - I was banned for the posts on the top of the page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/500618-dh-leipzig-details-announced?page=10 .
Seeker, thanks for the last post, I hope it will be OK in the future :-)
|
Banning people for making two posts with the same username next to each other isn't strict enough! Even two posts with the same country of residence should be be bannable ...
|
On February 04 2016 17:15 Phredxor wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:14 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:11 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 17:10 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 17:02 Cascade wrote:On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:
Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. Hmm, I don't feel you quite hit the mark on the explanation here. Honestly, the reason Mystique gave made more sense to me. I don't feel the key thing that allows multiposting is related to how fast the topic moves. Rather, it is just a matter of clear layout of your contribution. The end goal is readability. If you are sticking to one subject, better to write your sub-points in paragraphs or something, so people can see that it is all from the same person. If you are posting on very different topics inside a thread, it is ok to use separate posts. it should be a choice in the same way you chose to split up paragraphs, punctuate, and so on. In the LR example, I'd say it is ok to use separate posts if you are commenting on why sOs decided to go so heavy DTs in last game, discussing soO's rumoured new build on the upcoming map, and exactly how hungover tasteless is. If there are three separate reply-chains on those subjects, I don't see the reason to cram them all in the same post. But Mystique, if you get a warning for double posting, automated or not, and you go on to triple (or quadruple?) post a few hours later, you are not really in a position to claim ignorance. You got the warning, chose to ignore it, and suffered the consequences. Entirely your fault, motivated ban or not, sorry. I'm lazy and didn't feel like giving a long explanation. Also, who is Mystique? Was just about to ask this too.. From the context he means Diabolique I think. That's what I assumed, but it's really different name to get it mixed up with :s
haha, oops. You are right ofc. Sorry whatsname. 
|
On February 04 2016 17:40 Cascade wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:15 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 17:14 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:11 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 17:10 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 17:02 Cascade wrote:On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:
Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. Hmm, I don't feel you quite hit the mark on the explanation here. Honestly, the reason Mystique gave made more sense to me. I don't feel the key thing that allows multiposting is related to how fast the topic moves. Rather, it is just a matter of clear layout of your contribution. The end goal is readability. If you are sticking to one subject, better to write your sub-points in paragraphs or something, so people can see that it is all from the same person. If you are posting on very different topics inside a thread, it is ok to use separate posts. it should be a choice in the same way you chose to split up paragraphs, punctuate, and so on. In the LR example, I'd say it is ok to use separate posts if you are commenting on why sOs decided to go so heavy DTs in last game, discussing soO's rumoured new build on the upcoming map, and exactly how hungover tasteless is. If there are three separate reply-chains on those subjects, I don't see the reason to cram them all in the same post. But Mystique, if you get a warning for double posting, automated or not, and you go on to triple (or quadruple?) post a few hours later, you are not really in a position to claim ignorance. You got the warning, chose to ignore it, and suffered the consequences. Entirely your fault, motivated ban or not, sorry. I'm lazy and didn't feel like giving a long explanation. Also, who is Mystique? Was just about to ask this too.. From the context he means Diabolique I think. That's what I assumed, but it's really different name to get it mixed up with :s haha, oops. You are right ofc. Sorry whatsname.
I'll let you off since you're probably in mourning due to your awful cricket team.
|
On February 04 2016 17:31 Diabolique wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:24 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:18 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:38 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 16:32 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot Good idea. If I got the original warning from a mod, I would have answered to him that it is a mistake and we could clarify the situation. On February 04 2016 16:22 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot I think he's referring to the fact that straight after explaining he now knows the rules he double posted. Well, I have seen people doing what I did = marking the second post with "double post" and they were not banned ... so I thought, this might be OK if I do it as well? :-) On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:My tone was half joking half serious. I'm not a stick up my ass, old, stingy, and cranky mod yet But Phredxor is right. He double posted on the previous page. I'm pretty sure on purpose too On February 04 2016 16:15 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. I just don't understand, WHY? I would even not know, it is a rule, if I was not banned for it ... And when I do not understand the reason, I do not see a way how to follow it. Am I allowed to do a double / triple / quadruple post, if the posts will be let's say a few days from each other? As an example - I am trying to do some posts in the sOs Fan club thread. Almost noone else is active there. So I come back there after a few days with something new, and I see, the last post (a few days old) is mine. Does that mean, I am not allowed to post a new post? Or do I need to edit the last post adn add the new ideas into the old post? What a bullshit! Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. OK, this makes more sense now if it is allowed in fan clubs ... and the multiple posting in heavy discussions I do every day without a problem, as there is always someone posting between my posts. The problem are the "slow threads" ... so is there another exception than fan clubs? This is so stupid to answer to three posts in one post :-) How you did it just now is correct. Quote multiple times and put it all into one post. Thank you for doing that. If it's a really slowly moving thread and you don't want to get warned or banned for multiple posting, then post in here, PM a mod, or go to the Ask TL Staff Anything thread and ask us if it's okay to multi-post. We'll take a look at it, and if we think multiple posting should be allowed in that situation, we'll give you the thumbs up. Btw, if you post, then someone posts in between your next post, that is not multiple posting. That's just posting Look, Seeker, I really like you and respect you. But I do not think, I will be using this "answering in one post" much. Because this is a nonsense and I do not like it. But I promise, I will be very careful with any further double postings. Mostly, I will just not do the second post. So: 1. In fast flowing discussions, I do not care, I will just post quickly, in 90% of cases, somebody else writes in between my posts. 2. In sOs fanclub, I will not care if my posts are several days away from each other or describe another topic completely. 3. If I will want to make a double post in a slow moving thread, I will for sure not contact you or the mods and ask for permission, this is just some stupid discussion and I believe, your (and my) time is too valuable to contact you with something so stupid. So in these cases, I will consider whether it is reasonable in that particular situation to make a double post instead of putting it into the old post, and if yes, I will do the double post. In the worst case, I will be banned again for 2 days and that is nothing, I can't live with, just the mods of TL would fall in my eyes one level deeper. Dude. You take your posting way too seriously. Trust me, I don't, but I was banned for it and became a 'topic' in this thread, saying I am double / triple / quadruple posting because ... I do not know why ... So as FPL made me to come back to TL, I just wanted to clarify the situation. BTW: Cascade, thanks for the post, that is how I feel it as well. The only thing that time - I did not understand the warning from the TL.bot. I thought, it was just some error from the bot, who did not see, I was reacting to completely different posts - I was banned for the posts on the top of the page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/500618-dh-leipzig-details-announced?page=10 . Seeker, thanks for the last post, I hope it will be OK in the future :-)
If your passion is double posting. Just do LRs man. (espacially the one in the morning)
On February 04 2016 17:37 opisska wrote:
Banning people for making two posts with the same username next to each other isn't strict enough! Even two posts with the same country of residence should be be bannable ...
Damnit. I wanted to say the same thing with 2 Jin Air Flair and i saw Phredox had a KT one 
|
Do we take this as a ban request? 
|
|
|
On February 04 2016 17:48 FFW_Rude wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:31 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 17:24 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:18 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:38 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 16:32 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot Good idea. If I got the original warning from a mod, I would have answered to him that it is a mistake and we could clarify the situation. On February 04 2016 16:22 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot I think he's referring to the fact that straight after explaining he now knows the rules he double posted. Well, I have seen people doing what I did = marking the second post with "double post" and they were not banned ... so I thought, this might be OK if I do it as well? :-) On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:My tone was half joking half serious. I'm not a stick up my ass, old, stingy, and cranky mod yet But Phredxor is right. He double posted on the previous page. I'm pretty sure on purpose too On February 04 2016 16:15 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. I just don't understand, WHY? I would even not know, it is a rule, if I was not banned for it ... And when I do not understand the reason, I do not see a way how to follow it. Am I allowed to do a double / triple / quadruple post, if the posts will be let's say a few days from each other? As an example - I am trying to do some posts in the sOs Fan club thread. Almost noone else is active there. So I come back there after a few days with something new, and I see, the last post (a few days old) is mine. Does that mean, I am not allowed to post a new post? Or do I need to edit the last post adn add the new ideas into the old post? What a bullshit! Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. OK, this makes more sense now if it is allowed in fan clubs ... and the multiple posting in heavy discussions I do every day without a problem, as there is always someone posting between my posts. The problem are the "slow threads" ... so is there another exception than fan clubs? This is so stupid to answer to three posts in one post :-) How you did it just now is correct. Quote multiple times and put it all into one post. Thank you for doing that. If it's a really slowly moving thread and you don't want to get warned or banned for multiple posting, then post in here, PM a mod, or go to the Ask TL Staff Anything thread and ask us if it's okay to multi-post. We'll take a look at it, and if we think multiple posting should be allowed in that situation, we'll give you the thumbs up. Btw, if you post, then someone posts in between your next post, that is not multiple posting. That's just posting Look, Seeker, I really like you and respect you. But I do not think, I will be using this "answering in one post" much. Because this is a nonsense and I do not like it. But I promise, I will be very careful with any further double postings. Mostly, I will just not do the second post. So: 1. In fast flowing discussions, I do not care, I will just post quickly, in 90% of cases, somebody else writes in between my posts. 2. In sOs fanclub, I will not care if my posts are several days away from each other or describe another topic completely. 3. If I will want to make a double post in a slow moving thread, I will for sure not contact you or the mods and ask for permission, this is just some stupid discussion and I believe, your (and my) time is too valuable to contact you with something so stupid. So in these cases, I will consider whether it is reasonable in that particular situation to make a double post instead of putting it into the old post, and if yes, I will do the double post. In the worst case, I will be banned again for 2 days and that is nothing, I can't live with, just the mods of TL would fall in my eyes one level deeper. Dude. You take your posting way too seriously. Trust me, I don't, but I was banned for it and became a 'topic' in this thread, saying I am double / triple / quadruple posting because ... I do not know why ... So as FPL made me to come back to TL, I just wanted to clarify the situation. BTW: Cascade, thanks for the post, that is how I feel it as well. The only thing that time - I did not understand the warning from the TL.bot. I thought, it was just some error from the bot, who did not see, I was reacting to completely different posts - I was banned for the posts on the top of the page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/500618-dh-leipzig-details-announced?page=10 . Seeker, thanks for the last post, I hope it will be OK in the future :-) If your passion is double posting. Just do LRs man. (espacially the one in the morning) Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:37 opisska wrote:
Banning people for making two posts with the same username next to each other isn't strict enough! Even two posts with the same country of residence should be be bannable ... Damnit. I wanted to say the same thing with 2 Jin Air Flair and i saw Phredox had a KT one
OMG! Why should be my passion double posting???? I had even no idea that something like that exists when I was banned. And what is LR?
EDIT: no idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LR
|
On February 04 2016 17:48 FFW_Rude wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:31 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 17:24 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:18 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:38 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 16:32 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot Good idea. If I got the original warning from a mod, I would have answered to him that it is a mistake and we could clarify the situation. On February 04 2016 16:22 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot I think he's referring to the fact that straight after explaining he now knows the rules he double posted. Well, I have seen people doing what I did = marking the second post with "double post" and they were not banned ... so I thought, this might be OK if I do it as well? :-) On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:My tone was half joking half serious. I'm not a stick up my ass, old, stingy, and cranky mod yet But Phredxor is right. He double posted on the previous page. I'm pretty sure on purpose too On February 04 2016 16:15 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. I just don't understand, WHY? I would even not know, it is a rule, if I was not banned for it ... And when I do not understand the reason, I do not see a way how to follow it. Am I allowed to do a double / triple / quadruple post, if the posts will be let's say a few days from each other? As an example - I am trying to do some posts in the sOs Fan club thread. Almost noone else is active there. So I come back there after a few days with something new, and I see, the last post (a few days old) is mine. Does that mean, I am not allowed to post a new post? Or do I need to edit the last post adn add the new ideas into the old post? What a bullshit! Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. OK, this makes more sense now if it is allowed in fan clubs ... and the multiple posting in heavy discussions I do every day without a problem, as there is always someone posting between my posts. The problem are the "slow threads" ... so is there another exception than fan clubs? This is so stupid to answer to three posts in one post :-) How you did it just now is correct. Quote multiple times and put it all into one post. Thank you for doing that. If it's a really slowly moving thread and you don't want to get warned or banned for multiple posting, then post in here, PM a mod, or go to the Ask TL Staff Anything thread and ask us if it's okay to multi-post. We'll take a look at it, and if we think multiple posting should be allowed in that situation, we'll give you the thumbs up. Btw, if you post, then someone posts in between your next post, that is not multiple posting. That's just posting Look, Seeker, I really like you and respect you. But I do not think, I will be using this "answering in one post" much. Because this is a nonsense and I do not like it. But I promise, I will be very careful with any further double postings. Mostly, I will just not do the second post. So: 1. In fast flowing discussions, I do not care, I will just post quickly, in 90% of cases, somebody else writes in between my posts. 2. In sOs fanclub, I will not care if my posts are several days away from each other or describe another topic completely. 3. If I will want to make a double post in a slow moving thread, I will for sure not contact you or the mods and ask for permission, this is just some stupid discussion and I believe, your (and my) time is too valuable to contact you with something so stupid. So in these cases, I will consider whether it is reasonable in that particular situation to make a double post instead of putting it into the old post, and if yes, I will do the double post. In the worst case, I will be banned again for 2 days and that is nothing, I can't live with, just the mods of TL would fall in my eyes one level deeper. Dude. You take your posting way too seriously. Trust me, I don't, but I was banned for it and became a 'topic' in this thread, saying I am double / triple / quadruple posting because ... I do not know why ... So as FPL made me to come back to TL, I just wanted to clarify the situation. BTW: Cascade, thanks for the post, that is how I feel it as well. The only thing that time - I did not understand the warning from the TL.bot. I thought, it was just some error from the bot, who did not see, I was reacting to completely different posts - I was banned for the posts on the top of the page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/500618-dh-leipzig-details-announced?page=10 . Seeker, thanks for the last post, I hope it will be OK in the future :-) If your passion is double posting. Just do LRs man. (espacially the one in the morning) Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:37 opisska wrote:
Banning people for making two posts with the same username next to each other isn't strict enough! Even two posts with the same country of residence should be be bannable ... Damnit. I wanted to say the same thing with 2 Jin Air Flair and i saw Phredox had a KT one
Thought about it too as it would have worked as well, but god distracted by a phone call... But that would also be twice the graphics editing for CaptainObviousSCII up there and I don't know how well would have he handled that
Anyway, the rules against double posting are pretty silly and probably just a remnant from the days where this place was run by 15yearolds pretending to be the rightful and though guys at least online, when making up rules like that was the pinnacle of their social existence. If you look around, you see more things like that which just don't make much sense now. This whole "let young frats people grow up on an online board" is a pretty interesting social experiment.
|
On February 04 2016 17:52 Diabolique wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:48 FFW_Rude wrote:On February 04 2016 17:31 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 17:24 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:18 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:38 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 16:32 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot Good idea. If I got the original warning from a mod, I would have answered to him that it is a mistake and we could clarify the situation. On February 04 2016 16:22 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot I think he's referring to the fact that straight after explaining he now knows the rules he double posted. Well, I have seen people doing what I did = marking the second post with "double post" and they were not banned ... so I thought, this might be OK if I do it as well? :-) On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:My tone was half joking half serious. I'm not a stick up my ass, old, stingy, and cranky mod yet But Phredxor is right. He double posted on the previous page. I'm pretty sure on purpose too On February 04 2016 16:15 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. I just don't understand, WHY? I would even not know, it is a rule, if I was not banned for it ... And when I do not understand the reason, I do not see a way how to follow it. Am I allowed to do a double / triple / quadruple post, if the posts will be let's say a few days from each other? As an example - I am trying to do some posts in the sOs Fan club thread. Almost noone else is active there. So I come back there after a few days with something new, and I see, the last post (a few days old) is mine. Does that mean, I am not allowed to post a new post? Or do I need to edit the last post adn add the new ideas into the old post? What a bullshit! Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. OK, this makes more sense now if it is allowed in fan clubs ... and the multiple posting in heavy discussions I do every day without a problem, as there is always someone posting between my posts. The problem are the "slow threads" ... so is there another exception than fan clubs? This is so stupid to answer to three posts in one post :-) How you did it just now is correct. Quote multiple times and put it all into one post. Thank you for doing that. If it's a really slowly moving thread and you don't want to get warned or banned for multiple posting, then post in here, PM a mod, or go to the Ask TL Staff Anything thread and ask us if it's okay to multi-post. We'll take a look at it, and if we think multiple posting should be allowed in that situation, we'll give you the thumbs up. Btw, if you post, then someone posts in between your next post, that is not multiple posting. That's just posting Look, Seeker, I really like you and respect you. But I do not think, I will be using this "answering in one post" much. Because this is a nonsense and I do not like it. But I promise, I will be very careful with any further double postings. Mostly, I will just not do the second post. So: 1. In fast flowing discussions, I do not care, I will just post quickly, in 90% of cases, somebody else writes in between my posts. 2. In sOs fanclub, I will not care if my posts are several days away from each other or describe another topic completely. 3. If I will want to make a double post in a slow moving thread, I will for sure not contact you or the mods and ask for permission, this is just some stupid discussion and I believe, your (and my) time is too valuable to contact you with something so stupid. So in these cases, I will consider whether it is reasonable in that particular situation to make a double post instead of putting it into the old post, and if yes, I will do the double post. In the worst case, I will be banned again for 2 days and that is nothing, I can't live with, just the mods of TL would fall in my eyes one level deeper. Dude. You take your posting way too seriously. Trust me, I don't, but I was banned for it and became a 'topic' in this thread, saying I am double / triple / quadruple posting because ... I do not know why ... So as FPL made me to come back to TL, I just wanted to clarify the situation. BTW: Cascade, thanks for the post, that is how I feel it as well. The only thing that time - I did not understand the warning from the TL.bot. I thought, it was just some error from the bot, who did not see, I was reacting to completely different posts - I was banned for the posts on the top of the page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/500618-dh-leipzig-details-announced?page=10 . Seeker, thanks for the last post, I hope it will be OK in the future :-) If your passion is double posting. Just do LRs man. (espacially the one in the morning) On February 04 2016 17:37 opisska wrote:
Banning people for making two posts with the same username next to each other isn't strict enough! Even two posts with the same country of residence should be be bannable ... Damnit. I wanted to say the same thing with 2 Jin Air Flair and i saw Phredox had a KT one OMG! Why should be my passion double posting???? I had even no idea that something like that exists when I was banned. And what is LR? EDIT: no idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LR
LR = Live Report thread. It is the thread that is created under "Tournaments" Section so people can have their own version of "Twitch chat" and balance whine so mods can clean the site from some users.
|
On February 04 2016 18:17 WrathSCII wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:52 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 17:48 FFW_Rude wrote:On February 04 2016 17:31 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 17:24 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:18 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:38 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 16:32 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot Good idea. If I got the original warning from a mod, I would have answered to him that it is a mistake and we could clarify the situation. On February 04 2016 16:22 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:
[quote]
Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system.
The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning.
That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot I think he's referring to the fact that straight after explaining he now knows the rules he double posted. Well, I have seen people doing what I did = marking the second post with "double post" and they were not banned ... so I thought, this might be OK if I do it as well? :-) On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:My tone was half joking half serious. I'm not a stick up my ass, old, stingy, and cranky mod yet But Phredxor is right. He double posted on the previous page. I'm pretty sure on purpose too On February 04 2016 16:15 Diabolique wrote:
[quote]
I just don't understand, WHY? I would even not know, it is a rule, if I was not banned for it ...
And when I do not understand the reason, I do not see a way how to follow it. Am I allowed to do a double / triple / quadruple post, if the posts will be let's say a few days from each other? As an example - I am trying to do some posts in the sOs Fan club thread. Almost noone else is active there. So I come back there after a few days with something new, and I see, the last post (a few days old) is mine. Does that mean, I am not allowed to post a new post? Or do I need to edit the last post adn add the new ideas into the old post? What a bullshit! Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. OK, this makes more sense now if it is allowed in fan clubs ... and the multiple posting in heavy discussions I do every day without a problem, as there is always someone posting between my posts. The problem are the "slow threads" ... so is there another exception than fan clubs? This is so stupid to answer to three posts in one post :-) How you did it just now is correct. Quote multiple times and put it all into one post. Thank you for doing that. If it's a really slowly moving thread and you don't want to get warned or banned for multiple posting, then post in here, PM a mod, or go to the Ask TL Staff Anything thread and ask us if it's okay to multi-post. We'll take a look at it, and if we think multiple posting should be allowed in that situation, we'll give you the thumbs up. Btw, if you post, then someone posts in between your next post, that is not multiple posting. That's just posting Look, Seeker, I really like you and respect you. But I do not think, I will be using this "answering in one post" much. Because this is a nonsense and I do not like it. But I promise, I will be very careful with any further double postings. Mostly, I will just not do the second post. So: 1. In fast flowing discussions, I do not care, I will just post quickly, in 90% of cases, somebody else writes in between my posts. 2. In sOs fanclub, I will not care if my posts are several days away from each other or describe another topic completely. 3. If I will want to make a double post in a slow moving thread, I will for sure not contact you or the mods and ask for permission, this is just some stupid discussion and I believe, your (and my) time is too valuable to contact you with something so stupid. So in these cases, I will consider whether it is reasonable in that particular situation to make a double post instead of putting it into the old post, and if yes, I will do the double post. In the worst case, I will be banned again for 2 days and that is nothing, I can't live with, just the mods of TL would fall in my eyes one level deeper. Dude. You take your posting way too seriously. Trust me, I don't, but I was banned for it and became a 'topic' in this thread, saying I am double / triple / quadruple posting because ... I do not know why ... So as FPL made me to come back to TL, I just wanted to clarify the situation. BTW: Cascade, thanks for the post, that is how I feel it as well. The only thing that time - I did not understand the warning from the TL.bot. I thought, it was just some error from the bot, who did not see, I was reacting to completely different posts - I was banned for the posts on the top of the page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/500618-dh-leipzig-details-announced?page=10 . Seeker, thanks for the last post, I hope it will be OK in the future :-) If your passion is double posting. Just do LRs man. (espacially the one in the morning) On February 04 2016 17:37 opisska wrote:
Banning people for making two posts with the same username next to each other isn't strict enough! Even two posts with the same country of residence should be be bannable ... Damnit. I wanted to say the same thing with 2 Jin Air Flair and i saw Phredox had a KT one OMG! Why should be my passion double posting???? I had even no idea that something like that exists when I was banned. And what is LR? EDIT: no idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LR LR = Live Report thread. It is the thread that is created under "Tournaments" Section so people can have their own version of "Twitch chat" and balance whine so mods can clean the site from some users.
Ah OK, thanks, I see. I really hate Twitch chat and I really like LR :-) If it is not too fast :-)
|
On February 04 2016 17:48 FFW_Rude wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:31 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 17:24 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:18 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:38 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 16:32 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot Good idea. If I got the original warning from a mod, I would have answered to him that it is a mistake and we could clarify the situation. On February 04 2016 16:22 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot I think he's referring to the fact that straight after explaining he now knows the rules he double posted. Well, I have seen people doing what I did = marking the second post with "double post" and they were not banned ... so I thought, this might be OK if I do it as well? :-) On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:My tone was half joking half serious. I'm not a stick up my ass, old, stingy, and cranky mod yet But Phredxor is right. He double posted on the previous page. I'm pretty sure on purpose too On February 04 2016 16:15 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. I just don't understand, WHY? I would even not know, it is a rule, if I was not banned for it ... And when I do not understand the reason, I do not see a way how to follow it. Am I allowed to do a double / triple / quadruple post, if the posts will be let's say a few days from each other? As an example - I am trying to do some posts in the sOs Fan club thread. Almost noone else is active there. So I come back there after a few days with something new, and I see, the last post (a few days old) is mine. Does that mean, I am not allowed to post a new post? Or do I need to edit the last post adn add the new ideas into the old post? What a bullshit! Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. OK, this makes more sense now if it is allowed in fan clubs ... and the multiple posting in heavy discussions I do every day without a problem, as there is always someone posting between my posts. The problem are the "slow threads" ... so is there another exception than fan clubs? This is so stupid to answer to three posts in one post :-) How you did it just now is correct. Quote multiple times and put it all into one post. Thank you for doing that. If it's a really slowly moving thread and you don't want to get warned or banned for multiple posting, then post in here, PM a mod, or go to the Ask TL Staff Anything thread and ask us if it's okay to multi-post. We'll take a look at it, and if we think multiple posting should be allowed in that situation, we'll give you the thumbs up. Btw, if you post, then someone posts in between your next post, that is not multiple posting. That's just posting Look, Seeker, I really like you and respect you. But I do not think, I will be using this "answering in one post" much. Because this is a nonsense and I do not like it. But I promise, I will be very careful with any further double postings. Mostly, I will just not do the second post. So: 1. In fast flowing discussions, I do not care, I will just post quickly, in 90% of cases, somebody else writes in between my posts. 2. In sOs fanclub, I will not care if my posts are several days away from each other or describe another topic completely. 3. If I will want to make a double post in a slow moving thread, I will for sure not contact you or the mods and ask for permission, this is just some stupid discussion and I believe, your (and my) time is too valuable to contact you with something so stupid. So in these cases, I will consider whether it is reasonable in that particular situation to make a double post instead of putting it into the old post, and if yes, I will do the double post. In the worst case, I will be banned again for 2 days and that is nothing, I can't live with, just the mods of TL would fall in my eyes one level deeper. Dude. You take your posting way too seriously. Trust me, I don't, but I was banned for it and became a 'topic' in this thread, saying I am double / triple / quadruple posting because ... I do not know why ... So as FPL made me to come back to TL, I just wanted to clarify the situation. BTW: Cascade, thanks for the post, that is how I feel it as well. The only thing that time - I did not understand the warning from the TL.bot. I thought, it was just some error from the bot, who did not see, I was reacting to completely different posts - I was banned for the posts on the top of the page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/500618-dh-leipzig-details-announced?page=10 . Seeker, thanks for the last post, I hope it will be OK in the future :-) If your passion is double posting. Just do LRs man. (espacially the one in the morning) Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:37 opisska wrote:
Banning people for making two posts with the same username next to each other isn't strict enough! Even two posts with the same country of residence should be be bannable ... Damnit. I wanted to say the same thing with 2 Jin Air Flair and i saw Phredox had a KT one
Pls don't get me banned
|
I mean tbh the mods are very lenient with double posting so it's not that much of an issue. The only case when double posting is annoying is when (1) the thread is moving slowly BUT not too slow and (2) your two posts are less than ~20 hours apart.
Case study 1 : In a "Other Games" thread (like, I dunno, The Witcher 3 thread), you were the last to post, one month ago. Now, you've seen an article about the new expansion, and want to post it in the The Witcher 3 thread. Here, you clearly won't edit your old post, because it wouldn't bump the thread and people subscribed to it wouldn't see that you added something : it would be useless to edit it. Thus you'll double post.
Case study 2 : In a "General" thread (like, I dunno, the US Politics thread), you were the last to post, answering a quote from the last page, 30 minutes ago. Now, as you're clearly an expert on politics, you want to answer another post made before yours. Here, your last post is only 30 minutes old, and if no one posted in the last 30 minutes the thread is reasonably slow. Thus here it is better to edit your last post to add in the post you wanted to make, as few people subscribed to the thread will have seen your last post in 30 minutes. What you can do too is write your new post, copy it, F5 the thread, and if there's a new post by someone else, post it as a new post.
However triple and more posting should be instawarning the first time and instaban the second time. I don't get why it's not the case.
|
On February 04 2016 18:49 Phredxor wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:48 FFW_Rude wrote:On February 04 2016 17:31 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 17:24 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:18 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:38 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 16:32 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot Good idea. If I got the original warning from a mod, I would have answered to him that it is a mistake and we could clarify the situation. On February 04 2016 16:22 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot I think he's referring to the fact that straight after explaining he now knows the rules he double posted. Well, I have seen people doing what I did = marking the second post with "double post" and they were not banned ... so I thought, this might be OK if I do it as well? :-) On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:My tone was half joking half serious. I'm not a stick up my ass, old, stingy, and cranky mod yet But Phredxor is right. He double posted on the previous page. I'm pretty sure on purpose too On February 04 2016 16:15 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. I just don't understand, WHY? I would even not know, it is a rule, if I was not banned for it ... And when I do not understand the reason, I do not see a way how to follow it. Am I allowed to do a double / triple / quadruple post, if the posts will be let's say a few days from each other? As an example - I am trying to do some posts in the sOs Fan club thread. Almost noone else is active there. So I come back there after a few days with something new, and I see, the last post (a few days old) is mine. Does that mean, I am not allowed to post a new post? Or do I need to edit the last post adn add the new ideas into the old post? What a bullshit! Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. OK, this makes more sense now if it is allowed in fan clubs ... and the multiple posting in heavy discussions I do every day without a problem, as there is always someone posting between my posts. The problem are the "slow threads" ... so is there another exception than fan clubs? This is so stupid to answer to three posts in one post :-) How you did it just now is correct. Quote multiple times and put it all into one post. Thank you for doing that. If it's a really slowly moving thread and you don't want to get warned or banned for multiple posting, then post in here, PM a mod, or go to the Ask TL Staff Anything thread and ask us if it's okay to multi-post. We'll take a look at it, and if we think multiple posting should be allowed in that situation, we'll give you the thumbs up. Btw, if you post, then someone posts in between your next post, that is not multiple posting. That's just posting Look, Seeker, I really like you and respect you. But I do not think, I will be using this "answering in one post" much. Because this is a nonsense and I do not like it. But I promise, I will be very careful with any further double postings. Mostly, I will just not do the second post. So: 1. In fast flowing discussions, I do not care, I will just post quickly, in 90% of cases, somebody else writes in between my posts. 2. In sOs fanclub, I will not care if my posts are several days away from each other or describe another topic completely. 3. If I will want to make a double post in a slow moving thread, I will for sure not contact you or the mods and ask for permission, this is just some stupid discussion and I believe, your (and my) time is too valuable to contact you with something so stupid. So in these cases, I will consider whether it is reasonable in that particular situation to make a double post instead of putting it into the old post, and if yes, I will do the double post. In the worst case, I will be banned again for 2 days and that is nothing, I can't live with, just the mods of TL would fall in my eyes one level deeper. Dude. You take your posting way too seriously. Trust me, I don't, but I was banned for it and became a 'topic' in this thread, saying I am double / triple / quadruple posting because ... I do not know why ... So as FPL made me to come back to TL, I just wanted to clarify the situation. BTW: Cascade, thanks for the post, that is how I feel it as well. The only thing that time - I did not understand the warning from the TL.bot. I thought, it was just some error from the bot, who did not see, I was reacting to completely different posts - I was banned for the posts on the top of the page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/500618-dh-leipzig-details-announced?page=10 . Seeker, thanks for the last post, I hope it will be OK in the future :-) If your passion is double posting. Just do LRs man. (espacially the one in the morning) On February 04 2016 17:37 opisska wrote:
Banning people for making two posts with the same username next to each other isn't strict enough! Even two posts with the same country of residence should be be bannable ... Damnit. I wanted to say the same thing with 2 Jin Air Flair and i saw Phredox had a KT one Pls don't get me banned
Don't banbet me then 
On February 04 2016 17:52 Diabolique wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:48 FFW_Rude wrote:On February 04 2016 17:31 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 17:24 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:18 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:38 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 16:32 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot Good idea. If I got the original warning from a mod, I would have answered to him that it is a mistake and we could clarify the situation. On February 04 2016 16:22 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot I think he's referring to the fact that straight after explaining he now knows the rules he double posted. Well, I have seen people doing what I did = marking the second post with "double post" and they were not banned ... so I thought, this might be OK if I do it as well? :-) On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:My tone was half joking half serious. I'm not a stick up my ass, old, stingy, and cranky mod yet But Phredxor is right. He double posted on the previous page. I'm pretty sure on purpose too On February 04 2016 16:15 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. I just don't understand, WHY? I would even not know, it is a rule, if I was not banned for it ... And when I do not understand the reason, I do not see a way how to follow it. Am I allowed to do a double / triple / quadruple post, if the posts will be let's say a few days from each other? As an example - I am trying to do some posts in the sOs Fan club thread. Almost noone else is active there. So I come back there after a few days with something new, and I see, the last post (a few days old) is mine. Does that mean, I am not allowed to post a new post? Or do I need to edit the last post adn add the new ideas into the old post? What a bullshit! Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. OK, this makes more sense now if it is allowed in fan clubs ... and the multiple posting in heavy discussions I do every day without a problem, as there is always someone posting between my posts. The problem are the "slow threads" ... so is there another exception than fan clubs? This is so stupid to answer to three posts in one post :-) How you did it just now is correct. Quote multiple times and put it all into one post. Thank you for doing that. If it's a really slowly moving thread and you don't want to get warned or banned for multiple posting, then post in here, PM a mod, or go to the Ask TL Staff Anything thread and ask us if it's okay to multi-post. We'll take a look at it, and if we think multiple posting should be allowed in that situation, we'll give you the thumbs up. Btw, if you post, then someone posts in between your next post, that is not multiple posting. That's just posting Look, Seeker, I really like you and respect you. But I do not think, I will be using this "answering in one post" much. Because this is a nonsense and I do not like it. But I promise, I will be very careful with any further double postings. Mostly, I will just not do the second post. So: 1. In fast flowing discussions, I do not care, I will just post quickly, in 90% of cases, somebody else writes in between my posts. 2. In sOs fanclub, I will not care if my posts are several days away from each other or describe another topic completely. 3. If I will want to make a double post in a slow moving thread, I will for sure not contact you or the mods and ask for permission, this is just some stupid discussion and I believe, your (and my) time is too valuable to contact you with something so stupid. So in these cases, I will consider whether it is reasonable in that particular situation to make a double post instead of putting it into the old post, and if yes, I will do the double post. In the worst case, I will be banned again for 2 days and that is nothing, I can't live with, just the mods of TL would fall in my eyes one level deeper. Dude. You take your posting way too seriously. Trust me, I don't, but I was banned for it and became a 'topic' in this thread, saying I am double / triple / quadruple posting because ... I do not know why ... So as FPL made me to come back to TL, I just wanted to clarify the situation. BTW: Cascade, thanks for the post, that is how I feel it as well. The only thing that time - I did not understand the warning from the TL.bot. I thought, it was just some error from the bot, who did not see, I was reacting to completely different posts - I was banned for the posts on the top of the page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/500618-dh-leipzig-details-announced?page=10 . Seeker, thanks for the last post, I hope it will be OK in the future :-) If your passion is double posting. Just do LRs man. (espacially the one in the morning) On February 04 2016 17:37 opisska wrote:
Banning people for making two posts with the same username next to each other isn't strict enough! Even two posts with the same country of residence should be be bannable ... Damnit. I wanted to say the same thing with 2 Jin Air Flair and i saw Phredox had a KT one OMG! Why should be my passion double posting???? I had even no idea that something like that exists when I was banned. And what is LR? EDIT: no idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LR
That was some full romanian there. I was joking it was 2nd degree
LR is when you write in a thread what is happening in a game for people that can't watch it. So they read your report and feal the live of the game. It's a live recap if you want.
On February 04 2016 19:57 OtherWorld wrote:
I mean tbh the mods are very lenient with double posting so it's not that much of an issue. The only case when double posting is annoying is when (1) the thread is moving slowly BUT not too slow and (2) your two posts are less than ~20 hours apart.
Case study 1 : In a "Other Games" thread (like, I dunno, The Witcher 3 thread), you were the last to post, one month ago. Now, you've seen an article about the new expansion, and want to post it in the The Witcher 3 thread. Here, you clearly won't edit your old post, because it wouldn't bump the thread and people subscribed to it wouldn't see that you added something : it would be useless to edit it. Thus you'll double post.
Case study 2 : In a "General" thread (like, I dunno, the US Politics thread), you were the last to post, answering a quote from the last page, 30 minutes ago. Now, as you're clearly an expert on politics, you want to answer another post made before yours. Here, your last post is only 30 minutes old, and if no one posted in the last 30 minutes the thread is reasonably slow. Thus here it is better to edit your last post to add in the post you wanted to make, as few people subscribed to the thread will have seen your last post in 30 minutes. What you can do too is write your new post, copy it, F5 the thread, and if there's a new post by someone else, post it as a new post.
However triple and more posting should be instawarning the first time and instaban the second time. I don't get why it's not the case.
Sometime you can triple or quadruple post when LRing (game, event etc...) even if it's rare it happens
|
On February 04 2016 20:00 FFW_Rude wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 18:49 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 17:48 FFW_Rude wrote:On February 04 2016 17:31 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 17:24 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:18 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:38 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 16:32 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot Good idea. If I got the original warning from a mod, I would have answered to him that it is a mistake and we could clarify the situation. On February 04 2016 16:22 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:
[quote]
Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system.
The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning.
That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot I think he's referring to the fact that straight after explaining he now knows the rules he double posted. Well, I have seen people doing what I did = marking the second post with "double post" and they were not banned ... so I thought, this might be OK if I do it as well? :-) On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:My tone was half joking half serious. I'm not a stick up my ass, old, stingy, and cranky mod yet But Phredxor is right. He double posted on the previous page. I'm pretty sure on purpose too On February 04 2016 16:15 Diabolique wrote:
[quote]
I just don't understand, WHY? I would even not know, it is a rule, if I was not banned for it ...
And when I do not understand the reason, I do not see a way how to follow it. Am I allowed to do a double / triple / quadruple post, if the posts will be let's say a few days from each other? As an example - I am trying to do some posts in the sOs Fan club thread. Almost noone else is active there. So I come back there after a few days with something new, and I see, the last post (a few days old) is mine. Does that mean, I am not allowed to post a new post? Or do I need to edit the last post adn add the new ideas into the old post? What a bullshit! Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. OK, this makes more sense now if it is allowed in fan clubs ... and the multiple posting in heavy discussions I do every day without a problem, as there is always someone posting between my posts. The problem are the "slow threads" ... so is there another exception than fan clubs? This is so stupid to answer to three posts in one post :-) How you did it just now is correct. Quote multiple times and put it all into one post. Thank you for doing that. If it's a really slowly moving thread and you don't want to get warned or banned for multiple posting, then post in here, PM a mod, or go to the Ask TL Staff Anything thread and ask us if it's okay to multi-post. We'll take a look at it, and if we think multiple posting should be allowed in that situation, we'll give you the thumbs up. Btw, if you post, then someone posts in between your next post, that is not multiple posting. That's just posting Look, Seeker, I really like you and respect you. But I do not think, I will be using this "answering in one post" much. Because this is a nonsense and I do not like it. But I promise, I will be very careful with any further double postings. Mostly, I will just not do the second post. So: 1. In fast flowing discussions, I do not care, I will just post quickly, in 90% of cases, somebody else writes in between my posts. 2. In sOs fanclub, I will not care if my posts are several days away from each other or describe another topic completely. 3. If I will want to make a double post in a slow moving thread, I will for sure not contact you or the mods and ask for permission, this is just some stupid discussion and I believe, your (and my) time is too valuable to contact you with something so stupid. So in these cases, I will consider whether it is reasonable in that particular situation to make a double post instead of putting it into the old post, and if yes, I will do the double post. In the worst case, I will be banned again for 2 days and that is nothing, I can't live with, just the mods of TL would fall in my eyes one level deeper. Dude. You take your posting way too seriously. Trust me, I don't, but I was banned for it and became a 'topic' in this thread, saying I am double / triple / quadruple posting because ... I do not know why ... So as FPL made me to come back to TL, I just wanted to clarify the situation. BTW: Cascade, thanks for the post, that is how I feel it as well. The only thing that time - I did not understand the warning from the TL.bot. I thought, it was just some error from the bot, who did not see, I was reacting to completely different posts - I was banned for the posts on the top of the page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/500618-dh-leipzig-details-announced?page=10 . Seeker, thanks for the last post, I hope it will be OK in the future :-) If your passion is double posting. Just do LRs man. (espacially the one in the morning) On February 04 2016 17:37 opisska wrote:
Banning people for making two posts with the same username next to each other isn't strict enough! Even two posts with the same country of residence should be be bannable ... Damnit. I wanted to say the same thing with 2 Jin Air Flair and i saw Phredox had a KT one Pls don't get me banned Don't banbet me then Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:52 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 17:48 FFW_Rude wrote:On February 04 2016 17:31 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 17:24 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:18 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:38 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 16:32 Diabolique wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:On February 04 2016 16:11 Seeker wrote:
Don't test the mods. There is a reason TL doesn't allow multi-posting. Stick to the rules. Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system. The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning. That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot Good idea. If I got the original warning from a mod, I would have answered to him that it is a mistake and we could clarify the situation. On February 04 2016 16:22 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 16:19 WrathSCII wrote:
[quote]
Easy there champ. He was not testing anyone. He said that he did understand the warning was from a mod but a mistake from the system.
The way it is displayed is kinda confusing for new comers as the warning comes from TL.Bot instead of the mod who made the warning.
That system could you use a little visual improvement to understand that warnings are issued from mods not from TL.Bot I think he's referring to the fact that straight after explaining he now knows the rules he double posted. Well, I have seen people doing what I did = marking the second post with "double post" and they were not banned ... so I thought, this might be OK if I do it as well? :-) On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:My tone was half joking half serious. I'm not a stick up my ass, old, stingy, and cranky mod yet But Phredxor is right. He double posted on the previous page. I'm pretty sure on purpose too On February 04 2016 16:15 Diabolique wrote:
[quote]
I just don't understand, WHY? I would even not know, it is a rule, if I was not banned for it ...
And when I do not understand the reason, I do not see a way how to follow it. Am I allowed to do a double / triple / quadruple post, if the posts will be let's say a few days from each other? As an example - I am trying to do some posts in the sOs Fan club thread. Almost noone else is active there. So I come back there after a few days with something new, and I see, the last post (a few days old) is mine. Does that mean, I am not allowed to post a new post? Or do I need to edit the last post adn add the new ideas into the old post? What a bullshit! Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. OK, this makes more sense now if it is allowed in fan clubs ... and the multiple posting in heavy discussions I do every day without a problem, as there is always someone posting between my posts. The problem are the "slow threads" ... so is there another exception than fan clubs? This is so stupid to answer to three posts in one post :-) How you did it just now is correct. Quote multiple times and put it all into one post. Thank you for doing that. If it's a really slowly moving thread and you don't want to get warned or banned for multiple posting, then post in here, PM a mod, or go to the Ask TL Staff Anything thread and ask us if it's okay to multi-post. We'll take a look at it, and if we think multiple posting should be allowed in that situation, we'll give you the thumbs up. Btw, if you post, then someone posts in between your next post, that is not multiple posting. That's just posting Look, Seeker, I really like you and respect you. But I do not think, I will be using this "answering in one post" much. Because this is a nonsense and I do not like it. But I promise, I will be very careful with any further double postings. Mostly, I will just not do the second post. So: 1. In fast flowing discussions, I do not care, I will just post quickly, in 90% of cases, somebody else writes in between my posts. 2. In sOs fanclub, I will not care if my posts are several days away from each other or describe another topic completely. 3. If I will want to make a double post in a slow moving thread, I will for sure not contact you or the mods and ask for permission, this is just some stupid discussion and I believe, your (and my) time is too valuable to contact you with something so stupid. So in these cases, I will consider whether it is reasonable in that particular situation to make a double post instead of putting it into the old post, and if yes, I will do the double post. In the worst case, I will be banned again for 2 days and that is nothing, I can't live with, just the mods of TL would fall in my eyes one level deeper. Dude. You take your posting way too seriously. Trust me, I don't, but I was banned for it and became a 'topic' in this thread, saying I am double / triple / quadruple posting because ... I do not know why ... So as FPL made me to come back to TL, I just wanted to clarify the situation. BTW: Cascade, thanks for the post, that is how I feel it as well. The only thing that time - I did not understand the warning from the TL.bot. I thought, it was just some error from the bot, who did not see, I was reacting to completely different posts - I was banned for the posts on the top of the page: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/starcraft-2/500618-dh-leipzig-details-announced?page=10 . Seeker, thanks for the last post, I hope it will be OK in the future :-) If your passion is double posting. Just do LRs man. (espacially the one in the morning) On February 04 2016 17:37 opisska wrote:
Banning people for making two posts with the same username next to each other isn't strict enough! Even two posts with the same country of residence should be be bannable ... Damnit. I wanted to say the same thing with 2 Jin Air Flair and i saw Phredox had a KT one OMG! Why should be my passion double posting???? I had even no idea that something like that exists when I was banned. And what is LR? EDIT: no idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LR That was some full romanian there. I was joking it was 2nd degree LR is when you write in a thread what is happening in a game for people that can't watch it. So they read your report and feal the live of the game. It's a live recap if you want. Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 19:57 OtherWorld wrote:
I mean tbh the mods are very lenient with double posting so it's not that much of an issue. The only case when double posting is annoying is when (1) the thread is moving slowly BUT not too slow and (2) your two posts are less than ~20 hours apart.
Case study 1 : In a "Other Games" thread (like, I dunno, The Witcher 3 thread), you were the last to post, one month ago. Now, you've seen an article about the new expansion, and want to post it in the The Witcher 3 thread. Here, you clearly won't edit your old post, because it wouldn't bump the thread and people subscribed to it wouldn't see that you added something : it would be useless to edit it. Thus you'll double post.
Case study 2 : In a "General" thread (like, I dunno, the US Politics thread), you were the last to post, answering a quote from the last page, 30 minutes ago. Now, as you're clearly an expert on politics, you want to answer another post made before yours. Here, your last post is only 30 minutes old, and if no one posted in the last 30 minutes the thread is reasonably slow. Thus here it is better to edit your last post to add in the post you wanted to make, as few people subscribed to the thread will have seen your last post in 30 minutes. What you can do too is write your new post, copy it, F5 the thread, and if there's a new post by someone else, post it as a new post.
However triple and more posting should be instawarning the first time and instaban the second time. I don't get why it's not the case. Sometime you can triple or quadruple post when LRing (game, event etc...) even if it's rare it happens
Well LRs are special cases though
|
On February 04 2016 17:44 Phredxor wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 17:40 Cascade wrote:On February 04 2016 17:15 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 17:14 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On February 04 2016 17:11 Phredxor wrote:On February 04 2016 17:10 Seeker wrote:On February 04 2016 17:02 Cascade wrote:On February 04 2016 16:29 Seeker wrote:
Multiple posting in fan clubs is perfectly fine. Mods shouldn't action you for that. Multiple posting in LR threads and threads that have heavy discussions going on is not. It gets spammy and annoying. And if we allow one person to do it then we have to allow everyone to do it. Then chaos breaks out and no one can really understand what anyone is saying. Hmm, I don't feel you quite hit the mark on the explanation here. Honestly, the reason Mystique gave made more sense to me. I don't feel the key thing that allows multiposting is related to how fast the topic moves. Rather, it is just a matter of clear layout of your contribution. The end goal is readability. If you are sticking to one subject, better to write your sub-points in paragraphs or something, so people can see that it is all from the same person. If you are posting on very different topics inside a thread, it is ok to use separate posts. it should be a choice in the same way you chose to split up paragraphs, punctuate, and so on. In the LR example, I'd say it is ok to use separate posts if you are commenting on why sOs decided to go so heavy DTs in last game, discussing soO's rumoured new build on the upcoming map, and exactly how hungover tasteless is. If there are three separate reply-chains on those subjects, I don't see the reason to cram them all in the same post. But Mystique, if you get a warning for double posting, automated or not, and you go on to triple (or quadruple?) post a few hours later, you are not really in a position to claim ignorance. You got the warning, chose to ignore it, and suffered the consequences. Entirely your fault, motivated ban or not, sorry. I'm lazy and didn't feel like giving a long explanation. Also, who is Mystique? Was just about to ask this too.. From the context he means Diabolique I think. That's what I assumed, but it's really different name to get it mixed up with :s haha, oops. You are right ofc. Sorry whatsname. I'll let you off since you're probably in mourning due to your awful cricket team.
I'm Swedish actually, just living in AU, and I sincerely don't care the slightest about cricket. If anything, I'm amazed how anyone can play, let alone watch it, without getting terminally bored. I'm happy if you guys beat up the Aussies though, because that usually means that my co-workers shut up about it.
Thanks though, the gesture is appreciated, even though I know you were trying to rub it in. So I shouldn't be thankful I guess. Or something. Hmm.
|
On February 04 2016 19:57 OtherWorld wrote:
I mean tbh the mods are very lenient with double posting so it's not that much of an issue. The only case when double posting is annoying is when (1) the thread is moving slowly BUT not too slow and (2) your two posts are less than ~20 hours apart.
Case study 1 : In a "Other Games" thread (like, I dunno, The Witcher 3 thread), you were the last to post, one month ago. Now, you've seen an article about the new expansion, and want to post it in the The Witcher 3 thread. Here, you clearly won't edit your old post, because it wouldn't bump the thread and people subscribed to it wouldn't see that you added something : it would be useless to edit it. Thus you'll double post.
Case study 2 : In a "General" thread (like, I dunno, the US Politics thread), you were the last to post, answering a quote from the last page, 30 minutes ago. Now, as you're clearly an expert on politics, you want to answer another post made before yours. Here, your last post is only 30 minutes old, and if no one posted in the last 30 minutes the thread is reasonably slow. Thus here it is better to edit your last post to add in the post you wanted to make, as few people subscribed to the thread will have seen your last post in 30 minutes. What you can do too is write your new post, copy it, F5 the thread, and if there's a new post by someone else, post it as a new post.
However triple and more posting should be instawarning the first time and instaban the second time. I don't get why it's not the case.
Your second example is a great example of how silly the rule is. This is still somewhat okay on a desktop, where selecting and copy pasting is quick and easy. But for ppl posting mainly from mobile phones, it is hard enough to type; let alone copy paste quotes into the correct place for editing a post.
If it's the same topic, following this rule makes some sense, but if you're replying to, for instance, someone talking about Trump's polling in South Carolina, and the water situation in Flint, then having that be in the same, edited, post makes the thread (far) less legible than the occasional double posting.
Luckily, in practice, both posters and mods are fairly sensible when it comes to double posting.
Edit: @diabolic if you really want to doublepost, though, go join a mafia game. And posting this edit as a new post is the kind of double posting that is discouraged. Same topic and low additional information
|
On February 04 2016 20:43 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2016 19:57 OtherWorld wrote:
I mean tbh the mods are very lenient with double posting so it's not that much of an issue. The only case when double posting is annoying is when (1) the thread is moving slowly BUT not too slow and (2) your two posts are less than ~20 hours apart.
Case study 1 : In a "Other Games" thread (like, I dunno, The Witcher 3 thread), you were the last to post, one month ago. Now, you've seen an article about the new expansion, and want to post it in the The Witcher 3 thread. Here, you clearly won't edit your old post, because it wouldn't bump the thread and people subscribed to it wouldn't see that you added something : it would be useless to edit it. Thus you'll double post.
Case study 2 : In a "General" thread (like, I dunno, the US Politics thread), you were the last to post, answering a quote from the last page, 30 minutes ago. Now, as you're clearly an expert on politics, you want to answer another post made before yours. Here, your last post is only 30 minutes old, and if no one posted in the last 30 minutes the thread is reasonably slow. Thus here it is better to edit your last post to add in the post you wanted to make, as few people subscribed to the thread will have seen your last post in 30 minutes. What you can do too is write your new post, copy it, F5 the thread, and if there's a new post by someone else, post it as a new post.
However triple and more posting should be instawarning the first time and instaban the second time. I don't get why it's not the case. Your second example is a great example of how silly the rule is. This is still somewhat okay on a desktop, where selecting and copy pasting is quick and easy. But for ppl posting mainly from mobile phones, it is hard enough to type; let alone copy paste quotes into the correct place for editing a post. If it's the same topic, following this rule makes some sense, but if you're replying to, for instance, someone talking about Trump's polling in South Carolina, and the water situation in Flint, then having that be in the same, edited, post makes the thread (far) less legible than the occasional double posting. Luckily, in practice, both posters and mods are fairly sensible when it comes to double posting.
I dunno, with today's smartphones and their huge ass screens it's fairly easy to copy/paste shit. Not as fast as your good old CtrlC/CtrlV of course, but still.
|
Germany25658 Posts
We are super lenient when it comes to double posting, if you do end up getting actioned for it you probably fucked up
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/xauOgKC.png)
