EPT
The Automated Ban List - Page 250
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13912 Posts
| ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On February 13 2011 12:31 garbanzo wrote: I have no problem with these. Every time some random guy feels he can insult a player who has put hours upon hours of effort into their craft, it annoys me too. People ought to feel welcome on TL, and that's hard if every move you make is being criticized by someone.I usually don't question the mods, but anybody else thinks Naz has been a little high strung lately? Seems like a lot of people have been getting banned for what I think are just light comments. More recently are these two examples: Those two just seem like offhand comments to me, no offense implied. | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On February 13 2011 12:31 garbanzo wrote: I usually don't question the mods, but anybody else thinks Naz has been a little high strung lately? Seems like a lot of people have been getting banned for what I think are just light comments. More recently are these two examples: Those two just seem like offhand comments to me, no offense implied. The first says Zeerax must have gotten to a final through abuse because that's how bad he is. This player just played his heart out for our entertainment. Comment made by a person who has been banned and warned 4 times before. We ask all of you to treat players with some respect and don't make tasteless jokes. The second is just a spiteful wc3 remark we don't need. Saying "Qxc rolled wc3" is ridiculous. | ||
|
Diamond
United States10796 Posts
snorlax2 was just banned by Harem. That account was created on 2011-02-10 01:41:57 and had 13 posts. Reason: 01:47 Polishccheese oh wwell they dont got my smurf accounts 01:47 Polishccheese nah ill go to a MLGand punch out the mod 01:47 Polishccheese i rather do that 01:48 Polishccheese ofcourse i hate the mods here id punch them all out 01:48 Polishccheese esp nazgul 01:48 Polishccheese nah but id stab nazgul for sure Don't have your smurf account? Really now? Lol TL wins again. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
snorlax2 was just banned by Harem. That account was created on 2011-02-10 01:41:57 and had 13 posts. Reason: 01:47 Polishccheese oh wwell they dont got my smurf accounts 01:47 Polishccheese nah ill go to a MLGand punch out the mod 01:47 Polishccheese i rather do that 01:48 Polishccheese ofcourse i hate the mods here id punch them all out 01:48 Polishccheese esp nazgul 01:48 Polishccheese nah but id stab nazgul for sure Don't have your smurf account? Really now? I'm getting warm fuzzies in my tummy! <3 | ||
|
Trotske
410 Posts
| ||
|
garbanzo
United States4046 Posts
On February 13 2011 14:09 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: The first says Zeerax must have gotten to a final through abuse because that's how bad he is. This player just played his heart out for our entertainment. Comment made by a person who has been banned and warned 4 times before. We ask all of you to treat players with some respect and don't make tasteless jokes. The second is just a spiteful wc3 remark we don't need. Saying "Qxc rolled wc3" is ridiculous. I guess I didn't view the first comment like that. To me a response to his question of "abuse" could be, "Zeerax abused Terran's propensity to push with a lot of marauders initially." The word choice was a little strange, but reasonable. Oh well, I'm probably wrong, especially since he had previous history. I tend to give people a little too much credit I think. The second comment is more reasonable. I thought that's what the ban was for, but I thought it was too slight to be banned for. I guess that's the more reason to do it though. Thanks for the response. | ||
|
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=191753 I've tried to have a rational discussion but the entire thread has turned into agressive posting, namecalling and ridiculusation of people's beliefs. | ||
|
Iplaythings
Denmark9110 Posts
On February 14 2011 01:23 Saechiis wrote: Can some mod take a look at this thread? http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=191753 I've tried to have a rational discussion but the entire thread has turned into agressive posting, namecalling and ridiculusation of people's beliefs. Use the report button for it, or PM a mod, this thread is for discussing people how have been banned or just bans in general, it's not about suggesting bans or acting like a report button Thank you, I'd hate if this thread was derailed  | ||
|
oBlade
United States5294 Posts
On February 12 2011 10:38 motbob wrote: ...why? Normally I don't disagree with bans, but this I don't understand at all. I sympathize. It would have been embarrassing enough for him (and better for the thread) if Nazgul had just posted something to enlighten him - after all, the guy's comment is only ignorance, no malice. | ||
|
vyyye
Sweden3917 Posts
On February 14 2011 01:23 Saechiis wrote: Can some mod take a look at this thread? http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=191753 I've tried to have a rational discussion but the entire thread has turned into agressive posting, namecalling and ridiculusation of people's beliefs. Saechiis was just temp banned for 2 days by EvilTeletubby. That account was created on 2010-05-24 23:52:44 and had 1475 posts. Reason: I'm conducting an experiment here. I think the veganism thread will benefit greatly from you being gone for 2 days. Worthwhile conversation might even take place in the void left by your missing inane posts. Let's see if I'm right! I believe the word 'irony' is highly applicable. | ||
|
emperorchampion
Canada9496 Posts
On February 14 2011 04:17 vyyye wrote: I believe the word 'irony' is highly applicable. hahahaha | ||
|
Wargizmo
Australia1237 Posts
On February 13 2011 23:54 garbanzo wrote: I guess I didn't view the first comment like that. To me a response to his question of "abuse" could be, "Zeerax abused Terran's propensity to push with a lot of marauders initially." The word choice was a little strange, but reasonable. Oh well, I'm probably wrong, especially since he had previous history. I tend to give people a little too much credit I think. The second comment is more reasonable. I thought that's what the ban was for, but I thought it was too slight to be banned for. I guess that's the more reason to do it though. Thanks for the response. It's because every time someone mentions the Wc3 vs BW players debate it always ends up in a huge flamewar, better to just nip it in the bud and ban the instigator, it's the same deal with BW vs SC2 or balance discussion in threads that aren't specifically about those things. | ||
|
Archas
United States6531 Posts
On February 14 2011 07:12 Amarth wrote: why would i be banned for providing thoughtful discourse on how to deal with a build? it seems this board is just as full of mindless groupthink as bnet. A few minutes later, I moseyed on down to the Automated Ban List and indulged myself in the inevitable one-two punch: + Show Spoiler + Amarth was just temp banned for 1 week by Manifesto7. That account was created on 2011-02-12 13:31:45 and had 22 posts. Reason: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=7928580 Not acceptable. Amarth was just banned by Manifesto7. Reason: Oops, read further down the thread. Goodbye. I guess your question was answered, wasn't it, Amarth?  | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
|
Aquafresh
United States824 Posts
| ||
Kiante
Australia7069 Posts
| ||
|
echO [W]
United States1495 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Blessed was just temp banned for 2 weeks by Harem. That account was created on 2010-08-01 05:57:04 and had 230 posts. Reason: your incessant terran whining is making your ban lengths pretty long siege-tank long | ||
|
419
Russian Federation3631 Posts
On February 14 2011 08:40 Kiante wrote: Thats not a bad idea. manifesto7 would be a 11 point mod, chill 10. Nyovne coming in at about 6 points but a good chance for a nice payout this season. ANother mod showing promise is jibba, he'd be priced about 4 but i'd think next season he'll be going for like 7 or 8. Incontrol would be the dissapointment of the fantasy league. Kind of like picking bisu last season. you pay 9 points and get 3 wins TT I think that picking threads would be more effective. Run a monthlong round. You get 20 points per round. You can 'buy' up to 10 threads a month, with the following costs (scaled by how likely moderation activity is likely to occur): ~7 points for TL general ~5 points for SC2 strategy ~5 points for SC2 general ~4 points for SC2 LR thread, 3 points for BW LR thread ~2 points for blogs ~2 points for fanclub threads ~1 point for all other sections. Score is calculated according to the following: +2 for temp ban +4 for perma Double points if user has greater than 100 posts, triple if greater than 500. +3 for thread lock. However, you only get points for actions committed after you buy the thread. I think this could actually work. | ||
|
Kiante
Australia7069 Posts
| ||
| ||
