|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On May 31 2014 11:05 Ashakyre wrote: Hello. May I please have a 31 day ban for my birthday please?
Thank you in advance.
-Ashakyre
User was temp banned for this post.
I barely had time to read the post before seeing his name in the ABL. You guys are so fast.... >_<
|
Germany25657 Posts
Meh, about ~2 minutes until he was banned. Pretty average. We can do better...
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES50123 Posts
On May 31 2014 11:22 KadaverBB wrote: Meh, about ~2 minutes until he was banned. Pretty average. We can do better...
wow what a nub.
do you even ban?
|
On May 30 2014 08:07 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On May 30 2014 07:29 Jer99 wrote: so how does this thread work? I nominate someone? I nominate JimmyJRaynor Looks like wishes do come true: Show nested quote + JimmyJRaynor was just temp banned for 1 week by Manifesto7.
That account was created on 2010-04-11 22:42:46 and had 2457 posts.
Reason: Can you shut up about 1996 please? Hard to enjoy the playoffs in 2014 with you shitting up that thread. Thamks.
And look! He even got the other one! Show nested quote +lamprey1 was just banned by Manifesto7.
That account was created on 2012-06-03 06:21:21 and had 917 posts.
Reason: Prove to me you aren't jjr. QuanticHawk is going to cream his pants when he sees this. hahahhahahahhahahahahhaha this was the best
|
You know whats fun? I keep accidently logging into Omnishroud and seeing my "You have been banned" PM and panicking.
|
Canada8157 Posts
On May 31 2014 13:58 QuanticHawk wrote:Show nested quote +On May 30 2014 08:07 xDaunt wrote:On May 30 2014 07:29 Jer99 wrote: so how does this thread work? I nominate someone? I nominate JimmyJRaynor Looks like wishes do come true: JimmyJRaynor was just temp banned for 1 week by Manifesto7.
That account was created on 2010-04-11 22:42:46 and had 2457 posts.
Reason: Can you shut up about 1996 please? Hard to enjoy the playoffs in 2014 with you shitting up that thread. Thamks.
And look! He even got the other one! lamprey1 was just banned by Manifesto7.
That account was created on 2012-06-03 06:21:21 and had 917 posts.
Reason: Prove to me you aren't jjr. QuanticHawk is going to cream his pants when he sees this. hahahhahahahhahahahahhaha this was the best
The reason why I posted here was becaus he got banned, I can't predict the future
But yeah it's aboot fuckin time eh
|
TLADT24920 Posts
On May 31 2014 11:35 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2014 11:22 KadaverBB wrote: Meh, about ~2 minutes until he was banned. Pretty average. We can do better... wow what a nub. do you even ban? ever since he was upgraded to red, he's been slacking it seems
|
for each ban you issue you lose a bit of your soul. kadaver is fading. double damage if you touch me.
|
Dead week incoming. Can i get a two week ban? Failing that one week please! Wish me luck!!!
User was temp banned for this post.
|
Wow 4 minutes mods are sluffing
|
your Country52797 Posts
But it was only 3 minutes...
|
The 57th minute counted as well, silly
|
your Country52797 Posts
It was 3 minutes after he posted it, though.
|
On June 02 2014 09:14 The_Templar wrote: It was 3 minutes after he posted it, though. Well let's say he posted at XX:57:10. And the mods banned him at YY:00:20. Three minutes have elapsed at YY:00:10, and the mods banned him on the fourth minute, from YY:00:10 to YY:01:10. So it did take four minutes for him to get banned.
|
Or, if you wish to count the actual minutes, he posted on the first minute: XX:57 The second is XX:58 The third is XX:59 He gets banned on the fourth minute, YY:00.
It's the same reason there's no year zero.
|
your Country52797 Posts
On June 02 2014 09:19 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2014 09:14 The_Templar wrote: It was 3 minutes after he posted it, though. Well let's say he posted at XX:57:10. And the mods banned him at YY:00:20. Three minutes have elapsed at YY:00:10, and the mods banned him on the fourth minute, from YY:00:10 to YY:01:10. So it did take four minutes for him to get banned. Fair enough. It's also likely since he was able to make a post at :00, therefore it wasn't the beginning of the minute when he was banned.
|
|
this isn't about a ban or warning, more about the lack of one? not sure where to put this. i don't think it's worthy of a whole thread in website feedback and i don't want to start a drama train since he's a popular figure
On June 02 2014 06:42 TotalBiscuit wrote:Show nested quote +On June 02 2014 06:41 Andelas wrote:On June 02 2014 06:35 TotalBiscuit wrote:On June 02 2014 06:09 The_Red_Viper wrote:On June 02 2014 05:59 TotalBiscuit wrote:On June 02 2014 05:56 The_Red_Viper wrote:On June 02 2014 05:45 TotalBiscuit wrote:On June 02 2014 05:31 The_Red_Viper wrote:On June 02 2014 05:17 TotalBiscuit wrote:On June 02 2014 05:10 The_Red_Viper wrote: My problem is that some "famous and important" figureheads of the community act like it is 100% confirmed that he isn't legit. I can understand that people find it somewhat suspicious, but this "witch-hunt" looks very bad imo. You can think about his content what you want (only smurfs, blabla), but he produces A LOT of content and people seem to enjoy what he is doing. If the already established people get jealous and spread rumors it is imo pretty sad, get your shit together and produce content people enjoy yourself! (that part isn't about you TB, but other streamers who are vocal about him too) It is 99% confirmed that some of his views are not legit. It is not confirmed that this is his own doing. He obviously has a fanbase, it's just not as big as these stats indicate. His recent questionable claims that he was the "#1 viewed Starcraft streamer" in his ill-fated AMA have served to only compound the problem. then pls link the data, all i saw is a reddit article that literally said his stream isn't more suspicious than any other streamer you can find. The data is my eyes and knowing how streaming works. So basically no data, ty http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/257n93/hi_im_wintersc_currently_the_1_sc2_streamer_i_am/chei0klOther than him admitting it? No I do not have access to the impossible to access data, shockingly enough. So what exactly does this prove? You and others make it look like he is not legit at all. That is where my problem with this bs starts, it is basically a witch-hunt cause the big boys don't have his numbers and get mad about it. Streams get botted, this is nothing new and not exclusive to Winter, so what exactly is your point? I could probably say exactly the same about 4 random other streams on that list. Does he get botted? Probably from time to time like many other streams out there. The interesting part isn't IF someone gets botted, but how substantial the botting is, as long as nobody shows any data with evidence that his numbers are WAY exaggerated, i don't see any point in this whole discussion really... But hey it is obviously easier to be a douchebag about this whole situation because you don't like his growth. And to add something usefull: http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/26cnst/sc2_streams_and_viewbots_the_numbers/ Could you stop pretending that I am somehow jealous of Winters numbers? The last SC2 ladder stream I did I was above 10k concurrent. I have nothing to be jealous of. It's definitely easy to see where some of his fans get their obnoxious attitudes from though. Beating up gold leaguers in the name of "education" and then being smarmy about it is the reason some people don't like him, it has nothing to do with some imaginary "old boys club" being jealous of the newcomer. And your comments here show that you really don't watch his stream and feel justified in being smarmy yourself based on nothing but your own smugness. He starts every stream playing his masters account for at least an hour or two (usually 10-15 games) then switches. But hey, you clearly haven't given any thought before making a judgement on someone else, then again, that's pretty much the foundation of your career. Your honour I rest my case, I think we have proven beyond a doubt that Winters fanbois are insufferable toxic nitwits. Show nested quote +i have no idea why you would aslo jump on the hate train, but apparently you do. Ahh yes the good old "hate train". Everyone who criticizes this guy has gotta be a "hater". It's a childish way of approaching things and completely dismissive of criticism. No sorry, you'll have to accept that there are good reasons for not liking your favourite streamer and that going out and attacking those that don't only makes him and his fans look worse.
(referring strictly to the line about "toxic nitwit fanbois," not the argument itself)
i already know the rule about people who do a lot for the community getting more leeway and relaxed moderation, and i'm fine with it. but this isn't something silly like posting a meme image or bumping an old thread. it's a direct personal insult that serves no purpose other than dramatic internet slapfighting, and it's far from the first time he's done it
i don't have any grudge or bias against him. regardless of who's making them, i feel that posts like this bring down the level of discourse on any forum and make it a poorer environment for discussion and relaxation. hell, i've done the same thing in the past, and i think we've all been guilty a few times, but if i make a mistake i can accept the consequences
i don't know anything about this winter streaming debate, i've never even watched his stream, but i was reading the thread with interest in the points being made by both sides. i want to read reasoned arguments, and he was providing those as well, but as a forumgoer i don't want to read people calling each other toxic nitwits over streaming data.
anyway, just my opinion, not making any demands or trying to whine. if he can post like that, i'll just accept it. but it seems unfortunate to me if anyone can.
|
the people he was arguing with were 100 times more annoying
|
Eh, just ignore it. A report on a TB post is just wasteful and if you point it out you'll just get a "take it to website feedback" which is mod lingo for "lol"
|
|
|
|