On September 30 2013 23:58 BLinD-RawR wrote: some pbu said something about comparing him to a prison snitch and raping him for it.
On December 18 2012 05:51 PoisonFang wrote:
On December 17 2012 05:55 Cokefreak wrote: I'm happy enough with my report button.
You sound might proud of having that report button...I'm glad this stupid little geek fantasy land can only exist on the internet. In real life snitches like you get pass around in prison. You're amongst the lowest form of life in the prison hierarchy, right down there with child molesters. If we ever serve prison time together dude, pray I'm not your cell mate. I'd face fuck you every night and force you to answer to the name Heather.
User was banned for this post.
that's a rather interesting but also disturbing post >.> What was the reason for this?
That account was created on 2013-10-01 08:15:56 and had 2 posts.
Reason: letting people read your posts would also be against the advancement of society. fortunately, i am not a selfish person who will allow this pbu to live
HAREM IS BACK! :D I had to double check the date to be sure.
On September 30 2013 23:58 BLinD-RawR wrote: some pbu said something about comparing him to a prison snitch and raping him for it.
On December 18 2012 05:51 PoisonFang wrote:
On December 17 2012 05:55 Cokefreak wrote: I'm happy enough with my report button.
You sound might proud of having that report button...I'm glad this stupid little geek fantasy land can only exist on the internet. In real life snitches like you get pass around in prison. You're amongst the lowest form of life in the prison hierarchy, right down there with child molesters. If we ever serve prison time together dude, pray I'm not your cell mate. I'd face fuck you every night and force you to answer to the name Heather.
User was banned for this post.
that's a rather interesting but also disturbing post >.> What was the reason for this?
electronic voyeur is back at thread making, I wanted to say he was banned or actioned much more recently, but I only turned up one ban from last year that JingleHell (+ Show Spoiler +
(
) commented on.
Didn't he serve a ban more recently than that? Otherwise, how long before he threads himself back onto the ABL? Any bets?
On October 02 2013 00:21 ThomasjServo wrote: electronic voyeur is back at thread making, I wanted to say he was banned or actioned much more recently, but I only turned up one ban from last year that JingleHell (+ Show Spoiler +
(
) commented on.
Didn't he serve a ban more recently than that? Otherwise, how long before he threads himself back onto the ABL? Any bets?
His thread hasn't been bad so far, so I'd assume it's not going too terribly for him. Things can always take a turn for the worst though...
What the ever living fuck balls dickwad! Fuck you Blizz, fuck you and your inability to grasp that winrates mean jack fucking shit! Winrates are just that--winrates! No one whined when Savior had an almost 90% winrate against Terran! No one batted an eyelash when nada, midas, oov had an 80% winrate against Zerg; audience participation boomed! Imbalance is something that brings audiences in! Do you think Idra was famous for good play or for whining about balance? FUCK YES MAKE THE GAME IMBALANCED! We WANT the game to be imbalanced. We want to have to make maps that forces strategies instead of preserving them, we want to be forced to cheese or die, we want to see someone figure out a way to stop said cheese, we want macro games to birth out of a world where cheese happens 90% of the time. BECAUSE ONLY THEN ARE MACRO GAMES IMPRESSIVE! Outside of this post I will still remain objective and show the pros and fucking cons of everything you implement, everything you have implemented, and everything you will implement--but FUCK! FUCKITY FUCK-FUCK YOU FUCKING FUCKS! Blizzard! Stop being so... EA!
People please kindly ignore the spoilered text.
User was temp banned for this post.
I can understand his tone was harsh lol but I guess spoilering it doesn't allow you to get a pass?
Nah, the spoiler can't save you (although it seems like many do believe so as they put image macros in them..it's kinda like kids turning invisible by covering their eyes). But I did respect his wish and continued to read the thoughts of others without laying judgement upon our troubled Magpie.
On September 30 2013 23:58 BLinD-RawR wrote: some pbu said something about comparing him to a prison snitch and raping him for it.
On December 18 2012 05:51 PoisonFang wrote:
On December 17 2012 05:55 Cokefreak wrote: I'm happy enough with my report button.
You sound might proud of having that report button...I'm glad this stupid little geek fantasy land can only exist on the internet. In real life snitches like you get pass around in prison. You're amongst the lowest form of life in the prison hierarchy, right down there with child molesters. If we ever serve prison time together dude, pray I'm not your cell mate. I'd face fuck you every night and force you to answer to the name Heather.
User was banned for this post.
that's a rather interesting but also disturbing post >.> What was the reason for this?
Latent homosexual fantasies I suspect.
Probably. Kinda turned me on a bit.
Haha, prison fantasies, very hawt. <3
On October 02 2013 02:49 BigFan wrote: Thieving Magpie just got banned for this:
What the ever living fuck balls dickwad! Fuck you Blizz, fuck you and your inability to grasp that winrates mean jack fucking shit! Winrates are just that--winrates! No one whined when Savior had an almost 90% winrate against Terran! No one batted an eyelash when nada, midas, oov had an 80% winrate against Zerg; audience participation boomed! Imbalance is something that brings audiences in! Do you think Idra was famous for good play or for whining about balance? FUCK YES MAKE THE GAME IMBALANCED! We WANT the game to be imbalanced. We want to have to make maps that forces strategies instead of preserving them, we want to be forced to cheese or die, we want to see someone figure out a way to stop said cheese, we want macro games to birth out of a world where cheese happens 90% of the time. BECAUSE ONLY THEN ARE MACRO GAMES IMPRESSIVE! Outside of this post I will still remain objective and show the pros and fucking cons of everything you implement, everything you have implemented, and everything you will implement--but FUCK! FUCKITY FUCK-FUCK YOU FUCKING FUCKS! Blizzard! Stop being so... EA!
People please kindly ignore the spoilered text.
User was temp banned for this post.
I can understand his tone was harsh lol but I guess spoilering it doesn't allow you to get a pass?
I reported this one. When he said "out of character", I was expecting him to say something positive for once haha, so I was quite surprised to see the actual crazy content of the spoiler.
Poor magpie. Everyone has a bit of a breakdown at times. I thought it was a bit harsh not to let spoilers protect him, but its true that they aren't just a free pass to w/e you like.
Type it all out, then close the tab before posting. You may feel like you lost something super-important, but in the end, it was only a bit of your time, and not two days of posting on TL.
If you're set on pulling a stunt like Magpie did, you've gotta intentionally say you're only kidding and it's still gotta be appropriate given all context. Like when I requested my 30 day here four months ago. In a serious thread over Blizzard and balance, he knew precisely what to expect....
Despite Magpie and oov somewhat agreeing on the whole 'don't balance, let balance come' argument, that approach to the game just won't work when you have hundreds and thousands of people constantly begging for patches and your game's profitability relying on appeasing the majority of players.