On July 03 2013 01:59 EvilTeletubby wrote: TBH, it wasn't JUST for that post, that's just the one I had highlighted when I pulled the trigger. He had a lot of poor posts that thread.
Oh I know, I read them all and they were an amazing level of "tinfoil hat". I liked the one where someone reminded him that Hitler was dead and his response was, in essence "but his spirit lives on in the government of Germany."
On July 03 2013 01:59 EvilTeletubby wrote: TBH, it wasn't JUST for that post, that's just the one I had highlighted when I pulled the trigger. He had a lot of poor posts that thread.
Oh I know, I read them all and they were an amazing level of "tinfoil hat". I liked the one where someone reminded him that Hitler was dead and his response was, in essence "but his spirit lives on in the government of Germany."
Wow what? Looks like I'm missing out on all the fun...
On July 03 2013 01:59 EvilTeletubby wrote: TBH, it wasn't JUST for that post, that's just the one I had highlighted when I pulled the trigger. He had a lot of poor posts that thread.
Oh I know, I read them all and they were an amazing level of "tinfoil hat". I liked the one where someone reminded him that Hitler was dead and his response was, in essence "but his spirit lives on in the government of Germany."
Wow what? Looks like I'm missing out on all the fun...
On July 02 2013 22:56 Nyxisto wrote: Well nukes as a threat are tools for small rogue states and not for developed countries so that's basically nonsense. Economically as a whole we're also hanging in.(the EU is still the biggest economy worldwide). What the EU would need is a real political union to be able to speak as a whole.
Real political union = German hegemony, basically achieving Hitler's goals by peaceful means... I don't want any of that.
Thanks alot! You know Hitlers is dead for nearly 70 years right? Maybe a small % of Germans want something like this, but not the majority! People like you make me sick!
What does that have to do with him being dead? The German establishment's goal does seem to be German political and economic dominance in Europe (many countries have been economically colonized by Germany after they adopted euro; western parts of Poland are being colonized even without euro because our economy was in shambles after decades of centralization). Does that necessarily mean it's what a large number of Germans themselves want? Not really. just look at the USA, whose establishment's doings (illegal wars, assassinating people, imprisoning innocent people without trial, etc.) are not widely supported by the public. Same for Russia, for example.
What the government does does not always go hand in hand with what the population wants. What the establishment behind the government wants is what matters.
This is the quote. His idea that the master plans of Hitler live on in the government, below the surface and beyond the sight of the German people. It was pretty good. This is some Metal Gear Solid 2 level bullshit.
On July 03 2013 01:59 EvilTeletubby wrote: TBH, it wasn't JUST for that post, that's just the one I had highlighted when I pulled the trigger. He had a lot of poor posts that thread.
Oh I know, I read them all and they were an amazing level of "tinfoil hat". I liked the one where someone reminded him that Hitler was dead and his response was, in essence "but his spirit lives on in the government of Germany."
Wow what? Looks like I'm missing out on all the fun...
On July 02 2013 22:56 Nyxisto wrote: Well nukes as a threat are tools for small rogue states and not for developed countries so that's basically nonsense. Economically as a whole we're also hanging in.(the EU is still the biggest economy worldwide). What the EU would need is a real political union to be able to speak as a whole.
Real political union = German hegemony, basically achieving Hitler's goals by peaceful means... I don't want any of that.
Thanks alot! You know Hitlers is dead for nearly 70 years right? Maybe a small % of Germans want something like this, but not the majority! People like you make me sick!
What does that have to do with him being dead? The German establishment's goal does seem to be German political and economic dominance in Europe (many countries have been economically colonized by Germany after they adopted euro; western parts of Poland are being colonized even without euro because our economy was in shambles after decades of centralization). Does that necessarily mean it's what a large number of Germans themselves want? Not really. just look at the USA, whose establishment's doings (illegal wars, assassinating people, imprisoning innocent people without trial, etc.) are not widely supported by the public. Same for Russia, for example.
What the government does does not always go hand in hand with what the population wants. What the establishment behind the government wants is what matters.
This is the quote. His idea that the master plans of Hitler live on in the government, below the surface and beyond the sight of the German people. It was pretty good. This is some Metal Gear Solid 2 level bullshit.
Don't you remember the name of the AI in MGS2? GW... GW... GW Bush!
On July 02 2013 22:56 Nyxisto wrote: Well nukes as a threat are tools for small rogue states and not for developed countries so that's basically nonsense. Economically as a whole we're also hanging in.(the EU is still the biggest economy worldwide). What the EU would need is a real political union to be able to speak as a whole.
Real political union = German hegemony, basically achieving Hitler's goals by peaceful means... I don't want any of that.
maybenexttime was just temp banned for 2 days by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2006-11-18 08:33:12 and had 3143 posts.
Reason: If you can't maintain a reasonable and objective level of discussion in political discussion threads without throwing out blanket insults towards several nationalities (invoking Godwin's law, calling people sheep because they don't agree with you, making assumptions, etc.), then don't post.
I was really happy I didn't need to report this one, as my policy is that any time Hitler is used in an argument, I should automatically report it.
We are supposed to learn from the mistakes of history. Invoking Hitler or Naziism, which simply represent things near universally regarded as mistakes, and therefore represent a near objective foundation, is perfectly acceptable when making many arguments. Sure, many times people misuse or overuse it, but that doesn't mean we should leap to the absurd conclusion that any argument invoking Hitler should immediately be dismissed. That would be to ignore and therefore not learn from the mistakes of history.
On July 02 2013 22:56 Nyxisto wrote: Well nukes as a threat are tools for small rogue states and not for developed countries so that's basically nonsense. Economically as a whole we're also hanging in.(the EU is still the biggest economy worldwide). What the EU would need is a real political union to be able to speak as a whole.
Real political union = German hegemony, basically achieving Hitler's goals by peaceful means... I don't want any of that.
User was temp banned for this post.
maybenexttime was just temp banned for 2 days by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2006-11-18 08:33:12 and had 3143 posts.
Reason: If you can't maintain a reasonable and objective level of discussion in political discussion threads without throwing out blanket insults towards several nationalities (invoking Godwin's law, calling people sheep because they don't agree with you, making assumptions, etc.), then don't post.
I was really happy I didn't need to report this one, as my policy is that any time Hitler is used in an argument, I should automatically report it.
We are supposed to learn from the mistakes of history. Invoking Hitler or Naziism, which simply represent things near universally regarded as mistakes, and therefore represent a near objective foundation, is perfectly acceptable when making many arguments. Sure, many times people misuse or overuse it, but that doesn't mean we should leap to the absurd conclusion that any argument invoking Hitler should immediately be dismissed. That would be to ignore and therefore not learn from the mistakes of history.
Refraining from making cursory references to Hitler in online discussions does not equate to ignoring the lessons of history.
On July 02 2013 22:56 Nyxisto wrote: Well nukes as a threat are tools for small rogue states and not for developed countries so that's basically nonsense. Economically as a whole we're also hanging in.(the EU is still the biggest economy worldwide). What the EU would need is a real political union to be able to speak as a whole.
Real political union = German hegemony, basically achieving Hitler's goals by peaceful means... I don't want any of that.
User was temp banned for this post.
maybenexttime was just temp banned for 2 days by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2006-11-18 08:33:12 and had 3143 posts.
Reason: If you can't maintain a reasonable and objective level of discussion in political discussion threads without throwing out blanket insults towards several nationalities (invoking Godwin's law, calling people sheep because they don't agree with you, making assumptions, etc.), then don't post.
I was really happy I didn't need to report this one, as my policy is that any time Hitler is used in an argument, I should automatically report it.
We are supposed to learn from the mistakes of history. Invoking Hitler or Naziism, which simply represent things near universally regarded as mistakes, and therefore represent a near objective foundation, is perfectly acceptable when making many arguments. Sure, many times people misuse or overuse it, but that doesn't mean we should leap to the absurd conclusion that any argument invoking Hitler should immediately be dismissed. That would be to ignore and therefore not learn from the mistakes of history.
Refraining from making cursory references to Hitler in online discussions does not equate to ignoring the lessons of history.
Reporting any post which mentions Hitler does not equate to refraining from making cursory references.
On July 02 2013 22:56 Nyxisto wrote: Well nukes as a threat are tools for small rogue states and not for developed countries so that's basically nonsense. Economically as a whole we're also hanging in.(the EU is still the biggest economy worldwide). What the EU would need is a real political union to be able to speak as a whole.
Real political union = German hegemony, basically achieving Hitler's goals by peaceful means... I don't want any of that.
User was temp banned for this post.
maybenexttime was just temp banned for 2 days by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2006-11-18 08:33:12 and had 3143 posts.
Reason: If you can't maintain a reasonable and objective level of discussion in political discussion threads without throwing out blanket insults towards several nationalities (invoking Godwin's law, calling people sheep because they don't agree with you, making assumptions, etc.), then don't post.
I was really happy I didn't need to report this one, as my policy is that any time Hitler is used in an argument, I should automatically report it.
We are supposed to learn from the mistakes of history. Invoking Hitler or Naziism, which simply represent things near universally regarded as mistakes, and therefore represent a near objective foundation, is perfectly acceptable when making many arguments. Sure, many times people misuse or overuse it, but that doesn't mean we should leap to the absurd conclusion that any argument invoking Hitler should immediately be dismissed. That would be to ignore and therefore not learn from the mistakes of history.
Refraining from making cursory references to Hitler in online discussions does not equate to ignoring the lessons of history.
Reporting any post which mentions Hitler does not equate to refraining from making cursory references.
you're missing the point. Throwaway references to hitler make up 99.99% of posts about it on internet forums. Its not like he's going through and reporting well written historically accurate arguments that attempt to draw parallels between the third reich and something in modern times.
also farv, you switched your icon. How could you join the evil empire like that.
On July 02 2013 22:56 Nyxisto wrote: Well nukes as a threat are tools for small rogue states and not for developed countries so that's basically nonsense. Economically as a whole we're also hanging in.(the EU is still the biggest economy worldwide). What the EU would need is a real political union to be able to speak as a whole.
Real political union = German hegemony, basically achieving Hitler's goals by peaceful means... I don't want any of that.
User was temp banned for this post.
maybenexttime was just temp banned for 2 days by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2006-11-18 08:33:12 and had 3143 posts.
Reason: If you can't maintain a reasonable and objective level of discussion in political discussion threads without throwing out blanket insults towards several nationalities (invoking Godwin's law, calling people sheep because they don't agree with you, making assumptions, etc.), then don't post.
I was really happy I didn't need to report this one, as my policy is that any time Hitler is used in an argument, I should automatically report it.
We are supposed to learn from the mistakes of history. Invoking Hitler or Naziism, which simply represent things near universally regarded as mistakes, and therefore represent a near objective foundation, is perfectly acceptable when making many arguments. Sure, many times people misuse or overuse it, but that doesn't mean we should leap to the absurd conclusion that any argument invoking Hitler should immediately be dismissed. That would be to ignore and therefore not learn from the mistakes of history.
Refraining from making cursory references to Hitler in online discussions does not equate to ignoring the lessons of history.
Reporting any post which mentions Hitler does not equate to refraining from making cursory references.
On July 02 2013 22:56 Nyxisto wrote: Well nukes as a threat are tools for small rogue states and not for developed countries so that's basically nonsense. Economically as a whole we're also hanging in.(the EU is still the biggest economy worldwide). What the EU would need is a real political union to be able to speak as a whole.
Real political union = German hegemony, basically achieving Hitler's goals by peaceful means... I don't want any of that.
User was temp banned for this post.
maybenexttime was just temp banned for 2 days by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2006-11-18 08:33:12 and had 3143 posts.
Reason: If you can't maintain a reasonable and objective level of discussion in political discussion threads without throwing out blanket insults towards several nationalities (invoking Godwin's law, calling people sheep because they don't agree with you, making assumptions, etc.), then don't post.
I was really happy I didn't need to report this one, as my policy is that any time Hitler is used in an argument, I should automatically report it.
We are supposed to learn from the mistakes of history. Invoking Hitler or Naziism, which simply represent things near universally regarded as mistakes, and therefore represent a near objective foundation, is perfectly acceptable when making many arguments. Sure, many times people misuse or overuse it, but that doesn't mean we should leap to the absurd conclusion that any argument invoking Hitler should immediately be dismissed. That would be to ignore and therefore not learn from the mistakes of history.
Refraining from making cursory references to Hitler in online discussions does not equate to ignoring the lessons of history.
Reporting any post which mentions Hitler does not equate to refraining from making cursory references.
On July 02 2013 22:56 Nyxisto wrote: Well nukes as a threat are tools for small rogue states and not for developed countries so that's basically nonsense. Economically as a whole we're also hanging in.(the EU is still the biggest economy worldwide). What the EU would need is a real political union to be able to speak as a whole.
Real political union = German hegemony, basically achieving Hitler's goals by peaceful means... I don't want any of that.
User was temp banned for this post.
maybenexttime was just temp banned for 2 days by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2006-11-18 08:33:12 and had 3143 posts.
Reason: If you can't maintain a reasonable and objective level of discussion in political discussion threads without throwing out blanket insults towards several nationalities (invoking Godwin's law, calling people sheep because they don't agree with you, making assumptions, etc.), then don't post.
I was really happy I didn't need to report this one, as my policy is that any time Hitler is used in an argument, I should automatically report it.
We are supposed to learn from the mistakes of history. Invoking Hitler or Naziism, which simply represent things near universally regarded as mistakes, and therefore represent a near objective foundation, is perfectly acceptable when making many arguments. Sure, many times people misuse or overuse it, but that doesn't mean we should leap to the absurd conclusion that any argument invoking Hitler should immediately be dismissed. That would be to ignore and therefore not learn from the mistakes of history.
Refraining from making cursory references to Hitler in online discussions does not equate to ignoring the lessons of history.
Reporting any post which mentions Hitler does not equate to refraining from making cursory references.
User was banned for this post.
PUB btw
Report was you farv?
Sadly I missed it I recognized his name from a number of posts he made in the US politics thread that were eerily familiar in form and content.
On July 03 2013 04:33 Deleuze wrote: I'm intrigued:
On July 03 2013 03:37 Ingsoc101 wrote:
On July 03 2013 03:34 farvacola wrote:
On July 03 2013 03:33 Ingsoc101 wrote:
On July 03 2013 01:55 Plansix wrote:
On July 02 2013 23:54 maybenexttime wrote:
On July 02 2013 22:56 Nyxisto wrote: Well nukes as a threat are tools for small rogue states and not for developed countries so that's basically nonsense. Economically as a whole we're also hanging in.(the EU is still the biggest economy worldwide). What the EU would need is a real political union to be able to speak as a whole.
Real political union = German hegemony, basically achieving Hitler's goals by peaceful means... I don't want any of that.
User was temp banned for this post.
maybenexttime was just temp banned for 2 days by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2006-11-18 08:33:12 and had 3143 posts.
Reason: If you can't maintain a reasonable and objective level of discussion in political discussion threads without throwing out blanket insults towards several nationalities (invoking Godwin's law, calling people sheep because they don't agree with you, making assumptions, etc.), then don't post.
I was really happy I didn't need to report this one, as my policy is that any time Hitler is used in an argument, I should automatically report it.
We are supposed to learn from the mistakes of history. Invoking Hitler or Naziism, which simply represent things near universally regarded as mistakes, and therefore represent a near objective foundation, is perfectly acceptable when making many arguments. Sure, many times people misuse or overuse it, but that doesn't mean we should leap to the absurd conclusion that any argument invoking Hitler should immediately be dismissed. That would be to ignore and therefore not learn from the mistakes of history.
Refraining from making cursory references to Hitler in online discussions does not equate to ignoring the lessons of history.
Reporting any post which mentions Hitler does not equate to refraining from making cursory references.
User was banned for this post.
PUB btw
Report was you farv?
Sadly I missed it I recognized his name from a number of posts he made in the US politics thread that were eerily familiar in form and content.
Quick question, as I think there's a potential ban incoming: how much balance whining does a pro have to engage in to be warned/banned? I've seen IdrA's crap, and Cloud usually got banned for being a jerk, but what about anyone else? This is what prompted my question:
Whats the 2% you ask? Find a very cheeky/cheesy P or T build and learn it and do it every match(honestly dont think you can pick up zerg right now and win with some bad all ins, theyre not as strong as P and T cant be)
Which cheesy T build gets you into GM on EU?
Hellbat drop/ hellbat all in/ hellbat pressure/ 3 cc hellbat opening/ 1 base hellbat/ 2 base hellbat / double hellbat drop/ 2 fact hellbat
On July 03 2013 03:22 JackDragon wrote: Proof number 314 that KadaverBB is too nice to moderate
EPT
I recognized his name from a number of posts he made in the US politics thread that were eerily familiar in form and content. 
