EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 1609
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
| ||
|
SXGCoil
United States341 Posts
On December 28 2012 06:53 derpface wrote: What does "le" mean anyway? Additionally, it's a pronoun in spanish. (Le Hablé.) | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On December 29 2012 08:36 Brawny wrote: Additionally, it's a pronoun in spanish. (Le Hablé.) Additionally it is an indicator of past tense in Chinese, or also used to indicate a change from a former state. (我已经吃饭了) | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8095 Posts
On December 29 2012 08:33 dAPhREAk wrote: should have been a permban for such an incredibly idiotic argument. "__ is weapons their purpose is to kill people thats what they're ment for." insert in __ everything that could be used as a weapon: knives, poison, baseball bats, etc. Well I have to agree with you on that, guess having only one warning is what saved him? | ||
|
MountainDewJunkie
United States10341 Posts
On December 29 2012 08:33 dAPhREAk wrote: should have been a permban for such an incredibly idiotic argument. "__ is weapons their purpose is to kill people thats what they're ment for." insert in __ everything that could be used as a weapon: knives, poison, baseball bats, etc. The difference is that baseball bats were made for a game. Guns were invented solely for the purpose of killing [man or mammal, their only function is to kill]. (Also, so is poison).That much of what he said is indisputable. In addition, he's right that owning a gun is a huge responsibility. He deserves his ban for ignoring the note and certainly for martyring, but other than his egregious spelling, his post was not unsound on its own. And I'm against gun control. + Show Spoiler + Even as a function of defense, they're meant fight the attacker in defense, but to kill nonetheless | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On December 29 2012 07:56 Cokefreak wrote: Yeah, this still happens to me every time there is a PM ;; cLAN.Anax and I occasionally send each other PMs that look like warnings as jokes. | ||
|
MountainDewJunkie
United States10341 Posts
On December 29 2012 08:53 Praetorial wrote: cLAN.Anax and I occasionally send each other PMs that look like warnings as jokes. DAPHREAK PMs me all the time and tells me I'm a worthless human being. Even if there is merit in his criticism, I must say it does cut deep. | ||
|
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
 , I never get PMs.. | ||
|
Hypemeup
Sweden2783 Posts
On December 29 2012 07:55 Grobyc wrote: In the first couple years I was convinced every PM I got on TL was a message from a warning or ban or something. I'd open up TL and be like :O I can relate to that. On December 29 2012 08:57 MountainDewJunkie wrote: DAPHREAK PMs me all the time and tells me I'm a worthless human being. Even if there is merit in his criticism, I must say it does cut deep. You should start responding with the nigerian prince scam mails. On December 29 2012 08:51 MountainDewJunkie wrote: The difference is that baseball bats were made for a game. Guns were invented solely for the purpose of killing [man or mammal, their only function is to kill]. (Also, so is poison).That much of what he said is indisputable. In addition, he's right that owning a gun is a huge responsibility. He deserves his ban for ignoring the note and certainly for martyring, but other than his egregious spelling, his post was not unsound on its own. And I'm against gun control. + Show Spoiler + Even as a function of defense, they're meant fight the attacker in defense, but to kill nonetheless I never understood why people act like they got Blue-Balls or something after reading a post with poor english, is it really that hard to decipher? | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On December 29 2012 08:57 MountainDewJunkie wrote: DAPHREAK PMs me all the time and tells me I'm a worthless human being. Even if there is merit in his criticism, I must say it does cut deep. Doesn't he do that with everyone as soon as he senses weakness? | ||
JBright
Vancouver14381 Posts
Quick! Everyone go post all the bans Wom made so he doesn't feel lonely. | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
| ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8095 Posts
On December 29 2012 09:39 Praetorial wrote: That would impossible, since I've tracked him over the past few days and he hasn't made any. How many posts did he have when he was made a banling? Exact number please, it's for a study. | ||
|
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
On December 29 2012 09:40 Cokefreak wrote: How many posts did he have when he was made a banling? Exact number please, it's for a study. hahaha case study, not a survey study ifyaknowwhatimean WTF at the post that got that guy (Fearest) banned. | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On December 29 2012 09:39 Praetorial wrote: That would impossible, since I've tracked him over the past few days and he hasn't made any. That's because out of the Tech regulars, he's the most level headed one. I always kind of figured he'd be first, or at least best bet. He's probably going to keep it to people who absolutely fail at civilized debate, truly malicious advice, and closing duplicate threads. And even then, we're more likely to see closures, warnings, and possibly temp forum specific bans. That's always kind of been the trend there. Hell, he even gave an unofficial warning the other day, after getting the hammer, instead of a red text warning. | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On December 29 2012 09:44 JingleHell wrote: That's because out of the Tech regulars, he's the most level headed one. I always kind of figured he'd be first, or at least best bet. He's probably going to keep it to people who absolutely fail at civilized debate, truly malicious advice, and closing duplicate threads. And even then, we're more likely to see closures, warnings, and possibly temp forum specific bans. That's always kind of been the trend there. Hell, he even gave an unofficial warning the other day, after getting the hammer, instead of a red text warning. Heh. Who's the least level headed forum vet?  | ||
|
MountainDewJunkie
United States10341 Posts
On December 29 2012 09:45 Praetorial wrote: Heh. Who's the least level headed forum vet? Trick question: they're already been banned. On the other hand, of the remaining vets, there HAS to be the worst one (George Carlin had a bit about how in the world there must exist the worst active doctor. The logic is the same). | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On December 29 2012 09:45 Praetorial wrote: Heh. Who's the least level headed forum vet? Actually, now days, probably skyR. There was a time it was unquestionably me, but not anymore, unless you count not having the patience to post in Tech much as being less level-headed. | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On December 29 2012 09:56 JingleHell wrote: Actually, now days, probably skyR. There was a time it was unquestionably me, but not anymore, unless you count not having the patience to post in Tech much as being less level-headed. skyR?! He seemed like such a nice guy, but then again the last time I visited the tech forum was when you were still a marine. | ||
|
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
| ||
| ||
