EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 1539
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32051 Posts
| ||
|
jdseemoreglass
United States3773 Posts
On December 06 2012 03:10 KadaverBB wrote: Haha if only you knew :D I actually overthink everything I do 3 times. Doing things carefully, rather be to nice than to harsh  Wow, this is... a good philosophy. Better than "ban first, ask questions later" at least... With this statement and your quote, I'd like to be signed up for the KadaverBB fan club. | ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34490 Posts
On December 06 2012 05:01 jdseemoreglass wrote: Wow, this is... a good philosophy. Better than "ban first, ask questions later" at least... With this statement and your quote, I'd like to be signed up for the KadaverBB fan club. Basically Kwark's opposite ^_^_^_^_^_^_^ | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On December 06 2012 05:14 Firebolt145 wrote: Basically Kwark's opposite ^_^_^_^_^_^_^ lol, you took his not-so-subtle jab at the mods and put it right out there in the open. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18825 Posts
mortonm was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal. That account was created on 2012-12-05 04:50:19 and had 28 posts. Reason: If you think something deserves moderator attention then PM a moderator and let them know what and why. Bitching about moderation bias in the topic is never, ever acceptable. You've been warned about this before Edit: And to add some authority here, I've been banned by both  | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
 Also, farvacola, you were saying? mortonm was just banned by KwarK. That account was created on 2012-12-05 04:50:19 and had 28 posts. Reason: Given a warning including the phrase "Bitching about moderation bias in the topic is never, ever acceptable.", proceeds to bitch about said warning in the topic. Some people... Justified, IMO. All but one post in Travyon Martin thread or Transgender thread. New user. Spewing vitriol and hate. You know, KwarK magnet. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18825 Posts
On December 06 2012 05:21 JingleHell wrote: One of the KwarK threads got bumped by mortonm. Also, farvacola, you were saying? Justified, IMO. Bahaha, I spoke too soon, it would appear KwarK was merely charging his ban deathray! | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On December 05 2012 06:18 mortonm wrote: Looks like a post from someone who is so stubbornly ignorant they think they can tell more from a low quality photo showing someone who has received care from paramedics and been cleaned up than a doctor can from a medical examination. "Zimmerman was diagnosed with a closed fracture of his nose, a pair of black eyes, two lacerations to the back of his head and a minor back injury." http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-medical-report-sheds-light-injuries-trayvon/story?id=16353532 Why you are allowed to continue spreading lies, misinformation, and conspiracy theories despite the mod warning at the top of the thread baffles me. I suppose the warning must not apply to anti-Zimmerman hate crusaders, even when they say the most vitriolic and hateful lies possible. User was warned for this post On December 06 2012 04:50 mortonm wrote: Yeah, the moderation is heavily and blatantly biased. KwarK is warning people for complaining about people disregarding the mod note at the top of the thread, yet he refuses to enforce the mod warning. That's not an "outlandish interpretation of the evidence", it's an outright lie. Essentially my post you warned me for in This thread was accurate, people can say anything they want no matter how untrue and easily debunked as long as they join the anti-Zimmerman hate bandwagon. Thanks for clearing that up. User was banned for willful disregard of a prior warning on bitching about moderation in the topic in question and not for his stance. now the question is, will this dude follow suit? will you, will you? punk. On December 05 2012 12:18 saltywet wrote: sluggaslamoo should be banned for posting malicious and false information. Either he didn't read all the information or he's one big fat troll. All of his posts are subjective speculation and no facts. The facts are:
It's clear that Zimmerman did not throw the first punch, not any punches. On the tape recording of Martin's friend you can clearly hear Zimmerman asking "What are you doing here?" so even if Zimmerman did pursue Martin, it was clear that Zimmerman had no intention to fight him, but simply question him. User was warned for backseat modding. | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
| ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
On December 06 2012 05:27 dAPhREAk wrote: man, mortonm must be steaming right now. he went bat-shit (arguably justified) because some dude was making unsupported claims in the trayvon martin thread, he asked that the dude get moderated, instead, he gets moderated, then he goes crazy because there is still no moderation, and he gets moderated again (by GMarshal). then, kwark swoops in with the fuck-you-banhammer and eliminates his existence. lol Ouch, that's hilarious. I wonder if any PMs found their way out in the interim period. Alas, we shall likely never know. | ||
KwarK
United States42596 Posts
He got his first warning for this I suppose the warning must not apply to anti-Zimmerman hate crusaders, even when they say the most vitriolic and hateful lies possible. and the warning read If you think something deserves moderator attention then PM a moderator and let them know what and why. Bitching about moderation bias in the topic is never, ever acceptable. Our moderators are volunteers and deal with stuff as it is brought to their attention, be a part of the process rather than whining about it. If you feel there is an issue with moderation generally then the website feedback forum is the place to go. This was only a warning because of your low post count, learn from it. Thanks in advance for your cooperation, KwarK A day later he felt the need to make this post in the same topic Yeah, the moderation is heavily and blatantly biased. and this in another KwarK is apparently letting his personal bias cloud his moderation on this issue. I'd classify this under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_by_cop | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
| ||
|
Bibbit
Canada5377 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=329194 + Show Spoiler + On a side note, poor Kwark >_> | ||
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
| ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
Melliflue
United Kingdom1389 Posts
On December 06 2012 05:33 KwarK wrote: I'm sure he'll continue to believe that it's because I couldn't accept his stance in the Trayvon Martin topic or something. Martyrs gotta keep on martyring. He got his first warning for this and the warning read A day later he felt the need to make this post in the same topic and this in another I'd classify this under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_by_cop As a new user I don't have a report button. I know I can pm a mod but I would not know which one to pm. I'm not sure if it would make a big deal but I get nervous that what happens will depend on which mod I pm. I suspect it depends somewhat on which subforum the offending post was in. It would be cool if there were a list of which mod to pm based on subforum, eg monk. for Strat | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
It was the kind of stuff you just know is only a matter of time. I did think he would last more than a day though. | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
On December 06 2012 05:45 Melliflue wrote: As a new user I don't have a report button. I know I can pm a mod but I would not know which one to pm. I'm not sure if it would make a big deal but I get nervous that what happens will depend on which mod I pm. I suspect it depends somewhat on which subforum the offending post was in. It would be cool if there were a list of which mod to pm based on subforum, eg monk. for Strat Just about any mod who is active at the time will take a look. Just look at closed threads and the ban list to see who is active at that moment. | ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
On December 06 2012 05:42 JingleHell wrote: Any thoughts on whether we're going to see him sacrifice an alt account to the ABL trash talking altar? Did he ever post here in the past? It's usually the egotists that alt themselves here, the ones that were purely convinced of their own superiority, mortonm was more convinced of his own victimization, egotistic yes, but of a different kind. But then again, I've been called a basement dwelling virgin by lesser specimens. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18825 Posts
On December 06 2012 05:46 SKC wrote: He was actually worse on the transgender thread. He registered today and managed to start a (stupid) argument in the only 2 threads he has ever posted. 28 posts on your first day is ussually not a good sign as well. It was the kind of stuff you just know is only a matter of time. I did think he would last more than a day though. Yeah, when he posted this, On December 06 2012 04:11 mortonm wrote: So easily found, maybe you should put some effort in yourself. Gender (dʒe'ndəɹ), sb. Also 4 gendre. [a. OF. gen(d)re (F. genre) = Sp. género, Pg. gênero, It. genere, ad. L. gener- stem form of genus race, kind = Gr. γένος, Skr. jánas:— OAryan *genes-, f. root γεν- to produce; cf. KIN.] †1. Kind, sort, class; also, genus as opposed to species. The general gender: the common sort (of people). Obs. 13.. E.E.Allit. P. P. 434 Alle gendrez so ioyst wern ioyned wyth-inne. c 1384 CHAUSER H. Fame* 1. 18 To knowe of hir signifiaunce The gendres. 1398 TREVISA Barth. De P. K. VIII. xxix. (1495) 34I Byshynynge and lyghte ben dyuers as species and gendre, for suery shinyng is lyght, but not ayenwarde. 1602 SHAKES. Ham. IV. vii. 18 The great loue the generall gender beare him. 1604—Oth. I. iii. 326 Supplie it with one gender of Hearbes, or distract it with many. 1643 and so on.
I knew it was time to slowly back away from the thread and never return lol | ||
| ||
