|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On November 15 2012 14:22 Caihead wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 13:49 Praetorial wrote:My thread claimed its first victim...
CajunMan was just temp banned for 30 days by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2010-07-27 15:27:29 and had 662 posts.
Reason: Lets dissect this statement:
"Good too bad they didn't smoke the entire city block [likely inflicting extensive civilian casualties] to make sure. When you have the chance to kill a terrorist and his buddies it's time to go ham on him. GG no re hamas [+ all those civilians who are considered acceptable collateral damage according to you]"
I'm not going to dance around this - you're a fucking idiot.
On November 15 2012 11:04 CajunMan wrote:Good too bad they didn't smoke the entire city block to make sure. When you have the chance to kill a terrorist and his buddies it's time to go ham on him. GG no re hamas On November 15 2012 10:44 Probe1 wrote:A few hours ago, Israeli IDF planes launched a strike on the Gaza strip in attempt to assassinate a Hamas leader, Ahmed al-Jabari. They succeeded, obliterating his car with him inside. At this point it was well over 12 hours ago. But whatever that doesn't matter I'm just being lame. I am confident that this will result in open war. I can't say Israel was unwarranted in their response to the continued attacks on her soil but this will result in war and more deaths. Is there really no diplomatic end? War will only strengthen the resolve of those that will harm Israeli civilians to further their goals. In the end it is a choice of who loses more civilians. It is one of the great tragedies of my lifetime. Open war with who? Isreal beats any middle eastern country in open war hell last time they beat 3 User was temp banned for this post.  I'm getting the hell out of that thread, too much stupid. I should make a thread about China that will exclusively bait out uninformed idiots to watch the red text flow.
Well Prae decided to go through with the China thread, it seems to be effective, the very first post after the OP is a ban 
On November 15 2012 23:25 sOda~ wrote:
I don't care.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES51293 Posts
On November 16 2012 00:47 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 14:22 Caihead wrote:On November 15 2012 13:49 Praetorial wrote:My thread claimed its first victim...
CajunMan was just temp banned for 30 days by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2010-07-27 15:27:29 and had 662 posts.
Reason: Lets dissect this statement:
"Good too bad they didn't smoke the entire city block [likely inflicting extensive civilian casualties] to make sure. When you have the chance to kill a terrorist and his buddies it's time to go ham on him. GG no re hamas [+ all those civilians who are considered acceptable collateral damage according to you]"
I'm not going to dance around this - you're a fucking idiot.
On November 15 2012 11:04 CajunMan wrote:Good too bad they didn't smoke the entire city block to make sure. When you have the chance to kill a terrorist and his buddies it's time to go ham on him. GG no re hamas On November 15 2012 10:44 Probe1 wrote:A few hours ago, Israeli IDF planes launched a strike on the Gaza strip in attempt to assassinate a Hamas leader, Ahmed al-Jabari. They succeeded, obliterating his car with him inside. At this point it was well over 12 hours ago. But whatever that doesn't matter I'm just being lame. I am confident that this will result in open war. I can't say Israel was unwarranted in their response to the continued attacks on her soil but this will result in war and more deaths. Is there really no diplomatic end? War will only strengthen the resolve of those that will harm Israeli civilians to further their goals. In the end it is a choice of who loses more civilians. It is one of the great tragedies of my lifetime. Open war with who? Isreal beats any middle eastern country in open war hell last time they beat 3 User was temp banned for this post. I'm getting the hell out of that thread, too much stupid. I should make a thread about China that will exclusively bait out uninformed idiots to watch the red text flow. Well Prae decided to go through with the China thread, it seems to be effective, the very first post after the OP is a ban Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 23:25 sOda~ wrote:
I don't care.
User was temp banned for this post.
he cares enough to let people know that he doesn't care.
|
On November 16 2012 00:58 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2012 00:47 Cokefreak wrote:On November 15 2012 14:22 Caihead wrote:On November 15 2012 13:49 Praetorial wrote:My thread claimed its first victim...
CajunMan was just temp banned for 30 days by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2010-07-27 15:27:29 and had 662 posts.
Reason: Lets dissect this statement:
"Good too bad they didn't smoke the entire city block [likely inflicting extensive civilian casualties] to make sure. When you have the chance to kill a terrorist and his buddies it's time to go ham on him. GG no re hamas [+ all those civilians who are considered acceptable collateral damage according to you]"
I'm not going to dance around this - you're a fucking idiot.
On November 15 2012 11:04 CajunMan wrote:Good too bad they didn't smoke the entire city block to make sure. When you have the chance to kill a terrorist and his buddies it's time to go ham on him. GG no re hamas On November 15 2012 10:44 Probe1 wrote:A few hours ago, Israeli IDF planes launched a strike on the Gaza strip in attempt to assassinate a Hamas leader, Ahmed al-Jabari. They succeeded, obliterating his car with him inside. At this point it was well over 12 hours ago. But whatever that doesn't matter I'm just being lame. I am confident that this will result in open war. I can't say Israel was unwarranted in their response to the continued attacks on her soil but this will result in war and more deaths. Is there really no diplomatic end? War will only strengthen the resolve of those that will harm Israeli civilians to further their goals. In the end it is a choice of who loses more civilians. It is one of the great tragedies of my lifetime. Open war with who? Isreal beats any middle eastern country in open war hell last time they beat 3 User was temp banned for this post. I'm getting the hell out of that thread, too much stupid. I should make a thread about China that will exclusively bait out uninformed idiots to watch the red text flow. Well Prae decided to go through with the China thread, it seems to be effective, the very first post after the OP is a ban On November 15 2012 23:25 sOda~ wrote:
I don't care.
User was temp banned for this post. he cares enough to let people know that he doesn't care.
Isn't that called careception or something?
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES51293 Posts
On November 16 2012 01:26 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2012 00:58 BLinD-RawR wrote:On November 16 2012 00:47 Cokefreak wrote:On November 15 2012 14:22 Caihead wrote:On November 15 2012 13:49 Praetorial wrote:My thread claimed its first victim...
CajunMan was just temp banned for 30 days by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2010-07-27 15:27:29 and had 662 posts.
Reason: Lets dissect this statement:
"Good too bad they didn't smoke the entire city block [likely inflicting extensive civilian casualties] to make sure. When you have the chance to kill a terrorist and his buddies it's time to go ham on him. GG no re hamas [+ all those civilians who are considered acceptable collateral damage according to you]"
I'm not going to dance around this - you're a fucking idiot.
On November 15 2012 11:04 CajunMan wrote:Good too bad they didn't smoke the entire city block to make sure. When you have the chance to kill a terrorist and his buddies it's time to go ham on him. GG no re hamas On November 15 2012 10:44 Probe1 wrote:A few hours ago, Israeli IDF planes launched a strike on the Gaza strip in attempt to assassinate a Hamas leader, Ahmed al-Jabari. They succeeded, obliterating his car with him inside. At this point it was well over 12 hours ago. But whatever that doesn't matter I'm just being lame. I am confident that this will result in open war. I can't say Israel was unwarranted in their response to the continued attacks on her soil but this will result in war and more deaths. Is there really no diplomatic end? War will only strengthen the resolve of those that will harm Israeli civilians to further their goals. In the end it is a choice of who loses more civilians. It is one of the great tragedies of my lifetime. Open war with who? Isreal beats any middle eastern country in open war hell last time they beat 3 User was temp banned for this post. I'm getting the hell out of that thread, too much stupid. I should make a thread about China that will exclusively bait out uninformed idiots to watch the red text flow. Well Prae decided to go through with the China thread, it seems to be effective, the very first post after the OP is a ban On November 15 2012 23:25 sOda~ wrote:
I don't care.
User was temp banned for this post. he cares enough to let people know that he doesn't care. Isn't that called careception or something?
no its called crying for attention.
|
|
|
On November 16 2012 02:28 I Have a huge C0ck wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 23:23 Cokefreak wrote:
That look's so cool on the list, Plexa points just went up! nuked
Hi, I see you're back once again
|
On November 16 2012 02:28 I Have a huge C0ck wrote:
--- Nuked ---
Sup dood, we missed you. How have you been.
|
Starting threads is surprisingly addicted, but it's actually frustrating to see people banned in them
|
Prae so pro at setting bantraps. You'd never be this good if you weren't wishing it to be civil. 
|
On November 16 2012 03:07 Praetorial wrote:Starting threads is surprisingly addicted, but it's actually frustrating to see people banned in them
it's a trap!!!!-admiral ackbar.
|
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On November 16 2012 03:07 Praetorial wrote:Starting threads is surprisingly addicted, but it's actually frustrating to see people banned in them
Unless you are a sadist built in. I smiled every time someone was banned in the Dota 2 key thread when I was running it.
|
On November 16 2012 03:07 Praetorial wrote:Starting threads is surprisingly addicted, but it's actually frustrating to see people banned in them
You're a better person than I in this regard; watching the banhammer drop tickles my schadenfreude fancy like no other, particularly because of the times I've been banned myself. Haven't started a ban trap thread myself though, perhaps I'll have to get around to that
|
that Marxism thread might do the trick...
|
On November 16 2012 05:13 sam!zdat wrote:
that Marxism thread might do the trick...
Ahh yes, I had entirely forgotten! Reification in and of itself should prove a contentious topic, and we'd only be getting started. A little dialectic materialism never hurt anybody, but a lot might get ya banned
|
haha yes, the age old dilemma
|
On November 16 2012 05:22 farvacola wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2012 05:13 sam!zdat wrote:
that Marxism thread might do the trick... Ahh yes, I had entirely forgotten! Reification in and of itself should prove a contentious topic, and we'd only be getting started. A little dialectic materialism never hurt anybody, but a lot might get ya banned
What if I'm a proto-Hegelian, will I be allowed in you neo-Hegelian thread to discuss the affects of Spirit and how all of the world's great disasters are Spirit coming to know itself.
|
On November 16 2012 05:29 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2012 05:22 farvacola wrote:On November 16 2012 05:13 sam!zdat wrote:
that Marxism thread might do the trick... Ahh yes, I had entirely forgotten! Reification in and of itself should prove a contentious topic, and we'd only be getting started. A little dialectic materialism never hurt anybody, but a lot might get ya banned What if I'm a proto-Hegelian, will I be allowed in you neo-Hegelian thread to discuss the affects of Spirit and how all of the world's great disasters are Spirit coming to know itself.
Young Hegelians, Old Hegelians, Proto Hegelians; all shall we welcome!
|
hooray for Hegelians! I'm in on this thread. But only if I get to quote philosophy and ignore everyone else who is posting actual things.
|
On November 16 2012 05:29 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2012 05:22 farvacola wrote:On November 16 2012 05:13 sam!zdat wrote:
that Marxism thread might do the trick... Ahh yes, I had entirely forgotten! Reification in and of itself should prove a contentious topic, and we'd only be getting started. A little dialectic materialism never hurt anybody, but a lot might get ya banned What if I'm a proto-Hegelian, will I be allowed in you neo-Hegelian thread to discuss the affects of Spirit and how all of the world's great disasters are Spirit coming to know itself.
oh yes plz :D
I prefer to think of myself as a Younger Hegelian
|
On November 16 2012 00:56 Coal wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2012 23:10 Shellshock1122 wrote:
Chuparme la polla grande que te cagas u vaca gorda!!!!! Calm down dude  User was temp banned for this post.
Coal was just temp banned for 2 days by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2011-07-29 03:21:40 and had 1375 posts.
Reason: I'm not sure what inspires you to quote someone, delete what they actually said, and insert random Spanish insults. Yeah, just don't do that.
How did someone ever get over 1000 posts thinking something like that would be acceptable :p
deslice was just banned by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2011-04-27 21:10:34 and had 28 posts.
Reason: "just learn how to hack. fag."
Probably on the top 10 "things you don't want to say if you value your account on TL" list.
A request to the ABL regulars, please make such a top 10
Purpl3 was just temp banned for 30 days by EvilTeletubby. That account was created on 2011-01-09 09:33:32 and had 1044 posts. Reason: Show nested quote +On November 13 2012 16:21 Purpl3 wrote: On November 13 2012 16:11 dbg wrote: On November 13 2012 15:25 betamale wrote:
She'll probably end up in an early grave too if she keeps getting all that plastic.
all this guy does is fanboy/vagina ride t-ara and bash snsd. its fucking hilarious. don't ever change. And yet he still comes off as more intelligent than you. "KMD" is simply going to be my new ban reason for shitty posts like this in that thread. Especially considering like EVERY poster in that thread has prior warnings/bans FROM that thread. It's like you're bugs that get hit at the edge of a bug zapper, barely survive, and fly right into the fucking thing again.
I know this one is already a couple of days old but I think it would be awesome if that bug analogy was made into a stock ban reason. It would be great for PBUs or repeat temp ban offenders;
You're a bug that gets hit at the edge of a bug zapper, barely survives, and flies right into the fucking thing again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
